Articles
-
President-elect Trump is already changing sentiment tides on the border, just a week after being elected. For most of 2024, polling showed upwards of 75% of voters viewed the border as either a serious threat or a crisis.
CBS POLL: 75% of Americans "see the situation at the U.S./Mexico border as either a 'crisis' or a 'very serious situation'" — a "notable increase" from previous surveys pic.twitter.com/uumUM0gCQs
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) January 7, 2024Following Trump’s win, sentiment immediately improved—particularly with news of new leadership and promises of deportation. Americans on the left and the right demand secure borders and national sovereignty, though some leftist Democrats still object to Republican border plans.
- Since November 5, border and immigration sentiment has increased, reaching the high 40% range.
- MIG Reports data also shows sentiment toward Biden’s DHS secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on a consistent decline to 41% in the days after the election.
- A slight bump in Mayorkas’s sentiment over the weekend is due to celebrations over his imminent departure from DHS.
The Immediate Trump Effect
A distinct mood change has been evident in the first few days since Trump’s victory. Voters, especially Republicans, express confidence that a Trump 2.0 administration will address longstanding border issues.
Voters regularly say things like, “More has been accomplished in 72 hours than in the previous 3 1/2 years.” Trump’s pick of former acting ICE director Tom Homan as Border Czar fuels excitement and optimism. Border Patrol and ICE agents who were constrained for years, now feel empowered to enforce policies effectively.
Rapid Mood Change
- Border Patrol and ICE agents report a “total 180” shift in morale, with many expressing renewed hope in their ability to fulfill their duties.
- The morale boost comes from Trump’s victory, and Homan’s leadership, which are both seen as positive for immigration enforcement.
Republicans Versus Democrats
- Around 80% of Republicans voice support for Trump’s immigration plans, emphasizing mass deportations and border wall completion.
- Democrats are less vocal as only 20% are commenting. Those who are engaging in the discussion express concern about the humanitarian impact of stricter policies.
Immediate public perception shifts show the early impacts of Trump’s win are already evident. Voters are eager to improve border enforcement for several key reasons.
Key Issues Voters Want Addressed
Migrant Caravans being discouraged and even disbanded are a positive for voters. Many view reports that caravans are dissolving as a concrete result of Trump’s tough image. Voters see stopping caravans as symbolic of regained control of the U.S. border.
Mass Deportation is still high on the list of things voters want. Enthusiasm for mass deportations is high, particularly among those who link illegal immigration to crime and economic strain. Voters hope deportation will be a cornerstone of Trump’s immigration agenda, especially for illegals who commit crimes once inside the U.S.
Prioritizing Public Resources is a common refrain among Republicans. They say taxpayer funds should prioritize American citizens over illegal immigrants. Many advocate reallocating resources to benefit veterans and citizens in need, instead of providing aid to people who should not be here.
Job Market Benefits are another expectation for securing the border. Many say a reduced strain on social services and less job competitions will create more opportunities for American workers. People point out that most of the job growth under Biden-Harris benefitted foreign-born workers.
Sanctuary City Policies remain a focal point for Trump supporters. They view migrant sanctuaries as a roadblock to federal enforcement. With the new administration, voters expect stricter immigration policy alignment nationwide, overriding local policies that protect illegal immigrants and enforcing federal policies.
New Leadership in Tom Homan and speculations about North Dakota Governor Kristi Noem replacing Alejandro Mayorkas as DHS secretary spark discussion. Voters want strong leaders who will take decisive action to shore up the border and combat Democratic influence.
Mood Shift and Enthusiasm
Empowered Law Enforcement for Border Patrol and ICE agents under Trump 2.0 generates excitement and energy. Many agents, previously constrained by restrictive policies, are reportedly “ecstatic to go to work,” ready to act without Biden-Harris limitations tying their hands.
Killing "Woke" Policies drives hope for shifting away from progressive open border policies. Americans want a return to past norms where national sovereignty and citizen protection take priority over globalist and progressive immigration ideals.
Law and Order emphasis under Trump brings relief to voters who see current Democratic policies as detrimental to American communities. Voters believe Trump can stop increased crime among illegal immigrants and restore the rule of law.
Crime and Trafficking connected to illegal immigration also motivates voters. An open border is often synonymous with increased violent crime, drug trafficking, and gang activity. Voters point to problems like those in Aurora, Colorado, as exemplifying the need for anti-gang and anti-cartel border enforcement.
Partisan Divides cause friction between Republicans who are celebrating renewed border security and Democrats who fear mass deportations could lead to human rights abuses. Despite an overwhelming majority of Americans supporting strict borders, Democrats continue to oppose Trump’s policies—many of which were standard under Obama.
NEW: @ScottJenningsKY takes CNN panel to school by dropping some simple facts about deportations:
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) November 12, 2024
“It’s overwhelmingly popular. Everybody is trying to make this controversial. This is not controversial. Presidents always deport people."
"Barack Obama deported 3 million people.… pic.twitter.com/ZXOjWpJdlp13
Nov
-
The discourse among Trump supporters following his reelection shows a movement united in ideology, collective identity, and anticipation for America's future. Trump voters share an “America First” vision, intertwined with defiant optimism, a clear “us versus them” mentality, and a blend of humor and seriousness.
