On the 80th Anniversary of D-Day, illegal aliens organized a protest in New York City, blocked traffic and demanded Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) be abolished. MIG Reports analysis of American reactions shows unified disapproval.
The dominant sentiment Americans express is one of concern about uncontrolled illegal immigration. There are many comments highlighting issues of human trafficking and drug cartels. There is criticism of both Republican and Democrat politicians. Voters blame various representatives for damaging immigration policies, whether through inaction or misguided action.
The online conversation often includes derogatory and offensive remarks towards some politicians, demonstrating a high level of emotional intensity and strong political polarization on the border.
For instance, comments directed at politicians like Lauren Boebert and Ilhan Omar ranged from personal attacks to demands for expulsion or deportation. This hostility signals a high degree of controversy and animosity on the U.S. border crisis.
There is also a lot of mocking in online conversations as voters accuse certain representatives of hypocrisy or lack of effectiveness. The sentiment towards open borders is highly negative, with many expressing concerns about national security and maintaining the rule of law.
It seems most unhappy rhetoric comes from conservative-leaning individuals. They consistently express negative sentiment toward the border as a political issue, mentioning crime, border security, and national sovereignty. However, most Americans seem to have some anger or mockery and generally don't support the current border situation. This suggest that additional demographic groups share overall disapproval on border issues, but with different perspectives and emphasis than conservatives.
Recently, Infowars owner Alex Jones took steps to liquidate his assets to pay legal damages. These costs were money he owes victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook school massacre. The original court-ordered payment totaled approximately $1.5 billion.
Online reactions to possibility of Alex Jones being forced to sell Infowars are contentions, dividing people along political lines. The debate largely revolves around certain keywords and phrases like the "deep state,” "globalism,” “freedom of speech,” “the Biden administration,” and “MAGA.”
Deep State
Sentiment toward the deep state is predominantly negative and critical of:
The deep state is often blamed for negative events. People believe the deep state is a clandestine network within the government manipulating national affairs.
Media and politicians burying the Hunter Biden laptop story during the 2020 election is frequently cited as evidence of deep state action.
People express worry over perceived threats to free speech by the deep state. This is frequently mentioned in refences to Alex Jones and Infowars.
Infowars viewers suggest Jones being forced to sell his platform could be a coordinated attack by the deep state.
There is strong support for the MAGA movement, indicating a large conservative presence within these discussions.
A main theme in discussions is an “us versus them” attitude, suggesting strong distrust and suspicion towards government institutions and mainstream media.
Discussion and Sentiment Analysis
As people discuss the situation with Alex Jones and the potential loss of Infowars, there are several discussion and sentiment trends:
There is a pervasive sense of dissatisfaction and anger among Jones supporters.
Many people frequently use terms like "uniparty," highlighting a distrust in both political parties which people view as colluding against conservative interests.
There is specific dissatisfaction with Republican representatives for failing to uphold conservative values.
People are calling for action from figures like Rep. Marjorie Tayler-Greene and Speaker Mike Johnson, albeit with skepticism about their effectiveness.
Many conversations mention people like Steve Bannon, indicating a link between personal grievances and larger political events.
There is a desire for grassroots mobilization and resistance, with MAGA supporters viewed as a counterforce to perceived political wrongdoings.
Despite an overall negative sentiment, are also optimistic calls for concrete action to address perceived injustices against Jones, Bannon, Trump, and other conservative figures. Among the dissatisfaction and disillusionment, there's a hint of rallying and a call for tangible action.
The newest Star Wars franchise release called “The Acolyte” premiered to resounding love and admiration from those promoting the film. However, there was also dismissal and sharp disapproval from the viewing audience.
MIG Reports analysis of conversations about the show reveals negative sentiments, primarily about wokeness in contemporary culture. There is evident discontent and outrage among many American on this topic. They express disappointment with changes to traditional stories, claiming they have been altered to suit a woke agenda.
Most people associate wokeness with political correctness, social justice efforts, DEI, or liberal ideology. There are calls to boycott Disney and streaming platforms, or simply refusing to watch the series in objection to forced inclusiveness and diversity.
