Articles
-
President-elect Trump announced the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) with Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to lead, lighting a fire of discussion online. DOGE’s purpose is to root out waste and inefficiency from federal operations, with promises from Musk to enact swift change within the first year and half of the new administration.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 13, 2024
Musk also promises transparency and public participation in spending audits, aiming to bring a business-like discipline to the federal government. MIG Reports data shows DOGE’s mission resonates strongly with a populist voter base eager for streamlined governance and an end to bureaucratic excess.
Transparency and Accountability
For many conservative and populist voters, the concept of DOGE is a breath of fresh air, promising a level of government transparency and public involvement that Washington elites have long resisted. Musk’s promise to post all DOGE activities online sparks enthusiasm, particularly among those who despise wasteful government spending.
All actions of the Department of Government Efficiency will be posted online for maximum transparency.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 13, 2024
Anytime the public thinks we are cutting something important or not cutting something wasteful, just let us know!
We will also have a leaderboard for most insanely dumb… https://t.co/1c0bAlxmY0- Online Transparency: Many Americans believe Musk’s transparency strategy will empower them to hold budgets accountable and push back against bloat. This resonates with conservatives who often view government as self-serving.
- Disgust at Federal Spending: Voters point to excessive and pointless spending as a major drain on taxpayer resources. They are hopeful that disastrous initiatives like the Biden administration’s rural broadband project can be destroyed.
Disdain for D.C. Elites
MIG Reports data shows:
- 82% of Republican voters are dissatisfied with current government spending.
- 75% express strong support for Musk and Ramaswamy's roles within DOGE.
- 48% of comments cite specific examples of government wasting taxpayer dollars to emphasize their frustration.
DOGE supporters voice strong anti-establishment sentiment, criticizing the D.C. elite class which appears both insulated from and indifferent to the challenges they face. Social media reactions are filled with disdain for the swamp—officials, lobbyists, think tank analysts, and contractors who have long profited from federal inefficiency.
There are probably 100,000+ people in the greater DC area in the government sphere - govt employees, lawyers, lobbyists, think tanks, and NGO grifters - who are now worried about losing their jobs.
— John LeFevre (@JohnLeFevre) November 13, 2024
They’ve got fat mortgages, Mercedes payments, club memberships, and school fees… pic.twitter.com/UhoojN3589- Frustration with Elites: Voters resent the lifestyle of D.C. insiders, who they see as preserving their own privileges over addressing public concerns. This sentiment is especially strong among those who feel abandoned by establishment figures in both parties who “grift” in Washington elite circles.
- Hopes for Real Change: Average Americans are hopeful about cutting useless spending, foreign aid, and unnecessary projects. However, many are skeptical of how much progress DOGE can make with limited time and as an unofficial department.
The populist versus elite divide in politics seems to be growing, pitting the political class, the legacy media, and many of the ultra-rich against the people. DOGE is a symbol for challenging the old guard, though Musk is drawing sharp criticism from elites about using his power and wealth against the establishment.
Establishment Resistance
While DOGE excites many voters, the response from establishment figures and moderates is mixed. Some worry Musk and Ramaswamy’s “transparency revolution” may be more of a political maneuver than a meaningful reform.
- Qualification Objections: Critics say the initiative’s success requires seasoned political professionals, not tech or business executives. Establishment GOP figures question whether Musk understands the complexities of federal bureaucracy.
- Government Stability: D.C. elites also fear radical cuts and that increased transparency could destabilize essential government functions. Concerns about mismanagement and overreach echo through establishment circles.
- Fear of Job Cuts: Thousands of government employees, lobbyists, and contractors fear DOGE is a direct threat to their livelihoods. Comments show anxiety over job security and resentment, claiming DOGE unfairly targets D.C.’s professional class.
GOP Divisions
Reactions to DOGE highlight the stark contrast between MAGA Republicans and establishment sympathizers. The populist wing of the party demands a major “cleaning out” and “swamp draining,” while RINOs argue for a more measured approach.
- MAGA is Anti-Elite: The new "America First” GOP despises bureaucracy, viewing DOGE as an affirmation of Trump’s promise to drain the swamp. However, intra-party disagreements are already under way with the Senate voting Sen. John Thune as Senate majority leader instead of populist pick Rick Scott.
- Calls for Realignment: Many voters are setting expectations for major overhauls and changes with a Republican House and Senate. They urge the administration to act swiftly, within the limited timeframe before 2026 midterm elections.
Democratic Critiques
MIG Reports data shows:
- 80% of Democratic voters disapprove, saying DOGE may be a façade for partisan interests.
