Prior to Sean “P Diddy” Combs’s arrest, "Nice try, Diddy" began as a humorous meme used to mock him for his relentless self-promotion and involvement in multiple projects. People spammed the phrase in the comments of unrelated posts and ads as a way to sarcastically suggest he was behind everything.

However, after Diddy is facing serious allegations, including sex trafficking, the phrase took on a darker, more critical tone. It now reflects public skepticism and disdain, particularly toward his attempts to maintain a positive public image. Now, people use the phrase to imply a sarcastic disbelief in his sincerity.

MIG Reports analysis shows the phrase “Nice try Diddy” has evolved as a focal point in cultural and political commentary. It symbolizes the public’s sharpened skepticism toward high-profile figures for nefarious, behind-the-curtain acts.

This seemingly lighthearted meme conveys a barbed critique of Diddy’s alleged crimes, contradictions, or hypocrisy. The phrase signals shifting cultural patterns around authenticity, the complex role of celebrity activism, and polarized views among average Americans.

Omg. The woman who was standing by and watching Diddy blackmail and sexually assault men, women and children is now weeping begging you to vote for Kamala Harris. pic.twitter.com/FZYhpjOEJr

— Green Lives Matter (@Ultrafrog17) November 1, 2024

Cynicism and Skepticism

Posts using “Nice try Diddy” convey a powerful skepticism toward establishment and elite figures. It questions their intentions, especially when actions do not match their professed beliefs.

For instance, when celebrities who advocate for social change simultaneously flaunt luxurious lifestyles or engage in contentious politics, audiences often respond with this phrase as a callout of perceived hypocrisy.

This pattern speaks to a cultural climate in which authenticity is increasingly prized. After Diddy’s recent arrest, skepticism toward his actions and potential crimes transform the phrase into a more serious critique, conveying deep distrust and disgust.

Contradictions in Celebrity Activism

"Nice try, Diddy” also reveals the contradictions in celebrity activism, where persona and identity is synonymous with wealth and luxury. When public personalities delve into political or social commentary, especially on issues like inequality or social justice, “Nice try Diddy” becomes a pointed response to hypocrisy.

Diddy's arrest, combined with the ongoing historical lack of transparency on Jeffrey Epstein's client list, the dissonance resonates more deeply. Many Americans question the chances of justice for elites involved in heinous crimes as none seem to face proportional consequences.

Distrust of Political Elites

Discourse around “Nice try Diddy” extends beyond celebrity culture into political polarization, especially regarding figures like Kamala Harris. Supporters and detractors alike use similar expressions to bolster their narratives, framing opposing viewpoints as out-of-touch or disingenuous.

This polarization reinforces political identities, creating a landscape where opposing ideas often seem trivialized, further widening divides. The added layer of Diddy’s recent controversies amplifies the meme’s resonance in polarized circles. The phrase indicates skepticism is growing toward political and cultural elites.

Indicative Cultural and Political Forces

“Nice try Diddy” echoes cultural critiques around the role of celebrities in politics, amplifying widespread frustration with disingenuous narratives from establishment elites.

This discontent fuels a demand for authentic leadership, causing people to rally around candidates and influencers they see as more relatable or “real.” People call for congruence between rhetoric and action, amplified by high-profile figures facing legal and moral scrutiny.

This reinforces the anti-establishment sentiments sweeping through contemporary discourse, which is often manifested in memes and ironic online endeavors.

“Nice try, Diddy” echoes older memes like “Epstein didn’t kill himself,” resonating with public skepticism toward elites protecting themselves. While Diddy is certainly a cultural force, his association with the political class also erodes any significant grasp as a cultural influence.

Overall, “Nice try Diddy” reflects a growing political groundswell where authenticity is non-negotiable, and public accountability extends beyond elected officials to include influential cultural figures.

With his recent allegations casting a long shadow, this phrase underscores a societal shift toward decentralizing authority and demanding accountability and transparency from establishment elites.

The most recent topical conversations online about Trump and Harris continue to show top discussions around:

• Ideologies (culture issues)
• Economic Issues
• Housing
• Border Security
• Security Issues (national security)

While both candidates generate considerable engagement, Trump consistently garners a more favorable perception or, at the very least, a more engaged and vocal base across these topics.

Ideologies

In discussions about cultural issues, Trump has a definitive edge, resonating with voters who prioritize traditional American values. The tone of these conversations reflects a divide between conservative values and progressive policies.

