Articles
-
A big discussion prior to the 2024 election was the gender divide in support for Trump and Harris. Many concluded women would overwhelmingly turn out for Harris, based on “women’s rights” or abortion issues. However, surprising results showing Trump gaining ground with women, shocking some observers.
I don't know who needs to hear this, but Trump won white women outright pic.twitter.com/sxO5oc7pEw
— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) November 6, 2024Despite conventional narratives suggesting women would vote strongly based on abortion, post-election conversations are illuminating. While past elections hinged on topics like abortion and identity politics, this election saw many women—and other voter groups—recalibrating toward economic stability, women’s safety, and traditional values.
🚨 JUST IN: Trump gains in nearly every demographic from 2020
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) November 6, 2024
🔴 Women: +2
🔴 Men: +3
🔴 Non-college: +6
🔴 Hispanic: +6
🔴 Black: +7
🔴 Young: +10 pic.twitter.com/qNcFOTDAVmDemocrats Feel Women Failed Them
Around 40% of Democratic comments voice disappointment over female support for Trump. Many lament the disappointing turnout for abortion as the cornerstone issue of the Harris campaign.
This is “political analyst” & former poly-sci professor Dr. Arlene who brainwashed hundreds of thousands of people on TT into thinking Harris would win.
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) November 7, 2024
On Nov 5th, she told a story about how she taunted a grocery store worker about how Harris was 100% going to win
On Nov 6th,… pic.twitter.com/NbVhQ6uftx- A common theme among Democrats was disappointment over women supporting Trump, viewing it as a step back for women’s rights.
- Many Democrats express anxiety that Trump will roll back progress on abortion and gender equality.
- However voting results suggest women want policies that align with their family priorities and provide practical solutions.
Analysis
Previous MIG Reports data showed women are underrepresented in online political discourse. This may suggest that women voting for Trump are either less inclined to discuss it, or simply not captured due to lack of online presence.
Remember all those ads about "your husband won't know who you voted for?"
— mrs. dobbins ☕️🪶 (@mrsdobbins_) November 6, 2024
Turns out it wasn't their husbands that they were hiding their vote from, it was their judgy lefty girly pals.The rise of policy-driven voting behavior among women may be attributed to the receding influence of gender ideology. This presents a strategic opportunity for Republicans to continue appealing to women with a platform that addresses concrete concerns.
Economic Stability Trumps Abortion
Drastically rising prices, particularly for essentials like groceries, healthcare, and housing, has become a major driver of political sentiment among female voters.
- Roughly 65% of women discussing the election online say economic concerns are the top priority.
- Women say things like, “Financial stability matters more than any other issue right now,” pointing to high costs and stagnant wages.
- Many women credit Trump’s policies with lower inflation and better household finances—they see his return as a path to restoring stability.
Analysis
Women directly link economic stability to their families' well-being. This trend suggests the social and identity issues emphasized in the culture over the last decade have lost potency amid economic fears.
In 2024, women are making decisions based on financial considerations, which they see as non-negotiable. For a Republican administration, continuing to address voter economic concerns pragmatically could solidify and increase this trend.
Sick of “Woke” Politics
Many women say they view Trump’s emphasis on traditional values as a welcome departure from identity politics.
- 30% of Republicans celebrate Trump's cultural alignment with anti-woke values.
- 25% of women say they feel alienation from Democratic messaging on woke issues—particularly transgender rights and women’s safety.
- Many say transgender policies, particularly in women’s sports and public spaces, are more severely encroaching on women’s rights than abortion restrictions.
Analysis
Trends suggests there may be a growing cultural shift to the right, with conservative female voters rallying to reorient around traditional values over progressive ideology. Republican messages that champion economic stability, safety, and family-focused policies resonate deeply with women. As identity politics increasingly alienates this voter base, progressives may continue to lose hold on women.
Failed “Women’s Rights” Movement
Many on the left lauded abortion as the most critical issues for women in 2024. Although it was a dominant issue in the 2022 midterms post-Dobs, current trends show the economy and personal safety supersede abortion issues for many women.
- Only 20% of women discussing the election emphasize abortion, suggesting a diminishing role in shaping female voting patterns.
- Many in this group—particularly mothers—say they prioritize “women’s rights” in the form of securing the border and female spaces.
- While many voters still express concern over potential abortion rollbacks in certain states, this does not seem to have a dramatic impact on the presidential race.