- 60% are critical of Musk's appointment, citing concerns about corporate influence.
Reactions from the Democratic establishment are similar to those of the GOP establishment. Democrats criticize the concept of DOGE, questioning both the motives and feasibility of the initiative.
Democratic voices in Congress, as well as prominent figures in media and academia, have expressed concerns over its realistic implementation. They say it’s an unserious endeavor which will produce little or no results.
- Fear of Privatization: Many Democrats see DOGE as a thinly veiled attempt to privatize essential government functions. They worry cutting “wasteful spending” could endanger critical social programs that serve vulnerable populations.
- Distrust of Business Mindsets: Appointees Musk and Ramaswamy, both known for their tech and entrepreneurial backgrounds, also raise alarm among Democrats. They see a business-led approach to government reform as conflicting with governmental accountability and public service mandates.
14
Nov
-
Democratic voters are reacting to Kamala Harris's presidential defeat and discussions about her relationship with Joe Biden. Online, there are growing divides within the party regarding who is to blame, leadership decisions, and strategic missteps.
Much of the discourse centers on President Joe Biden and his short remaining time in office. Many are speculating about the health of his relationships behind the scenes and implications for party unity.
SHE'S GONNA MISS PETER!!!😂😂😂 pic.twitter.com/J0uQtkyvdp
— il Donaldo Trumpo (@PapiTrumpo) November 13, 2024Biden Blocks Kamala’s Path
Some Democrats attribute Harris's loss to Biden’s lack of effective leadership and failure to fully support her candidacy. They repeatedly express disappointment, describing Biden as lacking the proactive support to secure a win.
Refusing to place blame on Harris herself, they say things like "he could have done more" or "he didn’t take the lead." These discussions attempt to frame the loss as due to Biden’s missed campaign opportunities or not stepping down soon enough.
For the record this was meant to be The Art of Losing: Kamala Harris, but I wavered on it and eventually decided to leave her out of the headline. Whatever her flaws may be, Biden put her in an unprecedentedly difficult situation. https://t.co/EB1TJbXmbB
— ettingermentum (@ettingermentum) November 2, 2024Harris is Ineffective
Though many blame Biden, others include Harris as a focal point of criticism, though in smaller numbers. MIG Reports analysis shows nearly half of discussions blame Biden, while around 25% include Harris in the blame.
Those who blame her say Harris "didn’t connect with the base" and was "not the right choice," for a party coronation. Creating continuity with her failed 2020 presidential bid, voters question her electability and effectiveness. Harris’s public perception emphasizes the disconnect between party leadership and the perspectives of the voter base.
The remaining 25% of the discourse critiques the Democratic Party's overall strategy, with calls for a complete overhaul of its approach. Comments such as "we need to rethink our approach" reveal frustration with the party's failed vision. Some contrast this with a more cohesive strategy they attribute to Republicans.
Living in the Past
While blame dominates much of the conversation, a smaller segment of Democrats defends Biden. They emphasize his stabilizing influence and achievements in a challenging environment
Supporters say things like, "Biden has done the best he can under the circumstances," framing him as a steady leader. However, even within these defenses, there is an implicit acknowledgment of unmet expectations. Voters grapple with their support for Biden’s legacy against the reality of the party’s recent loss.
...Maybe It’s Us?
Broader systemic concerns surface as well, pointing to issues like gerrymandering and voter disenfranchisement. These conversations present election failures as caused by structural problems rather than individual shortcomings.
There are calls advocating for comprehensive reform to address these systemic challenges in the party. Discussions use emotional language and personal pronouns, as individuals express feelings of betrayal, disappointment, and personal responsibility.
14
Nov
-
The GOP has managed to maintain control of the House, energizing the voter base as they call for a strong "America First" agenda. Many view this control, combined with regaining the Senate majority, as a crucial opportunity to make Trump’s second term highly impactful.
Republicans emphasize loyalty to conservative ideals and a tangible alignment with figures like Rick Scott, who they see as fighting the establishment. With control of both the executive and legislative branches, voters expect concrete results in the first two years.
The Republicans have secured the trifecta, with Trump set to begin his interrupted second presidential term alongside GOP control of both the House and Senate. Unlike in 2016, Trump will start with a more unified Republican leadership—one less inclined to work with Democrats to…
— Quantus Insights (@QuantusInsights) November 11, 2024Party Accountability
MAGA voters want accountability and transparency in GOP leadership. They are particularly vocal about the need for leaders who are openly committed to their cause. Some also demand transparent voting processes and ending secret ballots in leadership decisions.