The one that sent Marines to go die in Iraq for feminism
— Josiah Lippincott (@jlippincott_) November 7, 2024The Friend or Enemy Distinction
MAGA voters discuss the distinction between their allies and adversaries.
They see Democrats, the media, and federal institutions as forces that actively threaten their values, freedoms, and way of life. This mentality transcends simple political disagreement, portraying adversaries as existential foes.
For many, Trump’s win is a political victory and a vindication of their beliefs, reinforcing a sense of justified distrust toward the establishment. They say compromise is neither feasible nor desirable—instead, conservatives advocate for resolute action to restore and protect their America.
Optimism and Policy Aspirations
Republicans widely express hope and enthusiasm for the changes they believe Trump’s leadership will bring. This optimism is shown in discussion of immediate positive signs, like market highs and favorable international developments in Ukraine and the Middle East.
Trump’s second term is seen as a catalyst for economic prosperity, strengthened national security, and a cultural return to traditional values. People mention specific policies and improvements, like tax cuts and deregulation, they hope will improve their personal well-being.
Conservatives want tangible benefits that will affirm his leadership and leave a legacy for the party. Even as some voice caution about policy execution, this tempered outlook only reinforces hope for a prosperous and strengthened America.
Reminder that the GOP was a party on life support after Bush, McCain, and Romney.
— Lucky (@TheMagaHulk) November 8, 2024
It was a party that appealed to no one but rich donors who wanted endless wars and unfettered immigration.
Trump rebranded the Republican Party as one of nationalism and populism, and now we're… https://t.co/gfKZL2AtHLIdentity and Patriotism
The MAGA movement’s sense of community is rising in online discussion. There is a shared network of beliefs and mutual recognition which creates a sense of belonging. For many, supporting Trump is a reaffirmation of identity, patriotism, and collective purpose.
There is an almost familial environment, where expressions of gratitude and pride in the community amplify the movement's cohesion. This coalition views the mission as welcoming anyone aligned with America-First principles. The movement shares in an identity that unifies against progressive cultural and ideological opposition.
Fun Times (Sorta)
While most conversations use humor and memes, there are many aspects to the discussion. Around 30% of Trump supporters want meaningful debate with their ideological opponents. There are sincere with the attempts to “red pill” Trump detractors and bring people together. Two other patterns emerge:
- Mockery of the left
- Using humor and memes to express defiance and community bonds
These trends may demonstrate how MAGA will react over time as the second Trump administration draws more vitriol from political opposition.
Calls for Action and Accountability
Amid this optimism and camaraderie, a strong call for accountability punctuates the narrative. Supporters want to see adversaries face repercussions, with proposals for policy changes and legal actions against political opponents.
This readiness for swift, decisive measures reflects a sense of urgency and a lack of patience for gradual reform. Trump’s second term, for many, represents an opportunity to correct past wrongs. They want a robust, proactive approach. Accountability is framed as a moral imperative—one that upholds justice and reaffirms American values.
No appeal to universal human concerns can compete with Trump's use of the friend/enemy distinction. Trump supporters are not just pushing back against liberal excesses. They like the way he demonizes and dehumanizes his enemies: the illegal alien occupiers (migrants) and the... https://t.co/CDrIhlmp4Y
— D.W. Lafferty (@rightscholar) November 11, 202412
Nov
-
Leftists on social media are talking about anti-Trump Americans leaving the United States prior to his second presidency. Discussions are a multifaceted web of identity, belonging, authoritarian fear, disillusionment, and economic anxiety—intertwined with individual and communal expressions of distress.
Many who are complaining mention their perceptions of American values eroding nationwide, sparking concerns over identity and belonging. Many describe feeling disconnected from a national identity they once resonated with but now find alien. They view the political landscape appears increasingly hostile to their beliefs.
Statements like “I’m seriously considering leaving” reflect a reckoning among leftists, where the desire to is a physical relocation and symbolic rejection of an America they see as departing from democratic and progressive ideals.
Man dressed up as a woman says he can’t live in the US under Trump so he’s moving back to Australia.
— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) November 7, 2024
He put on lipstick to make this historic announcement. pic.twitter.com/nFsHW1w7hCTrue Belief in the Second Coming of Hitler
Fear of authoritarianism and fascism dominates these discussions, with progressives envisioning Trump as an existential threat to personal freedoms and civil rights. They often refer to Trump as akin to Hitler, calling his supporters racists, misogynists, and fascists.
They say things like, “I won’t stay under this regime” with visceral urgency. Among this group, emigration is a defense against the potential for oppressive governance. Fears are not isolated but collectively felt, amplified by social media.
Leftists find solace and validation in shared anxieties. They feel leaving is not just an escape but a protective measure against an anticipated erosion of democratic norms.
Virtue Signals in an Echo Chamber
There is also economic and social anxiety, as many express concerns about Trump exacerbating economic inequality, deteriorating social policies, and making healthcare unreliable.
