The American online landscape in the week since Trump’s reelection is quickly shifting perspectives toward traditional media and sparking transformation. Conversations show disillusionment with mainstream media over bias, sensationalism, and alignment Democratic political agendas. This discontent is accelerating a shift towards alternative information sources.

Distrust in Traditional Media

There is a prevailing online theme of distrust toward legacy media, with 65% of comments indicating a lack of confidence in mainstream outlets. Americans are frustrated with a media landscape they view as prioritizing progressive ideology.

The overwhelming sentiment is that legacy media has strayed from impartial coverage, often skewing facts to sustain a partisan agenda. Users point to a trend of sensationalized stories that sacrifice accuracy to capture attention, eroding trust in what was once a central pillar of information.

People say things like, "The legacy media ran an unprecedented and profound propaganda campaign that failed."

Shift Towards Alternative Media

As confidence in traditional media wanes, alternative sources like X have gained traction. Around 25% of comments reveal a growing preference for alternative media, which many perceive as authentic and less influenced by corporate power structures.

These sources, operating outside traditional frameworks, are seen as more responsive to public concerns and more representative of ordinary Americans' voices. Many believe social media is now where the real discussion and breaking news happens.

Indifference and Disengagement

About 10% of Americans say they’re indifferent toward the news media altogether, distancing themselves from both traditional and alternative outlets. This indifference stems from a belief that bias is inevitable across all forms of media. This causes them to disengage or take a selective approach to news consumption.

For the disenchanted, media as an institution holds diminishing relevance. They have a resigned outlook even toward the possibility of unbiased reporting from new sources. This group says things like, “Honestly, I don’t care about the media anymore, I just look for information elsewhere."

Accountability and Reform

Viewers want greater accountability and transparency in media reporting. A pattern emerges which advocates for structured fact-checking measures and reforms that emphasize honesty and clarity.

Reformers envision a transformed media landscape where rigorous standards protect public trust and limit the influence of misinformation. They want systems in place to verify claims and some way to combat and eliminate clickbait.

Political Polarization

The polarized political climate in the United States is also evident in media preferences, with users discussing media through the lens of ideological divides. People are frustrated with traditional outlets they perceive as elitist or disconnected from "America First" ideals.

Sentiments highlight an ongoing identity struggle in the media, as more people seek narratives that align with their values and worldview. The rise of identity politics further complicates this divide, with media often seen as reinforcing partisan divides rather than fostering open dialogue.

Social Media and Independent Outlets

Social media and independent news sources have become essential alternatives, praised for their perceived authenticity and depth. Approximately 50% of users report relying on social media for real-time news, while 35% gravitate toward independent outlets and podcasts

People prefer alternatives sources for their ability to provide detailed, nuanced discussions in real-time without commercial pressures. These platforms fill a gap left by mainstream media, appealing to those seeking unfiltered and relatable perspectives on current events.

Direct Engagement with Political Figures

There is a marked appreciation for direct access to political figures via social media. Around 20% of commenters say they prefer unmediated updates from politicians, which they regard as more transparent than traditional news coverage.

There is a shift toward personal engagement with political discourse, as Americans seek to bypass the filters of mainstream outlets in favor of hearing directly from leaders.

Several leftist figures from news media like Don Lemon, Joy Reid, and The Guardian have announced their plans to leave X (formerly Twitter). This dramatic exodus is occurring against a backdrop of significant upheaval in traditional media.

Online discussions often view rumors of CNN facing layoffs, Comcast potentially selling MSNBC, major ratings declines, and Chris Wallace jumping ship from CNN as dying last gasps of legacy media. Elon Musk’s comment that “You are the media now!” captures a growing sentiment that corporate media is no longer the power center of information.

This platform is at all-time highs.

You are the media now. https://t.co/8Zy049xGAh

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 13, 2024

Making a Dramatic Exit from X

Reactions to prominent left-leaning figures leaving X are varied, but mostly unified against those leaving. This is demonstrated in a resounding ratio on Don Lemon’s announcement video and claims that Lemon didn’t actually leave.

Here's why I'm leaving Twitter... pic.twitter.com/VIope68L2k

— Don Lemon (@donlemon) November 13, 2024

Much of the commentary is negative, criticizing Lemon and others for abandoning X in a useless protest of the inevitable evolution of news. The lesser number of positive comments still criticize the Guardian, Reid, and Lemon, saying the chaff is separating itself.

Joy Reid just deleted her X account 🤣 pic.twitter.com/sqwZyJkBYA

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) November 14, 2024

63% Negative Sentiment

• Many view these exits from X as symptomatic of a biased new media who are incapable of withstanding opposing viewpoints.
• Negative comments accuse those leaving of running from the new reality of media, thus personifying legacy media’s failure to adapt and include all voices.
• People point out the shrinking pool of critical voices in media who are willing to hold politicians and institutions accountable. They say the leftist media would prefer to censor platforms like X, rather than integrate into the new media paradigm.