Many view Trump as a defender of American cultural identity against radical changes by the progressive left. Harris supporters are frustrated with “extremism” in the MAGA movement, but this sentiment lacks the intensity seen in Trump’s base.

Trump supporters are energized, framing the ideological battle as one to “save America” from forces they deem un-American. This cultural intensity gives Trump an advantage, as his supporters rally. Harris’s support appears more tempered and defensive in tone.

Economic Issues

Many voters blame their financial struggles with Biden-Harris policies. They point to Trump’s previous term as a period of economic stability and growth. There's frustration with inflation, high gas prices, and a rising cost of living—all blamed on Biden and Harris.

The narrative frequently casts Trump as a solution to these economic woes. Supporters believe his leadership could restore financial stability. Harris defenders attempt to highlight economic improvements, but this narrative seems to lack resonance, especially in light of the recent jobs report.

Trump appears to be “winning” the economic argument. People view his policies as pro-growth and more aligned with middle-class concerns.

Housing

Millions of Americans are also frustrated over housing affordability and rising costs. In these discussions, Trump’s supporters emphasize that his leadership would prioritize Americans over migrants, whom they blame for driving up housing demand and costs.

There is a strong undercurrent of resentment in these conversations, with phrases like “putting Americans first” and “protecting the American dream” often surfacing in support of Trump.

Harris supporters say her proposals for affordable housing and assistance to first-time homebuyers are necessary steps. However, many point out that these programs would likely still benefit illegal immigrants over citizens.

Policy proposals from Harris generate skepticism. This underlying doubt among critics, combined with Trump’s appeal to prioritize Americans, tilts public sentiment toward Trump in the housing debate.

Border Security

Border security consistently shows criticism toward Harris. Americans attribute current immigration challenges to her “open borders” policies. The rhetoric in these discussions often includes references to safety concerns and economic impacts.

Many present Trump as a champion of a strong border and protecting American interests. Harris’s narrative, by contrast, struggles against negativity, with supporters defending her approach as more humane but failing to overcome fears and frustrations.

This intensity of criticism directed at Harris and the frequent calls for a return to Trump’s immigration policies indicate that Trump holds a commanding position on the topic of border security. This is particularly evident in Harris’s messaging, which increasingly echoes Trump’s.

Security Issues

National and foreign security issues are particularly contentious across party lines, with both candidates receiving mixed sentiment. However, Trump’s image as a strong, decisive leader gives him a perceived edge in the public eye. Trump supporters view his approach to foreign relations as promoting peace. People cite things like the Abraham Accords and his handling of adversarial countries as exemplifying his strength.

Harris supporters argue her stance on Ukraine and upholding alliances is necessary for maintaining global stability. However, there is also significant criticism that the Biden-Harris administration fosters global tensions.

Many typically progressive groups are divided on Harris—Particularly regarding Israel-Hamas conflicts. Trump endorsements from Arab Americans and Somali leaders signal some shifts in voter views of American foreign policy.

Many people are discussing the “gender gap” in this election with women largely leaning Harris and men leaning Trump. While many people understand that trends among men and women differ, it remains to be seen how these trends may sway the election results.

MIG Reports data confirms many trends driving male and female voters, their alignment with candidates, and generational trends influencing attitudes.

Male Support for Trump

Most men’s discussions of politics online are supportive of Trump. They say they’re drawn by his economic and national security policies. MIG Reports analysis reveals:

• 61.53% of male voters align with Trump, citing law and order and the economy. They view Trump as reinforcing traditional American values and ensuring stability.
• 38.47% of male voters support Harris, often citing dissatisfaction with Trump’s rhetoric rather than alignment with Harris’s policies.

Female Support for Harris

Female voters, especially those concerned with social equity and healthcare, favor Harris.

• 70.49% of female voters back Harris, praising abortion and gender equity. They see her as defending women’s autonomy and achieving social progress.
• 29.51% of female voters express support for Trump, often driven by economic concerns, which they feel outweigh social policies.

Men Dominate Online Discussions

Online data may not be completely representative as male voices dominate discussions.

• MIG Reports data shows 62.34% of online discussion is among men.
• This higher representation often skews discussions toward economic and national security themes, creating a narrative aligned with Trump’s platform.
• Only 37.66% of the discussions comes from women online.
• The gender disparity reflects broader trends where men dominate discourse on traditional political issues, while engaged women tend to be highly energetic.