Those on the left express a sense of vulnerability regarding the perceived socioeconomic regressions that a Trump administration will impose. Phrases like “I won’t suffer through another four years of this” reveal an underlying apprehension that cuts across personal and societal dimensions.
For some, leaving the country is a decision driven by ideological and material concerns, amplifying their sense that America may no longer offer stability or security.
A Lump Sum
A striking element in these discussions is the concept of “collective departure,” or leaving as a communal protest against a Trump regime. Those who share this sentiment are bound by shared fears and frustrations.
There is a sense of community and solidarity in the idea of abandoning a country that seems to threaten authoritarianism. Progressives say things like, “We’re planning our exit strategy” or “A group of us are looking into moving out together.” In this way, leaving is a unified response to a disillusioning political reality.
Social media’s role in creating these communal spaces magnifies the sentiment, fostering a sense of solidarity among those who feel estranged.
Oh shit. He won.
— 𓄂Pew (@PewOrPew) November 6, 2024
Anyone wanna check back on those “if Trump wins I’m going to kill myself” posts? pic.twitter.com/fBCD84M3V312
Nov
-
Trump’s 2024 presidential win is rapidly shifting expectations and realities across many sectors—including cryptocurrency. Crypto markets are surging to new highs, crossing $85,000 for the first time at the start of the week.
BREAKING: $85,000 #Bitcoin NEW ALL TIME HIGH 💥🚀 pic.twitter.com/ZkqhrytriY
— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) November 11, 2024Now, the crypto community is discussing the potential longer-term impacts of a second Trump administration, including market movements, regulation, and a strategic Bitcoin reserve.
You might want to buy Bitcoin. pic.twitter.com/mEjFNOACgm
— Altcoin Daily (@AltcoinDailyio) November 6, 2024Crypto Voter Reactions
MIG Reports data shows:
- 70% want policies reducing government oversight in financial innovations.
- 65% of crypto voters are optimistic about a Trump administration’s impact on digital assets.
- 60% express hope for clearer regulations that protect rather than restrict crypto.
- 50% criticize legacy media’s portrayal of crypto and its neglect of blockchain’s benefits.
- 55% believe a Harris administration would have introduced unfavorable crypto policies.
Bitcoin Highs and Market Optimism
Almost immediately after Trump’s win, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies pumped, spurring discussions around:
- All-time highs: Bitcoin reached multiple new all-time highs following Trump’s victory, mirroring record gains in traditional stock markets.
- Increased trading volume: Trading volumes across major cryptocurrencies surged, reflecting renewed investor interest and perceived market stability.
This price movement isn’t the only reason to be bullish in crypto community—it’s symbolic of future positive movement. Many say the surge signals a political optimism toward decentralized finance, rejecting traditional financial systems which are over-regulated and restrictive.
Trump’s recent history of embracing crypto and making promises the community supports increases market optimism. Crypto voters who supported Trump are eager to see what his administration brings in the way of crypto regulation clarity and preventing a CBDC.
Enthusiasm and Policy Optimism
Beyond price pumps, the tone in the crypto community is optimistic about Trump’s impact on the industry.
Regulatory Relief
Many expect Trump to support less restrictive policies, anticipating an administration that leans into free-market principles. They want:
- Broader institutional adoption of cryptocurrencies.
- Greater regulatory clarity, particularly in navigating securities laws and tax regulations.
- Policy measures that prioritize financial innovation over governmental oversight.
Strategic Bitcoin Reserve
Crypto voters are excited about Trump’s promise to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve as a safeguard against broader economic uncertainties. They view this as strengthening the U.S. economically and positioning it as a global crypto leader. Many are growing more positive about having J.D. Vance in the administration, considering his history in venture capital and crypto-related tech industries.
Global Relations and Market Confidence
The community voices excitement about Trump’s relationships with foreign leaders, especially with countries like Russia and China. They believe a Trump administration could reduce international tensions, creating a stable environment for investment that directly benefits cryptocurrency markets.
Contrast with Harris
Many are relieved to have avoided a Harris administration, which would likely have leaned toward regulatory intervention. Voters speculate a Harris presidency would have dampened crypto enthusiasm through heavier restrictions and oversight on digital assets.
Overall, crypto voters view Bitcoin’s post-election rise as a financial victory and part of a larger paradigm shift toward decentralized finance. They see crypto assets as increasingly vital in a landscape where traditional financial systems are perceived as vulnerable to external pressures.
Geopolitical and Economic Signals
A bull market in crypto and traditional markets is also influenced by anticipated changes in global dynamics. Investors view Trump’s assertive foreign policy as a stabilizing force—one that fosters economic confidence beyond U.S. borders.
Global Stability Expectations
Trump's win coincides with immediate signals of reduced international tensions. His approach to foreign policy, which prioritizes economic interests, offers a sense of reassurance regarding:
- Dissolving migrant caravans at the border, which voters see as moving toward controlling immigration.
- Potential peace overtures with Russia, China, and the Middle East, likely to stabilize global markets and benefit U.S.-aligned economic interests.