29% Positive or Neutral Sentiment

• About a third of responses voice approval over the X departures. They say it allows for new voices to emerge in an environment less dominated by leftist corporate media figures.
• This group says things like, “Good riddance to biased reporting” and “We need more diverse voices not tied to the mainstream.” They hope X will foster independent journalism not influenced by corporate or partisan forces.
• People view X under Elon Musk as a victory for free speech, seeing it as fertile ground for alternative perspectives and causing a tantrum among corporate media elites who are losing their grip on power.

8% Concerned Sentiment

• A smaller fraction of comments is ambivalent but acknowledges both the potential positives and negatives of these high-profile departures.
• There's a sense of uncertainty, as people grapple with the long-term impact on media quality and public discourse online.
• Many in this camp worry the total collapse of legacy media might contribute to ideological echo chambers and the proliferation of “misinformation.”

Declining Trust in Legacy Media

Reactions to these dramatic exits are compounded by an ongoing bloodbath in legacy media credibility.

• CNN Layoffs: Rumored CNN layoffs are seen as the continuation of a downward trend for legacy news, which struggles to maintain relevance post-election.
• Comcast Selling MSNBC: Reports that Comcast is looking to sell MSNBC reinforces beliefs that news outlets have lost their once-powerful influence.
• Ratings Declines: Major networks are reporting significant rating drops over the past year, further decimating the sentiment of distrust among viewers.
• Reshaping News: A major news figure like Chris Wallace leaving CNN and saying podcasts are the future also indicates growing realizations within media ranks of the shifting reality.

More Americans say legacy media is out of touch with and fixated on advancing specific agendas rather than delivering reliable news. Increasingly, people are opting for independent and grassroots media sources, which they find on platforms like X and view as more genuine and less beholden to corporate interests.

Independent and Decentralized Media

Americans, particularly those on the right, place more trust in independent and decentralized media channels that bypass legacy gatekeepers. They want platforms where their perspectives can be freely shared without censorship or derision.

• Direct Channels: Figures like Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson have built large followings by leveraging podcasts and social media as direct channels for unfiltered commentary. People see these figures as better alternatives to biased traditional media.
• Free Speech: Many Americans see decentralized platforms like X as essential to free speech. By allowing diverse voices without institutional curation, platforms like X provide what voters feel is a more balanced discourse.
• User Engagement Data: Social media engagement metrics show a steady increase in user participation on independent platforms, with conservative audiences comprising a significant portion of these active users.

The embrace of alternative media reflects a rejection of legacy media’s perceived elitism and disconnect from mainstream America. Online discourse confirms the sentiment as people move away from television news to online platforms.

Media Viewership vs. 𝕏

Trends indicate that people are moving away from the legacy media. pic.twitter.com/rhTnUdNdCH

— DogeDesigner (@cb_doge) November 8, 2024

Participatory Media

Musk’s “You are the media now” sentiment embodies the shift toward participatory media, which empowers individual users over institutional authorities. As a result, more Americans feel they have a direct role in shaping political discourse, further diminishing legacy media’s influence.

• Public Response: Many conservative voters view Musk’s statement as a call to action, empowering them to contribute directly to the public discourse.
• Participation: By eliminating traditional gatekeepers, participatory media encourages a free flow of ideas, allowing the people to interact directly with rich and powerful influencers like Elon Musk and Joe Rogan.
• Future Outlook: Many say legacy media will continue to lose relevance as younger generations abandon traditional institutions. They say the 2024 election sealed the fate of legacy institutions which were already crumbling.

Gen Z’s response to the 2024 presidential election paints a vivid picture of a generation grappling with disillusionment, skepticism, and a desire for cultural change. Social media discussions reveal how young voters process and articulate their choices, show patterns and perspectives that define this cohort’s political identity.

Frat boys celebrating the landslide win pic.twitter.com/6OuQJSF88b

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) November 7, 2024

Disenfranchised vs. Empowered

There is pervasive disenchantment from both major political parties among Gen Z voters. Roughly 30% of comments express disappointment with the current political landscape, feeling alienated by traditional party structures. T

here is a noticeable frustration with the Democratic Party abandoning working-class advocacy. But some Gen Z voters are drawn to the Republican Party’s shift under Trump, viewing it as a new populist and working-class coalition.

Political dissatisfaction underscores a lack of enthusiasm for major political figures, amplifying calls for structural change in the political arena.

Leadership

Trump supporters in this demographic frequently voice desire for strong, decisive leadership. They frame him as a protector of American values, national security, and economic stability. They link his policies with the American Dream and the aspiration of a safer, more secure nation.

Language in this group often exhibits patriotic fervor, expressing loyalty and admiration toward America. Trump is seen as a figure capable of realigning the nation’s priorities to focus on traditional American ideals, creating a sense of vindication and pride.

Despite being the demographic breaking for Harris at the highest rate, Gen Z voters online are voicing pushback against many of the progressive ideals Millennials fought for at their age.

Looks like Gen X delivered the White House to Trump. pic.twitter.com/ANv5Ahssu1

— Philip Klein (@philipaklein) November 6, 2024

Fake News

A shared distrust of mainstream media surfaces as a potent unifying theme across both pro-Trump and pro-Harris Gen Z voters. This skepticism stems from collective frustration with media biases and manipulations. Many view mainstream narratives as distortions of reality.

