Assassination Attempt on President Trump Rocks the World
July 15, 2024![Assassination Attempt on President Trump Rocks the World image](https://mig.media/Assassination_Attempt_on_President_Trump_Rocks_the_World_(1).png)
Key Takeaways
- The shocking attempted assassination of Donald Trump heats up partisan divides with distrust and often outright hostility towards opposing sides.
- The assassination attempt has heightened fears of civil unrest, with some drawing historical parallels to moments of deep crisis and warning of potential violence.
- Polarization is likely to continue shaping the behavior and decisions of undecided and independent voters moving forward.
Our Methodology
Demographics
All Voters
Sample Size
48,500
Geographical Breakdown
National
Time Period
1 Day
MIG Reports leverages EyesOver technology, employing Advanced AI for precise analysis. This ensures unparalleled precision, setting a new standard. Find out more about the unique data pull for this article.
On July 13 in Butler, PA, former president Donald Trump held a campaign rally, during which, he was shot in the ear and took cover as follow-on shots continued between a would-be assassin and Secret Service counter-sniper agents.
President Trump was immediately removed from the scene, holding up a fist and chanting “fight” and “USA.” Americans and the world immediately took to social media to pour out reactions and feelings. MIG Reports analysis of these initial conversations reveals a complex and possibly disturbing trend:
- Deep political divisions and escalating tensions within American society.
- A mix of outrage, conspiracy theories, and heightened rhetoric from both supporters and detractors of Trump.
Trump Supporters
Among Trump supporters, the sentiment is predominantly one of anger and determination. There is a strong sense of martyrdom surrounding Trump, with many asserting the assassination attempt is a direct result of the liberal media's rhetoric about the end of democracy and the Democratic establishment's aggressive stance against him.
This group tends to emphasize themes of divine protection and resilience, often invoking religious overtones and patriotic fervor. They argue the attack has only solidified their support for Trump and has awoken a "sleeping giant" of political activism within the conservative base.
Many conservatives and Trump supporters suggest a coordinated effort by the left, possibly involving figures within the Biden administration or intelligence agencies, to silence Trump. There is also increasing speculation of incompetence or even malice coming from within the Secret Service and DHS. Many point to recent inflammatory comments from prominent Democrats as evidence of incitement.
Anti-Trump Skeptics
Those opposed to Trump express skepticism about the motivations behind the attack and its implications. Some dismiss the seriousness of the attack, while others suggest it was staged by Trump or his allies to garner sympathy and galvanize his political base.
There are also claims that the shooter might not align with any clear political ideology, complicating the narrative further. This side is more likely to call for a measured and investigative approach, emphasizing the need to de-escalate political violence and rhetoric—despite some within the ranks openly lamenting the assassinations failure.
On the left, there is a counter-narrative that suggest Trump himself and allies are to blame for inciting violence. They suggest heightened animosity in America, leading to events like this attempted assassination, are the product of the toxic political environment Trump has fostered.
Independents and Undecided
Independent and undecided voters appear to be caught in the middle of these polarized viewpoints. The assassination attempt and subsequent reactions might push some undecided voters towards Trump out of sympathy or distrust towards the left's handling of political violence. Conversely, others may become disenchanted with the entire political process, viewing the escalating rhetoric and violence as evidence of a broken system.
![](https://mig.media/Assassination_Attempt_on_President_Trump_Rocks_the_World_(3).png)
![](https://mig.media/Assassination_Attempt_on_President_Trump_Rocks_the_World_(4).png)
The Pennsylvania Rally
Right-of-Center Responses
Trump supporters and right-wing voters mostly attribute the attack to liberal or leftist causes, linking the shooter to groups like Antifa. They claim Democratic leaders and anti-Trump rhetoric incited the attack and suggest the incident was either orchestrated or mishandled by government agencies, furthering distrust in federal institutions. This narrative is used to rally Trump’s base by highlighting systemic bias and targeted aggression against them.
Left-of-Center Responses
Left-leaning and liberal voices focus on gun control, noting the use of an AR-15 and the shooter's alleged Republican affiliations. They critique Trump’s history of incendiary language and emphasize broader issues of gun culture and political extremism in the U.S. This group is also skeptical about the details of the incident, separating the shooter’s actions from broader political groups.
Centrist Responses
The polarized conversations likely have a substantial impact on undecided and independent voters, who may find the vitriol and partisan accusations off-putting, leading to disillusionment with both major parties. High-profile violent incidents often push voters towards policy-oriented stances, potentially nudging them to support candidates advocating for gun control or criminal justice reforms.
Sentiment Trends
Sentiment trends align with ideological inclinations. Trump supporters feel outrage and victimization, while critics highlight the dangers of permissive gun laws and violent rhetoric. The discourse includes significant blame-shifting, with Trump backers accusing Democrats and "deep state" actors of foul play, while opponents called out perceived hypocrisies and the consequences of Trump’s polarizing language.
![](https://mig.media/Assassination_Attempt_on_President_Trump_Rocks_the_World_(5).png)
Assassination
Right-of-Center Responses
The predominant trend among Trump supporters is an outpouring of outrage and calls for accountability. Many posts focus on identifying and condemning perceived liberal incitement to violence, often citing past rhetoric from Democratic leaders and media outlets as catalysts.
There is a strong narrative that this attempt on Trump's life is a direct consequence of the "hate-filled" discourse promulgated by the left. Sentiment among Trump's base is highly charged, oscillating between anger, blame, and a renewed sense of fervor to support Trump against what they see as a corrupt and malevolent political system.
Left-of-Center Responses
Most on the left either downplay the severity of the attack or suggest it was staged, contributing to a narrative of skepticism and conspiracy. Criticism is aimed at security lapses and the potential political manipulation of the event. A fraction of posts reflect a chilling nonchalance or thinly veiled schadenfreude, which only serves to fuel the ire of Trump supporters further.
Neutral and Independent Responses
Neutral and independent voters are caught in the middle, attempting to call for calm and rational discourse in the aftermath. Sentiment analysis shows many undecided and independent voters are disheartened by the level of vitriol and divisive rhetoric coming from both sides. The assassination attempt and the subsequent reaction have left many in the center feeling alienated and distressed, worried about the implications for future political stability.
Impact on Centrist Voters
Undecided and Independent voters say extreme reactions only heighten their disenchantment with the current political climate. The discourse generates a perception of increased instability and the potential for wider societal divisions.
While the assassination attempt has undeniably rallied Trump's core supporters, solidifying their opposition to perceived left-wing extremism, independent voters may find themselves more wary of aligning with either extreme end of the political spectrum.
However, there are some in the middle who perceived Trump’s reaction and demeanor during the shooting as a sign of strong leadership and express heightened patriotism. Some even say it has swayed them to want to vote for him.
Broader Implications
Rhetoric on both sides, from charged accusations and language to actual threats and expressions of hope for further violence, exacerbates a deepening sense of mistrust and fear. Moderate voices calling for unity, calm, and rationality are crucial but easily drowned out by the cacophony of partisan anger.
The assassination attempt against Donald Trump has thus impacted the political landscape, potentially shifting the sentiments of undecided voters towards disengagement or a search for a candidate who promises a return to stability and decorum.
![](https://mig.media/Assassination_Attempt_on_President_Trump_Rocks_the_World_(2).png)