Shift in Energy and Trade Dynamics
Comments in the crypto community suggest energy self-sufficiency and the move away from reliance on adversarial energy sources (e.g., Russian gas) could reinforce economic independence—an essential condition for a flourishing crypto market reliant on stable, decentralized finance.
Projections for Crypto Under Trump
While immediate data points reveal optimism, crypto voters also discuss their future hopes for crypto under Trum:
- Long-term market growth: If Trump’s administration delivers on regulatory relief, crypto investors expect prolonged growth for digital assets, with Bitcoin likely testing new highs. Trump’s anti-establishment stance, combined with crypto’s decentralized appeal, stokes enthusiasm.
- Institutional adoption: With a stable political climate, more traditional financial institutions may enter the crypto space. Banks and investment firms could see Trump’s policies as a green light for incorporating digital assets into portfolios, leading to higher market penetration.
- Global integration: Trump’s foreign policy approach, if it promotes energy independence and stable trade relations, could make the U.S. an appealing hub for crypto. Increased international cooperation could facilitate smoother cross-border crypto transactions, enhancing the legitimacy of digital finance worldwide.
12
Nov
-
Rumors and reports are beginning to swirl about Trump’s transition team and incoming cabinet appointments. Republican voters and influencers are already voicing strong reactions to potential picks.
MIG Reports data shows a mix of hope and skepticism about Trump’s second term. MAGA Republicans voice support for an “America First” agenda and frustration with establishment influences.
Appointment Discussions
As discussions and announcement ramp up, Republicans are reacting to various names attached to cabinet positions.
Sen. Rick Scott
I’m committed to getting President Trump’s nominees confirmed by the Senate immediately.
— Rick Scott (@ScottforFlorida) November 11, 2024
Democrats will do everything they can to stonewall the Trump agenda, and we need a Senate Majority Leader who will fight to get it done. pic.twitter.com/4QwU97Fc4rFlorida Senator Rick Scott is discussed as a favorite for Senate Majority Leader. MAGA voters view him as a strong ally for advancing Trump’s legislative priorities in Congress, as opposed to Sen. John Thune or Sen. John Cornyn, who many strongly associate with establishment Republicans.
🚨WOW!
— 🇺🇸Jessica🇺🇸 (@Jessica_4_Trump) November 11, 2024
According to The Heritage Foundation’s conservative voting record scorecard, Sen. Rick Scott has a 95% lifetime score, while Thune and Cornyn have 62 and 64%.
No wonder the Swamp is doing everything in its power to keep Rick Scott from becoming Senate Majority Leader👇 pic.twitter.com/qeOssBL7EbTom Homan
As the former acting ICE director, Tom Homan is a widely anticipated choice for “Border Czar,” tasked with overseeing immigration enforcement. His reputation for tough immigration policies aligns well with Trump’s strict border stance. Many are discussing his appointment as important for national security and border integrity.
Ladies and gentlemen, your new Border Czar, Tom Homan.
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) November 11, 2024
Let’s go!! pic.twitter.com/ELV9BBX7NORep. Elise Stefanik
Known for her strong pro-Israel stance and strong MAGA alignment, New York Rep. Stefanik gains favor among conservatives as Trump's pick for U.N. Ambassador. Her stance on foreign policy aligns closely with Trump's vision of robust U.S. leadership abroad.
🚨 #BREAKING: Rep. Elise Stefanik has ACCEPTED Trump’s offer for US Ambassador to the United Nations, per NYP
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) November 11, 2024
This admin is going to be STACKED! 🔥 pic.twitter.com/zQiMz92FVSStephen Miller
As an architect of Trump’s initial immigration policies, Stephen Miller’s influence on Trump's hardline stance is unmistakable. Recent reports naming him as Trump’s deputy chief of staff for policy generate positive discussion among MAGA voters. His reentry is a strong indication that Trump aims to revive the rigorous policies of his first term.
NEW: Donald Trump is expected to announce Stephen Miller as his deputy chief of staff for policy, according to CNN.
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) November 11, 2024
Miller is a strong advocate for a secure border and has repeatedly called for mass deportations.
Miller says he hopes to see deportations increase by 10x to over… pic.twitter.com/9gSFO7vcXcElon Musk
Many conservatives view Elon Musk as a positive influence in Trump's administration, particularly in tech, energy independence, and government efficiency. Musk’s outspoken positions on free speech and resistance to regulatory constraints align with Trump’s anti-bureaucratic vision. Trump and Elons’ public discussions about a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), generates excitement in the base.
Washington DC swamp creatures trying to join the @realDonaldTrump administration right now 🤣🤣 pic.twitter.com/K3vJ6byDwy
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 9, 2024Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
RFK Jr. has gained some traction among conservatives for his skepticism of government health policies. His anti-establishment views resonate with Trump’s base, and many anticipate his involvement in the administration to push the MAHA movement.
America First Agenda
Supporters expect Trump’s team to double down on "America First,” particularly regarding border security, economic protectionism, and domestic deregulation. MAGA backers see these choices as necessary to address long-standing grievances, from the woke policies they say erode traditional values to rectifying illegal immigration.