Statistics show there are more women in American than men—168 million women versus 165.28 million men. This suggests the full spectrum of female viewpoints is likely not captured exclusively through online voter discussions.

Male Voter Priorities

In online discussions, men say they prioritize economic stability and national security.

Economic Stability

• Inflation, job creation, and taxes are top concerns.
• Many men align with Trump’s promise of fiscal conservatism and deregulation.
• They say Trump’s economic approach offers tangible stability, with sentiments focused on his track record of job creation and pro-business tax policies.

National Security and Immigration

• Male conversations voice anxiety about immigration policy and national security.
• Trump’s approach to border control resonates deeply, with men framing stricter immigration as essential to preserving American sovereignty.

Female Voter Priorities

Women mostly prioritize social equity, abortion, and healthcare.

Abortion and Healthcare

• Women discuss Harris’s pro-abortion platform with passion.
• Following the overturning of Roe v. Wade, many women say their support for Harris reflects a desire to safeguard personal freedoms.
• However, MIG Reports data also shows a growing number of women are willing to prioritize public health and MAHA over abortion.

Social Equity and Climate Change

• Many women are drawn to Harris’s positions on climate change and environmental policy, seeing these as critical to family and future welfare.
• Women focus less on economic strength compared to men, saying they prefer policies that will address systemic inequities.

Younger Voters (Under 30)

• Younger voters, especially women, lean towards progressive issues.
• This age group prioritizes social justice, climate change, and abortion, with strong support for Harris.
• Younger men are more likely to voice anti-establishment sentiment, with economic anxieties often eclipsing party loyalty.
• However, many younger men resonate with Trump’s focus on economic growth as an antidote to inflation.

Middle-Aged Voters (30-50)

• Middle-aged men say economic stability and national security are motivating them, leading many in this group to support Trump.
• These men associate Trump with financial and familial security.
• Middle-aged women see Harris’s healthcare and family welfare policies as preferable.
• They value stability but view it through a lens of economic impact through social policies and feeling reassured rather than economic theory.

Older Voters (50+)

• Older men mostly lean toward Trump, seeing his policies as preserving national strength and security.
• Older women, while concerned with national stability, place a higher emphasis on healthcare access and social welfare policies.
• Many voice preference for Harris’s opposition to Trump and advocacy for progressive social values.

Gender-Based Issues and Voter Engagement

Based on MIG Reports analysis of voter discussions, women likely to show higher turnout at the polls. This is fueled by anger over Roe v. Wade and abortion discussions among Democrats.

Many women see the election as a direct defense of their personal freedoms. Female urgency is evident in passionate discussions around Kamala Harris, whom they see as a champion for these rights.

Men are also engaged strongly in political discussions but indicate a mix of motivations to vote. Issues like gun rights and immigration also tend to feature prominently in male discussions, overshadowing the more interpersonal issues highlighted by women.

Energy levels suggest women are slightly more energized compared to men. Female commenters express a profound commitment to change, speaking out against Trump and calling to resist authoritarianism.

Men often express support in more practical and less emotional terms. The disparate energy level in discourse could suggest turnout differences. However, this remains to be seen if men choose to vote, while remaining at a lower baseline for emotional intensity.

On Oct 30, former Mayor of University Park, MD, was arrested for owning copious amounts of child porn—including child sexual abuse material known as CSAM. MIG Reports data shows social media reactions to this event are outraged but ultimately apathetic.

Discussions have sporadically emerged across social media due to this high-profile case and a general climate of social unease regarding children’s safety. However, discussion remains relatively low compared to other topics.

While some voices rally for significant reform, most conversations reveal a public wary of sustained engagement on such dark issues. Within the existing dialogue, there is deeply negative sentiment and an undercurrent of apathy. This suggests, while Americans are concerned, they are reluctant to face these tragic and sensitive issues head-on.

This despicable “man” and former mayor of University Park, Maryland, was arrested with more than 45,000 files related to child pornography and charged with 28 felonies.

Joel Biermann (D) is a huge Kamala supporter and detractor of Trump. We need to protect our kids. pic.twitter.com/85kiWWRzKD

— Jessica O’Donnell 🏈 (@heckyessica) October 30, 2024

Discussions are Low

Although child exploitation and safety represent pressing concerns, general discussion levels on these topics are notably low.

MIG Reports data shows conversations directly addressing issues like CSAM, child trafficking, and systemic child protection flaws only constitute 2-15% of overall discourse.

