On July 13 in Butler, PA, former president Donald Trump held a campaign rally, during which, he was shot in the ear and took cover as follow-on shots continued between a would-be assassin and Secret Service counter-sniper agents.

President Trump was immediately removed from the scene, holding up a fist and chanting “fight” and “USA.” Americans and the world immediately took to social media to pour out reactions and feelings. MIG Reports analysis of these initial conversations reveals a complex and possibly disturbing trend:

• Deep political divisions and escalating tensions within American society.
• A mix of outrage, conspiracy theories, and heightened rhetoric from both supporters and detractors of Trump.

Trump  Supporters

Among Trump supporters, the sentiment is predominantly one of anger and determination. There is a strong sense of martyrdom surrounding Trump, with many asserting the assassination attempt is a direct result of the liberal media's rhetoric about the end of democracy and the Democratic establishment's aggressive stance against him.

This group tends to emphasize themes of divine protection and resilience, often invoking religious overtones and patriotic fervor. They argue the attack has only solidified their support for Trump and has awoken a "sleeping giant" of political activism within the conservative base.

Many conservatives and Trump supporters suggest a coordinated effort by the left, possibly involving figures within the Biden administration or intelligence agencies, to silence Trump. There is also increasing speculation of incompetence or even malice coming from within the Secret Service and DHS. Many point to recent inflammatory comments from prominent Democrats as evidence of incitement.

Anti-Trump Skeptics

Those opposed to Trump express skepticism about the motivations behind the attack and its implications. Some dismiss the seriousness of the attack, while others suggest it was staged by Trump or his allies to garner sympathy and galvanize his political base.

There are also claims that the shooter might not align with any clear political ideology, complicating the narrative further. This side is more likely to call for a measured and investigative approach, emphasizing the need to de-escalate political violence and rhetoric—despite some within the ranks openly lamenting the assassinations failure.

On the left, there is a counter-narrative that suggest Trump himself and allies are to blame for inciting violence. They suggest heightened animosity in America, leading to events like this attempted assassination, are the product of the toxic political environment Trump has fostered.

Independents and Undecided

Independent and undecided voters appear to be caught in the middle of these polarized viewpoints. The assassination attempt and subsequent reactions might push some undecided voters towards Trump out of sympathy or distrust towards the left's handling of political violence. Conversely, others may become disenchanted with the entire political process, viewing the escalating rhetoric and violence as evidence of a broken system.

The Pennsylvania Rally

Right-of-Center Responses

Trump supporters and right-wing voters mostly attribute the attack to liberal or leftist causes, linking the shooter to groups like Antifa. They claim Democratic leaders and anti-Trump rhetoric incited the attack and suggest the incident was either orchestrated or mishandled by government agencies, furthering distrust in federal institutions. This narrative is used to rally Trump’s base by highlighting systemic bias and targeted aggression against them.

Left-of-Center Responses

Left-leaning and liberal voices focus on gun control, noting the use of an AR-15 and the shooter's alleged Republican affiliations. They critique Trump’s history of incendiary language and emphasize broader issues of gun culture and political extremism in the U.S. This group is also skeptical about the details of the incident, separating the shooter’s actions from broader political groups.

Centrist Responses

The polarized conversations likely have a substantial impact on undecided and independent voters, who may find the vitriol and partisan accusations off-putting, leading to disillusionment with both major parties. High-profile violent incidents often push voters towards policy-oriented stances, potentially nudging them to support candidates advocating for gun control or criminal justice reforms.

Sentiment Trends

Sentiment trends align with ideological inclinations. Trump supporters feel outrage and victimization, while critics highlight the dangers of permissive gun laws and violent rhetoric. The discourse includes significant blame-shifting, with Trump backers accusing Democrats and "deep state" actors of foul play, while opponents called out perceived hypocrisies and the consequences of Trump’s polarizing language.

Assassination

Right-of-Center Responses

The predominant trend among Trump supporters is an outpouring of outrage and calls for accountability. Many posts focus on identifying and condemning perceived liberal incitement to violence, often citing past rhetoric from Democratic leaders and media outlets as catalysts.

There is a strong narrative that this attempt on Trump's life is a direct consequence of the "hate-filled" discourse promulgated by the left. Sentiment among Trump's base is highly charged, oscillating between anger, blame, and a renewed sense of fervor to support Trump against what they see as a corrupt and malevolent political system.