This demand for visibility speaks to a sense of vigilance among voters. Republicans wish to ensure their representatives are held accountable and act in alignment with the principles that secured them the House.
There is also vocal frustration with establishment “RINOs” (Republicans in name only). Many express dissatisfaction with figures who don’t uphold MAGA’s America First agenda. Voters want strong advocates who do not cave to Democratic pressure, and many say they plan to primary anyone who fails to meet expectations.
Looking for Strength
Among Republicans, there’s a sense of social and political alienation. Some are apprehensive about displaying their support for GOP causes, fearing backlash from opposing factions.
This caution in the electorate spurs voters’ resolve to support leaders who will boldly counter societal pressures and “woke” influences. They want greater transparency, advocacy for a clear conservative agenda, and unity of action among GOP representatives.
MAGA’s Moment
Trump voters are motivated by both aspiration and urgency. Many see the GOP’s House control as an essential leverage point, allowing them to influence a broader conservative agenda and safeguard their values within the political landscape.
Following huge election victories, GOP voters are politically engaged but also intent on shaping the party's path. They are committed to solidifying conservative principles and advancing a vision for the country that resonates with traditional values.
13
Nov
-
Democratic voter discourse around Kamala Harris’s $1 billion campaign spending spree is fraught. Conversation about the staggering expenditure reflects disillusionment in the party. Democrats are frustrated by what they perceive as a misalignment between party leadership and the working-class electorate it claims to represent.
After Harris spent $1 billion dollars only to perform worse than Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden voters say:
- Campaign spending is symbolic of current party flaws
- Leaders refuse to embrace the base
- They expect no fix anytime soon
Many also wonder how they managed to spend $1 billion in just a few months.
we are so fucked pic.twitter.com/sHyYfObmST
— Corinne Green (@gaynarcan) September 8, 2024The Hits Keep Coming
The calls for accountability in response to Harris’s campaign spending demand party leaders own up to their mismanagement. Voters view Democratic leaders as unwilling or unable to address the concerns of the base around issues that matter to working Americans.
Voters want accountability and meaningful change, saying the party risks further alienating an already disillusioned base. The sentiment resonates with recent critiques of the Democratic National Committee’s campaign strategies and its perceived corporate alignment. Many believe the party has dismissed voters and sacrificed grassroots connections in favor of top-down establishment protections.
Broke Beats Woke
Democratic voters hope for reforms that prioritize everyday issues like healthcare, housing, and economic stability. Many highlight the disconnect between party priorities and the economic struggles of the middle and lower classes, demonstrated by the spending mentality in the Harris campaign.
Americans are concerned about rising living costs, housing affordability, and Democrats’ failure to address inflation concerns. Some Democrats feel the party’s focus on identity politics has worsened division, detracting from core issues that resonate with a broader swath of voters. Voters want to return to unifying messaging that bridges ideological divides rather than emphasizes them.
🇺🇸 Kamala Harris's team reportedly spent the following:
— Remarks (@remarks) November 9, 2024
• Oprah: $1m
• Concerts: $20m
• Influencers: $4m
• Call Her Daddy set: $100k
The campaign ended $20 million in debt, after raising over $1 billion. pic.twitter.com/ZhlCpO4wnGLeft Behind
Some Democrats are questioning their loyalty to the Democratic Party in the wake of Harris’s disastrous campaign. Explicit statements from voters expressing their intent to leave the party capture the severity of disillusionment.
Voters say things like, “I’m done with the Democratic Party” to emphasize their disengagement. Many describe feeling “betrayed” and “disappointed,” over the party abandoning its prior unifying values of supporting the working class.
Disillusionment comes with nostalgia for a time when Democratic policies more directly aligned with the needs of average Americans instead of catering to elites and protecting establishment enclaves.
13
Nov
-
President-elect Trump is already changing sentiment tides on the border, just a week after being elected. For most of 2024, polling showed upwards of 75% of voters viewed the border as either a serious threat or a crisis.
CBS POLL: 75% of Americans "see the situation at the U.S./Mexico border as either a 'crisis' or a 'very serious situation'" — a "notable increase" from previous surveys pic.twitter.com/uumUM0gCQs
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) January 7, 2024Following Trump’s win, sentiment immediately improved—particularly with news of new leadership and promises of deportation. Americans on the left and the right demand secure borders and national sovereignty, though some leftist Democrats still object to Republican border plans.
- Since November 5, border and immigration sentiment has increased, reaching the high 40% range.