Several media outlets gave the series high scores, reviews, and other accolades. But most consumers and Star Wars fans imposed precipitously low ratings and reviews on the show.
A lot of viewers are also rekindling criticism of The Acolyte’s protagonist Amandla Stenberg, who made controversial remarks in 2018. At the time, she said, "The goal was the upset white people." This drew indignation, resentment, and accusations that Stenberg promotes racism. The voices resurrecting Stenberg’s comments voice opposition to what they call "liberal" or "leftist" narratives. Many in this group are parents or Star Wars fans with conservative viewpoints.
There is also spirited debate about individual freedom and the right to express one's opinions. People emphasize the importance of free speech and bemoan what they perceive as restrictions imposed by woke culture on individual expression.
Some Americans characterize themselves as victims of aggressive leftist agendas, expressing fear and concern about traditional values deteriorating and the erasure of history. They also draw parallels between current socio-political trends and historical societal collapses.
Additionally, there is robust criticism of Democrats, with comments equating the party's policies with communism and predicting a possible civil war due to ideological disparities. They also believe the left would refuse to allow a peaceful separation, if things come to that. Many in this group dismisses Joe Biden’s left leaning administration and a call to save America in upcoming elections.
A video went viral which claimed President Joe Biden may have soiled himself during the 80th Anniversary of D-Day in France. Other videos showed First Lady Jill Biden swiftly leading the president away while French President Macron thanked veterans.
MIG Reports analysis of social media commentary shows different interpretations of what Joe Biden was doing in the video, like many of his well-publicized gaffes. Most of the online speculation is based on unverified rumors and has not been officially confirmed or denied by any credible sources.
Because online discussion is so fractured, it's difficult to discern a majority consensus on whether people actually believe Biden experienced such an embarrassing mishap as incontinence. The political nature of conversations about president and his questionable cognition, as well as the overall mockery and humorous tones of social media make people’s true beliefs somewhat opaque.
Most Americans seem to believe the claim that Biden soiled his pants and take it as an opportunity to fuel political debate and criticisms. Many openly ridicule Biden with profane language and derisive commentary. Some Biden defenders dismiss the claim, but only citing their reasons as emphasizing more serious issues like the necessity to impeach Biden.
Despite rampant online memeing and speculations, no official denials have been made by White House officials.
Discussion and Sentiment Trends
There is an undeniable presence of derisive rhetoric from Biden's detractors. They use phrases like "poopy pants" and "filled his adult diaper" when talking about the video. Some insinuate Biden's inability to control bodily functions is evidence of weakness or mental decline.
On the other hand, some dismiss the accusations as baseless and criticize those who spread such rumors. They emphasize a lack of concrete evidence for the claim, pushing back against unfounded speculations. They emphasize other issues they believe should take precedence over personal ridicule, like impeachment inquiries and political wrongdoings.
Alternative Analysis
Some media outlets reported the incident as simply a momentary lapse in judgement. They say the president thought there was a chair behind him. Additional reporting from liberal blogs and op-eds crafted stories to shift away from the viral mockery, such as “Joe Biden Didn’t Poop Himself But These Celebs Did.” Other outlets had body language experts weigh in.
Overall distrust in liberal and mainstream media suggests Americans who believe Biden’s senior moment was more embarrassing than searching for a missing chair would not be swayed by media spin.
Vice President Kamala Harris recently appeared on Jimmy Kimmel Live and made waves with her comments about former president Trump’s conviction. Among other things, the VP said, “The reality is, cheaters don’t like getting caught,” referring to Trump and implying he cheated in the 2016 election.
Many Americans took her comments as an admission that continued prosecutions against Trump are politically motivated and retributive. Much of the response displays contempt and dissatisfaction towards her and Joe Biden's administration with accusations of lying, weakening the country, and serving their own self-interests — a common sentiment when the Vice President speaks publicly.
While conservatives reacted negatively to Harris’s comments about Trump and liberals cheered, pro-Palestine protesters overshadowed the conversation. Video emerged on social media showing protesters interrupting the Jimmy Kimmel Live taping to shout at Harris saying, “Stop the genocide” and “15,000 children dead because of you.”
