Swing States: Will Kamala Alienate Moderate Voters?
August 09, 2024.png)
Key Takeaways
- Kamala Harris’s far-left sympathies pose a problem for gaining moderate and Independent votes in swing states.
- When voters perceive the Harris-Walz campaign as promoting extreme positions, data shows, they demonstrate critical reactions and lower approval.
- Critical issues like the economy and the border reveal lower approval for Harris in swing states, compared to nationally.
Our Methodology
Demographics
Democrats, Independents
Sample Size
30,000
Geographical Breakdown
Swing States
Time Period
7 Days
MIG Reports leverages EyesOver technology, employing Advanced AI for precise analysis. This ensures unparalleled precision, setting a new standard. Find out more about the unique data pull for this article.
MIG Reports data shows Kamala Harris faces a major challenge in solidifying her political identity. The task becomes even more complex after choosing Tim Walz, who represents a leftward shift, as her running mate. Opinions vary widely as Harris navigates her campaign's ideological positioning. This brings into question whether she can successfully appeal to a far-left base without alienating moderate Democrats and Independent voters.
Polarizing issues which are important to critical voter groups create a chasm Harris and Walz must bridge to avoid seeming extreme to moderate and independent voters. Support weakens if swing state voters believe the Democratic stance includes:
- Open borders
- Increased crime and decreased policing
- Socialist policies
- Greater economic instability
- Fracking bans
- Gun confiscation
- Healthcare for illegal immigrants
Many voters are eager for the Harris campaign to clarify her positions on these issues, often expressing frustration at the lack of detailed platform thus far.
Walz Pushes Harris Left
Discussions also delve into the political implications of Harris's VP pick, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz. Many in swing states view the Harris-Walz ticket as intentionally doubling down on progressive values to galvanize the liberal base. Critics see it as a potential misstep that alienates moderate voters.
The debate over their ideological stance often refers to broader issues such as family values, economic policies, national security, and systemic social changes. This polarization is further fueled by contrasting opinions on the impact of progressive policies on America's safety, economy, and overall direction.
Supporters seem to unify against the perceived threat of Donald Trump rather than enthusiasm about a Harris-Walz administration. Advocates assert their eagerness to "save democracy" from Donald Trump, who has been characterized in media as an autocratic strongman. They emphasize the stakes and urgency felt by many Democratic voters.
It seems Harris has a difficult tightrope to walk in appealing to different voter groups with conflicting values. Opposing groups include:
- Leftist progressives versus moderates
- Pro-Israel versus pro-Hamas Democrats
- Rule of law versus “Defund the police” voters
- Identity politics versus advocates of meritocratic policies
.png)
Swing State and Moderate Voters
Many moderates and Independents have difficulty pinning down Harris's policy platform. There is a sense of frustration with the perception that she often speaks in generalities rather than clarifying detailed policy proposals. This sentiment is echoed in comments asking Harris to list her specific positions and proposed actions on major issues.
Gun control and abortion are two topics that polarize swing state voters. Harris's stance on gun confiscation scares moderates who support the Second Amendment. However, abortion tends to gain more approval in swing states.
In general, the Harris-Walz ticket gains greater support nationally than in critical swing states. This suggests, as of August, Kamala Harris has not yet shored up support needed for critical electoral votes.
- On six polarizing issues including the border, the economy, national security, crime, abortion, and protests, Harris averages 3.5% lower approval in swings states.
- The largest approval disparities are on the border and the economy, averaging -4.9% and -4.8% in swing states compared to nationally.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
Historical Contradictions Unsettle Voters
Harris's history of policy shifts also lead to perception among moderates and Independents that she is politically opportunistic or adaptable, depending on her audience.
Specific issues like her previous support for the Green New Deal versus aligning with broader climate and energy policies under the Biden administration illustrate the malleable nature of her positions. Many view this as a sign of inconsistency or lack of core principles.
Kamala’s flip-flops on issues like illegal immigration, prosecuting crime, and gun control drive significant debate. On immigration, discussions often refer to her shift from supporting a 2008 policy in San Francisco that reported undocumented juveniles to ICE. This contradicts her current stance on decriminalizing border crossings and advocating for taxpayer-funded healthcare for undocumented immigrants, which Walz implemented in Minnesota. Other similar policy inconsistencies cause swing state voters to question her consistency and authenticity.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)