- MIG Reports data also shows sentiment toward Biden’s DHS secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on a consistent decline to 41% in the days after the election.
- A slight bump in Mayorkas’s sentiment over the weekend is due to celebrations over his imminent departure from DHS.
The Immediate Trump Effect
A distinct mood change has been evident in the first few days since Trump’s victory. Voters, especially Republicans, express confidence that a Trump 2.0 administration will address longstanding border issues.
Voters regularly say things like, “More has been accomplished in 72 hours than in the previous 3 1/2 years.” Trump’s pick of former acting ICE director Tom Homan as Border Czar fuels excitement and optimism. Border Patrol and ICE agents who were constrained for years, now feel empowered to enforce policies effectively.
Rapid Mood Change
- Border Patrol and ICE agents report a “total 180” shift in morale, with many expressing renewed hope in their ability to fulfill their duties.
- The morale boost comes from Trump’s victory, and Homan’s leadership, which are both seen as positive for immigration enforcement.
Republicans Versus Democrats
- Around 80% of Republicans voice support for Trump’s immigration plans, emphasizing mass deportations and border wall completion.
- Democrats are less vocal as only 20% are commenting. Those who are engaging in the discussion express concern about the humanitarian impact of stricter policies.
Immediate public perception shifts show the early impacts of Trump’s win are already evident. Voters are eager to improve border enforcement for several key reasons.
Key Issues Voters Want Addressed
Migrant Caravans being discouraged and even disbanded are a positive for voters. Many view reports that caravans are dissolving as a concrete result of Trump’s tough image. Voters see stopping caravans as symbolic of regained control of the U.S. border.
Mass Deportation is still high on the list of things voters want. Enthusiasm for mass deportations is high, particularly among those who link illegal immigration to crime and economic strain. Voters hope deportation will be a cornerstone of Trump’s immigration agenda, especially for illegals who commit crimes once inside the U.S.
Prioritizing Public Resources is a common refrain among Republicans. They say taxpayer funds should prioritize American citizens over illegal immigrants. Many advocate reallocating resources to benefit veterans and citizens in need, instead of providing aid to people who should not be here.
Job Market Benefits are another expectation for securing the border. Many say a reduced strain on social services and less job competitions will create more opportunities for American workers. People point out that most of the job growth under Biden-Harris benefitted foreign-born workers.
Sanctuary City Policies remain a focal point for Trump supporters. They view migrant sanctuaries as a roadblock to federal enforcement. With the new administration, voters expect stricter immigration policy alignment nationwide, overriding local policies that protect illegal immigrants and enforcing federal policies.
New Leadership in Tom Homan and speculations about North Dakota Governor Kristi Noem replacing Alejandro Mayorkas as DHS secretary spark discussion. Voters want strong leaders who will take decisive action to shore up the border and combat Democratic influence.
Mood Shift and Enthusiasm
Empowered Law Enforcement for Border Patrol and ICE agents under Trump 2.0 generates excitement and energy. Many agents, previously constrained by restrictive policies, are reportedly “ecstatic to go to work,” ready to act without Biden-Harris limitations tying their hands.
Killing "Woke" Policies drives hope for shifting away from progressive open border policies. Americans want a return to past norms where national sovereignty and citizen protection take priority over globalist and progressive immigration ideals.
Law and Order emphasis under Trump brings relief to voters who see current Democratic policies as detrimental to American communities. Voters believe Trump can stop increased crime among illegal immigrants and restore the rule of law.
Crime and Trafficking connected to illegal immigration also motivates voters. An open border is often synonymous with increased violent crime, drug trafficking, and gang activity. Voters point to problems like those in Aurora, Colorado, as exemplifying the need for anti-gang and anti-cartel border enforcement.
Partisan Divides cause friction between Republicans who are celebrating renewed border security and Democrats who fear mass deportations could lead to human rights abuses. Despite an overwhelming majority of Americans supporting strict borders, Democrats continue to oppose Trump’s policies—many of which were standard under Obama.
NEW: @ScottJenningsKY takes CNN panel to school by dropping some simple facts about deportations:
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) November 12, 2024
“It’s overwhelmingly popular. Everybody is trying to make this controversial. This is not controversial. Presidents always deport people."
"Barack Obama deported 3 million people.… pic.twitter.com/ZXOjWpJdlp13
Nov
-
The discourse among Trump supporters following his reelection shows a movement united in ideology, collective identity, and anticipation for America's future. Trump voters share an “America First” vision, intertwined with defiant optimism, a clear “us versus them” mentality, and a blend of humor and seriousness.