Left-of-Center Responses

Most on the left either downplay the severity of the attack or suggest it was staged, contributing to a narrative of skepticism and conspiracy. Criticism is aimed at security lapses and the potential political manipulation of the event. A fraction of posts reflect a chilling nonchalance or thinly veiled schadenfreude, which only serves to fuel the ire of Trump supporters further.

Neutral and Independent Responses

Neutral and independent voters are caught in the middle, attempting to call for calm and rational discourse in the aftermath. Sentiment analysis shows many undecided and independent voters are disheartened by the level of vitriol and divisive rhetoric coming from both sides. The assassination attempt and the subsequent reaction have left many in the center feeling alienated and distressed, worried about the implications for future political stability.

Impact on Centrist Voters

Undecided and Independent voters say extreme reactions only heighten their disenchantment with the current political climate. The discourse generates a perception of increased instability and the potential for wider societal divisions.

While the assassination attempt has undeniably rallied Trump's core supporters, solidifying their opposition to perceived left-wing extremism, independent voters may find themselves more wary of aligning with either extreme end of the political spectrum.

However, there are some in the middle who perceived Trump’s reaction and demeanor during the shooting as a sign of strong leadership and express heightened patriotism. Some even say it has swayed them to want to vote for him.

Broader Implications

Rhetoric on both sides, from charged accusations and language to actual threats and expressions of hope for further violence, exacerbates a deepening sense of mistrust and fear. Moderate voices calling for unity, calm, and rationality are crucial but easily drowned out by the cacophony of partisan anger.

The assassination attempt against Donald Trump has thus impacted the political landscape, potentially shifting the sentiments of undecided voters towards disengagement or a search for a candidate who promises a return to stability and decorum.

Recently, prominent political figures have sparked significant discourse by suggesting President Biden drop out of the race. This notion has generated a mixed reactions among Americans and revealing deep divisions within the Democratic Party.

Discussions primarily revolve around Biden's age and infirmity, recent and relentless gaffes, and his perceived electability against Donald Trump. The growing list, as of this writing, of influential figures who are questioning Biden or calling on home to drop include:

• George Clooney (who recently raised $30,000,000 for Biden’s campaign)
• Sen. Michael Bennett (CO)
• Sen. Jon Tester (MT)
• Sen. Sherrod Brown (OH)
• Sen. Peter Welch (VT)
• Sen. Patty Murray (WA)
• Rep. Raul Grijalva (AZ)
• Rep. Greg Stanton (AZ)
• Rep. Adam Schiff (CA)
• Rep. Scott Peters (CA)
• Rep. Jim Himes (CT)
• Rep. Ed Case (HI)
• Rep. Mike Quigley (IL)
• Rep. Eric Sorensen (IL)
• Rep. Brad Schneider (IL)
• Rep. Seth Moulton (MA)
• Rep. Jamie Raskin (MD)
• Rep. Hillary Scholten (MI)
• Rep. Angie Craig (MN)
• Rep. Mikie Sherrill (NJ)
• Rep. Pat Ryan (NY)
• Rep. Earl Blumenauer (OR)
• Rep. Adam Smith (WA)
• Gov. Maura Healy (MA)

Downward Trajectory

Trending online conversations suggest a growing frustration among Democrats, particularly those identifying as progressives or left-leaning centrists. They feel increasingly uncertain about Biden's ability to secure a victory in the next election.

Many express concerns Biden continuing his campaign may weaken the party's chances. They advocate for someone younger or different to take the mantle, like Vice President Kamala Harris. This sentiment aligns with demographic patterns where younger voters and minority groups appear less enthusiastic about a second Biden term compared to their initial support in the 2020 election.

Criticism of Biden's slip-up on the first question of his “big boy” press conference, referring to Vice President Kamala Harris as "President Trump," highlights fears about his mental acuity and readiness for another term. This gaffe has been weaponized by both the right and the far left to question his competency. Many also continue to question his physical health and stamina.

Some liberal voices within media spheres criticize the Democratic establishment for being slow to address internal calls for change, hinting at a desire for rejuvenated leadership.