Analysis
Many women, including pro-choice advocates, are balancing abortion issues with more pressing economic and safety concerns. State races show a significant number of women still place importance on abortion, however Republican messaging about states’ rights post-Roe may impact voter decisions for national issues.
11
Nov
-
Discussions about Ukraine and Russia are changing with Donald Trump headed back to the Oval Office. Conversations are fraught with anticipation, fear, and polarized visions for America’s role on the global stage. Voters discuss allegiance as they envision what a Trump administration could mean for U.S. foreign policy and domestic priorities.
🚨BREAKING: Putin announces Russia’s readiness to restore relations with the United States
— Jack (@jackunheard) November 7, 2024
Trump is the President of peace.The Fractured Perspective on Ukraine
American responses to the Ukraine-Russia conflict are like a prism reflecting divergent values.
- Trump supporters see his return as a path to recalibrating U.S. priorities toward "America First." They see his foreign policy stance as one that would temper U.S. involvement in conflicts like Ukraine.
- Many in this camp view Trump as capable of negotiating a diplomatic settlement, likely by reducing U.S. support for Ukraine and pursuing a strategic détente with Russia.
- This group considers drawing back as a reorientation that would halt U.S. resources sent abroad when we cannot afford domestic needs facing American citizens.
Trump critics view his return with increasing anxiety. To them, a Trump-led disengagement from Ukraine signals a betrayal of democratic values and allies.
- Anti-Trump voices express unease over the possible erosion of international alliances and a shifting balance of power that could embolden Russia.
- Critics say Trump’s affinity for unilateral action risks undermining the democratic fabric of Ukraine.
- This group says retracting U.S. support from Ukraine would be an ideological concession to authoritarianism.
National Security and Geopolitical Realignment
The fear of Trump's re-engagement with Russia compounds worries about America’s security and international standing.
- Trump supporters, rallying around his assertive posture, believe direct negotiation with formidable leaders like Vladimir Putin can lead to peace, citing early signs of de-escalation by Hamas.
- They frame Trump’s foreign policy as resistant against unchecked involvement in global conflicts which cost money and compromise U.S. security interests.
- Supporters view his willingness to "deal directly" with adversaries as a practical, results-driven approach.
Trump critics feel a sense of foreboding and diminished stability, arguing Trump's affinity for personal diplomacy might weaken the established multilateral order.
- There is widespread apprehension that by realigning U.S. foreign policy, Trump may inadvertently facilitate Russian expansionist goals.
- Critics worry he will embolden Russia and other adversarial states, ultimately destabilizing both American and European security structures.
- These voices fear Trump’s administration will be too isolationist, abandoning the current globalist approach.
- Many fear consequences for NATO and other alliances, reshaping the contours of Western influence in a volatile era.
BREAKING: 🇷🇺🇺🇸 Russian President Putin says he is ready to speak with US President-elect Donald Trump. pic.twitter.com/64LbhZeIBE
— BRICS News (@BRICSinfo) November 7, 2024Domestic Consequences
Discussions also touch on how international strategies intertwine with domestic policy.
- Trump voters say his pragmatic approach could free up resources for critical issues at home like the economic crisis.
- Many of these voices are weary of Democrats prioritizing foreign aid at the expense of U.S. citizens.
- Voters portray Trump’s foreign policy as reprioritizing national well-being over foreign entanglements, which resonates strongly with struggling Americans.
Opponents say Trump’s isolationist leanings undermine America's foundational values of supporting global democracy.
- Establishment voices say they worry about a regression to insular policies that neglect humanitarian concerns abroad.
- They voice concerns over wealth inequality, social justice, and threats to marginalized communities which Trump's "America First" agenda may not address.
- Many fear rhetoric emphasizing national interest will sideline essential human rights and social justice issues, both at home and abroad.
JUST IN: @ElonMusk joined President-elect Donald Trump's phone call with Ukraine President Zelensky after the election - Axios
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) November 8, 202410
Nov
-
The 2024 election delivered a historic “red wave,” as Trump and Republican candidates cleaned up with an electoral presidential win, the popular vote, and projections for a majority in the Senate and House.
While conservative circles celebrate this shift, Democratic voters and pundits are reeling from Democrats losing support in almost every state.
Donald Trump gained support in 49 out of 50 states from 2020 to 2024 pic.twitter.com/Jd4O2plEWZ
— America (@america) November 7, 2024Democratic Voters in Shock and Disbelief
The scale of the Republican victory has generated shock among Democratic voters, many of whom anticipated more favorable results based on conventional polling and media reporting.