The one that sent Marines to go die in Iraq for feminism
— Josiah Lippincott (@jlippincott_) November 7, 2024The Friend or Enemy Distinction
MAGA voters discuss the distinction between their allies and adversaries.
They see Democrats, the media, and federal institutions as forces that actively threaten their values, freedoms, and way of life. This mentality transcends simple political disagreement, portraying adversaries as existential foes.
For many, Trump’s win is a political victory and a vindication of their beliefs, reinforcing a sense of justified distrust toward the establishment. They say compromise is neither feasible nor desirable—instead, conservatives advocate for resolute action to restore and protect their America.
Optimism and Policy Aspirations
Republicans widely express hope and enthusiasm for the changes they believe Trump’s leadership will bring. This optimism is shown in discussion of immediate positive signs, like market highs and favorable international developments in Ukraine and the Middle East.
Trump’s second term is seen as a catalyst for economic prosperity, strengthened national security, and a cultural return to traditional values. People mention specific policies and improvements, like tax cuts and deregulation, they hope will improve their personal well-being.
Conservatives want tangible benefits that will affirm his leadership and leave a legacy for the party. Even as some voice caution about policy execution, this tempered outlook only reinforces hope for a prosperous and strengthened America.
Reminder that the GOP was a party on life support after Bush, McCain, and Romney.
— Lucky (@TheMagaHulk) November 8, 2024
It was a party that appealed to no one but rich donors who wanted endless wars and unfettered immigration.
Trump rebranded the Republican Party as one of nationalism and populism, and now we're… https://t.co/gfKZL2AtHLIdentity and Patriotism
The MAGA movement’s sense of community is rising in online discussion. There is a shared network of beliefs and mutual recognition which creates a sense of belonging. For many, supporting Trump is a reaffirmation of identity, patriotism, and collective purpose.
There is an almost familial environment, where expressions of gratitude and pride in the community amplify the movement's cohesion. This coalition views the mission as welcoming anyone aligned with America-First principles. The movement shares in an identity that unifies against progressive cultural and ideological opposition.
Fun Times (Sorta)
While most conversations use humor and memes, there are many aspects to the discussion. Around 30% of Trump supporters want meaningful debate with their ideological opponents. There are sincere with the attempts to “red pill” Trump detractors and bring people together. Two other patterns emerge:
- Mockery of the left
- Using humor and memes to express defiance and community bonds
These trends may demonstrate how MAGA will react over time as the second Trump administration draws more vitriol from political opposition.
Calls for Action and Accountability
Amid this optimism and camaraderie, a strong call for accountability punctuates the narrative. Supporters want to see adversaries face repercussions, with proposals for policy changes and legal actions against political opponents.
This readiness for swift, decisive measures reflects a sense of urgency and a lack of patience for gradual reform. Trump’s second term, for many, represents an opportunity to correct past wrongs. They want a robust, proactive approach. Accountability is framed as a moral imperative—one that upholds justice and reaffirms American values.
No appeal to universal human concerns can compete with Trump's use of the friend/enemy distinction. Trump supporters are not just pushing back against liberal excesses. They like the way he demonizes and dehumanizes his enemies: the illegal alien occupiers (migrants) and the... https://t.co/CDrIhlmp4Y
— D.W. Lafferty (@rightscholar) November 11, 202412
Nov
-
Leftists on social media are talking about anti-Trump Americans leaving the United States prior to his second presidency. Discussions are a multifaceted web of identity, belonging, authoritarian fear, disillusionment, and economic anxiety—intertwined with individual and communal expressions of distress.
Many who are complaining mention their perceptions of American values eroding nationwide, sparking concerns over identity and belonging. Many describe feeling disconnected from a national identity they once resonated with but now find alien. They view the political landscape appears increasingly hostile to their beliefs.
Statements like “I’m seriously considering leaving” reflect a reckoning among leftists, where the desire to is a physical relocation and symbolic rejection of an America they see as departing from democratic and progressive ideals.
Man dressed up as a woman says he can’t live in the US under Trump so he’s moving back to Australia.
— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) November 7, 2024
He put on lipstick to make this historic announcement. pic.twitter.com/nFsHW1w7hCTrue Belief in the Second Coming of Hitler
Fear of authoritarianism and fascism dominates these discussions, with progressives envisioning Trump as an existential threat to personal freedoms and civil rights. They often refer to Trump as akin to Hitler, calling his supporters racists, misogynists, and fascists.
They say things like, “I won’t stay under this regime” with visceral urgency. Among this group, emigration is a defense against the potential for oppressive governance. Fears are not isolated but collectively felt, amplified by social media.