Looking Ahead

Undecided and Independent voters seem torn between dissatisfaction with Biden's current administration and dread of returning to Trump-era policies. A potential alternative candidate for the Democratic Party may become a significant factor as these voters gravitate toward stability and effective governance.

Economic factors like inflation, which the administration claims is improving, and public safety concerns, such as the crime surge near Times Square, also shape the political battleground. How candidates address these issues will likely influence centrist support.

Younger voters, urban residents, and progressive activists want new Democratic leadership. Older voters and centrist Democrats tend to prefer an experienced candidate like Biden. This internal divide reflects broader national sentiments of political fatigue and desire for change.

Among Independents, there is a notable inclination to support candidates who offer pragmatic solutions over entrenched partisanship. This demographic often swings elections and currently shows a readiness to evaluate alternatives critically before making their final decisions. They focus heavily on economic stability, crime reduction, and foreign policy, as seen in their reactions to Biden's recent aid packages for Ukraine and legislative actions blocked by Senate Democrats.

Following Independence Day, the New York Times published an opinion piece titled. “Does America Need a President?” Online conversation among American readers subsequently showed a stark contrast among political and social groups. The article generated reactions from skepticism to fervent agreement, provoking visceral reactions that often align with each reader’s political ideology.

Conservatives Scoff

Conservatives generally view the article as an attack on American traditions and constitutional norms. They argue the presidency is a crucial institution symbolizing unity and national leadership. These reactions often come with an added suspicion that questioning the presidency is an attempt to undermine traditional structures in favor of radical, possibly socialist, political reforms.

Voters on the right frequently express concerns about the left's influence on media and academic institutions. They connect the article to broader transformations they deem threatening to American society. Their feedback often includes anxieties about issues like immigration, economic regulation, and social policies like abortion and gender rights.

Some also argue narratives like this one from the NYT are attempts to protect an ailing President Biden—who many believe is not capable of fulfilling his presidential duties.

Progressives Entertain the Idea

Liberals and progressives appear more open to the question of whether America needs a president. They are using it to critique current and past administrations for their failures. They are also more likely to view the theory as a legitimate scholarly debate, encouraging discussions about democratic reforms and the decentralization of power.

For some, the article provides a platform to voice dissatisfaction with existing political structures and advocate for significant changes they believe will address systemic inequities and enhance democratic governance.

Demographic Patterns

Older conservatives, especially those who can recall periods of heightened national unity such as post-WWII or the Reagan era, are particularly resistant to notions challenge the presidency.

Younger demographics, including Millennials and Gen Z, tend to skew liberal and are often more enthusiastic about rethinking traditional government roles. Among younger Americans, there is considerable support for arguments that suggest power could be more equitably distributed among public institutions or directly by citizen initiatives.

Young voters are split, however. On one hand, they are fascinated by the idea of significant political overhaul. Many view our current system as outdated and inadequate for addressing modern challenges such as climate change, digital privacy, and social justice.

However, there is also a substantial contingent within this demographic that remains cautious about proposing such dramatic shifts without a clear and practical roadmap for implementation. This group seems to align with the segments of younger Americans who are moving to the right.

Republicans

Republicans tend to view the article as fueling narratives that contribute to a loss of national identity or sovereignty. Discussions here frequently reference "Project 2025" and other controversial programs opposing liberal overreach.

Topics such as social security, Medicare, and immigration reform are flashpoints. Some Republicans use these as examples of how liberal policies erode institutional integrity. This group prefers adherence to strict constitutionalist interpretations and a wary approach to federal overreach.

Democrats

Democratic voters use the article as a springboard to highlight current administrative deficiencies and historical injustices. This includes systemic racism and economic disparities.

There is a tendency among these Americans to advocate for radical reforms—often suggesting a need for novel governance structures. Arguments in favor of stronger local governance or communal decision-making models are common. Many progressives also focus on social justice issues, climate change, and healthcare reform.

Hardliners Disenfranchised

Discussions also reveal evolving attitudes towards social policies within the parties. For example, a notable faction within the GOP base is becoming disenfranchised with the party's shifting stance on issues like abortion. This suggests an internal fracture which is influenced by leaders who are perceived to strategically soften traditional stances to widen their appeal.