Symbolic Wins and Quick Changes
Following Trump’s election, reports are beginning to flow on early victories, such as:
- Migrant caravans reportedly being dismantled at the southern border, reflecting hopes for a stricter immigration policy.
- Key figures from Trump’s first administration, like ICE veteran Tom Homan as “Border Czar,” being appointed to address the border.
- International relations being shored up swiftly and imminently in places like Ukraine and the Middle East.
- A sharp rise in the stock market and crypto, which many Republicans attribute to market confidence in Trump’s policies.
These developments heighten anticipation among GOP voters for quick, decisive policy shifts under Trump’s new team.
Distrust of the GOP Establishment
While Trump loyalists express enthusiasm, there is also clear distrust toward what Republicans label the “establishment” wing of the party.
Opposition to RINOs
Many Republicans are wary of RINOs being involved in the administration, mentioning Senators John Thune and John Cornyn by name. Voters see them as potential obstacles to the agenda they envision. Establishment figures are perceived as out of touch with Trump’s grassroots supporters, and many express relief at Trump’s announcement that neither Mike Pompeo nor Nikki Haley will be involved in the administration.
I was proud to work with President Trump defending America at the United Nations. I wish him, and all who serve, great success in moving us forward to a stronger, safer America over the next four years. pic.twitter.com/6PhWN6xn1B
— Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) November 10, 2024Republican voters express frustration with GOP leaders willing to work with Democrats on issues like immigration reform. This sentiment reinforces calls for an “all-in” approach that prioritizes conservative values over bipartisan solutions.
MAGA Appointments
GOP voices are increasingly rallying around figures like Senator Rick Scott for Senate Majority Leader and other MAGA names being floated for various positions. Some also mention Kash Patel for CIA Director, saying he would be integral to challenging the deep state.
The “America First” segment of Republicans celebrate Susie Wiles being named Trump’s Chief of Staff, hoping Trump’s second term will finally “drain the swamp.”
Susie Wiles is great pic.twitter.com/h56f2LIn6d
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 8, 2024A Vision for the Administration
Within discussions of Trump’s new administration and position appointments, Republicans are talking about top-priority issues.
- Strict Immigration: Voters want immediate action on mass deportations, completion of the border wall, and robust enforcement measures.
- An “America First” Economy: MAGA supports reinstating tariffs, limiting foreign dependencies, deregulating industries, and fostering domestic energy independence to strengthen the U.S. economy and create jobs.
- Combating Woke Culture: Conservatives are adamant about fighting back against progressive social policies, particularly related to gender and education. They expect appointees to uphold the people’s vote to kill woke ideology.
- Ending Federal Bureaucracy: Voters want Trump to dismantle the deep state, especially in intelligence, law enforcement, corrupt courts, and healthcare agencies.
- Strengthening Alliances: There is a focus on pro-Israel foreign policy, reasserting U.S. interests abroad, and settling foreign conflict.
- Cutting Federal Spending: Voters want to prioritize fiscal conservatism through spending cuts, reduced taxes, and targeting wasteful government programs that burden taxpayers.
11
Nov
-
A big discussion prior to the 2024 election was the gender divide in support for Trump and Harris. Many concluded women would overwhelmingly turn out for Harris, based on “women’s rights” or abortion issues. However, surprising results showing Trump gaining ground with women, shocking some observers.
I don't know who needs to hear this, but Trump won white women outright pic.twitter.com/sxO5oc7pEw
— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) November 6, 2024Despite conventional narratives suggesting women would vote strongly based on abortion, post-election conversations are illuminating. While past elections hinged on topics like abortion and identity politics, this election saw many women—and other voter groups—recalibrating toward economic stability, women’s safety, and traditional values.
🚨 JUST IN: Trump gains in nearly every demographic from 2020
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) November 6, 2024
🔴 Women: +2
🔴 Men: +3
🔴 Non-college: +6
🔴 Hispanic: +6
🔴 Black: +7
🔴 Young: +10 pic.twitter.com/qNcFOTDAVmDemocrats Feel Women Failed Them
Around 40% of Democratic comments voice disappointment over female support for Trump. Many lament the disappointing turnout for abortion as the cornerstone issue of the Harris campaign.
This is “political analyst” & former poly-sci professor Dr. Arlene who brainwashed hundreds of thousands of people on TT into thinking Harris would win.
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) November 7, 2024
On Nov 5th, she told a story about how she taunted a grocery store worker about how Harris was 100% going to win
On Nov 6th,… pic.twitter.com/NbVhQ6uftx- A common theme among Democrats was disappointment over women supporting Trump, viewing it as a step back for women’s rights.
- Many Democrats express anxiety that Trump will roll back progress on abortion and gender equality.
- However voting results suggest women want policies that align with their family priorities and provide practical solutions.
Analysis
Previous MIG Reports data showed women are underrepresented in online political discourse. This may suggest that women voting for Trump are either less inclined to discuss it, or simply not captured due to lack of online presence.
Remember all those ads about "your husband won't know who you voted for?"
