Can’t Spell “Allan Lichtman” Without a Lot of Ls

November 24, 2024 Can’t Spell “Allan Lichtman” Without a Lot of Ls  image

Key Takeaways

  • Democrats are still confused and discontented at the extent to which polls, analysts, and the Harris campaign miscalculated the American people.
  • Allan Lichtman fails to understand why his “13 Keys” for predicting election outcomes exemplifies the political class and the media’s lack of awareness.
  • Democratic voters want answers as to where the party went wrong, blaming leadership and confused priorities.
  • Internal divisions and calls for reform reveal the discontent among Democrats at the state of the party and the country.

Our Methodology

Demographics

All Voters, Democrats

Sample Size

9,000

Geographical Breakdown

National

Time Period

1 Day

MIG Reports leverages EyesOver technology, employing Advanced AI for precise analysis. This ensures unparalleled precision, setting a new standard. Find out more about the unique data pull for this article. 

Democratic responses to Allan Lichtman’s "13 Keys" election predictions and their failure to capture public sentiment accurately. In the aftermath of Trump’s decisive victory, Democrats continue to grapple with their understanding of the loss. Meanwhile, broader political developments expose a charged environment of frustration, speculation, and party tension.

While Lichtman’s forecasts remain a focal point, discussions touch on immigration, national safety, and leadership accountability, showing a party at odds with itself and its strategy.

Democratic Trends

  • Trust in party leadership and political analysis like Lichtman’s "13 Keys" is waning, reflecting broader doubts about the Democratic Party’s understanding of public sentiment.
  • Many commenters say the party's messaging does not resonate with Americans. They complain about woke ideologies and a lack of relatable figures in leadership.
  • Voters worry about inflation, wages, and the overall economy. This, along with safety concerns, worsens critiques of Democratic governance and priorities.
  • Despite frustration, some Democrats call for unity and constructive dialogue. They promote collective progress instead of finger pointing and blame.

Discussion Themes

Democrats are desperately searching for the cause of their catastrophic loss, trying to pinpoint explanations. Many were shocked by the inaccuracy of predictions like Lichtman’s or polls like Ann Selzer’s, creating confusion about which issues turned the tide.

Outrage and Accountability

Democratic frustration touches on the failures of leadership, pollsters, and analysis. Leadership figures like Secretary Mayorkas and Director Wray are criticized for actions voters feel are evasive or insufficient.

Statements such as "Mayorkas and Wray’s refusal to testify is an outrage" illustrate a sense of betrayal and neglect of responsibility. These sentiments echo broader calls for resignations and reforms within party leadership.

Safety and Immigration Concerns

Safety issues, particularly those tied to immigration, feature prominently in postmortem discussions. Tragedies involving fentanyl and violent crimes committed by illegal immigrants dominate narratives.

Comments like "Every day, 350 Americans die from cartel-imported fentanyl" link these crises to perceived Democratic policy failures, reflecting a growing anxiety about national security.

Speculation and Distrust in Leadership

Speculative language creates a tone of distrust toward Democratic leadership. Comments like, "Biden clearly does not want this war to end" convey dissatisfaction with foreign policy decisions and perceived ulterior motives. This speculation extends to domestic governance, with many calling for transparency and prioritizing voters’ concerns.

Democratic Friction and Calls for Reform

Party divisions are growing, with abundant critiques of Democratic leadership and party strategy. Terms like "profound failure" highlight dissatisfaction with the party’s current trajectory. Voters want "self-reflection" and appeals to "good people" in leadership positions point to a desire for transformative change.

Voters voice confusion and frustration with leadership. However, the media and the political class still seem unwilling or unable to accurately assess the strategic failures which led to Harris’s historic loss.

Stay Informed

More Like This

  • 25

    Dec

    2024 is Ending the “War on Christmas”  image
  • 24

    Dec

    The National Debt Crisis is Crushing American Dreams  image
  • 23

    Dec

    An AI and Tech-Driven Future Makes Americans Nervous  image