Trump supporters often feel demonized by the media, viewing coverage as subservient to a political agenda. Harris voters feel her media portrayal doesn’t align with the real issues facing their generation.

Distrust has become a rallying point that transcends party lines, as young voters increasingly question the reliability of traditional information sources and media-driven political narratives.

Raging Against the Machine

Anxiety over election integrity drives distrust, appearing frequently in conversations from both sides of the political divide. For Trump supporters, electoral cheating is a common concern, with discussions focusing on alleged malfeasance and voter interference.

Harris supporters express disillusionment with polling and media narratives that, they feel, fail to represent genuine public sentiment. This overlap in skepticism toward institutional reliability suggests a generational shift. Many Gen Z voters voice doubts about the transparency and fairness of the political process.

🗳️ Gen Z Voters: 👍 or 👎 after the election results were announced?

Here’s what they had to say about it... 🗣️

Let us know your thoughts in the comments, Gen Z’ers. 📲#genz #vote #voters #statenisland #siny pic.twitter.com/xY5DISgo7L

— SIAdvance (@siadvance) November 6, 2024

Identity Politics? Okay!

Divides over identity politics and policy emphasis also emerge clearly in these discussions.

Harris voters point to her reliance on identity policies over actionable policies. This sentiment is particularly strong among those who lean progressive but want concrete solutions to pressing issues.

Trump supporters emphasize nationalism and traditional values, viewing Harris’s platform as detached from American identity. The ideological split reveals generational how Gen Z voters prioritize identity and inclusivity versus policy impact and nationalism.

Progressive Tension

A segment of Gen Z shows a complex response to Harris’s background, especially in discussions that merge respect for her identity with criticism of her policies. While some are proud of her accomplishments, they question her leadership, creating tension between valuing diversity and prioritizing competence.

This conflicted view suggests an evolving perspective in progressive circles, where identity is honored yet separated from expectations for impactful governance. These sentiments reflect the delicate balance Gen Z voters face between representation and meaningful action.

Over the last three election cycles, trust in political polls has dramatically deteriorated. Polling inaccuracies and media reporting on potential outcomes are destroying confidence and eroding public trust. After multiple elections where predictive numbers majorly failed to capture American sentiments, many are saying they’re done with legacy institutions.

You are the media now

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 6, 2024

Americans discuss Elon Musk’s alliance with Trump and his decision to buy Twitter (now X) in 2022 as death blows to mainstream media. Discussions of news media lies being revealed through citizen journalism on X bolster sentiments that America is ready to discard legacy platforms.

Unsalvageable Distrust Among Americans

Voters have long voiced distrust toward the media and political polls, but Trump’s shocking blowout victory only confirms those sentiments. Many point to inaccurate poll projections as evidence of anti-Trump and anti-conservative bias from the establishment regime.

Many see problems both in flawed methodology and elite resentment toward average Americans. Some voters even suggest mainstream polling is manipulated or used as a rhetorical tool to favor establishment narratives.

There is a reason why educated people vote blue. What we’re seeing is the uneducated population of America holding the rest of the country hostage. This is why there’s such a push to weaken education, ban books, and outlaw the teaching of Black history by the Republican Party.

— Sueanna Smith, PhD (@SueannaSmith3) November 6, 2024

• Distrust of Accuracy: Around 37% of voters say "polling manipulation" is a primary concern, believing poll results are skewed to fit media or political agendas.
• Partisan Divide: Conservative and right-leaning voters are more likely to distrust polling data, while liberal-leaning voters show more confidence.
• Broken System: Roughly 55% of conservatives say polling inaccuracies reflect deeper issues in the election process.

The sentiment exists among traditional conservative demographics, but now also resonates among Independents who distrust poll numbers. Many suggest traditional polling techniques may no longer capture the complexities of an evolving electorate.

MIG Reports Data

Amid many wildly inaccurate traditional polls, MIG Reports data proves to be highly competitive in tracking sentiment and trends among online voters.

MIG Reports data on the morning of Election Day showed Trump winning all the competitive battle ground states except VA and MN.

As of this writing, NYT election results show:

• Wisconsin +.88 for Trump
• Virginia +5 for Harris
• Pennsylvania +2 for Trump
• Nevada +5 for Trump
• North Carolina +3 for Trump
• Minnesota +4 for Harris
• Michigan +1.6 for Trump
• Georgia +2 for Trump
• Arizona +5 for Trump

Themes Emerging from Public Reactions

Voter sentiment surrounding polling isn’t just about accuracy—it’s an indictment of outdated and inadequate methodologies that fail to evolve with culture and technology.

• Demand for Transparency: Voters want greater transparency in polling methods. They seek clear explanations of how sample groups are selected, what adjustments are made for turnout assumptions, and how error margins are communicated.
• Media Narratives: Many say the media’s heavy reliance on polls—especially when those polls inaccurately project outcomes—only fuels distrust. They say media framing particularly underplays conservative viewpoints, causing an information bubble that misleads voters.
• Growing Cynicism: More voters are saying this election marks a shift away from mainstream reporting and polling metrics toward independent analysis. Many express hope that legacy institutions like the news media and political consultants will face extinction before 2028.