Leftists find solace and validation in shared anxieties. They feel leaving is not just an escape but a protective measure against an anticipated erosion of democratic norms.
Virtue Signals in an Echo Chamber
There is also economic and social anxiety, as many express concerns about Trump exacerbating economic inequality, deteriorating social policies, and making healthcare unreliable.
Those on the left express a sense of vulnerability regarding the perceived socioeconomic regressions that a Trump administration will impose. Phrases like “I won’t suffer through another four years of this” reveal an underlying apprehension that cuts across personal and societal dimensions.
For some, leaving the country is a decision driven by ideological and material concerns, amplifying their sense that America may no longer offer stability or security.
A Lump Sum
A striking element in these discussions is the concept of “collective departure,” or leaving as a communal protest against a Trump regime. Those who share this sentiment are bound by shared fears and frustrations.
There is a sense of community and solidarity in the idea of abandoning a country that seems to threaten authoritarianism. Progressives say things like, “We’re planning our exit strategy” or “A group of us are looking into moving out together.” In this way, leaving is a unified response to a disillusioning political reality.
Social media’s role in creating these communal spaces magnifies the sentiment, fostering a sense of solidarity among those who feel estranged.
Oh shit. He won.
— 𓄂Pew (@PewOrPew) November 6, 2024
Anyone wanna check back on those “if Trump wins I’m going to kill myself” posts? pic.twitter.com/fBCD84M3V312
Nov
-
Trump’s 2024 presidential win is rapidly shifting expectations and realities across many sectors—including cryptocurrency. Crypto markets are surging to new highs, crossing $85,000 for the first time at the start of the week.
BREAKING: $85,000 #Bitcoin NEW ALL TIME HIGH 💥🚀 pic.twitter.com/ZkqhrytriY
— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) November 11, 2024Now, the crypto community is discussing the potential longer-term impacts of a second Trump administration, including market movements, regulation, and a strategic Bitcoin reserve.
You might want to buy Bitcoin. pic.twitter.com/mEjFNOACgm
— Altcoin Daily (@AltcoinDailyio) November 6, 2024Crypto Voter Reactions
MIG Reports data shows:
- 70% want policies reducing government oversight in financial innovations.
- 65% of crypto voters are optimistic about a Trump administration’s impact on digital assets.
- 60% express hope for clearer regulations that protect rather than restrict crypto.
- 50% criticize legacy media’s portrayal of crypto and its neglect of blockchain’s benefits.
- 55% believe a Harris administration would have introduced unfavorable crypto policies.
Bitcoin Highs and Market Optimism
Almost immediately after Trump’s win, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies pumped, spurring discussions around:
- All-time highs: Bitcoin reached multiple new all-time highs following Trump’s victory, mirroring record gains in traditional stock markets.
- Increased trading volume: Trading volumes across major cryptocurrencies surged, reflecting renewed investor interest and perceived market stability.
This price movement isn’t the only reason to be bullish in crypto community—it’s symbolic of future positive movement. Many say the surge signals a political optimism toward decentralized finance, rejecting traditional financial systems which are over-regulated and restrictive.
Trump’s recent history of embracing crypto and making promises the community supports increases market optimism. Crypto voters who supported Trump are eager to see what his administration brings in the way of crypto regulation clarity and preventing a CBDC.
Enthusiasm and Policy Optimism
Beyond price pumps, the tone in the crypto community is optimistic about Trump’s impact on the industry.
Regulatory Relief
Many expect Trump to support less restrictive policies, anticipating an administration that leans into free-market principles. They want:
- Broader institutional adoption of cryptocurrencies.
- Greater regulatory clarity, particularly in navigating securities laws and tax regulations.
- Policy measures that prioritize financial innovation over governmental oversight.
Strategic Bitcoin Reserve
Crypto voters are excited about Trump’s promise to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve as a safeguard against broader economic uncertainties. They view this as strengthening the U.S. economically and positioning it as a global crypto leader. Many are growing more positive about having J.D. Vance in the administration, considering his history in venture capital and crypto-related tech industries.
Global Relations and Market Confidence
The community voices excitement about Trump’s relationships with foreign leaders, especially with countries like Russia and China. They believe a Trump administration could reduce international tensions, creating a stable environment for investment that directly benefits cryptocurrency markets.
Contrast with Harris
Many are relieved to have avoided a Harris administration, which would likely have leaned toward regulatory intervention. Voters speculate a Harris presidency would have dampened crypto enthusiasm through heavier restrictions and oversight on digital assets.