— mrs. dobbins ☕️🪶 (@mrsdobbins_) November 6, 2024
Turns out it wasn't their husbands that they were hiding their vote from, it was their judgy lefty girly pals.The rise of policy-driven voting behavior among women may be attributed to the receding influence of gender ideology. This presents a strategic opportunity for Republicans to continue appealing to women with a platform that addresses concrete concerns.
Economic Stability Trumps Abortion
Drastically rising prices, particularly for essentials like groceries, healthcare, and housing, has become a major driver of political sentiment among female voters.
- Roughly 65% of women discussing the election online say economic concerns are the top priority.
- Women say things like, “Financial stability matters more than any other issue right now,” pointing to high costs and stagnant wages.
- Many women credit Trump’s policies with lower inflation and better household finances—they see his return as a path to restoring stability.
Analysis
Women directly link economic stability to their families' well-being. This trend suggests the social and identity issues emphasized in the culture over the last decade have lost potency amid economic fears.
In 2024, women are making decisions based on financial considerations, which they see as non-negotiable. For a Republican administration, continuing to address voter economic concerns pragmatically could solidify and increase this trend.
Sick of “Woke” Politics
Many women say they view Trump’s emphasis on traditional values as a welcome departure from identity politics.
- 30% of Republicans celebrate Trump's cultural alignment with anti-woke values.
- 25% of women say they feel alienation from Democratic messaging on woke issues—particularly transgender rights and women’s safety.
- Many say transgender policies, particularly in women’s sports and public spaces, are more severely encroaching on women’s rights than abortion restrictions.
Analysis
Trends suggests there may be a growing cultural shift to the right, with conservative female voters rallying to reorient around traditional values over progressive ideology. Republican messages that champion economic stability, safety, and family-focused policies resonate deeply with women. As identity politics increasingly alienates this voter base, progressives may continue to lose hold on women.
Failed “Women’s Rights” Movement
Many on the left lauded abortion as the most critical issues for women in 2024. Although it was a dominant issue in the 2022 midterms post-Dobs, current trends show the economy and personal safety supersede abortion issues for many women.
- Only 20% of women discussing the election emphasize abortion, suggesting a diminishing role in shaping female voting patterns.
- Many in this group—particularly mothers—say they prioritize “women’s rights” in the form of securing the border and female spaces.
- While many voters still express concern over potential abortion rollbacks in certain states, this does not seem to have a dramatic impact on the presidential race.
Analysis
Many women, including pro-choice advocates, are balancing abortion issues with more pressing economic and safety concerns. State races show a significant number of women still place importance on abortion, however Republican messaging about states’ rights post-Roe may impact voter decisions for national issues.
11
Nov
-
Discussions about Ukraine and Russia are changing with Donald Trump headed back to the Oval Office. Conversations are fraught with anticipation, fear, and polarized visions for America’s role on the global stage. Voters discuss allegiance as they envision what a Trump administration could mean for U.S. foreign policy and domestic priorities.
🚨BREAKING: Putin announces Russia’s readiness to restore relations with the United States
— Jack (@jackunheard) November 7, 2024
Trump is the President of peace.The Fractured Perspective on Ukraine
American responses to the Ukraine-Russia conflict are like a prism reflecting divergent values.
- Trump supporters see his return as a path to recalibrating U.S. priorities toward "America First." They see his foreign policy stance as one that would temper U.S. involvement in conflicts like Ukraine.
- Many in this camp view Trump as capable of negotiating a diplomatic settlement, likely by reducing U.S. support for Ukraine and pursuing a strategic détente with Russia.
- This group considers drawing back as a reorientation that would halt U.S. resources sent abroad when we cannot afford domestic needs facing American citizens.
Trump critics view his return with increasing anxiety. To them, a Trump-led disengagement from Ukraine signals a betrayal of democratic values and allies.
- Anti-Trump voices express unease over the possible erosion of international alliances and a shifting balance of power that could embolden Russia.
- Critics say Trump’s affinity for unilateral action risks undermining the democratic fabric of Ukraine.
- This group says retracting U.S. support from Ukraine would be an ideological concession to authoritarianism.
National Security and Geopolitical Realignment
The fear of Trump's re-engagement with Russia compounds worries about America’s security and international standing.
- Trump supporters, rallying around his assertive posture, believe direct negotiation with formidable leaders like Vladimir Putin can lead to peace, citing early signs of de-escalation by Hamas.
- They frame Trump’s foreign policy as resistant against unchecked involvement in global conflicts which cost money and compromise U.S. security interests.
- Supporters view his willingness to "deal directly" with adversaries as a practical, results-driven approach.
Trump critics feel a sense of foreboding and diminished stability, arguing Trump's affinity for personal diplomacy might weaken the established multilateral order.
- There is widespread apprehension that by realigning U.S. foreign policy, Trump may inadvertently facilitate Russian expansionist goals.
- Critics worry he will embolden Russia and other adversarial states, ultimately destabilizing both American and European security structures.
- These voices fear Trump’s administration will be too isolationist, abandoning the current globalist approach.
- Many fear consequences for NATO and other alliances, reshaping the contours of Western influence in a volatile era.