Polling and Voting Security

Many view predictive polling inaccuracies as connected to worries about election integrity and the voting system itself. Right-leaning voters often point to polling errors as evidence the electoral process may be similarly flawed, particularly regarding voting security.

• Mail-in Voting: 40% of right leaning voters continue to express doubts about the authenticity of mail-in ballots, which they perceive as prone to manipulation.
• "Red Mirage": Some discuss the concept of the “Red Mirage,” where initial in-person voting leans right only for mail-in ballots to shift later shift results to Democrats. This reinforces their belief that mail-in voting lacks transparency and amplifies polling errors.
• Voter ID: Up to 70% of Americans support voter ID laws, seeing them as a safeguard for election security. The absence of such standards across states feeds into skepticism about the election system’s integrity.

Proposed Reforms

Given the ongoing erosion of trust in polling and news reporting, many are calling for concrete reforms.

• Polling Transparency: Voters want pollsters to provide detailed breakdowns of how samples are chosen, the assumptions behind turnout models, and the adjustments made to reflect historical voting patterns.
• Adapting Methodologies: The call for modernized polling methods is growing. Many voters believe polling organizations should explore new techniques, like online panels, that better capture the evolving nature of the electorate.
• Media Accountability: There is strong support for media outlets to emphasize the provisional nature of predictions—though many also call for the death of mainstream media altogether.

Campaign fervor is cresting just days prior to the election and MIG Reports data shows non-Trump partisans—liberals and Democrats—are leaning into performative outrage. Using dramatic language, hyperbolic expressions, and a repeated emphasis on extreme descriptors, this group is expressing high emotion.

Some do articulate reasonable concerns over some of Trump’s policies and potential influence. A substantial portion of liberals also seem to genuinely believe the outrage, calling Trump a fascist. However, much of the discourse skews toward performative expressions, crafted to amplify emotional resonance and foster a unified group identity.

Ana Kasparian clashes with Cenk Uygur on Trump, arguing that he isn't a “fascist” and the Democrat Party misrepresents him.

Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/RPvzniKyge

— AF Post (@AFpost) November 1, 2024

Performative Elements in Language

The language deployed across these conversations frequently borders on theatrical.

• Terms such as “fascist,” “Hitler,” and “authoritarian” are common, imbuing Trump with a villainous aura that aligns with familiar tropes.
• Critics frame him as an antagonist in a moral and political struggle.
• Despite the existence of other authoritarian leaders like Pol Pot, Josef Stalin, Augusto Pinochet, Hitler is only parallel most use to depict Trump.
• The lexicon signals a collective identity that rallies around shared anxieties and moral judgments.
• Embellished phrases like “end of democracy” or “chaos in America,” tap into a performative mode designed less to analyze and more to evoke.
• The prevalence of these dramatized expressions suggests the intent is to stir reactions—likes, comments, and shares.

The tone of many online posts shows stylized indignation. Common keywords like “garbage,” “disgrace,” and “complete disaster” create an atmosphere that leans heavily on hyperbole to drive points home.

Much of the discourse can be categorized as “outrage posting,” where media and influencers exaggerate language to amplify emotional responses.

Outrage as a Mobilization Tool

The performative outrage often functions as a mobilization tool.

• Posts pushing extreme discontent or alarmist tones are among the most engaging, with metrics indicating hyperbolic statements significantly boost reactions.
• The performative nature serves as a rallying call, mobilizing users by constructing Trump as a political opponent and existential threat.
• Posts often use an urgent tone, calling for action or moral imperatives that encourage followers to align with the collective response.
• Recurring terms include, “protect democracy” or “save America,” tapping into a mythology of resistance and survival.

Heightened rhetoric on both sides shapes voter responses, promoting a sense of duty among followers. The performative outrage is often a coordinated effort to convert emotional reactions into tangible support for the broader progressive agenda.

🚨 Warning - heavy TDS: Before my flight, this woman put her middle finger up at me. I ignored it.

After the flight, she walked by me before I could record and screamed that I was a “facist”. Here is the rest of the interaction: #TDS #5days pic.twitter.com/ra5zAa2OCv

— Melissa Robey (@Robey2020) October 31, 2024

Genuine Concern vs. Amplified Rhetoric

Certain topics, such as healthcare, education, and climate change, are discussed with less sensationalism and more emphasis on practical consequences. The language shifts subtly to discuss policies or potential impacts, emphasizing marginalized groups and vulnerable communities.

Moments of sincerity suggest that while performative outrage dominates, there is a genuine core that fuels these discussions, reflecting real fears and apprehensions among progressives.

However, the performative aspect tends to overshadow genuine concerns due to rage bait engagement. This dynamic suggests the structure of social media itself, with its emphasis on engagement metrics, incentivizes users to use a hyperbolic style.

Outrage as the New Norm

Progressive conversations about Donald Trump are contentious and emotional. The use of exaggerated language, dramatized fears, and repeated calls to action suggest the discourse operates primarily to elicit reactions, reinforce group identity, and galvanize support. Genuine concerns do exist, particularly on specific policy issues, yet they are often subsumed within the larger spectacle of outrage.