Voter reactions indicate a profound disconnect within the Democratic base, with discussions centering around disbelief that such a large political shift could take place after Biden’s historic popular vote totals in 2020.
10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) November 7, 2024
#10 - Joe Rogan raises SERIOUS questions about Biden’s “81 million votes” in 2020.
“Look at the difference in how many people voted for Biden in 2020. It's unprecedented! It's way higher than any other time since 2012.”
“Look at where… pic.twitter.com/lUN3lMWZdbSome attribute this wholesale American rejection of Kamala Harris to a cultural shift which the Democratic Party misread. However, the majority of Harris voters largely attribute the loss to “racism," "misogyny," and a resurgent conservatism. Now, many question whether America remains fundamentally center-right, a trend Democratic strategists appear to have underestimated.
Internal Conflict and Critique
There is division over whether Democrats strayed too far from their traditional working-class roots, or Americans are racist and misogynistic.
An increasingly progressive party, some argue, only alienated vital demographics who feel sidelined by elite-focused, urban-driven policies. Discussions show frustration with the party’s focus on identity politics over practical concerns like economic stability, public safety, and personal freedom.
On today's Morning Joe, Scarborough is still trying to square how Kamala Harris lost so bad and was SHOCKED to learn about the high price of groceries.
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) November 7, 2024
Scarborough was floored when a friend told him butter was $3 and he almost fell out of his chair when Mika Brzezinski told him… pic.twitter.com/6MelvWoput- Identity Politics: Many Democrats criticize the party’s emphasis on identity politics (e.g., gender identity and race-based policies), arguing they are detached from the daily realities facing middle America.
- Working-Class Alienation: Voters from blue-collar and Latino communities report feeling condescended to, left out by a party they once identified with but now view as elitist and dismissive.
- Shift in Latino Support: A shift toward Trump among Latino voters in traditionally Democratic regions challenges assumptions that progressive policies resonate universally among minority groups.
Some also point out that Trump gained ground with nearly every voter group besides older voters 65+ and white, college educated women. This again results in either accusations of racism and misogyny or critiques of woke ideologies.
red wave is an understatement pic.twitter.com/oRJkGEYYY6
— ian bremmer (@ianbremmer) November 6, 2024Strategic Failures and Down-Ballot Neglect
Internal critiques extend to strategic missteps that left Democrats vulnerable at both national and local levels. Voters accuse party officials of focusing too narrowly on top-ticket races, abandoning down-ballot races critical for future influence.
- Down-Ballot Neglect: Voters say too many down-ballot seats went uncontested in key areas, contributing to a domino effect that bolstered Republican gains. This lack of attention to local issues, especially in swing states, draws backlash.
- Missed Outreach: Many Democrats say party leadership failed to mobilize working-class voters, particularly losing touch with Teamsters. There is frustration at the party’s seeming disinterest in engaging on local, bread-and-butter issues.
Professor/NYT columnist Tressie McMillian Cottom urges Dems to double down on identity politics "[Trump] tapped into one of the most powerful of American identities, he tapped into white identity...That means you should double down on identities of your base." pic.twitter.com/21jyTKjhMQ
— Alex Christy (@alexchristy17) November 7, 2024Woke Versus Democrat
Democratic voter responses indicate a growing internal division. Left-leaning voters are split between support for and frustration with reactionary movements like the “4B movement,” where liberal women pledge to abstain from relationships with men who supported Trump.
- Movement Backlash: Moderate Democrats say progressive and woke movements are self-defeating, alienating young male voters and many conservative minorities who reject identity politics.
- Conservative Mockery: These reactionary movements have also faced ridicule from conservatives. Particularly the 4B movement, which they say plays into Republican messaging on family values, abstinence, and pro-life advocacy.
- Traditional Democrats: A substantial faction in the party calls for a return to traditional Democratic values over worries about alienating leftist progressives.
Outside observers and those on the right are taking the Democrats’ dramatic loss as a complete rejection of woke politics from the American electorate.
Wokeism is dead.
— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) November 8, 2024
Identity politics is dead.
Virtue-signalling is dead.
Trump’s massive win was a total repudiation of all the far-left’s ‘progressive’ (but actually regressive) crap.