The sparse nature of these discussions, especially considering the severity of the topic, suggests people are uncomfortable discussing it. When instances of exploitation surface, there are brief moments of public outcry, but discussions quickly lose momentum. Sadly, most are overshadowed by other trending topics or national political events.

Overwhelmingly Negative Sentiment

When child protection issues do garner attention, the reactions are profoundly negative. Public reactions often reflect feelings of frustration, anger, and betrayal, with people expressing disillusionment in both government and societal responses.

Sentiment analysis indicates a score as low as -0.6 on a scale from -1 to 1, revealing the depth of negativity. Americans are unhappy with how institutions address, or fail to address, child exploitation issues.

The negative tone is consistent, highlighting a strong belief that current systems and officials are falling short in their duty to protect the vulnerable. Comments frequently call out inaction, corruption, and a lack of accountability. They urgently want reform, which many feel is either ignored or deflected by those in power.

Apathy and Superficial Concern

Perhaps the most telling aspect of the discourse is a pervasive sense of apathy, paired with what many describe as a superficial or surface-level concern for children’s safety. While some voices advocate passionately for change, the majority of responses suggest a resigned, almost cynical view of societal priorities.

Many people appear skeptical that the heightened emotions surrounding cases of child exploitation will lead to lasting change. This sentiment points to a belief that public outcry has become performative—high in rhetoric but lacking depth and action.

This "surface-level" engagement reflects a societal malaise, where the public is increasingly resigned to viewing these issues as intractable, with little hope for meaningful improvement.

Campaign fervor is cresting just days prior to the election and MIG Reports data shows non-Trump partisans—liberals and Democrats—are leaning into performative outrage. Using dramatic language, hyperbolic expressions, and a repeated emphasis on extreme descriptors, this group is expressing high emotion.

Some do articulate reasonable concerns over some of Trump’s policies and potential influence. A substantial portion of liberals also seem to genuinely believe the outrage, calling Trump a fascist. However, much of the discourse skews toward performative expressions, crafted to amplify emotional resonance and foster a unified group identity.

Ana Kasparian clashes with Cenk Uygur on Trump, arguing that he isn't a “fascist” and the Democrat Party misrepresents him.

Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/RPvzniKyge

— AF Post (@AFpost) November 1, 2024

Performative Elements in Language

The language deployed across these conversations frequently borders on theatrical.

• Terms such as “fascist,” “Hitler,” and “authoritarian” are common, imbuing Trump with a villainous aura that aligns with familiar tropes.
• Critics frame him as an antagonist in a moral and political struggle.
• Despite the existence of other authoritarian leaders like Pol Pot, Josef Stalin, Augusto Pinochet, Hitler is only parallel most use to depict Trump.
• The lexicon signals a collective identity that rallies around shared anxieties and moral judgments.
• Embellished phrases like “end of democracy” or “chaos in America,” tap into a performative mode designed less to analyze and more to evoke.
• The prevalence of these dramatized expressions suggests the intent is to stir reactions—likes, comments, and shares.

The tone of many online posts shows stylized indignation. Common keywords like “garbage,” “disgrace,” and “complete disaster” create an atmosphere that leans heavily on hyperbole to drive points home.

Much of the discourse can be categorized as “outrage posting,” where media and influencers exaggerate language to amplify emotional responses.

Outrage as a Mobilization Tool

The performative outrage often functions as a mobilization tool.

• Posts pushing extreme discontent or alarmist tones are among the most engaging, with metrics indicating hyperbolic statements significantly boost reactions.
• The performative nature serves as a rallying call, mobilizing users by constructing Trump as a political opponent and existential threat.
• Posts often use an urgent tone, calling for action or moral imperatives that encourage followers to align with the collective response.
• Recurring terms include, “protect democracy” or “save America,” tapping into a mythology of resistance and survival.

Heightened rhetoric on both sides shapes voter responses, promoting a sense of duty among followers. The performative outrage is often a coordinated effort to convert emotional reactions into tangible support for the broader progressive agenda.

🚨 Warning - heavy TDS: Before my flight, this woman put her middle finger up at me. I ignored it.

After the flight, she walked by me before I could record and screamed that I was a “facist”. Here is the rest of the interaction: #TDS #5days pic.twitter.com/ra5zAa2OCv

— Melissa Robey (@Robey2020) October 31, 2024

Genuine Concern vs. Amplified Rhetoric

Certain topics, such as healthcare, education, and climate change, are discussed with less sensationalism and more emphasis on practical consequences. The language shifts subtly to discuss policies or potential impacts, emphasizing marginalized groups and vulnerable communities.

