Former President Donald Trump’s rally in Las Vegas generated much buzz and social media discussion, including a 2-point increase in his lead against Joe Biden for the presidential election. MIG Reports analysis of voter reactions to the rally indicates a positive view of Trump’s appeal.
Discussion Trends
Many Americans are talking about the perceived faults of the Biden administration with hashtags like #BidenBorderCrisis, #BidenDementia, #Bidenomics, #bidenflation. They also voice criticism of Democrats more generally. Voters express a desire for Trump to provide solutions to these issues they view as caused by President Biden.
Title IX and girls' sports is also a trending topic. Following Trump's comments about women's sports at the rally, supporters are echoing his sentiment. They agree with the assertion that men should not participate in women's sports events.
Another notable discussion trend involves statements from Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC). Some on her side fear she could be jailed if Trump wins another term. These suggestions have led to a negative response from Trump supporters who view many AOC comments as overblown or who hold critical views of AOC herself.
Sentiment Trends
Voter sentiment toward Trump’s Las Vegas rally is largely positive toward the presumptive GOP nominee. Supporters express admiration for him, describing him as a "fighter," a "proven winner,” and a "leader." Negatively charged language mostly used against figures in the Democratic party such as Biden or Ocasio-Cortez.
Negative sentiment focuses on important problems in America for voters like the border crisis, economic worries, and alleged freedom of speech issues – all of which were discussed during Trump's rally.
Other points of discussion include:
Biden Administration Criticisms
Negative sentiment toward Biden and Harris, particularly criticizing the action of their administration.
The country's current state, Trump’s potential nickname for Biden, “Crooked Joe,” the legitimacy of Biden’s election win, and comparisons between Trump and Biden’s leadership.
There is significant criticism towards Biden himself, focusing on his cognitive abilities, election legitimacy, and leadership performance. People use terms like "criminal" and "liar" when speaking about him.
Kamala Harris also faces heavy criticism, with many attributing the administration's perceived failures to both her and Biden.
Some Independents say they prefer Trump over Biden, despite not being strong Trump supporters.
Trump Supporter Reactions
Voters express unity and strength with phrases like "MAGA STRONG" and appreciate the rally despite challenges like high temperatures.
Negative online comments label Trump supporters as "gullible" and "duped" and refer to Trump as a "convict.” However, there is also a prevalent view that criticism of Trump was a coordinated effort by major liberal accounts.
The most discussed subject from the rally was Trump's support for Nevada senate candidate Sam Brown, highlighted by his post on Truth Social.
Positive sentiments were not just about support but also resistance against criticism and political targeting.
Economic Issues
Many people are enthusiastic about Trump's pledge to eliminate taxes on tips, significant for service-industry-heavy cities like Las Vegas. Some voters are making comparisons between Trump's tax policies and those of other leaders like Reagan.
Republicans and conservatives especially voice excitement about lower taxes under a second Trump administration.
There is also negative sentiment targeted at the media, with accusations of the Vegas television media suppressing coverage of Trump's tax pledges.
Voter reactions to Steve Bannon being ordered to jail are divided but with severe negativity, much like opinions on Donald Trump's conviction. The rhetoric varies sharply, with a considerable number viewing the order as a red flag for the state of democracy in the U.S., while others believe it's necessary for the government to maintain its authority.
Discussion Trends
Critics of Jailing Bannon
Critics of the order to jail Bannon view it as political persecution. They believe Bannon is a pawn in a political game orchestrated by the Biden administration.
Comments accuse Biden's administration of using power to silence and jail political opponents. They equate these actions to tactics used by dictators and communist regimes.
Critics see Bannon's indictment as a threat to governance and an attack on free speech. Common phrases include "deep state," "lawfare," and "banana republic," indicating distrust in institutional justice.
There is a trend of linking this situation to broader conservative grievances. These grievances include perceived infringements on First Amendment and Second Amendment rights.
Those Cheering the Order
Some view Bannon's indictment as a step towards accountability and upholding the rule of law. This narrative portrays Bannon as challenging institutional authority and jeopardizing democratic norms.
These views are less visible compared to the critics of the actions taken against Bannon.
Rule of Law
A recurring topic within these discussions is the perceived decline of the rule of law in America. While both sides invoke this term, they interpret and apply it differently based on partisan perspectives. Some believe Bannon's punishment upholds the rule of law because he broke the law and must face the consequences just like any citizen.
However, others feel the rule of law is being undermined, contending that Bannon's case is an instance of political persecution rather than a lawful procedure.
There is disparate sentiment depending on a person’s political orientation. However, across the board, there is a shared concern for the health of American democracy and the country's justice system, though opinions on the current state of these institutions vary sharply.