BREAKING: 🇷🇺🇺🇸 Russian President Putin says he is ready to speak with US President-elect Donald Trump. pic.twitter.com/64LbhZeIBE
— BRICS News (@BRICSinfo) November 7, 2024Domestic Consequences
Discussions also touch on how international strategies intertwine with domestic policy.
- Trump voters say his pragmatic approach could free up resources for critical issues at home like the economic crisis.
- Many of these voices are weary of Democrats prioritizing foreign aid at the expense of U.S. citizens.
- Voters portray Trump’s foreign policy as reprioritizing national well-being over foreign entanglements, which resonates strongly with struggling Americans.
Opponents say Trump’s isolationist leanings undermine America's foundational values of supporting global democracy.
- Establishment voices say they worry about a regression to insular policies that neglect humanitarian concerns abroad.
- They voice concerns over wealth inequality, social justice, and threats to marginalized communities which Trump's "America First" agenda may not address.
- Many fear rhetoric emphasizing national interest will sideline essential human rights and social justice issues, both at home and abroad.
JUST IN: @ElonMusk joined President-elect Donald Trump's phone call with Ukraine President Zelensky after the election - Axios
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) November 8, 202410
Nov
-
The 2024 election delivered a historic “red wave,” as Trump and Republican candidates cleaned up with an electoral presidential win, the popular vote, and projections for a majority in the Senate and House.
While conservative circles celebrate this shift, Democratic voters and pundits are reeling from Democrats losing support in almost every state.
Donald Trump gained support in 49 out of 50 states from 2020 to 2024 pic.twitter.com/Jd4O2plEWZ
— America (@america) November 7, 2024Democratic Voters in Shock and Disbelief
The scale of the Republican victory has generated shock among Democratic voters, many of whom anticipated more favorable results based on conventional polling and media reporting.
Voter reactions indicate a profound disconnect within the Democratic base, with discussions centering around disbelief that such a large political shift could take place after Biden’s historic popular vote totals in 2020.
10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) November 7, 2024
#10 - Joe Rogan raises SERIOUS questions about Biden’s “81 million votes” in 2020.
“Look at the difference in how many people voted for Biden in 2020. It's unprecedented! It's way higher than any other time since 2012.”
“Look at where… pic.twitter.com/lUN3lMWZdbSome attribute this wholesale American rejection of Kamala Harris to a cultural shift which the Democratic Party misread. However, the majority of Harris voters largely attribute the loss to “racism," "misogyny," and a resurgent conservatism. Now, many question whether America remains fundamentally center-right, a trend Democratic strategists appear to have underestimated.
Internal Conflict and Critique
There is division over whether Democrats strayed too far from their traditional working-class roots, or Americans are racist and misogynistic.
An increasingly progressive party, some argue, only alienated vital demographics who feel sidelined by elite-focused, urban-driven policies. Discussions show frustration with the party’s focus on identity politics over practical concerns like economic stability, public safety, and personal freedom.
On today's Morning Joe, Scarborough is still trying to square how Kamala Harris lost so bad and was SHOCKED to learn about the high price of groceries.
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) November 7, 2024
Scarborough was floored when a friend told him butter was $3 and he almost fell out of his chair when Mika Brzezinski told him… pic.twitter.com/6MelvWoput- Identity Politics: Many Democrats criticize the party’s emphasis on identity politics (e.g., gender identity and race-based policies), arguing they are detached from the daily realities facing middle America.
- Working-Class Alienation: Voters from blue-collar and Latino communities report feeling condescended to, left out by a party they once identified with but now view as elitist and dismissive.
- Shift in Latino Support: A shift toward Trump among Latino voters in traditionally Democratic regions challenges assumptions that progressive policies resonate universally among minority groups.
Some also point out that Trump gained ground with nearly every voter group besides older voters 65+ and white, college educated women. This again results in either accusations of racism and misogyny or critiques of woke ideologies.
red wave is an understatement pic.twitter.com/oRJkGEYYY6
— ian bremmer (@ianbremmer) November 6, 2024Strategic Failures and Down-Ballot Neglect
Internal critiques extend to strategic missteps that left Democrats vulnerable at both national and local levels. Voters accuse party officials of focusing too narrowly on top-ticket races, abandoning down-ballot races critical for future influence.
- Down-Ballot Neglect: Voters say too many down-ballot seats went uncontested in key areas, contributing to a domino effect that bolstered Republican gains. This lack of attention to local issues, especially in swing states, draws backlash.
- Missed Outreach: Many Democrats say party leadership failed to mobilize working-class voters, particularly losing touch with Teamsters. There is frustration at the party’s seeming disinterest in engaging on local, bread-and-butter issues.
Professor/NYT columnist Tressie McMillian Cottom urges Dems to double down on identity politics "[Trump] tapped into one of the most powerful of American identities, he tapped into white identity...That means you should double down on identities of your base." pic.twitter.com/21jyTKjhMQ
— Alex Christy (@alexchristy17) November 7, 2024Woke Versus Democrat
Democratic voter responses indicate a growing internal division. Left-leaning voters are split between support for and frustration with reactionary movements like the “4B movement,” where liberal women pledge to abstain from relationships with men who supported Trump.