Moments of sincerity suggest that while performative outrage dominates, there is a genuine core that fuels these discussions, reflecting real fears and apprehensions among progressives.

However, the performative aspect tends to overshadow genuine concerns due to rage bait engagement. This dynamic suggests the structure of social media itself, with its emphasis on engagement metrics, incentivizes users to use a hyperbolic style.

Outrage as the New Norm

Progressive conversations about Donald Trump are contentious and emotional. The use of exaggerated language, dramatized fears, and repeated calls to action suggest the discourse operates primarily to elicit reactions, reinforce group identity, and galvanize support. Genuine concerns do exist, particularly on specific policy issues, yet they are often subsumed within the larger spectacle of outrage.

Language analysis suggests discourse is disproportionately hyperbolic compared to real, normal life. However, it’s also possible to conclude that many anti-Trump voters who exhibit what some call “TDS” (Trump Derangement Syndrome), are genuinely disturbed. There are also growing discussions about mental health, anxiety, depression, and anger tied to political fears.

American feelings about their wallets are dismal, with constant discussions about the economy, inflation, and housing prices. There is unrelenting frustration and discontent with voters online as people tie the direction of the country to dissatisfaction with Biden and Harris. They want change, strained by daily financial pressures and perceptions of governmental inadequacy.

🚨 CNN ANALYST: Just 28% of Americans think the U.S. is on the right track. The incumbent party usually loses when that number nears 25%, and wins when it is near 42%. This is a bad sign for Kamala Harris. pic.twitter.com/tCbXkPLihD

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) October 4, 2024

Can’t Afford a Home

Americans are dismayed over unaffordable living costs, tying these issues to political decisions and low housing supply—due in part to the massive influx of illegal immigrants.

Voters particularly critique policies in urban areas where prices are highest. The government's focus on broader political rivalries over actionable housing solutions angers Americans struggling to live comfortably.

Many say illegal immigration is exacerbating housing scarcity, calling for leaders to prioritize Americans. Voters want American citizens to benefit from housing initiatives instead of "overly accommodating" migrant populations.

🚨🚨🚨Tim Walz Approved an Immigrant Down-payment Assistance Program in Minnesota.🚨🚨🚨 SAME NGO that used Oregon tax dollars to give 30k to undocumented migrants.

The Minnesota CDC, similar to Hacienda CDC of Oregon, will cap down-payment assistance at 32k for first-generation… pic.twitter.com/RwICfEq3RO

— Breeauna Sagdal (@Breeauna9) October 31, 2024

Biden-Harris Didn’t Pan Out

Inflation is another focal point, with significant distress over soaring costs for essentials like food, housing, and energy. While some view the Inflation Reduction Act as a win for affordable healthcare, most perceive it as insufficient in the face of steep price increases.

Biden-Harris economic policies are largely under scrutiny, with critics linking the current inflationary environment directly to their policies. Voters suggest socialistic-leaning policies are hurting market forces.

Trump supporters juxtapose their financial situations today with the more successful Trump-era economic strategies. They want stability and lower inflation, even if they don’t like Trump for other reasons.

Left Behind

Economic issues as a whole encapsulate voter dissatisfaction. People discuss the allocation of federal funds and government spending priorities as hurting Americans.

Many citizens express disbelief over the amount of aid directed toward international conflicts, like Ukraine, while domestic needs are ignored. They voice frustration over high living costs and federal funds disproportionately benefiting illegal aliens. This stokes resentment around issues like entitlement sustainability and local infrastructure.

Voters critique the Biden-Harris administration's lack of transparency and responsiveness, with calls for policies that genuinely support the middle class. Social media discussions often echo Trump’s calls to shift from income tax to tariffs as a way to alleviate the working class's financial burden.

This level of economic unease indicates that Americans are dissatisfied and highly motivated as they consider alternative policy directions for the nation’s financial future.

In the final week before Election Day, there is a growing wave of discontent and frustration directed at Kamala Harris and Joe Biden. Many Americans are angry, betrayed, and skeptical of the political establishments. Momentum changes emphasize the growing disconnect between voters and the ruling class.

Themes of economic struggle, political distrust, and desire for strong, decisive leadership dominate the discourse. Recent polling shows Trump leading significantly in battleground states among voters who have not previously voted. This suggests enthusiasm among Republicans is high, and perhaps not so much among Democrats.

