Kamala Tosses a Word Salad on the “Call Her Daddy” Podcast
October 08, 2024Key Takeaways
- Kamala Harris’s appearance on the “Call Her Daddy” podcast caused a stir around abortion and Harris’s rhetorical abilities.
- The target audience, younger progressive voters, largely responded positively. But conservatives and moderates took issue with her abortion comments.
- Many listeners pointed out that Harris did not mention the draft when talking about any government policy that imposes on men’s bodily autonomy.
Our Methodology
Demographics
All Voters
Sample Size
10,000
Geographical Breakdown
National
Time Period
2 Days
MIG Reports leverages EyesOver technology, employing Advanced AI for precise analysis. This ensures unparalleled precision, setting a new standard. Find out more about the unique data pull for this article.
Vice President Kamala Harris's appearance on the "Call Her Daddy" podcast generated controversy across the internet. Harris’s attempt to engage with a younger, more progressive audience drew sharp criticism from conservatives and moderates.
Some of the criticisms people mention are:
- Harris recording the podcast just days after Hurricane Helene, with recovery ongoing.
- The buffet of her signature word salads which provide little or no substance on issues.
- The objectionable nature of the podcast’s subject matter as a pillar interview of her campaign a month before the election.
- Her inaccurate and uninformed comments on abortion and bodily autonomy.
Harris on "Call Her Daddy"
The "Call Her Daddy" podcast has built its reputation as an irreverent space for discussions on relationships, sex, and social issues—far from the usual platform for a sitting vice president. Kamala’s decision to appear on this show suggests her clamor to reach younger voters. But the subject matter raised eyebrows among many political observers, especially older and more conservative voters.
The podcast’s trivial tone starkly contrasts with more serious policy debates typically expected of national leaders. While 62% of younger voters appreciated Kamala’s outreach and relatability, 67% of older and conservative voters criticized the podcast, seeing it as another instance of “word salad” responses that fail to address pressing issues.
Voter Reactions
Much of the discussion following Kamala’s appearance focused on her remarks about abortion. Specifically, Harris asserted there are no equivalent laws governing men’s bodies in the way she says abortion imposes on women’s.
Many listeners pointed out that neither Harris nor the podcast host mentioned the draft. Voters point out that men are subject to government regulation through conscription laws—though now some are advocating for “inclusivity” in the form of female conscription.
Call Her Daddy Girl: “Are there any laws that give the government control over a man’s body?”
— Ryan James Girdusky (@RyanGirdusky) October 6, 2024
Kamala Harris: “No”
The correct answer is the draft
pic.twitter.com/zEIUV9mMZN
MIG Reports data shows:
- 68% of pro-abortion voters support Kamala’s framing, emphasizing reproductive rights as an essential issue for women’s bodily autonomy.
- 75% of conservatives push back against Kamala’s claim, arguing the draft is a significant government imposition on men.
- 55% of swing voters find some merit in Kamala’s points but remain skeptical, with 45% calling her comments politically motivated.
Because Harris didn’t mention the draft, the public discourse made it a focal point, particularly as the segment was framed as attempting to think of an equivalent imposition on men. However, the messaging seems to work with younger progressive voters as 80% view Kamala’s commentary on bodily autonomy as progressive and necessary.
Young Voters vs. Older Voters
Kamala’s engagement with the "Call Her Daddy" audience was a clear attempt to connect with younger, progressive voters who value relatability and authenticity in political discourse. Among all younger voters, 62% react positively, praising Harris for stepping outside traditional political venues and making herself accessible to a new audience.
Older or more conservative voters react harshly, with 67% viewing the podcast as another example of Kamala’s inability to clearly articulate a coherent thought. These voters focus on her evasiveness on issues like inflation and immigration. Kamala's relaxed demeanor was seen not as refreshing, but as detached from the serious challenges facing the nation.
Kamala’s Challenge Moving Forward
Mixed reactions to Kamala’s podcast appearance underscore a fundamental challenge in her appeal to different voter blocs. Younger voters—especially those who are pro-abortion—see her as a relatable and progressive figure. The podcast appearance, while a calculated risk to broaden her appeal, may have done more to reinforce existing divisions than to unify disparate voter groups.
Many on the right also point out that Trump has been appearing on podcasts and doing alternative media interviews for months, which much larger audiences.
🚨RATIO ALERT🚨
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) October 7, 2024
DISLIKES on Kamala's recent cringe Call Her Daddy episode have officially eclipsed likes by a factor of TWO with only 100K views in one day
By contrast:
Trump commands REAL culture with appearances reaching tens of millions of views in mere HOURS
WINNING. pic.twitter.com/TPQbsduujq
In the run-up to the 2024 election, Kamala’s ability to bridge these divides will be critical. Her media strategy may help solidify support among progressives, but risks alienating many segments of the electorate. The perception that she dodges difficult questions with "word salad" responses remains a significant barrier to her.