Harris Campaign “Vibes” Redirect Away from Policy
August 08, 2024.png)
Key Takeaways
- Americans wonder what the Harris-Walz platform stands for as the campaign focuses on vibes and memes over meaningful policy discussions.
- Many worry the lack of clarity on the Democratic platform betrays an underlying agenda that is much further left than most Americans would embrace.
- Leftists seem happy to paper over questions with assertions of their own policy positions, supporting Kamala for what they believe she stands for, rather than what she has explicitly taken a position on.
Our Methodology
Demographics
All Voters
Sample Size
30,000
Geographical Breakdown
National
Time Period
1 Day
MIG Reports leverages EyesOver technology, employing Advanced AI for precise analysis. This ensures unparalleled precision, setting a new standard. Find out more about the unique data pull for this article.
Voters are increasingly concerned about Kamala Harris's lack of clarity on policy positions. Multiple sources comment on the absence of explicit policy goals on her campaign website, suggesting an underlying apprehension about her and Walz’s ability to address pressing national issues. Many say she has a phantom platform which emphasizes vibes over policy. They say it is an effort to redirect voters away from far-left policies they would not support.
These critiques often dovetail with broader accusations of the Democratic Party's manipulation and control over political processes. Many Americans believe Democrats impose undue influence from party elites and operatives.
A dominant thread in these conversations is the portrayal of both Harris and Walz as adherents to radical leftist ideologies. Phrases such as "socialism," "communism," and "far-left" continually emerge, reflecting public concern over their progressive stances.
Critics argue Harris and Walz embody a dangerous liberal agenda which must be obfuscated as it dismantles traditional American values.
Problematic Histories for Harris-Walz
Many voters point out both Harris and Walz having track records checkered with extreme leftwing positions. They criticize past statements and actions from both candidates advocating for radically progressive policies.
However, this sense of historically radical viewpoints becomes less clear to many voters who are unable to ascertain current Democratic platform positions. The candidates’ silence about what they are running on feels, to many, like a refusal to acknowledge their own leftist histories.
Republican VP candidate J.D. Vance pointed out the fact that Kamala Harris has made very few unscripted appearances and taken no questions from the press. This garnered attention online from Americans who find the lack of substance from Harris-Walz concerning.
I thought the reporters traveling with Kamala might be a little lonely given that she never answers questions from them, so I figured I’d come say hello and check out my new plane while I was at it. https://t.co/OPEh0UKBDc
— JD Vance (@JDVance) August 7, 2024
Many also point out allegations against Walz of stolen valor—a question he ignored from reporters in a recent public appearance.
REPORTER: Your response to allegation of stolen valor?
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) August 7, 2024
WALZ: *ignores*
REPORTER: Your response to allegation of stolen valor!?
WALZ: *runs away* pic.twitter.com/el3sPGDYuM
Another prominent complaint voters lodge against the Democratic candidates is the issue of George Floyd protests in 2020. Critics claim Walz intentionally mismanaged Minneapolis protests, allowing and even condoning chaos and destruction. They also assert that Kamala Harris fundraised to bail protesters out of jail.
Voter ire also extends to Harris-Walz's opaque positions on:
- Immigration
- Law enforcement
- Gender policies
- Energy reform
- Foreign policy
Detractors say Harris and Walz both sympathize with extreme positions which are socially and economically destabilizing. These claims are paired with the current uncertainty as to what the Harris-Walz platform actually does advocate for.
Leftists Pencil in Their Own Views
Meanwhile, Democratic supporters celebrate the lack of clarity on Harris-Walz policy positions. They seem willing to fill in uncertainty with their own progressive viewpoints, hopeful of ushering in an era of leftist reforms and DEI initiatives.
Here, terms like "progressive," "equity," and "solutions" echo a counter-narrative that Kamala Harris and Tim Walz provide a necessary counterbalance to conservative agendas. Proponents underscore Walz's practical appeal, saying he’s relatable in his Midwestern resilience, complementing Harris's national political stature.
Progressives say Harris relies on charm and relatability without needing to explicitly outline substantive policy discourse. They praise her trendy appeal, especially among young people who either hold far-left views or lack their own conviction.
.png)
Vibes and Crowd Size
With recent campaign rallies, Harris supporters draw attention to crowd sizes compared to Trump's rally turnouts. This comparison tends to be used as a measure of support and enthusiasm among attendees. People use phrases like "electric energy" and "packed arena" reflecting positive engagement at events.
Supporters also emphasize impeccable vibes and tone over policies. They focus on the joyful and enthusiastic atmosphere at Harris’s rallies, marked by chants of "USA, USA, USA." This they compare to allegedly more personality-driven chants of "Trump, Trump, Trump" at MAGA rallies. This distinction attempts to position Harris as one that, ostensibly, aligns with national unity over individual glorification.
Critics paint the campaign as "meme-driven," accusing Harris of falling back on pop culture figures and influencer clout to compensate for lack of political support. This group accuses Harris of astroturfing social media influence, drawing crowds with performers like Megan Thee Stallion, and receiving assists from the media to inflate perceptions of support.
Skeptics say the Harris-Walz campaign utilizes emotion over substance to fill the gaps left by a lack of transparency in policy. Discussions involve terms like "radical left regime," and skepticism about her ability to manage the country effectively. People question her competence in light of an overly caricatured profile currently being promoted by Democrats and the media.
_.png)
_.png)
_.png)
_.png)
_.png)
_.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)