Demographics play a significant role in the polarized viewpoints, with partisan affiliations primarily driving the discourse. Ideological differences aside, there appear to be shared anxieties about the rule of law, democracy, and the use of power in politics—themes that resonate with Americans of all political stripes.
MIG Reports performed analysis of social media commentary regarding Americans’ desire or acceptance of mass deportation. Data suggests a general negativity towards the current administration’s border security and related immigration issues. Meanwhile, former president Donald Trump maintains a steady lead over Joe Biden on all border issues.
Discussion Trends
Border Security
Border security continues to be one of the highest volume discussion topics online, suggesting high engagement with this issue. This demonstrates its importance to American voters.
Currently, most Americans are extremely negative about mass migration and the presence of illegal immigrants in the country.
There is significant talk of deportation, closing the border, and increasing crime associated with migrants.
There are some concerns about the feasibility and practicality of mass deportation, but less disapproval of the idea of reducing illegal immigrants in general.
Several hot-button topics repeatedly come up in voter conversations online. Many believe mass migration is negatively impacting quality of life in America. Voters also dislike how government authorities are currently handling illegal immigration.
There are also recurring accusations of "open borders” which are allowed by the Biden administration. There’s also a strong emphasis on the association of increased crime with immigration, including cartel activities.
Immigration Issues
Discussions and sentiment on immigration issues reveal a variety of opinions about border control policies. There is significant discussion about constructing a border wall, with differing levels of support, skepticism, and criticism.
A lot of discussion about immigration issues is more technical and includes talk about executive steps the Biden administration has taken.
The discussions still touch on border security, which likely explains why border security discussion volume is higher.
Most voters advocate for stricter immigration control, with many supporting former President Trump's border policies and calling for a border shutdown.
There is some opposition to stronger measures or a wall due to affordability, practicality, and potential human rights issues.
Some people note the need for more border patrol staff or other security measures in addition to a physical barrier.
Sentiment Trends
Feelings about the border are overwhelmingly negative. Some voters voice hostility towards politicians, government decisions, and migrants. Many blame illegal immigrants for increased crime, economic stress, or demographic changes. However, a few comments question the practicality of mass deportations—but without wholly opposing it.
Analysis of online discourse clearly shows the topic of border security as a bigger conversation than general immigration issues. Despite higher volume, however, border security also gains lower sentiment, suggesting voters are extremely negative about the U.S. border. It is also clear voters prefer Donald Trump to Joe Biden on both border security and immigration issues.
On the 80th Anniversary of D-Day, illegal aliens organized a protest in New York City, blocked traffic and demanded Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) be abolished. MIG Reports analysis of American reactions shows unified disapproval.
The dominant sentiment Americans express is one of concern about uncontrolled illegal immigration. There are many comments highlighting issues of human trafficking and drug cartels. There is criticism of both Republican and Democrat politicians. Voters blame various representatives for damaging immigration policies, whether through inaction or misguided action.
The online conversation often includes derogatory and offensive remarks towards some politicians, demonstrating a high level of emotional intensity and strong political polarization on the border.
For instance, comments directed at politicians like Lauren Boebert and Ilhan Omar ranged from personal attacks to demands for expulsion or deportation. This hostility signals a high degree of controversy and animosity on the U.S. border crisis.
There is also a lot of mocking in online conversations as voters accuse certain representatives of hypocrisy or lack of effectiveness. The sentiment towards open borders is highly negative, with many expressing concerns about national security and maintaining the rule of law.
It seems most unhappy rhetoric comes from conservative-leaning individuals. They consistently express negative sentiment toward the border as a political issue, mentioning crime, border security, and national sovereignty. However, most Americans seem to have some anger or mockery and generally don't support the current border situation. This suggest that additional demographic groups share overall disapproval on border issues, but with different perspectives and emphasis than conservatives.
Recently, Infowars owner Alex Jones took steps to liquidate his assets to pay legal damages. These costs were money he owes victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook school massacre. The original court-ordered payment totaled approximately $1.5 billion.
Online reactions to possibility of Alex Jones being forced to sell Infowars are contentions, dividing people along political lines. The debate largely revolves around certain keywords and phrases like the "deep state,” "globalism,” “freedom of speech,” “the Biden administration,” and “MAGA.”
Deep State
Sentiment toward the deep state is predominantly negative and critical of:
The deep state is often blamed for negative events. People believe the deep state is a clandestine network within the government manipulating national affairs.
Media and politicians burying the Hunter Biden laptop story during the 2020 election is frequently cited as evidence of deep state action.