Language analysis suggests discourse is disproportionately hyperbolic compared to real, normal life. However, it’s also possible to conclude that many anti-Trump voters who exhibit what some call “TDS” (Trump Derangement Syndrome), are genuinely disturbed. There are also growing discussions about mental health, anxiety, depression, and anger tied to political fears.

After multiple days of mainstream media coverage of Tony Hinchcliffe’s Puerto Rico joke at Trump’s MSG rally, Joe Biden stole the news cycle by calling Trump supporters “garbage.” This led to Trump’s meme-like arrival in Green Bay on a garbage truck. All this dramatic and joke-driven controversy overshadowed Kamala Harris’s major rally speech at the Ellipse in D.C.

Sometimes the Democrat elite tell us what they really think of us. Hillary Clinton thinks we are “deplorables”. Joe Biden thinks we are “garbage.” Kamala Harris thinks we are so stupid as to believe her lies.

We deserve better. Vote Trump pic.twitter.com/cwEBnGSbLj

— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) October 30, 2024

Voter reactions show how each candidate’s strategic choices and surrogate impact are shaping the final days of the campaign.

• Prior to Joe Biden’s comment, Harris was leading Trump in national sentiment as news coverage slammed the MSG rally.
• After Biden’s “garbage” comment and Trump’s subsequent garbage truck stunt, public sentiment in swing states and nationally swung in Trump’s favor.
• In the national race, Trump maintains a support lead with 53% support to Harris’s 44%.

Harris at the Ellipse vs. Biden’s “Garbage”

Closing Arguments

Kamala Harris’s Ellipse rally drew an impressive crowd, reportedly reaching 75,000 attendees—a notable turnout for any candidate. Her message centered on anti-Trump rhetoric, January 6, calls for unity, and even, again cribbing from Trump, claims that a Harris administration would implement deportations for illegal immigrants.

Vice Pres. Harris addresses voters from the Ellipse, where then-Pres. Donald Trump gave Jan. 6 speech.

“He is the person who stood at this very spot nearly four years ago and sent an armed mob to the United States Capitol." https://t.co/ruQEQkjaUQ pic.twitter.com/MwPeAE9Ubb

— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) October 29, 2024

The speech resonated with her base, eliciting positive responses. However, the message alone fell flat with most Americans, including the pro-Palestine segment of Democratic voters.

Unfortunately, the content alone was not the downfall of Harris’s closing argument for presidential office. In the midst of her rally, Joe Biden was on camera making comments that swiftly took over the news cycle.

Biden’s “Garbage” Comment

Biden’s comment calling Trump supporters “garbage” flooded online conversation and news coverage. The episode drew outrage among conservatives who viewed it as another example of disdain from Democratic elites, causing team Biden to issue a clarification. The Washington Post helped with damage control.

Earlier today I referred to the hateful rhetoric about Puerto Rico spewed by Trump's supporter at his Madison Square Garden rally as garbage—which is the only word I can think of to describe it. His demonization of Latinos is unconscionable. That's all I meant to say. The…

— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) October 30, 2024

However, the controversy escalated when mainstream media and even the White House transcript began to spin the remark, claiming he wasn't referring to all Trump supporters. Discussion volumes around Biden vastly overshadowed Harris’s rally, adding fuel to the fire for those decrying Democrats over hypocrisy.

BREAKING: Rep @EliseStefanik sent a scorching letter to the White House Counsel demanding they correctly quote Biden's "garbage" comment after the official WH transcript EDITED it to cover for Biden.

They may have BROKEN THE LAW.

The WH is trying to rewrite history. This is… pic.twitter.com/EZEMTTkv0K

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) October 30, 2024

Losing the Spotlight

MIG Reports data shows 70% of conversations following the incident focused on Biden’s remark compared to only 30% discussing Harris’s speech and rally.

Conservatives

• Trump supporters are quick to point out the hypocrisy of Democrats and the media.
• They say those who claimed to be scandalized by a Puerto Rico joke were too quick to dismiss Biden’s comment.
• Many MAGA voters also embrace the label, calling for Trump to make use of the comment by working a garbage route.

Independent Discontent

• Moderates and Independents largely voice disappointment in Biden’s tone.
• They say it’s yet another instance of divisive rhetoric in politics, which contradicts Harris’s attempt at a unity message.
• Independents are disillusioned with the rhetoric on both sides of the aisle, but many recognize the incongruence of media coverage.

Trump’s Garbageman Meme

Adding insult to injury for Harris, who lost the news cycle, Trump arrived at his Green Bay rally wearing a reflective orange vest and riding a garbage truck. Social media erupted with commentary, making viral photos and clips of Trump into memes and jokes at the expense of Biden and Harris.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: "How do you like my garbage truck? This truck is in honor of Kamala and Joe Biden." pic.twitter.com/7UwMZ8syvx

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 30, 2024

Trump’s tongue-in-cheek and unapologetic style energizes his base. Embracing the garbage meme, Trump appeals to everyday, working-class Americans as refreshingly down-to-earth. He also took the time to sincerely assure Americans that they are not garbage.

President Trump is about to get off Trump Force One…and head over to the MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN Garbage Truck here in Wisconsin… pic.twitter.com/XpqvRFqgJv

— Dan Scavino Jr.🇺🇸🦅 (@DanScavino) October 30, 2024

Internal Biden-Harris Conflict?