Common sense will now return to a world that had gone nuts, and thank god for that.Election Integrity Worries
Another prominent reaction among Democratic voters centers on suspicions of election irregularities. Some suspect compromised mail-in ballots, voter ID issues, and lost votes are generating may have allowed Republicans to cheat. There are calls for reform, as Democrats grapple with the integrity of the electoral process they once championed.
- Missing Votes: Many view the disparity in voter turnout from 2020 to 2024 as suspicious, raising questions about the missing votes.
- Voter ID and Paper Ballots: In a reversal, some Democrats now call for stricter voter ID laws and paper ballots to ensure election security, a stance traditionally taken by Republicans.
- Perceived Fraud: Numerous comments suggest states Democrats lost correlate with lenient voter ID laws, intensifying voter mistrust and calls for electoral reform.
10
Nov
-
Following the reelection of Donald Trump, Hamas abruptly called for an immediate end to the war. This is a stark contrast from the Aug. 18 rejection when Hamas declined the U.S.’s offer for a ceasefire. MIG Reports data shows online discourse shows continued division on the Middle East.
After Trump Victory, Hamas Calls For ‘Immediate End’ to War https://t.co/1Ir1BwoknJ
— Ainsley Earhardt (@ainsleyearhardt) November 7, 2024Palestine
Conversations about Palestine are intense and frustrated. People are outraged over perceived aggressions against Palestinians in Gaza. Pro-Palestine voices condemn what they describe as Western complicity in enabling aggressive actions through financial and military support. A mix of concern and anger is directed at the United States, which this groups describes as failing to uphold a just stance. Many fear under Trump, pro-Israel policies will further suppress Palestinian voices.
Israel
Discussion of Israel is also polarized, with sentiments divided over Israel’s approach to Gaza and the perceived impact of U.S. support. Supporters view Trump’s reelection as potentially reinforcing Israel’s hardline stance, while critics foresee violent escalation.
Concerns about global antisemitism, particularly highlighted by incidents in Europe, fuel anxiety over a hostile environment for Jewish communities. The refugee crisis also intensifies calls for humanitarian aid, while some criticize media coverage as biased, either neglecting or inflating pro- or anti-Israel narratives.
Reactions to Hamas Calling for Ceasefire
Polarization and Contempt
Pro-Trump voices view his leadership as a return to strong, decisive governance that aligns with Israel. Pro-Palestine activists view his support for Israel as contributing to a worsening humanitarian crisis. The ceasefire call by Hamas draws polarized reactions, with some supporting the move as a necessary pause in violence, while others see it as a manipulative tactic.
National Identity and Strongman Rhetoric
Trump supporters often frame his leadership as a symbol of strength and American resurgence. The conversations illustrate a preference in his base for a U.S. foreign policy that prioritizes Israel’s interests, viewing Trump as the figure who can safeguard American security in alignment with allies like Israel.
Criticism of Democratic Leadership
The Democratic Party, particularly Kamala Harris, faces strong backlash, with accusations of ineffective leadership during the conflict and alienating various Americans invested in Middle East outcomes. This sentiment intertwines with economic dissatisfaction and disenfranchisement among those feeling left behind by current policies.
Calls for Advocacy and Activism
Among progressive voices, there’s a desire to continue advocating for human rights and Palestinian equity. The commentary is often framed as a moral imperative, rejecting pro-Trump policies and calling for sustained mobilization and activism.
🚨 NEW: President-elect Trump views his victory as a resounding mandate to aggressively pursue his agenda, especially after securing the popular vote - CNN
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) November 8, 2024
He is reportedly in a completely different headspace than 2017.
He has also received over a dozen calls from foreign…Critics express concerns about further escalation under Trump, with anxiety around Middle Eastern policy shifts and potential domestic consequences. Those on the left worry about the possible social regression for vulnerable U.S. groups, which they view as racially targeted. This group fears Trump’s foreign and domestic policies might erode social stability.
Sentiment and Trends
- Acidic/Contemptuous (45%): Pro-Israel voices express contempt for Democratic policies, favoring aggressive, nationalistic rhetoric.
- Anxious/Defeatist (30%): On the left, there’s anxiety about societal and international turbulence under Trump, with some fearing regressive policies.
- Activist/Hopeful (25%): Despite the bleak outlook from some, a segment remains hopeful, mobilizing for justice and humanitarian support.