Meanwhile, among Democrats, there is an observable frustration towards moderate candidates or policies that do not adequately challenge entrenched systems of power. A similar chasm seems to be growing on the Democratic side over Israel-Palestine relations as well as Joe Biden’s bid for a second term.

President Joe Biden publicly stating he plans to stay in the presidential race has caused viral discussion online and among Democrats. There are passionate debates on both sides, but especially within Biden’s own constituencies. MIG Reports data shows a split among those who hope Biden stays in to beat Trump at any cost, and those who vehemently insist he step down.

Biden's Increasing Health Concerns

Biden's mental and physical health have nearly overshadowed all political conversations in recent days. Critics often raise concerns about his age and clear cognitive decline, with many pushing for him to step down.

More Democrats are now saying a younger candidate like Kamala Harris or others should take the helm. Some Democrat leaders, including Nancy Pelosi, also insist that time is growing short for Biden to make a decision.

Voters across the political spectrum discuss the possibility of Biden suffering from dementia, Parkinson's, and other health issues. This focus on the President’s increasing feeble appearance causes many to question his ability to handle the pressures of the presidency.

Democrats are now split on whether Biden can withstand another rigorous campaign. His supporters often dismiss these concerns as baseless attacks meant to undermine Biden’s credibility. They argue he is capable of fulfilling his duties and the media is making unjustified claims.

Other Democrats say, even if Biden does not have the capacity to continue as the sitting president, they are not bothered. A viral clip of Whoopie Goldberg promoting a similar idea went viral, drawing criticism from Republicans and some Democrats.

Whoopi: "I don't care if [Biden] pooped his pants. I don't care if he can't put a sentence together. Show me he can't do the job, and then I'll say, okay, maybe it's time to go...I have poopy day all the time. All the time." pic.twitter.com/QlMHzH8LF9

— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) July 8, 2024

Any Blue Won’t Do

A salient point in the conversation is the perception of party loyalty and internal disarray among Democrats. The idea that influential Democrats and former supporters are now withdrawing their support for Biden is gaining traction.

Notable figures and entities, such as a Disney heiress and a growing number of mainstream media outlets, are shifting their allegiance or calling for Biden to step aside. Recent news that fervent Obama supporter George Clooney is calling for Biden to step down displays the significant fracture among Democrats.

George Clooney urges Joe Biden to step down as the 2024 Democratic nominee for president in a new op-ed:

“We are not going to win in November with this president. On top of that, we won’t win the House, and we’re going to lose the Senate. This isn’t only my opinion; this is the… pic.twitter.com/EArMreTtMk

— Variety (@Variety) July 10, 2024

This swell of infighting among Democrats gives critics space to argue that a party in disarray will weaken their chances in the upcoming election. Many are also questioning whether VP Harris could carry the ticket, should Biden step down. 

Trending Sentiment

Sentiment toward Biden is polarized. There’s a mixture of die-hard support and vehement opposition. Supporters champion his achievements and leadership, expressing frustration towards those within the party who are contemplating a replacement. They argue Biden represents stability and a return to normalcy compared to the chaotic tenure of his predecessor.

Opponents paint a grim picture of Biden’s presidency, attributing various national issues to his leadership and suggesting that his running for re-election would be detrimental to the country. They evoke strong imagery of moral and political decay, centering on personal attacks against Biden and his family.

For undecided voters, the ongoing discussions introduce an element of uncertainty. They are weighing the implications of Biden continuing his presidency against emerging critiques and alternative possibilities. The growing divide may influence undecided voter perceptions of party stability.

Independents, often swayed by pragmatic considerations and a broader perspective beyond strict party lines, are closely observing these developments. The Democratic Party's ability to maintain coherence and present a strong, unified case for Biden’s continuance remains a key factor for these voters. Visible rifts and intra-party dissent may deter their support, emphasizing the importance of how Democrats manage these narratives moving forward.

Conversations among those aligned with the Uncommitted Movement—a pro-Palestinian movement critical of Biden’s Israel policy—have added another layer of complexity to the debate. While not all primary-held states have an “Uncommitted” option for Democrats, notable results included:

• Michigan: 13.3% Uncommitted
• Minnesota: 19% Uncommitted
• New Jersey: Approximately 9% Uncommitted
• New Mexico: Approximately 10% Uncommitted

Online discussions suggest this movement is likely to continue through August and the Democratic National Convention. However, if Biden stays in the race, he will likely receive the official nomination via Zoom, without attending in person.