The Biden-Harris relationship has also become a focal point of discussion across voter groups, with each side interpreting this dynamic differently. Many speculate that, behind closed doors, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have a rocky relationship where, intentionally or inadvertently, Biden ends up damaging her with his public comments.

Even among those who do not believe there is animosity between the two, most agree that Biden is not helping Harris on the campaign trail. This was once again demonstrated by confusion and disgust at images of Biden biting babies at the White House Halloween Party.

President Trump is mingling with garbage men at his rally in Wisconsin.

Meanwhile, Joe Biden is literally BITING BABIES at the White House Halloween Party.

WTF IS THIS TIMELINE? pic.twitter.com/wYIzsDjxDt

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) October 31, 2024

Republican Criticism

• GOP voters see Harris as complicit in Biden’s failures, viewing her as an ineffective extension of his administration.
• Many Republicans speculate about bad blood between the two, suggesting Biden may be intentionally undermining her.

Unenthusiastic Democrats

• While Democrats acknowledge Harris’s historic role, there is significant tension within the party.
• The base voices frustration over Harris's ineffectiveness both as VP and on the campaign trail.
• There are also questions about the division she causes among different groups like Muslims and black men.

Independent Ambivalence

• For Independents, Harris’s visibility compared to Biden raises questions about leadership within the administration.
• Many express sentiments suggesting Americans have “forgotten that Biden is president.”
• This group wants an action-oriented administration, and the perceived lack of coordination among Democrats is causing some to reconsider their support.

Joe Rogan's podcast allows public figures to connect directly with a vast and ideologically diverse audience—bypassing traditional media. And this election cycle, online content creators and podcasters have eclipsed the legacy media in audience reach, and potentially also influence.

Many voters believe, with internet generations joining the voting ranks, legacy media outlets—which are now facing a credibility crisis—could be obsolete before the 2028 cycle.

Donald Trump’s recent appearance on “The Joe Rogan Experience” had more than 40 million views on YouTube alone, just five days after its release. Rogan also posted the entire interview on X, implying YouTube may be throttling the video. Now, voters are discussing the impact of the three-hour-long interview, along with the pressure Kamala Harris is facing to sit with Rogan as well.

Since there's an issue with searching for this episode on YouTube here is the full podcast with Trump pic.twitter.com/sl2GTUaWdE

— Joe Rogan (@joerogan) October 29, 2024

Comparing the Risks and Rewards

The disparities in voter reactions show contrasting risks and rewards for both candidates. For Harris, the stakes are high, as her recent media appearances have not created an image of a proficient or confidence-inspiring leader. Democrats fear an unscripted interview would not make her more relatable but expose vulnerabilities in her policies.

For Trump, the Rogan interview played as on-brand for his persona. This is a double-edged sword as many voters cannot be swayed in his direction with more exposure. Others, however, feel the conversation’s comprehensive and casual tone made Trump more appealing to moderates.

Harris Stakes

• Vulnerabilities: High potential for a challenging, possibly damaging interview experience.
• Reward Potential: Could humanize her and bridge gaps with undecided voters.
• Base Voter Risks: Many Democratic voters see Rogan’s platform as hostile territory, losing enthusiasm if she were to appear.

Trump Stakes

• Strengths: Rogan’s unformatted style aligns well with Trump’s communication approach.
• Reward Potential: Further cements his position as a no-nonsense leader who has a depth of knowledge and willingness to speak openly.
• Moderate Risk: Potential to alienate some moderate Independents, though many in this group already have an immovable negative opinion.

Her Base is Scared She’ll Bomb

Democratic voters don’t want Harris to go on Rogan, voicing skepticism and concern. They voice their strong reluctance, centering caution around Rogan’s format, which often promotes freewheeling dialogue, challenging guests directly. They view this as a risk to Harris’s image, especially given the scrutiny she is facing over all her public appearances.

Democrat Reactions

• 70% of Democratic voters discourage Harris from appearing on Rogan, citing concerns his audience and style could expose her to intensified criticism.
• 10% say an appearance could sway undecideds toward her, a low figure exclusive to those who believe she’s a capable and competent leader.
• Key Concerns: Democrats fear an interview could backfire, as any missteps would be widely circulated and potentially weaken her already wavering campaign.

Rogan himself has commented, saying a Harris sit-down is not out of the question. However, his post can also be read as critical, saying the Harris team will not go to his studio and want to limit the interview to one hour.

Also, for the record the Harris campaign has not passed on doing the podcast. They offered a date for Tuesday, but I would have had to travel to her and they only wanted to do an hour. I strongly feel the best way to do it is in the studio in Austin. My sincere wish is to just…

— Joe Rogan (@joerogan) October 29, 2024

Independents Think She’ll Faceplant

Independent voters, typically more open to alternative media and diverse perspectives, advocate for Harris appearing on Rogan. They emphasize the importance of new media, but also express skepticism about the likelihood a Harris sit-down could change their votes.

Moderates and Independents responded mostly positively to Trump’s interview. They recognize Rogan’s platform could present Harris with an opportunity to connect authentically with voters, but many also believe she is not capable of doing so.