09
Nov
-
The FBI made waves on social media by announcing racist text messages targeting black students. This ignited strong reactions from voters across the political spectrum. The incident elicits different reactions from Republicans and Democrats, each viewing it through a lens of political belief and social priorities.
FBI Statement on Offensive and Racist Text Messageshttps://t.co/vpQYAO6LT7 pic.twitter.com/iDtN36WhX4
— FBI (@FBI) November 7, 2024- Republicans emphasize personal responsibility, downplaying claims of widespread racism as a distraction from pressing issues like the economy.
- Democrats see the messages as evidence of systemic racism and call for reforms to address broader social inequities.
- Independents show mixed reactions, with some expressing frustration at the divisive narratives and calling unity.
Republicans React
On the right, voters largely interpret the reports of racist texts as “woke” overreactions. They are skeptical of racial incidents being given unwarranted attention for political gain. This group says news and federal agencies should focus on more pressing issues.
Many Republicans who already have very low trust in institutions like the FBI question the motivation for investigations. And some, including Rep. Thomas Massie, even jokingly suggest the FBI itself is creating a hoax.
It’s probably y’all sending them. Pack your bags. https://t.co/1EazekPpwI
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) November 8, 2024- Skepticism: 54% of Republicans see the emphasis on these incidents as politically driven. They question the motivations behind amplifying the issue, often viewing it as Democratic leaders “pouncing” to sway public opinion.
- Individual Responsibility: Many Republicans argue incidents like these reflect individual behavior, not an indictment of Republicans writ large. They emphasize personal accountability over sweeping indictments.
- Economic Concerns: 63% of Republicans tie these racial issues to a perceived neglect of bigger issues like the economy. Some see the focus on racial grievances as misdirected energy, diverting attention from unifying issues.
Conservative voters say the Democratic approach to racial issues polarizes rather than unites. They criticize focusing on identity politics at the expense of addressing more substantive issues.
Democrats React
The left sees the text messages as part of a much larger problem of systemic and cultural racism. Their responses emphasize the importance of recognizing and addressing issues in educational institutions and communities, often condemning MAGA supporters as racist.
Let me just say I’m thankful for the texts & the calls, but nothing that I do has ever been about me. The pain that I feel is for “US” collectively, as a World.
— Jasmine Crockett (@JasmineForUS) November 7, 2024
I NEVER like being wrong but I’m praying that I am… the immediate aftermath 👇🏾doesn’t give me much hope, but… pic.twitter.com/GIKTmeM9ct- Outrage: 83% of Democratic responses voice anger toward the incident, demanding immediate action and accountability for those responsible.
- Systemic Hatred: Democrats consistently view incidents like these as symptomatic of systemic racial issues. Many also say it’s representative of Trump voters and those on the right.
- Mobilization: They call for requirements around racial sensitivity and inclusivity, particularly on college campuses. They argue inclusion training is essential to prevent incidents like these and foster equity.
For many Democrats, these reports confirm assumptions that Republicans and conservatives are largely racist. They point to jokes and memes among Republicans as contributing to the problem—including black and gay Republicans making jokes about themselves being “sent to camps” or other tropes.
Independents React
Independents generally express a desire for unity and moderation, but they are torn between the polarized narratives. Some Independents resonate with the Republican emphasis on personal responsibility, while others decry racism.
- Mixed Reactions: Some Independents are frustrated by the grave responses to what they perceive as a troll. Others call for accountability, wary of greater division through racism.
- Local Over National: Many prioritize community-level solutions, such as fostering dialogue and understanding rather than calling for systemic or partisan action.
- Practical Solutions: Some Independents express frustration with both parties, advocating for addressing local needs rather than feeding into national ideological divides.
Themes of Division and Polarization
Both Republican and Democratic voters feel a sense of betrayal but for different reasons. Those on the right accuse the left of amplifying and even fanning the flames of racism, while Democrats cry out against unacceptable and harmful language.
- Narrative Framing: Republican voters view these incidents as overblown to push a divisive agenda, while Democrats interpret them as vital warnings of entrenched national racism.
- Distrust: Voters on both sides express distrust toward opposing party motives. Republicans see this as an attempt to demonize conservatives, while Democrats see Republican resistance as complicit or enabling.
- Irreparable Division: A sense of antagonism adds to the intensity of responses, as each group sees racial issues as symbolic of broader cultural problems.