Most of the reactions to the video are from progressive Democrats who agree with the protesters or conservatives who enjoy the hilarity of Democrat infighting.
What People Are Saying About Harris on Kimmel
Conversations about the VP’s late night TV appearance predominantly disapprove. Conservatives and Trump supporters are critical of Harris's statements and liberals dislike her actions regarding Israel.
People argue over Trump’s conviction, Biden's potential corruption, the Biden-Harris Administration's current policies, and questions about their allegiance towards America. Anti-Trump conversation skews more positively towards Harris's remarks. This group says Trump was found guilty by a jury of his peers and the trial was a necessary measure ensuring justice is served.
Usually liberals, those agreeing with Harris frame the conviction as the consequence for breaking the law and claim nobody is above the law. They criticize suggestions of political persecution as attempts to destroy democracy and undermine the justice system.
More conservative and Republican-leaning voters view Harris's statement with outrage, denial, or frustration. Many have frequently accused her and other Democrats of being driven by bias against Trump. They believe accusations that Trump cheated in the election are false and believe his prosecutions are politically motivated witch hunts.
Kamala Harris’s typically low approval saw a slight boost after her Kimmel appearance, suggesting anti-Trump viewers approved of her comments.
However, Donald Trump’s national approval has held steady and even increased since his conviction, suggesting many believe in Democrats having political motivations.
Belief in a Weaponized Court
Many voters express continued strong support for Trump, endorsing his candidacy for the 2024 presidency. They also criticize the Biden Administration and the current state of the nation. These voters accuse Democrats and the deep state of corruption, interfering in elections, ignoring laws, and politicizing the court system.
There is a palpable belief that Trump was unfairly targeted and condemned to hamper his campaign rather than any actual misconduct. People say the conviction is an abuse of power by the Democrats to target their political opponents and a disastrous violation of norms. They compare ongoing lawfare to actions seen in authoritarian regimes.
MIG Reports analysis suggest most Americans believe the justice system has been weaponized for partisan reasons. Those on the left believe the courts are biased in Trump’s favor. Those on the right believe Democrats are using a corrupt judiciary to attack their political opponents.
On the day of Trump’s conviction in New York, national sentiment towards “weaponization of government,” dropped dramatically.
Sentiment went from the around 44% the week before to 37% on the day Trump was convicted, suggesting many people viewed the trial as an abuse of the court system.
The Biden administration's mixed messages about cryptocurrencies have stirred confusion, dismay, and frustration among American crypto users. Many views depend on what people think about regulation in general, but some are worried about the inconsistency and potential negative impact the Biden administration’s uncertainty may have on the cryptocurrency market.
Earlier in May, a joint resolution to overturn SAB 121 gained enthusiastic bipartisan support in Congress, including from Democrats like Chuck Schumer and Cory Booker.This sea change among Democrats in Congress sparked speculations about a pivot on crypto from the Biden Administration. However, Biden followed through in his promise to veto the resolution to repeal SAB 121.
Crypto Voters Are Angry
Crypto-influenced voters are now annoyed by POTUS's reconfirmed hostility and waffling on crypto. Many assert that vetoing the resolution is a nonsensical move, as SAB 121 is neither approved nor GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles). They see it as an unnecessary kick at the "cyber hornet's nest."
Voters demand action instead of mere posturing. And many who were skeptical of a true Biden pivot are now doubling down on their disapproval. Even Democratic voters who support the rest of Joe Biden’s platform are critical of his cryptocurrency policy. They say his lack of clarity is a hindrance to the development and adoption of crypto technologies.
People are also frustrated with the unclear messaging, saying that if Biden was hoping to court crypto voters, he’s doing an exceptionally poor job. Many in the crypto community are also discussing whether crypto voters as a demographic are a much larger group than the Biden White House anticipates. They say he could be severely hurting his already struggling presidential campaign by upsetting crypto holders.
The bipartisan engagement among members of the House and Senate creates a sharp contrast with Joe Biden’s anti-crypto stance. Figures like Democratic Rep. Mike Flood and Republican Senator Ted Cruz taking joining on pro-crypto issues gains them approval. Cruz's initiative for operating Bitcoin miners in Texas has gained him popularity in the crypto community.