Independent Reactions

• 60% of Independents say Harris should go on Rogan, viewing it as a chance for her to address criticism and try to humanize her image.
• 30% say it could positively shift their view of her, only half of those urging her to accept the invitation.
• Key Concerns: Independents doubt Harris’s messaging and relatability will improve with longform content, raising further questions about her authenticity.

Rogan: "I'll give you 3 hours to say anything you want to America on the most popular show in the country."

Kamala: "No."

Leftoids: "So brave. Stunning."

— hoe_math (@ItIsHoeMath) October 27, 2024

Reactions to Trump’s Rogan Interview

Donald Trump’s appearance on “The Joe Rogan Experience” resonates strongly with his base. Conservative and right-leaning Independents widely celebrate the three-hour conversation, viewing it as an unfiltered display of his commitment to America and his breadth of knowledge.

Even among some undecided voters, Trump’s unapologetic style on Rogan’s platform resonates as authentic, further distinguishing him from traditional politicians.

Right Leaning Reactions

• Trump supporters view his Rogan appearance as reinforcing anti-establishment sentiments, particularly contrasting Harris’s controlled media performances.
• Independents are divided. Some found the candid conversation appealing, humanizing Trump. But others find his rhetoric polarizing.
• For many, Trump’s unfiltered approach is refreshing. Though his divisive image still alienates some moderate and undecided voters.

The Broader Political Implications

MIG Reports data suggests a Rogan appearance for Harris could be a high-risk, high-reward gamble. Her base appears unconvinced of the benefits, while Independents offer only tepid support.

Meanwhile, Trump supporters praise both Trump’s performance and Rogan as a pioneer in the new media space. Many who distrust mainstream media, calling it biased and in Democrats’ pocket, say presidential politics crossing into digital media is a positive shift.

Voters are also discussing recent news that GOP VP candidate J.D. Vance is also scheduled to appear on Rogan before election day. Increasing anti-establishment feelings and distrust in legacy media suggests traditional outlets may be facing death throes.

⁦@JDVance⁩ will sit down with Joe Rogan tomorrow - Live Updates - POLITICO https://t.co/7zK2uee79D

— Joe Rogan Podcast (@joeroganhq) October 29, 2024

Left-leaning Americans are angrily canceling their “Washington Post” subscriptions to the tune of 250,000—though apparently not their Amazon Prime accounts. Following a controversy in which WaPo and Amazon owner Jeff Bezos barred the newspaper from making a presidential endorsement.

UPDATE: The number of cancellations since Friday’s revelation now exceeds 250,000, NPR can report.

That represents approximately 10 percent of all paid circulation. https://t.co/XrDDWR3Vt5

— David Folkenflik (@davidfolkenflik) October 29, 2024

The contradiction in liberal outcry against Bezos reveals the tension between stated ideals and real-life consumer choices. Americans are disillusioned with mainstream media and left leaning voters are showing their dissatisfaction by unsubscribing.

However, many on the right are pointing out various coping mechanisms and the selective outrage they see among liberals. They point out members of the media like Jennifer Rubin who criticized LA Times reporters who did not resign after the paper also made no endorsement. Rubin, who works for WaPo, has yet to resign.

Jennifer Rubin @JRubinBlogger cheered a reporter who quit in response to the LA times not endorsing either presidential canidate. She works for the Washington post which is also not endorsing this election let's reminder her that she is a hypocrite unless she resigns immediately pic.twitter.com/2mvpNBzS6N

— Steve (@Steve113875651) October 25, 2024

Unsub from WaPo

Liberals often frame their decision to cancel their “Washington Post” as personal empowerment and ethical consumerism. They invoke, “taking a stand,” “voting with my wallet,” and “demanding truth.” Many are disillusioned with WaPo, using terms like “biased reporting” and “supporting ethical journalism” to validate their choice to unsubscribe.

Won’t Cancel Prime

However, there is deafening silence on the same activists canceling their Amazon Prime memberships. They justify this with practical language emphasizing convenience and necessity, such as “just too good to give up” and “I can’t live without my Prime.” This rationalization for keeping services that contradict their activism suggests a kind of opportunistic hypocrisy.

Language Analysis

Coping Mechanisms

Among those outraged about Jeff Bezos’s decision regarding WaPo endorsements, there is tendency toward self-justification. They use rationalizing phrases like “we deserve better,” portraying canceling subscriptions as a principled choice. This hints at cognitive dissonance, where values are flexible depending on convenience.

Hypocrisy Indicators

There’s a noticeable double standard where users critique WaPo for perceived corporate media bias yet justify Amazon Prime as essential, despite Amazon’s controversial practices.

Phrases like “corporate monsters are everywhere” reflect a resignation to the omnipresence of corporate influence, exposing a discrepancy between ideological intentions and consumer behavior. This focus suggests an emotional, issue-based hierarchy in which certain values can be sidelined based on the perceived relevance of the company involved.