#NEW BATTLEGROUND STATES poll

Voters who have voted in...
🔵 '22/'24 primaries: Harris+3
🟡 '22, not primaries: Tie
🔴 '20 general election only: Trump+12
🔴 No voting record: Trump+19

NYT/Siena | PA/MI/WI/AZ/GA/NC

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) October 31, 2024

The Language of Anger

The language voters use is impassioned and confrontational, often with strong and colorful language, signaling more than passive dissatisfaction—but a call to action.

• People use phrases like “it’s time to wake up America” and “we’re being lied to,” going beyond mere disappointment.
• The tone suggests readiness, even a demand for mobilization, among those who believe a leadership change can restore the values and stability of America.

“Y’all need to go back to Ukraine & get my f***king money back”

Americans are getting angrier by the day as they continue to wake up. In fact it’s not just the US, but the entire Western World. pic.twitter.com/ZeGSrV7LA2

— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) October 11, 2024

Betrayal, Hypocrisy, and Urgency

Social media posts reveal a sense of betrayal and abandonment, as Americans feel deceived by political promises that remain unfulfilled.

• The language is direct, frequently harsh, and often laced with urgency—“it’s time to turn the page” or “we need change now.”
• Voters criticize Democrats for the failures of the last four years on the economy, border security, and social grievances.
• Words like “liars,” “garbage,” and “incompetent” permeate discussions, suggesting leaders are disconnected from everyday \working Americans.

Economic Disillusionment

Economic concerns are consistently a top priority.

• Discussions of inflation, wage stagnation, and rising living costs frustrate voters who feel neglected by policies they see as ineffective.
• Americans describe their struggles with affording bills, job stability, and housing—often blaming problems on failed leadership and out-of-touch policies.
• Sentiments such as “nothing has been fixed” and “the economy is in shambles” reveal a working-class who feel abandoned.

"Inflation has cooled, but people are still seething over prices," per WSJ.

"People find it unsettling that price tags don't look like they did before inflation took off during the pandemic, surging to the highest level in four decades."

— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) October 31, 2024

Anti-Establishment Fervor

A clear preference for Donald Trump is largely driven by anti-establishment ire. Voters view him as a counter to the inadequacies and corruption in the political class.

• Trump is often depicted as the antidote to systemic incompetence and political stagnation.
• Supporters view him as capable of restoring stability, strength, and decisiveness.
• Americans want a leader who can break the cycle of unfulfilled promises and ineffective governance, hoping to reform entrenched and powerful institutions.
• For many, Trump represents a sense of hope that resonates deeply with those feeling left behind.

Fear about Election Integrity

Following from the 2020 election, there is now persistent skepticism about the integrity of electoral processes.

• Voters on social media voice concerns about disenfranchisement, fraud, and dishonesty.
• Many have doubts about whether elections are truly representative or if they are, in fact, manipulated to favor the establishment.
• This distrust bolsters the desire for new leadership, with voters clamoring for transparency and reform to secure a system they can trust.

Oops!!! ABC somehow has the final results of the election in Pennsylvania, but there isn’t any cheating, and the media isn’t biased or anything. pic.twitter.com/C56NACylUB

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) October 31, 2024

After multiple days of mainstream media coverage of Tony Hinchcliffe’s Puerto Rico joke at Trump’s MSG rally, Joe Biden stole the news cycle by calling Trump supporters “garbage.” This led to Trump’s meme-like arrival in Green Bay on a garbage truck. All this dramatic and joke-driven controversy overshadowed Kamala Harris’s major rally speech at the Ellipse in D.C.

Sometimes the Democrat elite tell us what they really think of us. Hillary Clinton thinks we are “deplorables”. Joe Biden thinks we are “garbage.” Kamala Harris thinks we are so stupid as to believe her lies.

We deserve better. Vote Trump pic.twitter.com/cwEBnGSbLj

— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) October 30, 2024

Voter reactions show how each candidate’s strategic choices and surrogate impact are shaping the final days of the campaign.

• Prior to Joe Biden’s comment, Harris was leading Trump in national sentiment as news coverage slammed the MSG rally.
• After Biden’s “garbage” comment and Trump’s subsequent garbage truck stunt, public sentiment in swing states and nationally swung in Trump’s favor.
• In the national race, Trump maintains a support lead with 53% support to Harris’s 44%.