A recent scoop alleging President Biden and his staff have been concealing ongoing visits from doctors who specialize in Parkinson's Disease created firestorm among voters and the press.

As Biden’s approval plummets and Democrats begin jumping ship, the White House is struggling to keep media and voters on their side. Sentiments toward the Biden family and allegations against them have reached lows in the mid 30% range over the last 15 days.

Mainstream Media Finally Wakes Up

Mainstream media and Democratic pundits have been responding with sharp criticisms toward Biden and his administration since the President’s disastrous debate performance. While some are still attempting damage control, trying to maintain a semblance of unity and stability, most seem to be turning on Biden.

Many observers suggest media figures, who have long been feigning ignorance of Biden’s clear cognitive decline, are turning on Biden because they believe he cannot win the election. Articles and reports from mainstream media outlets notorious for supporting Democratic narratives are now, for the first time in his presidency, asking tough questions about Joe Biden.

Figures like Joe Scarborough are generating harsh criticism for, just weeks ago, claiming Joe Biden was “more than cogent” and completely fit to serve. Now, those same talking heads are calling for Biden to step down—deepening distrust many Americans already held towards the media.

A Soviet-Style Coverup

In a recent White House press conference, Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre struggled to address questions about the allegations of Parkinson’s and medical exams. She claimed medical privacy privileges and security concerns for doctors involved.

Meanwhile, mainstream media reporters voiced dissatisfaction with the official White House responses. They said urgent questions about the president's health justify a release of public information, rather than suppression of information by the administration.

Truly incredible clip.

Jean-Pierre is asked over and over again why a Parkinson’s expert visited the White House multiple times.

She says she can’t answer for “security” and “privacy” reasons.

Literally the worst press secretary ever.
pic.twitter.com/7ZUKLSWH6t

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) July 8, 2024

More media representatives are now expressing frustration and dissatisfaction at White House talking points. They emphasize the lack of transparency to the press, which garners scoffs among many voters who believe the press, until now, has been complicit. Criticisms grew even more sharp the next day, as Karine Jean-Pierre admitted to lying about O’Connor and Dr. Cannard’s White House visits.

The pressing nature of Biden’s health concerns is making his administration’s inability to provide clear answers particularly concerning for many Americans. This frustration is also causing significant backlash toward Biden as a candidate and his family who are rumored to be pushing him to stay in the presidential race.

A Puppet President?

Allegations of President Biden being controlled by unelected figures like Jill Biden and Hunter Biden are also gaining traction. However, while Republicans and many Democrats balk at the idea of unknown and unelected individuals or groups running the White House, some Democratic voters insist it doesn’t matter as long as Trump loses.

One viral NBC news clip shows Parkinson's expert Dr. Tom Pitts explaining Joe Biden’s clear and obvious signs of the disease. He also says, as a Democrat, he has been shocked to witness the dystopian level of gaslighting from the White House—which he likens to a Soviet Union propaganda campaign.

NEW: Parkinson's expert Dr. Tom Pitts tells NBC that Biden clearly has it. No debate.

He compares the coverup to the Soviets.

This is coming from a lifelong Democrat. pic.twitter.com/BcR0btWhja

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) July 9, 2024

Following the chaotic White House press briefing, it is not just critics who are calling out the Biden administration. More and more Democrats view the administration’s non-answers as indicative of a coverup.

Republican Voter Reactions

Among Republicans, there is a palpable sense of vindication combined with indignation. Many on the right have long questioned Biden’s fitness for office. The media and Democrats finally admitting their own suspicions only seems to increase Republican suspicions that Democrats have acted disingenuously.

Republican voters are not only concerned about the implications for national leadership but are also actively using the news to criticize the Democratic Party's apparently failing strategy.

While many Republicans believe Biden should step down for the good of the country, they also say it would be politically advantageous for them if he stays in the race. They view Biden's health issues as compromising national security and undermining public trust. However, some Trump supporters fear if Biden is removed, any other challenger could pose a problem for Donald Trump in the general election.