Biden’s approval on crypto is consistently lower than sentiment toward pro-crypto politicians – especially Donald Trump.
While there is some fluctuation, Trump’s crypto approval trends similarly with overall crypto approval while Biden dipped from 52% to 45% the day before his veto.
Donald Trump is Successfully Courting the Crypto Crowd
While criticism continues toward Biden, another trending topic among American crypto voters
is a rumored discussion on crypto policy between Elon Musk and Donald Trump. The news sparked controversy as some who dislike both men ridicule them, while others are hopeful a collaboration may lead to more pro-crypto policies.
Musk denied the rumors, saying he didn't discuss crypto policy with Trump. However, he expressed support for any initiative that moves power from government to the people, which he says includes crypto.
Regardless of whether the rumors are true, many are positive about Trump’s recent crypto support, hoping more discussions lead to more crypto-friendly. They’re especially hopeful if Trump returns to the White House.
Rumors about Trump’s potential crypto policies in general have sparked a flurry of conversations leading to speculation about the role crypto will play in Trump's election campaign. Those who are highly motivated by crypto say it is part of their livelihood and important enough to vote on in the presidential election.
Claudia Sheinbaum was elected as Mexico's first female president, which has led to a flurry of public reactions. The assassination of at least 37 political candidates in Mexico has also stirred trepidation. MIG Reports analysis shows increasing worry about what this means for safety and sovereignty in the United States.
Sentiment Analysis
Online commentary links Sheinbaum to drug cartels, suggesting she was elected by their influence. This belief causes a deep concern about Mexico's ongoing accommodation of drug trafficking and related violence. Sheinbaum's election adds to a narrative of skepticism about her ability to improve the situation. With forecasts that Sheinbaum would win, there was an immediate drop in sentiment from American observers.
Some voices accuse Sheinbaum of being a socialist who will worsen the crisis of illegal immigration in the United States. This prospect also increases concerns about threats to American national security posed by drug cartels who may operate more freely.
Many voters express disappointment, anger, and fear, at the implications of a Sheinbaum presidency, citing likely increases in drug trafficking, violent crime, and illegal immigration in the U.S.
Many also suggest Sheinbaum's victory is meaningless due to Mexican election being commandeered by the cartels. People also view Sheinbaum as having ineffective and socialist policies.
Sheinbaum’s supporters online celebrate the historic significance of her achievement as Mexico's first female president. Some of the supportive commentary is hopeful she will focus on curbing Mexico's high murder rate, which is largely caused by cartel activity.
Discussion Analysis
Some of the top discussion topics related to Sheinbaum’s election include:
The potential for continued lax border control policies
People argue for stricter policies both on drug control and border security
Notably, there is little sentiment noted about Sheinbaum's policies or ideas beyond the issues of drugs and immigration. This suggests broader understanding of her platform has been overshadowed by these dominant concerns.
Recent reporting revealed quiet steps the Biden administration has taken regarding asylum cases, angering voters. The executive order partially suspends asylum requests at the U.S.-Mexico border when unauthorized crossings exceed 2,500 foreigners a day (912,000 a year). However, the suspension excludes two key immigration classes:
Credible Fear applicants (an immigration process which leads to asylum)
Executive guidance for handling Credible Fear applicants suggests it will likely result in a loophole that still allows asylum, even beyond the daily crossings cap. In the minds of many Americans, the effectively creates mass amnesty without regard to voters desires to close the border.
Furthermore, since 2022, more than 350,000 asylum cases were closed by the U.S. government for those who don’t have a criminal record or are otherwise not deemed a threat to the country. A Venezuelan illegal alien who shot two NYPD officers was among the 350,000 to have his case closed, causing objections to what are deemed as threats to the country.
MIG Reports analysis of voter reactions shows a continuing distrust in current border policies and the Biden administration.
Immigration Issues
There are recurring discussions about the border wall initiated under former President Trump's administration. Many who view the border as a crisis would like to see it completed. However, discussions about the border wall indicate a consensus that a physical barrier is not the full solution to border control issues. Most believe we need a more sophisticated approach to managing the U.S. border.