An Amazon warehouse worker's 'thank you' bag for working Prime Big Deal Days earlier this month pic.twitter.com/PAEADIQvSs

— Michael Sainato (@msainat1) October 29, 2024

Owning the Narrative

Many express a need for narratives that align with their personal values, reflecting a belief that media consumption should ideologically agree with readers. This causes a pattern of binary thinking where WaPo is labeled as becoming antagonistic to liberal values, while Amazon is a practical tool divorced from these political concerns.

Cognitive dissonance is a recurring theme as liberals openly struggle to reconcile their ideals with convenience. The discussions highlight how modern consumer habits complicate the pursuit of ideological purity, as practicality frequently overrides principles.

Performative Activism

Some describe their WaPo cancellation as part of “cancel culture” or an act of visibility rather than a purely ethical stance. This suggests it’s either performative or rhetorical. For some, canceling WaPo is less about values and more about participating in visible, symbolic acts.

In voter discussions around 75% of comments are negative toward WaPo, while Amazon Prime discussion is mostly neutral or slightly positive. This difference underscores a greater discontent with media credibility than corporate ethics, suggesting a prioritization of ideological alignment over ethical consistency.

Kamala Harris, once heralded by many as progressive and resilient, is now facing intense scrutiny from supporters and external political figures. Allegations of plagiarism, compounded by her tenuous hold on certain voter demographics, stir skepticism even among Democrats.

MIG Reports analysis of social media discussions shows a fracture among her supporters, oscillating between ardent loyalty and disillusionment. Her alignment—or lack thereof—with other Democratic leaders also continues to raise questions.

EXCLUSIVE: In 2007, Kamala Harris plagiarized pages of Congressional testimony from a Republican colleague.

And in 2012, she plagiarized a fictionalized story about sex trafficking—but presented it as a real case.

It's not just one book; it's a career-long pattern.🧵 pic.twitter.com/ZiHkzxTg4r

— Aaron Sibarium (@aaronsibarium) October 22, 2024

I'm usually pretty skeptical about plagiarism claims, but the case made here about Kamala's 2009 book on criminal justice is very strong. Major sections just copied wholesale with no attribution: https://t.co/kNFx8LoTkF

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) October 14, 2024

Testing Democratic Loyalty

Harris supporters have mixed emotions in response to the plagiarism allegations. Some simply dismiss them, while others express serious doubt.

• 35-48% remain supportive, brushing off the accusations as politically charged attacks meant to damage her influence and reputation.
• 25-34 are disappointed, struggling to reconcile the allegations with their previously held perceptions of Harris’s integrity.
• Critical voices hint at an underlying fragility in her base, where loyalty wavers under the weight of unrelenting controversies.
• 14-20% are indifferent and, while supporters, they see the allegations as part of the “usual” political spectacle.
• Indifference may also suggest a pragmatic acceptance of flaws in a similar way to Trump supporters remaining unmoved by recent allegations.

Major publications like the L.A. Times and Washington Post have also broken tradition by withholding endorsement. This hints at a growing establishment belief that Harris cannot win. Her exclusion from high-profile endorsements and the swing-state campaign discourse heightens this sense of resignation.

NEWS: The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement in this year's presidential race, the editor of the editorial pages has told colleagues at a tense meeting this morning

THREAD AND LINK: https://t.co/papQiStKDC

— David Folkenflik (@davidfolkenflik) October 25, 2024

Scoop: The LA Times will not endorse a candidate for president this year, a decision that was made by the paper's owner Patrick Soon-Shiong. The LA Times has endorsed Democratic presidential candidates each cycle since 2008 https://t.co/uS3hETkLQV

— Max Tani (@maxwelltani) October 22, 2024

Coping and Reframing

Some Democrats frame the plagiarism accusations as a manufactured controversy orchestrated by partisan actors. The persistent refrain of “political hit job” or “treacherous media” underscores a belief that Harris is being unjustly targeted.

The narrative that suggests media and rivals are weaponizing these allegations against Harris is often a coping mechanism, fostering a sense of solidarity against perceived injustice.

As sentiment toward Harris plummets, down-ballot Democratic candidates in swing states are beginning to promote their alignment with certain Trump-like positions. Harris’s presence is conspicuously absent from their campaigns, corroborating fracture withing the party. A defensive framing of Harris’s campaign suggests recognition that her influence within the party is waning.

Every Dem Senator featuring Trump in their ads should be asked if they agree with this. https://t.co/iNRxDtvyI9

— Peter Towey (@petermtowey) October 24, 2024

Around 30% of the discussion attempts to redirect the conversation toward her middle-class advocacy and other progressive achievements. By emphasizing her policy work over the plagiarism allegations, supporters attempt to gloss over the controversy. The media is also noticeably absent in discussions and reporting on plagiarism allegations.

Resilience or Denial?

Harris defenders use language of defiance and resilience, with terms like “manipulative narrative” and “smear tactics” in her defense.

They focus on her advocacy as a “fight for justice” and use inclusive language like “together we can” to create a collective identity. This rhetoric reveals reluctance to confront the implications of the plagiarism allegations head-on.

People use emotionally charged language—often bitter and at times hostile—suggesting frustration about Harris’s electability and leadership. Expressions of indignation, combined with sentiments of abandonment reveal the sense of doom many Harris supporters seem to be adopting.