Democratic Voter Reactions

Democrat voters seem more defensive, with various reactions. There is a mix of concern for Biden’s health and frustration at the optics and handling of the situation. Many loyalists maintain that Biden remains the best option to uphold the party’s values and policies. They also say he may be the only person who can beat Trump in November.

Yet, a faction of Democratic voters is urgently calling for more transparency and possibly re-evaluating their support. Calls for Biden to step down are increasing within the Democratic base as worries mount around the long-term implications if he stays in.

Many Democrats also feel a deep sense of betrayal and concern over Biden’s health revelations. His obvious fragility has prompted supporters to grapple with questions of being lied to. There are also disagreements about whether Vice President Kamala Harris is a capable a safety net, should Biden become incapable of continuing his duties.

The media landscape swiftly turned after the first debate as mainstream outlets suddenly started calling for Democrats to remove President Joe Biden from the ballot. This sudden narrative shift is generating a mix of heated rhetoric and disagreement among Democratic voters.

Following his disastrous debate performance on CNN, even the most notoriously partisan pundits quickly turned against Joe Biden. However, there is growing tension in the Democratic Party about whether this is the right move. Those who want Biden to continue are growing more critical of anyone calling for Biden to step down.

The Overnight Media Pivot

Biden's recent debate performance acted as a catalyst for discussions about his ability to win—or even last through a second term. Many voters point out that, prior to the debate, any discussion of Biden’s cognitive or physical health was completely dismissed by mainstream media. This stark contrast is igniting severe criticism toward the perceived hypocrisy of media figures who seem to parrot Democratic Party lines.

After the debate discussion exploded about Biden’s stamina, cognitive ability, and overall suitability to continue in the race. In the days following, there has been a flood of fact-checking claims and accusations of bias against mainstream media outlets.

The responses from media giants like CNN and MSNBC are being scrutinized by American voters who notice the sudden shift. Opinions are split along party lines about whether these networks are demonstrating adequate journalistic integrity.

Americans on Both Sides Distrust Media

Democratic sentiment on social media and in media reporting reflects widespread concern about Biden's viability as a candidate. This worry manifests through suggestions and editorial pieces from outlets such as the New York Times, calling for Biden to step down. They, Democrats hope, can create a stronger Democratic position against Trump.

Many view increasingly frantic calls for Biden's removal as a sign of panic within Democratic ranks. They say the panic is exacerbated by multiple media outlets suggesting alternative candidates. CNN, for instance, reported internal Democratic anxieties post-debate, highlighting a sense of unrest and the potential for significant changes in the party's strategy.

Conversely, there's a palpable frustration and backlash from Biden supporters who argue against this narrative. They insist the President, despite an off night, should not be disqualified based on a single performance. This camp is vocal about perceived double standards, noting the lack of calls for Trump to withdraw despite his numerous legal challenges and controversial actions. This sentiment is particularly strong among individuals actively engaged in political discourse online, suggesting an ideological battleground over media fairness and accountability.

Democrats Align with Party Narratives

Reactions from Democratic voters to media stories that align with party talking points seem to indicate the base will move with shifting narratives. Poll results post-debate indicate some movement in public opinion, with noticeable swings among Democrats regarding Joe Biden.

There are also many undecided voters reacting to the debate performance with evolving views. However, the predominant view among Biden supporters is the idea that focusing on one debate will damage the party’s chances amid larger policy and cultural conflicts.

Conversations after the first presidential debate unleashed fears about President Joe Biden's mental acuity. The president’s lackluster debate performance confirms his fitness as a focal point or worry among media outlets and Democratic Party officials.

Following the CNN debate, there are a range of reactions from the public and various political stakeholders. There’s significant concern within the Democratic Party about Biden’s cognitive capabilities, but this concern does not seem to be uniform among Democratic voters.

Many Democratic supporters actively defend Biden, highlighting his policy successes against derisive critiques from his Republican opponents. They echo Biden’s narratives about the stock market, government figures in jobs markets, and strategic actions in the oil market. These supporters tend to emphasize that, despite concerns over his age and mental acuity, Biden aligns closely with American values they cherish. They say he remains a preferable candidate compared to Donald Trump.

On the other hand, there are also critical voices within the Democratic base who are becoming increasingly vocal about their doubts regarding Biden’s ability to serve another term effectively. These critics suggest exploring alternative candidates to ensure strong leadership moving forward.