Some voters express disapproval of the Republican Party's stance on the border crisis. They accuse the GOP of voicing their grievances but not acting decisively when given the opportunity to pass a bill. The frustration and dissatisfaction seems to come from both sides.
There are disparate views on the effectiveness of Trump's border policies and the border wall. Some argue Trump was successful in reducing illegal crossings and accuse Democrats of hindering border control efforts. The sentiment here is defensive and leans towards praise for Trump's efforts.
In general, both political parties blame the other side for issues at the border.
Border Security
Online conversations show overwhelming negativity towards the open borders policy, rampant illegal immigration, and the resulting consequences under the Biden administration. There is a high volume of posts calling for stricter immigration regulations, deportations, and blaming illegal immigrants for crime. Negative sentiment towards Biden is particularly strong, with allegations of dishonesty and perceived political maneuvering.
A minority of voters challenge the idea that current policies promote open borders, accusing critics of lying or of manufacturing political controversies. Usually Democrats, this group tends to question the integrity of politicians or citizens making open borders claims.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently publicly issued a rare critique of U.S. President Joe Biden. He argued Biden’s decision to allow Ukrainian attacks on Russia with American weapons does not go far enough.
Speaking at Asia's top security summit in Singapore, Zelensky thanked Biden for allowing Ukraine to strike limited Russian territory with U.S. arms. But he also insisted the restrictions Biden included should be lifted.
MIG Reports analysis shows various sentiment and discussion trends among Americans on this subject. News about the Biden administration providing weapons to Ukraine for strikes in Russian territory are divisive. Comments and reactions are polarized and indicate a stagnation in support for Ukraine.
Views of Russia Conflict
Potential Conflict Escalation
Some Americans express concern that U.S. involvement in arming Ukraine could spur a wider conflict. They even fear potentially sparking a World War, causing skepticism, caution, and objections.
Broad Global Context
People draw parallels with Ukraine and conflicts in other foreign countries. Rising tensions in Israel, China, Iran, and others increase worries. Voters fear foreign relations with these countries—either friendly or confrontational—could be influenced or affected by America's role in Ukraine.
Russia and Putin
There are some who emphasize Russia's aggression, expressing support for Ukraine. However, a mirror of such sentiments sympathizes with Russia, juxtaposing the country's supposed intentions with those of the U.S. and NATO.
Among international concerns is an emphasis on domestic issues and internal politics within the U.S. Many voters talk about the divide at home among political leaders and previous administrations. Domestic worries seem to complicate American views on global politics, influencing their reactions.
Views of Ukraine
Escalation
American voters are divided over the Biden administration's decision to provide weapons to Ukraine for strikes within Russian territory. Some support Ukraine's fight for freedom and others sympathizing with Russia, worried about further straining U.S.-Russia relations.
Broad Global Context
Many express disappointment with Ukraine's stance on Israel and Palestine, shifting support among some who initially backed Ukraine. Historical references to events like the Vietnam War highlight concerns about U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts.
Financial Concerns
Some Americans see the decision as a strategic move in proxy wars, while others criticize the financial burden of sending substantial funds overseas. They argue taxpayer money would be better spent on domestic issues.
Domestic and Geopolitical Trends
Opinions on Ukraine are often linked to views on Israel, influencing support or criticism of Biden's actions. There are also concerns about China's growing power in the drone market and beliefs that U.S. foreign policy under Trump would improve regarding Ukraine and Israel.
Like in the case of Russia, there are those who relate Ukraine relations to American domestic politics. The sentiment that a change in administration could help prevails. Many insinuate a Trump administration would improve U.S. foreign policy, particularly concerning Ukraine and Israel.
Overall sentiment is concern and critique of U.S. and Ukrainian foreign policies. Many perceive Biden’s move to provide weapons as an escalation of a dangerous military conflict rather than a solution to an ongoing political crisis. They argue the roots of the problem lie within manipulative international politics and a harmful approach to foreign policy.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
_.png)
_.png)
_.png)
_.png)