Overall, crypto voters view Bitcoin’s post-election rise as a financial victory and part of a larger paradigm shift toward decentralized finance. They see crypto assets as increasingly vital in a landscape where traditional financial systems are perceived as vulnerable to external pressures.
Geopolitical and Economic Signals
A bull market in crypto and traditional markets is also influenced by anticipated changes in global dynamics. Investors view Trump’s assertive foreign policy as a stabilizing force—one that fosters economic confidence beyond U.S. borders.
Global Stability Expectations
Trump's win coincides with immediate signals of reduced international tensions. His approach to foreign policy, which prioritizes economic interests, offers a sense of reassurance regarding:
- Dissolving migrant caravans at the border, which voters see as moving toward controlling immigration.
- Potential peace overtures with Russia, China, and the Middle East, likely to stabilize global markets and benefit U.S.-aligned economic interests.
Shift in Energy and Trade Dynamics
Comments in the crypto community suggest energy self-sufficiency and the move away from reliance on adversarial energy sources (e.g., Russian gas) could reinforce economic independence—an essential condition for a flourishing crypto market reliant on stable, decentralized finance.
Projections for Crypto Under Trump
While immediate data points reveal optimism, crypto voters also discuss their future hopes for crypto under Trum:
- Long-term market growth: If Trump’s administration delivers on regulatory relief, crypto investors expect prolonged growth for digital assets, with Bitcoin likely testing new highs. Trump’s anti-establishment stance, combined with crypto’s decentralized appeal, stokes enthusiasm.
- Institutional adoption: With a stable political climate, more traditional financial institutions may enter the crypto space. Banks and investment firms could see Trump’s policies as a green light for incorporating digital assets into portfolios, leading to higher market penetration.
- Global integration: Trump’s foreign policy approach, if it promotes energy independence and stable trade relations, could make the U.S. an appealing hub for crypto. Increased international cooperation could facilitate smoother cross-border crypto transactions, enhancing the legitimacy of digital finance worldwide.
12
Nov
-
Rumors and reports are beginning to swirl about Trump’s transition team and incoming cabinet appointments. Republican voters and influencers are already voicing strong reactions to potential picks.
MIG Reports data shows a mix of hope and skepticism about Trump’s second term. MAGA Republicans voice support for an “America First” agenda and frustration with establishment influences.
Appointment Discussions
As discussions and announcement ramp up, Republicans are reacting to various names attached to cabinet positions.
Sen. Rick Scott
I’m committed to getting President Trump’s nominees confirmed by the Senate immediately.
— Rick Scott (@ScottforFlorida) November 11, 2024
Democrats will do everything they can to stonewall the Trump agenda, and we need a Senate Majority Leader who will fight to get it done. pic.twitter.com/4QwU97Fc4rFlorida Senator Rick Scott is discussed as a favorite for Senate Majority Leader. MAGA voters view him as a strong ally for advancing Trump’s legislative priorities in Congress, as opposed to Sen. John Thune or Sen. John Cornyn, who many strongly associate with establishment Republicans.
🚨WOW!
— 🇺🇸Jessica🇺🇸 (@Jessica_4_Trump) November 11, 2024
According to The Heritage Foundation’s conservative voting record scorecard, Sen. Rick Scott has a 95% lifetime score, while Thune and Cornyn have 62 and 64%.
No wonder the Swamp is doing everything in its power to keep Rick Scott from becoming Senate Majority Leader👇 pic.twitter.com/qeOssBL7EbTom Homan
As the former acting ICE director, Tom Homan is a widely anticipated choice for “Border Czar,” tasked with overseeing immigration enforcement. His reputation for tough immigration policies aligns well with Trump’s strict border stance. Many are discussing his appointment as important for national security and border integrity.
Ladies and gentlemen, your new Border Czar, Tom Homan.
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) November 11, 2024
Let’s go!! pic.twitter.com/ELV9BBX7NORep. Elise Stefanik
Known for her strong pro-Israel stance and strong MAGA alignment, New York Rep. Stefanik gains favor among conservatives as Trump's pick for U.N. Ambassador. Her stance on foreign policy aligns closely with Trump's vision of robust U.S. leadership abroad.
🚨 #BREAKING: Rep. Elise Stefanik has ACCEPTED Trump’s offer for US Ambassador to the United Nations, per NYP
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) November 11, 2024
This admin is going to be STACKED! 🔥 pic.twitter.com/zQiMz92FVSStephen Miller
As an architect of Trump’s initial immigration policies, Stephen Miller’s influence on Trump's hardline stance is unmistakable. Recent reports naming him as Trump’s deputy chief of staff for policy generate positive discussion among MAGA voters. His reentry is a strong indication that Trump aims to revive the rigorous policies of his first term.