Among the broader public discourse, Biden’s age and mental sharpness frequently surface as contentious topics. This ongoing debate over his cognitive fitness seems to reflect deeper divisions within the party and among the electorate on the future direction of Democratic leadership.

There is also a conspicuous trend of partisanship coloring these discussions. Supporters of Biden often juxtapose his perceived shortcomings against what they consider the more severe failings of former President Donald Trump and his supporters. This ongoing comparison underlines much of the sentiment within Democratic circles that, regardless of Biden’s condition, he represents a far superior option to any Republican candidate.

Anticipation for the first presidential debate moderated by CNN reporters Jake Tapper and Dana Bash is generating controversy. Many, especially conservatives, express skepticism about whether the debate moderation will be rigged in favor of Democrat narratives. People point to the historical biases they see in both moderators and on CNN’s network.

The most pervasive concern is CNN's recurring bias against Donald Trump. Many voters say they do not trust Jake Tapper and Dana Bash to allow a fair debate. People are especially citing Tappers past comments about Trump his role in promoting Russiagate and other controversies.

Nobody Trusts Jake Tapper

Criticism against Jake Tapper is especially pronounced. There's a common theme that he is profoundly anti-Trump, with an inability to remain fair. Many discuss his ad nauseum coverage of the narrative that Trump is essentially Adolf Hitler.

Oh look, debate moderator Jake Tapper repeatedly comparing Trump to HitIer.

I'm sure this debate will be 100% fair.

pic.twitter.com/isshrBs72G

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) June 24, 2024

Many also point out Tapper's role in covering and legitimizing the leftist media’s Russiagate narrative, which has now been thoroughly disproven. They also cite his inability to hold a neutral stance when reporting on Trump’s comments or actions.

Here is Jake Tapper angrily demanding CNN cut off live coverage of Trump being greeted by Cubans in a Miami restaurant pic.twitter.com/zYFkGHQ2Ct

— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) June 24, 2024

Viral Clip of CNN Cutting Karoline Leavitt’s Mic

There is also significant outrage over a viral CNN clip in which Trump spokesperson Karoline Leavitt’s mic was cut when she criticized Jake Tapper. Many vies this incident as evidence of CNN's unwillingness to allow dissenting opinions, fueling calls for Trump to boycott the network's debate altogether.

The abrupt end to Leavitt's interview has compounded fears that any criticism of the moderators or the network will not be tolerated during the debate.

Like and retweet if you think Jake Tapper will be a partisan hack during the debate.
pic.twitter.com/ZYersdOb1Y

— Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) June 24, 2024

Trump supporters express outrage at CNN’s clear bias against Trump and his allies. They argue Leavitt was well within fair bounds to point out historical biases from Jake Tapper. Voters view the incident as an attempt to suppress legitimate criticism of CNN’s impartiality.

Fears About Mainstream Media Bias

Another major point of contention is CNN's decision to restrict independent media from streaming or providing real-time commentary on the debate. Voters view this as a deliberate attempt to protect the so-called “elite media” and prevent alternative perspectives from reaching the public.

Right leaning voters call out CNN as a "propaganda network" rather than a legitimate news organization. This sentiment is not new but has intensified with the approach of the debate. These CNN critiques often include ire toward the broader media landscape.

Americans express suspicion around media covering up election rigging, censoring opposition, and manipulating voters with politicized narratives. These arguments express a broader disenchantment with mainstream media’s role in elections and American politics generally.

With a strong belief in mainstream media bias against conservatives, Trump supporters fear possibilities like:

• Moderators pushing unfair and slanted questions.
• Accusations about Trump’s felony convictions—to which he cannot respond by gag order.
• CNN producers muting Trump’s mic when he’s speaking.
• Conditions set up to hide Joe Biden’s declining cognitive state.

There is also a repeated belief the debate will be more of a three-against-one scenario, with Joe Biden, Jake Tapper, and Dana Bash combining forces against Donald Trump. Critics say Tapper and Bash will prop up Biden by framing the narrative in his favor, effectively silencing Republican voters.