09
Nov
-
Election fallout continues as Democrats, liberals, progressives, and left-leaning Americans dissect Harris’s loss and assign blame. MIG Reports suggests most blame goes to party leadership, strategic failures, and a growing disconnect Democratic priorities and voter needs. These issues can be summed up as:
- Out of touch with everyday voters' lives
- Too much focus on social issues and identity politics
- Disagreement on core policy issues
Kamala Harris Versus Joe Biden
Much of the Democratic discontent centers on Kamala Harris and Joe Biden accountable for the loss.
- Harris is often perceived as disconnected and ineffective, with many saying she failed to appeal to critical demographics such as progressives and minority groups.
- Biden faces criticism for not stepping aside sooner to allow a potentially more viable candidate to emerge.
Sentiment is especially strong among those who believe the Democratic Party’s existing leadership has become too entrenched in the establishment. There is also a generational divide, with younger progressives openly frustrated by the party's attempt at a centrist approach—one leftists feels is out of touch with pressing voter concerns.
This is not Kamala's fault. At all. And I won't entertain people who think it is. She's the most qualified candidate in history, and y'all still voted for a fascist promising dictatorship. https://t.co/8gxEGh0k68
— Small Screen Girl (@KiraJW) November 6, 2024Fractured Identity Groups
While most conversations focus on domestic issues, some unique perspectives emerge.
- Certain Arab-Americans express dissatisfaction with Harris's stance on foreign issues like Palestine, seeing this as alienating key voter groups.
- The defection of Somali-Americans who endorsed Trump also causes consternation as Democrats discuss hemorrhaging base voters.
- Many also blame Trump’s gain in minorities and female votes, going as far as accusing Latino voters of misogyny.
The View says Latinos are misogynistic and blames them for Kamala’s election loss
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) November 7, 2024
Everyone and everything is to blame except Kamala…. 🤔 pic.twitter.com/y5XJVyLBzbAmid voter disillusionment, a notable subset of progressives expresses resilience, urging continued focus on social justice, climate change, and core Democratic values. This group advocates for a renewed ideological commitment rather than the moderation that many see as an impediment to meaningful change.
Strategy Versus Voter Priorities
Economic concerns dominate discussions about where the party went wrong.
- Many feel Democrats focused too heavily on social issues at the expense of more pressing economic problems.
- Inflation, job security, and cost-of-living repeatedly emerge as voter priorities, highlighting the party’s failure to address middle- and working-class voters.
Criticism of identity politics is a strong theme, with many arguing an overemphasis at the expense of practical issues alienates potential voters. Middle- and working-class voters often adopt this critique, voicing frustration with a strategy that feels decadent.
Information Echo Chambers
Democrats also discuss the role of news and social media in shaping the party’s messaging.
- Many feel social media echo chambers reinforce insular party messaging, deepening polarization rather than broadening appeal.
- Traditional media outlets also face accusations of failing to adequately support the Democratic message.
Some comments claim media coverage was biased toward Trump or neglected the issues that resonate with progressive voters. This frustration with the media indicates the Democratic Party and its voters are experiencing a breakdown in communication.
Generation and Gender Dynamics
There is also a demographic divide when it comes to placing blame.
- Younger Democrats are especially critical of the party’s centrist campaign strategy. They want a progressive approach that distinguishes Democrats from conservatives.
- Many younger voters are disillusioned, viewing Democratic leadership as unwilling to pursue transformative policies that could address systemic inequalities.
- Women, particularly those concerned with abortion rights, highlight the implications of a Trump victory for women.
- They say gender-based messaging failed to emphasize the stakes of a setback for gender equality under Trump.
Generational and gender divides reveal competing priorities and expectations in the Democratic coalition. Disagreements, regardless of cause, highlight the Harris campaign’s failure to unite an increasingly diverse voter base under a cohesive message.
Third-Party Candidates
There is also resentment toward Democratic voters who opted for third-party candidates, blaming "spoilers" who fractured the left-leaning vote.
- Frustration with the lack of unity on the left is exacerbated by lingering disillusionment with the electoral process.
- Allegations of voter fraud or electoral manipulation surface in many discussions, often alongside calls for greater accountability and transparency.
Disaffected Democrats receive blame from the core base, while those disaffected blame the party for straying too far left.
08
Nov
-
Recent reports allege the Harris campaign spent the $1 billion dollars it fundraised, and after only 107 days, ended the campaign with a $20 million debt. This news elicits sharply negative voter reactions.