- Movement Backlash: Moderate Democrats say progressive and woke movements are self-defeating, alienating young male voters and many conservative minorities who reject identity politics.
- Conservative Mockery: These reactionary movements have also faced ridicule from conservatives. Particularly the 4B movement, which they say plays into Republican messaging on family values, abstinence, and pro-life advocacy.
- Traditional Democrats: A substantial faction in the party calls for a return to traditional Democratic values over worries about alienating leftist progressives.
Outside observers and those on the right are taking the Democrats’ dramatic loss as a complete rejection of woke politics from the American electorate.
Wokeism is dead.
— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) November 8, 2024
Identity politics is dead.
Virtue-signalling is dead.
Trump’s massive win was a total repudiation of all the far-left’s ‘progressive’ (but actually regressive) crap.
Common sense will now return to a world that had gone nuts, and thank god for that.Election Integrity Worries
Another prominent reaction among Democratic voters centers on suspicions of election irregularities. Some suspect compromised mail-in ballots, voter ID issues, and lost votes are generating may have allowed Republicans to cheat. There are calls for reform, as Democrats grapple with the integrity of the electoral process they once championed.
- Missing Votes: Many view the disparity in voter turnout from 2020 to 2024 as suspicious, raising questions about the missing votes.
- Voter ID and Paper Ballots: In a reversal, some Democrats now call for stricter voter ID laws and paper ballots to ensure election security, a stance traditionally taken by Republicans.
- Perceived Fraud: Numerous comments suggest states Democrats lost correlate with lenient voter ID laws, intensifying voter mistrust and calls for electoral reform.
10
Nov
-
Following the reelection of Donald Trump, Hamas abruptly called for an immediate end to the war. This is a stark contrast from the Aug. 18 rejection when Hamas declined the U.S.’s offer for a ceasefire. MIG Reports data shows online discourse shows continued division on the Middle East.
After Trump Victory, Hamas Calls For ‘Immediate End’ to War https://t.co/1Ir1BwoknJ
— Ainsley Earhardt (@ainsleyearhardt) November 7, 2024Palestine
Conversations about Palestine are intense and frustrated. People are outraged over perceived aggressions against Palestinians in Gaza. Pro-Palestine voices condemn what they describe as Western complicity in enabling aggressive actions through financial and military support. A mix of concern and anger is directed at the United States, which this groups describes as failing to uphold a just stance. Many fear under Trump, pro-Israel policies will further suppress Palestinian voices.
Israel
Discussion of Israel is also polarized, with sentiments divided over Israel’s approach to Gaza and the perceived impact of U.S. support. Supporters view Trump’s reelection as potentially reinforcing Israel’s hardline stance, while critics foresee violent escalation.
Concerns about global antisemitism, particularly highlighted by incidents in Europe, fuel anxiety over a hostile environment for Jewish communities. The refugee crisis also intensifies calls for humanitarian aid, while some criticize media coverage as biased, either neglecting or inflating pro- or anti-Israel narratives.
Reactions to Hamas Calling for Ceasefire
Polarization and Contempt
Pro-Trump voices view his leadership as a return to strong, decisive governance that aligns with Israel. Pro-Palestine activists view his support for Israel as contributing to a worsening humanitarian crisis. The ceasefire call by Hamas draws polarized reactions, with some supporting the move as a necessary pause in violence, while others see it as a manipulative tactic.
National Identity and Strongman Rhetoric
Trump supporters often frame his leadership as a symbol of strength and American resurgence. The conversations illustrate a preference in his base for a U.S. foreign policy that prioritizes Israel’s interests, viewing Trump as the figure who can safeguard American security in alignment with allies like Israel.
Criticism of Democratic Leadership
The Democratic Party, particularly Kamala Harris, faces strong backlash, with accusations of ineffective leadership during the conflict and alienating various Americans invested in Middle East outcomes. This sentiment intertwines with economic dissatisfaction and disenfranchisement among those feeling left behind by current policies.
Calls for Advocacy and Activism
Among progressive voices, there’s a desire to continue advocating for human rights and Palestinian equity. The commentary is often framed as a moral imperative, rejecting pro-Trump policies and calling for sustained mobilization and activism.
🚨 NEW: President-elect Trump views his victory as a resounding mandate to aggressively pursue his agenda, especially after securing the popular vote - CNN
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) November 8, 2024
He is reportedly in a completely different headspace than 2017.
He has also received over a dozen calls from foreign…Critics express concerns about further escalation under Trump, with anxiety around Middle Eastern policy shifts and potential domestic consequences. Those on the left worry about the possible social regression for vulnerable U.S. groups, which they view as racially targeted. This group fears Trump’s foreign and domestic policies might erode social stability.
Sentiment and Trends
- Acidic/Contemptuous (45%): Pro-Israel voices express contempt for Democratic policies, favoring aggressive, nationalistic rhetoric.
- Anxious/Defeatist (30%): On the left, there’s anxiety about societal and international turbulence under Trump, with some fearing regressive policies.
- Activist/Hopeful (25%): Despite the bleak outlook from some, a segment remains hopeful, mobilizing for justice and humanitarian support.
09
Nov