Predictions About Candidate Performance

How voters perceive the potential performances of each candidate varies with political views. Trump supporters hope he will dominate the debate, leveraging his strong debate skills, clear communication, and ability to generate viral television moments. They often contrast him favorably against Biden’s lackluster public performances and his administration’s poor legacy. Conservatives are generally confident that Trump, even with inevitable media bias, will gain the upper hand.

Democratic voters believe Trump’s performance will contrast poorly with Biden's. They expect Trump to resort to combative and inflammatory rhetoric rather than substantive discussion. They express hope the debate will highlight what they see as Trump’s erratic and dishonest tendencies. This group also urges the moderators to challenge Trump rigorously on issues like the economy and social justice.

Related Debate Conversations

There is also some talk about Robert F. Kennedy Jr. being excluded from the debate stage. Many believe this undermines democratic processes and fuels accusations of bias from conservatives, Independents, and even some moderate Democrats.

This is a particularly sore spot since Kennedy qualified according to CNN's own criteria but is still being left out. Some also voice objections over the fact that neither Trump nor Biden have been officially nominated for their Parties. People view this as a greater injustice, saying a one-on-one debate is highly irregular before the Party conventions.

Adding to the controversy is a demand for Joe Biden to take a drug test before the debate. This unusual request stems from public opinion and media denial that Joe Biden is not cognitively or physically fit to be president. Many believe Biden's handlers provide him a cocktail of drugs before public appearances in hopes that his deterioration can be hidden.

Two controversial reversals in Snopes fact-checks are causing online discussion and controversy. Debates over Donald Trump's infamous "very fine people" comment and Ashley Biden's diary are fervent.

Snopes, a left-leaning fact checking website, reversed its previous fact-check that Donald Trump called neo-Nazis “very fine people” after the Charlottesville protests of 2017. In April, Snopes also reversed a fact check about whether the contents of Ashley Biden’s diary were confirmed, changing its rating from "Unproven" to "True."

These reversals are stirring public sentiment and cast a spotlight on broader issues of media trust and political bias – both of which look to have influence on voting trends in the 2024 election.

Very Fine People Hoax

The media’s continual characterization of Trump’s "very fine people" comment has long been contentious. President Joe Biden, in 2019, launched his campaign citing this now-debunked claim that Trump called neo-Nazis fine people.

Many Americans feel Snopes’s revisions validate their previously held beliefs either about mainstream media's unfair portrayal of Trump or its broader role in pushing political narratives.

Among Trump's supporters, there is a palpable sense of vindication. They argue Snopes admitting Trump’s comments were mischaracterized demonstrates how media and fact-checker spin has fueled a biased narrative against the former president and other conservatives.

This skepticism toward media is fueling a deeper mistrust of news and fact checking outlets. It also seems to encourage voters’ growing resolve to support Trump more fervently in the upcoming election. Trump's base, which includes a substantial portion of rural and working-class voters, is therefore likely to remain steadfast or grow.

Critics of Trump view the Snopes revision as problematic. They contend that, while the retraction might be technically accurate, it could be weaponized to downplay the serious implications of Trump's rhetoric.

Anti-Trump voters fear such reversals may perpetuate a dangerous narrative and embolden extremist views. This skepticism towards media corrections could boost voter turnout among those who oppose Trump, particularly in urban and suburban areas where such views are more prevalent.

Ashley Biden’s Diary

Regarding Ashley Biden's diary, the Snopes reversal regarding it authenticity and content have further deepened partisan divides. Right-leaning Americans suggest the original fact-check of the diary was another among many attempts to shield the Biden family from scrutiny.

Biden critics argue this reversal exposes a concerted effort within the media to protect Biden. The reversal also reinforces their belief in a biased media that unfairly attacks conservative figures while ignoring liberal misdeeds. This perception bolsters support for Trump and could attract more undecided or moderate voters who are increasingly skeptical of media integrity.

Conversely, left-leaning voters and Biden supporters are disheartened by Snopes's reversals. They interpret these actions as caving to pressure and contributing to the spread of misinformation. Many believe such admissions could have a demoralizing effect, potentially dissuading some voters from participating in the election due to a feeling of disillusionment with the political process and media landscape.

However, there's also a counter-effect among those who perceive these reversals as hair-splitting. These exhausted voters may be energized to fight against what they see as manipulation and misinformation.