NEW: Donald Trump is expected to announce Stephen Miller as his deputy chief of staff for policy, according to CNN.
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) November 11, 2024
Miller is a strong advocate for a secure border and has repeatedly called for mass deportations.
Miller says he hopes to see deportations increase by 10x to over… pic.twitter.com/9gSFO7vcXcElon Musk
Many conservatives view Elon Musk as a positive influence in Trump's administration, particularly in tech, energy independence, and government efficiency. Musk’s outspoken positions on free speech and resistance to regulatory constraints align with Trump’s anti-bureaucratic vision. Trump and Elons’ public discussions about a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), generates excitement in the base.
Washington DC swamp creatures trying to join the @realDonaldTrump administration right now 🤣🤣 pic.twitter.com/K3vJ6byDwy
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 9, 2024Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
RFK Jr. has gained some traction among conservatives for his skepticism of government health policies. His anti-establishment views resonate with Trump’s base, and many anticipate his involvement in the administration to push the MAHA movement.
America First Agenda
Supporters expect Trump’s team to double down on "America First,” particularly regarding border security, economic protectionism, and domestic deregulation. MAGA backers see these choices as necessary to address long-standing grievances, from the woke policies they say erode traditional values to rectifying illegal immigration.
Symbolic Wins and Quick Changes
Following Trump’s election, reports are beginning to flow on early victories, such as:
- Migrant caravans reportedly being dismantled at the southern border, reflecting hopes for a stricter immigration policy.
- Key figures from Trump’s first administration, like ICE veteran Tom Homan as “Border Czar,” being appointed to address the border.
- International relations being shored up swiftly and imminently in places like Ukraine and the Middle East.
- A sharp rise in the stock market and crypto, which many Republicans attribute to market confidence in Trump’s policies.
These developments heighten anticipation among GOP voters for quick, decisive policy shifts under Trump’s new team.
Distrust of the GOP Establishment
While Trump loyalists express enthusiasm, there is also clear distrust toward what Republicans label the “establishment” wing of the party.
Opposition to RINOs
Many Republicans are wary of RINOs being involved in the administration, mentioning Senators John Thune and John Cornyn by name. Voters see them as potential obstacles to the agenda they envision. Establishment figures are perceived as out of touch with Trump’s grassroots supporters, and many express relief at Trump’s announcement that neither Mike Pompeo nor Nikki Haley will be involved in the administration.
I was proud to work with President Trump defending America at the United Nations. I wish him, and all who serve, great success in moving us forward to a stronger, safer America over the next four years. pic.twitter.com/6PhWN6xn1B
— Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) November 10, 2024Republican voters express frustration with GOP leaders willing to work with Democrats on issues like immigration reform. This sentiment reinforces calls for an “all-in” approach that prioritizes conservative values over bipartisan solutions.
MAGA Appointments
GOP voices are increasingly rallying around figures like Senator Rick Scott for Senate Majority Leader and other MAGA names being floated for various positions. Some also mention Kash Patel for CIA Director, saying he would be integral to challenging the deep state.
The “America First” segment of Republicans celebrate Susie Wiles being named Trump’s Chief of Staff, hoping Trump’s second term will finally “drain the swamp.”
Susie Wiles is great pic.twitter.com/h56f2LIn6d
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 8, 2024A Vision for the Administration
Within discussions of Trump’s new administration and position appointments, Republicans are talking about top-priority issues.
- Strict Immigration: Voters want immediate action on mass deportations, completion of the border wall, and robust enforcement measures.
- An “America First” Economy: MAGA supports reinstating tariffs, limiting foreign dependencies, deregulating industries, and fostering domestic energy independence to strengthen the U.S. economy and create jobs.
- Combating Woke Culture: Conservatives are adamant about fighting back against progressive social policies, particularly related to gender and education. They expect appointees to uphold the people’s vote to kill woke ideology.
- Ending Federal Bureaucracy: Voters want Trump to dismantle the deep state, especially in intelligence, law enforcement, corrupt courts, and healthcare agencies.
- Strengthening Alliances: There is a focus on pro-Israel foreign policy, reasserting U.S. interests abroad, and settling foreign conflict.
- Cutting Federal Spending: Voters want to prioritize fiscal conservatism through spending cuts, reduced taxes, and targeting wasteful government programs that burden taxpayers.
11
Nov