Reactions point to widespread perceptions of fiscal irresponsibility and elite detachment from American concerns. Voters express thankfulness that Harris lost, fearing such spending habits are indicative of Democratic tendencies with U.S. tax dollars.
Spender Versus Earner
Harris’s spending failures brighten the promises of fiscal conservatism by Trump.
- Financial Accountability: Trump supporters contrast his fiscal conservatism with Harris’s extravagant spending. Many align with his message of spending cuts, small government, and prioritizing taxpayer interests.
- Good for Trump: As the Harris budget deficit fuels perceptions of elitist excess, GOP and Independent voters call for Trump’s straightforward approach to budget efficiency and fiscal responsibility.
- Public and Private: Some point out that Trump’s success in the private sector earning money contrasts sharply with a career politician like Harris who is used to only spending.
Government Disgust
Across voter demographics, reactions indicate a strong sense of distrust and disgust at the Harris campaign’s fiscal management.
- Democrat Finances: Voters are in disbelief at the scale of spending by the Harris campaign, tying it to their criticism of overall government inefficiency.
- Wasting Money: Many see the campaign’s budget handling as emblematic of Democratic financial mismanagement. They say funds are wasted on ineffective initiatives that do not produce results—just like the Harris campaign.
- Incompetence: People criticize Harris’s campaign, linking it to longstanding frustrations with the Biden administration’s economic policy. Voters say budget issues reinforce views of Democratic leadership as fiscally irresponsible.
Disconnected from Voter Reality
The budget revelations come at a particularly tense economic time, with inflation and cost-of-living concerns dominating public sentiment.
- Elite Waste: Americans contrast their financial struggles with the extravagant political spending by elites for celebrity appearances and concerts. They say the billion-dollar fundraising was squandered, producing no benefits.
- Economic Realities: People view Harris’s spending as out-of-touch with economic reality and offensive to families struggling to make ends meet. They say the campaign prioritized campaign optics over reaching out to voters.
The anger and criticism are especially pronounced among working- and middle-class voters. The economic divide between political elites and regular Americans intensifies disgust as people express hope for budget accountability from the coming Trump administration.
08
Nov
-
Gen Z’s response to the 2024 presidential election paints a vivid picture of a generation grappling with disillusionment, skepticism, and a desire for cultural change. Social media discussions reveal how young voters process and articulate their choices, show patterns and perspectives that define this cohort’s political identity.
Frat boys celebrating the landslide win pic.twitter.com/6OuQJSF88b
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) November 7, 2024Disenfranchised vs. Empowered
There is pervasive disenchantment from both major political parties among Gen Z voters. Roughly 30% of comments express disappointment with the current political landscape, feeling alienated by traditional party structures. T
here is a noticeable frustration with the Democratic Party abandoning working-class advocacy. But some Gen Z voters are drawn to the Republican Party’s shift under Trump, viewing it as a new populist and working-class coalition.
Political dissatisfaction underscores a lack of enthusiasm for major political figures, amplifying calls for structural change in the political arena.
Leadership
Trump supporters in this demographic frequently voice desire for strong, decisive leadership. They frame him as a protector of American values, national security, and economic stability. They link his policies with the American Dream and the aspiration of a safer, more secure nation.
Language in this group often exhibits patriotic fervor, expressing loyalty and admiration toward America. Trump is seen as a figure capable of realigning the nation’s priorities to focus on traditional American ideals, creating a sense of vindication and pride.
Despite being the demographic breaking for Harris at the highest rate, Gen Z voters online are voicing pushback against many of the progressive ideals Millennials fought for at their age.
Looks like Gen X delivered the White House to Trump. pic.twitter.com/ANv5Ahssu1
— Philip Klein (@philipaklein) November 6, 2024Fake News
A shared distrust of mainstream media surfaces as a potent unifying theme across both pro-Trump and pro-Harris Gen Z voters. This skepticism stems from collective frustration with media biases and manipulations. Many view mainstream narratives as distortions of reality.
Trump supporters often feel demonized by the media, viewing coverage as subservient to a political agenda. Harris voters feel her media portrayal doesn’t align with the real issues facing their generation.
Distrust has become a rallying point that transcends party lines, as young voters increasingly question the reliability of traditional information sources and media-driven political narratives.
Raging Against the Machine
Anxiety over election integrity drives distrust, appearing frequently in conversations from both sides of the political divide. For Trump supporters, electoral cheating is a common concern, with discussions focusing on alleged malfeasance and voter interference.