Harris at the Ellipse vs. Biden’s “Garbage”

Closing Arguments

Kamala Harris’s Ellipse rally drew an impressive crowd, reportedly reaching 75,000 attendees—a notable turnout for any candidate. Her message centered on anti-Trump rhetoric, January 6, calls for unity, and even, again cribbing from Trump, claims that a Harris administration would implement deportations for illegal immigrants.

Vice Pres. Harris addresses voters from the Ellipse, where then-Pres. Donald Trump gave Jan. 6 speech.

“He is the person who stood at this very spot nearly four years ago and sent an armed mob to the United States Capitol." https://t.co/ruQEQkjaUQ pic.twitter.com/MwPeAE9Ubb

— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) October 29, 2024

The speech resonated with her base, eliciting positive responses. However, the message alone fell flat with most Americans, including the pro-Palestine segment of Democratic voters.

Unfortunately, the content alone was not the downfall of Harris’s closing argument for presidential office. In the midst of her rally, Joe Biden was on camera making comments that swiftly took over the news cycle.

Biden’s “Garbage” Comment

Biden’s comment calling Trump supporters “garbage” flooded online conversation and news coverage. The episode drew outrage among conservatives who viewed it as another example of disdain from Democratic elites, causing team Biden to issue a clarification. The Washington Post helped with damage control.

Earlier today I referred to the hateful rhetoric about Puerto Rico spewed by Trump's supporter at his Madison Square Garden rally as garbage—which is the only word I can think of to describe it. His demonization of Latinos is unconscionable. That's all I meant to say. The…

— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) October 30, 2024

However, the controversy escalated when mainstream media and even the White House transcript began to spin the remark, claiming he wasn't referring to all Trump supporters. Discussion volumes around Biden vastly overshadowed Harris’s rally, adding fuel to the fire for those decrying Democrats over hypocrisy.

BREAKING: Rep @EliseStefanik sent a scorching letter to the White House Counsel demanding they correctly quote Biden's "garbage" comment after the official WH transcript EDITED it to cover for Biden.

They may have BROKEN THE LAW.

The WH is trying to rewrite history. This is… pic.twitter.com/EZEMTTkv0K

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) October 30, 2024

Losing the Spotlight

MIG Reports data shows 70% of conversations following the incident focused on Biden’s remark compared to only 30% discussing Harris’s speech and rally.

Conservatives

• Trump supporters are quick to point out the hypocrisy of Democrats and the media.
• They say those who claimed to be scandalized by a Puerto Rico joke were too quick to dismiss Biden’s comment.
• Many MAGA voters also embrace the label, calling for Trump to make use of the comment by working a garbage route.

Independent Discontent

• Moderates and Independents largely voice disappointment in Biden’s tone.
• They say it’s yet another instance of divisive rhetoric in politics, which contradicts Harris’s attempt at a unity message.
• Independents are disillusioned with the rhetoric on both sides of the aisle, but many recognize the incongruence of media coverage.

Trump’s Garbageman Meme

Adding insult to injury for Harris, who lost the news cycle, Trump arrived at his Green Bay rally wearing a reflective orange vest and riding a garbage truck. Social media erupted with commentary, making viral photos and clips of Trump into memes and jokes at the expense of Biden and Harris.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: "How do you like my garbage truck? This truck is in honor of Kamala and Joe Biden." pic.twitter.com/7UwMZ8syvx

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 30, 2024

Trump’s tongue-in-cheek and unapologetic style energizes his base. Embracing the garbage meme, Trump appeals to everyday, working-class Americans as refreshingly down-to-earth. He also took the time to sincerely assure Americans that they are not garbage.

President Trump is about to get off Trump Force One…and head over to the MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN Garbage Truck here in Wisconsin… pic.twitter.com/XpqvRFqgJv

— Dan Scavino Jr.🇺🇸🦅 (@DanScavino) October 30, 2024

Internal Biden-Harris Conflict?

The Biden-Harris relationship has also become a focal point of discussion across voter groups, with each side interpreting this dynamic differently. Many speculate that, behind closed doors, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have a rocky relationship where, intentionally or inadvertently, Biden ends up damaging her with his public comments.

Even among those who do not believe there is animosity between the two, most agree that Biden is not helping Harris on the campaign trail. This was once again demonstrated by confusion and disgust at images of Biden biting babies at the White House Halloween Party.

President Trump is mingling with garbage men at his rally in Wisconsin.

Meanwhile, Joe Biden is literally BITING BABIES at the White House Halloween Party.

