Newsom Moves Right on Trans Issues, Democrats Pounce

March 16, 2025 Newsom Moves Right on Trans Issues, Democrats Pounce  image

Key Takeaways

  • Gavin Newsom made comments saying trans athletes should not compete in women’s sports, causing outrage in his own party.
  • Most Democratic voters resist the idea of moving the party platform to the right on social issues, with only 15% expressing this sentiment.
  • Republicans are overwhelmingly skeptical of Newsom, suggesting his pivot is not genuine but calculated to improve his electoral odds among the wider electorate.

Our Methodology

Demographics

All Voters

Sample Size

7,200

Geographical Breakdown

National

Time Period

4 Days

MIG Reports leverages EyesOver technology, employing Advanced AI for precise analysis. This ensures unparalleled precision, setting a new standard. Find out more about the unique data pull for this article. 

California Governor Gavin Newsom, a standard-bearer for progressive policies, recently made comments on his debut podcast with Charlie Kirk, acknowledging fairness concerns in women’s sports. This triggered intense debate within the Democratic Party over partisan stances on social issues.

A few in the party see his remarks as a necessary political calculation, but most Democrats interpret them as a betrayal, shining a light on the growing crisis over the future of the party.

Democrats face growing pressure to reconcile ideological purity with electoral pragmatism. The divide is particularly evident in discussions about transgender rights, DEI policies, and the broader LGBTQ agenda.

A Party in Tatters

Democratic sentiment is largely fixed, with the voter base committed to progressive ideals and social ideology. MIG Reports data from online discussions among self-identified Democrats shows:

  • 15% favor a shift rightward on social issues, believing a more moderate approach could prevent further electoral losses.
  • 40% want to retain the party’s progressive stance but adjust messaging to better connect with voters who are skeptical of the party’s current direction.
  • 45% insist on no compromise, viewing any moderation as a capitulation to conservative narratives.


These sentiments suggest the divide is deepening between ideological progressives and those concerned about the party’s electoral viability in the wake of 2024 losses. While the majority still support a progressive social framework, there is clear momentum toward messaging adjustments, if not outright policy recalibration.

  • Newsom's standing among Democrats is fragile, with an average sentiment score of 37%, reflecting significant discontent.
  • His recent pivot on transgender sports has resulted in a net loss of support, with 19 points lost and only 6 gained.
  • This suggest Newsom’s attempt to moderate on trans issues is not welcomed, and rather than broadening his appeal, it may further alienate his Democratic coalition.

Progressive Backlash

For the most ardent progressives, Newsom’s remarks are highly objectionable. Many fear even acknowledging the debate over transgender athletes will embolden Republican attacks and undermine hard-won victories in LGBTQ advocacy.

Progressive activists see the issue as one of moral clarity rather than electoral strategy. They say shifting the Democratic position—even slightly—opens the door for a more drastic rollback of DEI policies, LGBTQ protections, and other progressive priorities. They argue that any pivot from Democratic leaders like Newsom, regardless of how minor, reinforce conservative narratives and erode the party’s standing with its base.

Moderates See a Warning Sign

More pragmatic Democrats recognize the party’s stance on social issues is increasingly at odds with public sentiment—as banning men in women’s sports surpasses 80/20 support overall. Polling and electoral trends suggest other social issues like crime, and DEI mandates are also alienating suburban voters, Independents, and blue-collar Democrats.

Newsom’s comments may have been a calculated effort to bridge this gap. Acknowledging fairness concerns aligns with majority public opinion, where data consistently shows skepticism of transgender athletes in women’s sports. While his remarks stopped short of endorsing restrictions, they signaled an awareness that Democrats cannot afford to ignore shifting voter attitudes.

Moderates wonder how the party can maintain its commitment to progressive values without handing Republicans an easy attack line. Many say the answer is recalibrating the messaging rather than making substantive policy shifts. They argue emphasizing fairness and common-sense governance could help the party retain support among swing voters.

Should Democrats Move Right?

The debate over whether Democrats should shift their platform to the right on social issues bleeds into a larger identity crisis within the party caused by the unpopularity of Democratic messaging.

Those advocating for a moderate shift point to key electoral realities:

  • Suburban losses in key battleground states tie into voter dissatisfaction with progressive social policies.
  • DEI mandates are increasingly unpopular, even among some Democrats, as concerns over meritocracy and fairness gain traction.
  • Crime and public safety remain significant issues, with progressive policies facing backlash in major cities.
  • Anger over mismanagement in states like California for things like poor governance during the most recent wildfires angers constituents in blue areas.

At the same time, progressives argue these issues are being exaggerated by conservative media and that any shift rightward would demoralize the Democratic base. They warn abandoning progressive commitments will fracture the coalition that delivered victories in 2020.

Republican Newsom as Unprincipled

While Newsom’s comments spark internal debate among Democrats, Republicans remain skeptical that his remarks indicate any real ideological shift. Online discussions among conservative voters and commentators overwhelmingly frame his comments as calculated to reposition himself for national politics, particularly a potential 2028 presidential run.

Those on the right point to Newsom’s long-standing record of supporting progressive policies, including legislation that expanded transgender rights in California. His financial ties to major left-wing donors further fuel suspicions that his comments are nothing more than political lip service.

Many say Newsom is attempting to stem electoral damage by co-opting populist rhetoric on fairness in sports. His remarks, made to popular conservative figure Charlie Kirk, are seen as an attempt to appeal to disaffected moderates rather than a true reappraisal of his position. The prevailing belief is that if Newsom were sincere, he would be backing actual policy changes rather than making ambiguous statements on podcasts.

Electoral Implications

With the 2026 gubernatorial races and the 2028 presidential election on the horizon, the Democratic Party faces a strategic dilemma. The party’s position on social issues will shape its ability to win over key voter blocs:

  • Independents and Suburban Voters – Polling suggests these voters are skeptical of progressive social policies but remain open to economic messaging.
  • Younger Progressives and Activists – Any perceived retreat on social issues could dampen enthusiasm among the party’s activist wing, impacting voter turnout.
  • Working-Class Democrats – Many traditional Democratic voters are frustrated with the party’s cultural priorities and feel alienated by elite progressive narratives.

Stay Informed

More Like This

  • 17

    Mar

    Child Trafficking at the Border is Real—And No One Cares  image
  • 15

    Mar

    Voters Excited About Trump’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve  image
  • 14

    Mar

    Cringe: No Hope on the Horizon for Democratic Leadership  image