Harris supporters express disillusionment with polling and media narratives that, they feel, fail to represent genuine public sentiment. This overlap in skepticism toward institutional reliability suggests a generational shift. Many Gen Z voters voice doubts about the transparency and fairness of the political process.
🗳️ Gen Z Voters: 👍 or 👎 after the election results were announced?
— SIAdvance (@siadvance) November 6, 2024
Here’s what they had to say about it... 🗣️
Let us know your thoughts in the comments, Gen Z’ers. 📲#genz #vote #voters #statenisland #siny pic.twitter.com/xY5DISgo7LIdentity Politics? Okay!
Divides over identity politics and policy emphasis also emerge clearly in these discussions.
Harris voters point to her reliance on identity policies over actionable policies. This sentiment is particularly strong among those who lean progressive but want concrete solutions to pressing issues.
Trump supporters emphasize nationalism and traditional values, viewing Harris’s platform as detached from American identity. The ideological split reveals generational how Gen Z voters prioritize identity and inclusivity versus policy impact and nationalism.
Progressive Tension
A segment of Gen Z shows a complex response to Harris’s background, especially in discussions that merge respect for her identity with criticism of her policies. While some are proud of her accomplishments, they question her leadership, creating tension between valuing diversity and prioritizing competence.
This conflicted view suggests an evolving perspective in progressive circles, where identity is honored yet separated from expectations for impactful governance. These sentiments reflect the delicate balance Gen Z voters face between representation and meaningful action.
08
Nov
-
For a week leading up to the election, MIG Reports data on voter conversations using "nation" versus "country" shows a chasm between conservative and progressive perspectives. While seemingly interchangeable, these terms reveal nuanced divides in how Americans conceptualize identity, values, and the nation’s future.
A Hidden Red Vote?
This divergence in language illustrates the ideological divide in how conservatives and progressives perceive the essence of American identity.
- Conservatives use “nation” as a unified ideal to defend, while “country” serves as a metric by which to judge current policies and governance.
- Progressives invoke “country” in a forward-looking critique, advocating for systemic reform, and view “nation” as a shared moral landscape.
These linguistic choices show distinct value differences and contrasting visions for the future of America. The polarized discourse mirrors growing complexities in American political identity today.
America the “Nation”
Conservatives
- Conservatives frame their language around ideas of tradition, loyalty, and protection.
- They use "nation" as a call to defend a unified American identity and preserve foundational values.
- This perspective includes a tone of urgency, rallying to safeguard the “nation” from cultural or political shifts they see as threats.
- There’s a nostalgic or protective tone, where the “nation” symbolizes an America they believe in.
- Those on the right associate American identity as intrinsic and immutable.
- The word “nation” encapsulates pride and a duty to uphold the sovereignty of America’s founding, often with an implicit expectation of cultural continuity.
Progressives
- Those on the left typically use “nation,” to emphasize a shared moral responsibility rather than a national identity.
- It's used to invoke a cultural identity based on ideology rather than tied to a vision of America as a sovereign nation.
- For progressive, “nation” is a collective aspiration, one that leans toward diversity and equality, rather than geopolitical entity with a certain set of values.
- The progressive use of “nation” often implies targeted language about the people of America within a more globalist worldview.
American the “Country”
Conservatives
- For conservatives, "country" often symbolizes the physical and political entity of the United States—its borders, laws, and governance.
- When they discuss "country," it’s frequently in contexts of sovereignty, security, and economic self-sufficiency.
- The term ties accountability and critique of governance failures, especially threats to American stability, like immigration or foreign policy decisions.
- Conservatives use "country" when discussing what needs defending—a place whose integrity must be protected against the erosion of traditional values.
- The tone is frequently critical when discussing policies that, in their view, compromise national unity or economic vitality.
Progressives
- For progressives, "country" is not only a political or geographic entity—it represents social movement toward DEI and systemic reform.
- The term is often used to critique social and economic policies they feel fail to support marginalized groups or uphold social justice.
- In their discourse, "country" becomes a symbol of an unreached potential, or an America that should be reimagined to serve equity and inclusion.
- Progressives see "country" as a reflection of the nation’s moral and social responsibilities and use it to emphasize the need for systemic changes
- Unlike conservatives, who see it as something to safeguard, progressives speak of "country" in terms of what needs improvement from within.
07
Nov