Energy Bills: $1,000 a Month and Californians Have Had Enough
October 25, 2024.png)
Key Takeaways
- Americans are anxious about the rising cost of energy, calling for leaders who will address the issue immediately.
- The majority of middle- and lower-income households say utility bills are directly impacting their monthly budgets.
- Republicans want energy deregulation, Democrats want renewable alternatives, and Independents want political and corporate accountability.
Our Methodology
Demographics
All Voters
Sample Size
10,000
Geographical Breakdown
National
Time Period
14 Days
MIG Reports leverages EyesOver technology, employing Advanced AI for precise analysis. This ensures unparalleled precision, setting a new standard. Find out more about the unique data pull for this article.
Energy prices continue to rise, and American families are struggling to afford basics like air conditioning and washing machines. In California, many are giving personal testimonies of monthly electric bills over $1,800. This, many voters say, is unsustainable and cripplingly expensive. Some share stories of turning off appliances to make ends meet.
this is my friend's bill in san francisco
— Jenny, Girl from 4th 🌍, 鄰白廢物 🧠 🪱 (@JennyChachan) October 22, 2024
this is what happens when you vote democrat https://t.co/nrRR24GOU2 pic.twitter.com/f3kqrJoxTK
Voters are frustrated with government failures and misguided energy policies. They say it’s time for a leader who prioritizes economic reality over environmental idealism. The Biden-Harris administration, and specifically VP Harris, are central to the debate. Voters in California and across the country blame her governance strategies for the cost of energy and overall living expenses.
.png)
PG&E and Sky-High Utility Costs
A major part of the discussion about energy costs is directed at Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) and other utility companies. Voters across the political spectrum are dissatisfied with PG&E’s rate hikes, accusing the company of greed and poor management.
Voter Reactions
- 65% of the discussion is among middle-income voters who say rising utility prices directly impact their household budgets.
- 25% of the discussion is among lower-income voters who cannot afford energy bills and other necessities. Some say they must choose between food and power.
- Higher-income voters, while more tolerant of short-term price increases, also criticize the strain. They often defend renewable energy alternatives but still call for immediate economic intervention.
Americans urgently want regulatory reforms and corporate accountability. There's a very loud contingent demanding deregulation in the energy industry. Republican voters particularly argue that government intervention is exacerbating the situation, stifling competition, and allowing monopolies like PG&E to thrive without checks.
Political Ramifications from Energy
Voters are saying they will align themselves with candidates who promise economic relief and energy independence. The first Trump administration is often nostalgically cited as a time of lower energy prices and economic prosperity. Voters are frustrated by the lack of clear, actionable plans from Harris, saying they don’t trust her to “turn the page” on policy.
Voter Alignment
- Democratic Voters: 70% advocate for government intervention in energy pricing but express frustration at the inefficacy of current efforts.
- Republican Voters: 60% believe deregulation and free-market competition will lower energy prices, viewing Democratic policies as economically harmful.
- Independent Voters: 65% are anxious about rising energy costs and want pragmatic political solutions, regardless of party affiliation.
.png)
.png)
Environmental Idealism vs. Economic Realism
Criticism toward the Biden-Harris administration's energy policies often focuses on renewable energy. People criticize policies that prioritize environmentalism at the expense of practical economic concerns.
Voters say political leaders and those in urban areas are disconnected from the realities facing rural and middle-class Americans who depend on affordable energy.
Voter Sentiments
- Rural voters are angry at the focus on environmental idealism, which ignores the economic struggle of working families.
- Around 50% of voters discussing energy are skeptical of renewable energy transitions, particularly in states like California, where prices have skyrocketed.
- Critics use terms like “death cult” to describe the administration's environmentalist push for renewable energy.
.png)
Drill Baby, Drill
Within energy discussions, some voters criticize Harris’s flip-flopping stance on fracking. The lack of clarity around her advocacy or opposition generates skepticism and critique. Voters in areas with high energy costs are not convinced of her commitment to maintaining jobs in the fossil fuel industry.
For regions dependent on oil and gas, such as Pennsylvania, voters are keenly aware of the risks posed by restrictive policies. As some voters put it, “You will lose your jobs,” if fracking is banned. Others stress rising energy prices will worsen economic strain.
Voter Reactions
- 65% of comments from middle-income voters are concerned about the strain of utility bills on household finances.
- Voters view Harris’s inconsistent stance on fracking as a threat to jobs in oil and gas-rich regions, as well as the cost of energy overall.
- In oil-dependent regions, voters connect fracking bans with immediate economic hardships.
The economic implications of banning or restricting fracking are clear to voters who see fossil fuels as a bridge to energy independence. For them, Harris’s ambiguity on the issue is a slap in the face to their livelihoods and economic stability.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)