WTF IS THIS TIMELINE? pic.twitter.com/wYIzsDjxDt

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) October 31, 2024

Republican Criticism

• GOP voters see Harris as complicit in Biden’s failures, viewing her as an ineffective extension of his administration.
• Many Republicans speculate about bad blood between the two, suggesting Biden may be intentionally undermining her.

Unenthusiastic Democrats

• While Democrats acknowledge Harris’s historic role, there is significant tension within the party.
• The base voices frustration over Harris's ineffectiveness both as VP and on the campaign trail.
• There are also questions about the division she causes among different groups like Muslims and black men.

Independent Ambivalence

• For Independents, Harris’s visibility compared to Biden raises questions about leadership within the administration.
• Many express sentiments suggesting Americans have “forgotten that Biden is president.”
• This group wants an action-oriented administration, and the perceived lack of coordination among Democrats is causing some to reconsider their support.

Reactions to Kamala Harris’s closing pitch in Washington, D.C. were tepid. There are significant obstacles for her, with criticism and skepticism largely overshadowing positive responses.

I am in Kamala Harris’s Ellipse rally crowd in D.C., and her whole crowd is angry pro-Hamas voters chanting “Intifada Revolution.” A Kamala victory means all these “lovely” people standing behind me will be coming to “protest” in your town. President Trump is the only one with… pic.twitter.com/xNg3Jl6ilb

— Charles R Downs (@TheCharlesDowns) October 29, 2024

Voter Sentiment

• Sentiment toward Harris’s closing pitch skews heavily negative, with approximately 70% of comments expressing critical perspectives on her message and policies.
• While some supportive voices resonate with her emphasis on democratic values, the dominant tone is critical.
• Primary criticisms focus on issues like immigration, corruption, and perceived leadership failings, and her lack of support for Palestine.

Independents

• Around 82-85% of Independents express skepticism or opposition to Harris’s messaging.
• Many Independents are frustrated with her approach to the border, seeing her policies as disconnected from their concerns.
• Americans perceive her as out of touch with citizen needs, viewing her focus on unity and democracy as insufficient to address immediate crises.
• Only 15-18% expressed support, typically referencing her work for marginalized communities, though this support was notably less intense than the criticisms.

Language Patterns

The language on social media is charged and polarized. Key negative phrases—such as “inept,” “failure,” and “delusional”—paint a picture of Harris as lacking the capacity to address critical issues.

Negative terms related to immigration and law enforcement, like “open borders” and “corrupt judges,” further intensify the critical narrative, as commenters often challenge her ability to lead on pressing national issues.

Supportive language, though less frequent, often contains “democracy,” “freedom,” and “hope,” portraying Harris as an advocate for marginalized groups. However, this positive language is overshadowed by the stronger negative critiques.

Independents

Language among Independents reflects heightened skepticism, often using vivid and direct critiques of Harris’s policies. Terms like “open borders” and “draining Social Security” capture the most common concerns.

The rhetoric suggests Independents view her priorities as misaligned, prioritizing illegal migrants over American citizens. Other terms like “defund the police” and “intifada” reveal an intense reaction to what they see as her radical policies. Many protesters, even in her own base, are furious about Harris’s support for Israel.

Just a few seconds in and Kamala's already getting drowned out by sirens. pic.twitter.com/Fype2ThqP2

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 29, 2024

Convincing Undecided Voters

Harris’s narrative, focused on unity and social justice, struggles to resonate with undecided voters. They voice distrust and anger in response to her closing message.

The dominant critique from undecided voters is the disconnect between her rhetoric and American priorities. They say her messaging lacks the substance needed to sway them. Keywords like “inefficiency” and “self-seeking” further emphasize a view of Harris as unable to address critical issues convincingly.

Critiques often emphasize Harris's lack of authenticity, with terms like “pandering” and “lip service” describing her message. Harris’s focus on unity falls flat in the wake of divisive rhetoric from Harris and, during her closing speech, from Joe Biden.

Shriveling Enthusiasm

Any enthusiasm generated by her closing pitch is modest and likely unable to counterbalance the significant opposition. Supporters rallying behind her message are literally drowned out by protests from angry Democratic voters and disillusioned Independents. Many Americans view her policies as radical and impractical.

Independents say her closing pitch leaves them feeling disconnected rather than energized. There is a sense of disenchantment rather than engagement. Harris’s efforts to invoke pride or urgency appear largely ineffective, particularly overshadowed by Joe Biden’s comments calling Trump supporters “garbage.