People express worry over perceived threats to free speech by the deep state. This is frequently mentioned in refences to Alex Jones and Infowars.
Infowars viewers suggest Jones being forced to sell his platform could be a coordinated attack by the deep state.
There is strong support for the MAGA movement, indicating a large conservative presence within these discussions.
A main theme in discussions is an “us versus them” attitude, suggesting strong distrust and suspicion towards government institutions and mainstream media.
Discussion and Sentiment Analysis
As people discuss the situation with Alex Jones and the potential loss of Infowars, there are several discussion and sentiment trends:
There is a pervasive sense of dissatisfaction and anger among Jones supporters.
Many people frequently use terms like "uniparty," highlighting a distrust in both political parties which people view as colluding against conservative interests.
There is specific dissatisfaction with Republican representatives for failing to uphold conservative values.
People are calling for action from figures like Rep. Marjorie Tayler-Greene and Speaker Mike Johnson, albeit with skepticism about their effectiveness.
Many conversations mention people like Steve Bannon, indicating a link between personal grievances and larger political events.
There is a desire for grassroots mobilization and resistance, with MAGA supporters viewed as a counterforce to perceived political wrongdoings.
Despite an overall negative sentiment, are also optimistic calls for concrete action to address perceived injustices against Jones, Bannon, Trump, and other conservative figures. Among the dissatisfaction and disillusionment, there's a hint of rallying and a call for tangible action.
The newest Star Wars franchise release called “The Acolyte” premiered to resounding love and admiration from those promoting the film. However, there was also dismissal and sharp disapproval from the viewing audience.
MIG Reports analysis of conversations about the show reveals negative sentiments, primarily about wokeness in contemporary culture. There is evident discontent and outrage among many American on this topic. They express disappointment with changes to traditional stories, claiming they have been altered to suit a woke agenda.
Most people associate wokeness with political correctness, social justice efforts, DEI, or liberal ideology. There are calls to boycott Disney and streaming platforms, or simply refusing to watch the series in objection to forced inclusiveness and diversity.
Several media outlets gave the series high scores, reviews, and other accolades. But most consumers and Star Wars fans imposed precipitously low ratings and reviews on the show.
A lot of viewers are also rekindling criticism of The Acolyte’s protagonist Amandla Stenberg, who made controversial remarks in 2018. At the time, she said, "The goal was the upset white people." This drew indignation, resentment, and accusations that Stenberg promotes racism. The voices resurrecting Stenberg’s comments voice opposition to what they call "liberal" or "leftist" narratives. Many in this group are parents or Star Wars fans with conservative viewpoints.
There is also spirited debate about individual freedom and the right to express one's opinions. People emphasize the importance of free speech and bemoan what they perceive as restrictions imposed by woke culture on individual expression.
Some Americans characterize themselves as victims of aggressive leftist agendas, expressing fear and concern about traditional values deteriorating and the erasure of history. They also draw parallels between current socio-political trends and historical societal collapses.
Additionally, there is robust criticism of Democrats, with comments equating the party's policies with communism and predicting a possible civil war due to ideological disparities. They also believe the left would refuse to allow a peaceful separation, if things come to that. Many in this group dismisses Joe Biden’s left leaning administration and a call to save America in upcoming elections.
A video went viral which claimed President Joe Biden may have soiled himself during the 80th Anniversary of D-Day in France. Other videos showed First Lady Jill Biden swiftly leading the president away while French President Macron thanked veterans.
MIG Reports analysis of social media commentary shows different interpretations of what Joe Biden was doing in the video, like many of his well-publicized gaffes. Most of the online speculation is based on unverified rumors and has not been officially confirmed or denied by any credible sources.
Because online discussion is so fractured, it's difficult to discern a majority consensus on whether people actually believe Biden experienced such an embarrassing mishap as incontinence. The political nature of conversations about president and his questionable cognition, as well as the overall mockery and humorous tones of social media make people’s true beliefs somewhat opaque.
Most Americans seem to believe the claim that Biden soiled his pants and take it as an opportunity to fuel political debate and criticisms. Many openly ridicule Biden with profane language and derisive commentary. Some Biden defenders dismiss the claim, but only citing their reasons as emphasizing more serious issues like the necessity to impeach Biden.
Despite rampant online memeing and speculations, no official denials have been made by White House officials.
Discussion and Sentiment Trends
There is an undeniable presence of derisive rhetoric from Biden's detractors. They use phrases like "poopy pants" and "filled his adult diaper" when talking about the video. Some insinuate Biden's inability to control bodily functions is evidence of weakness or mental decline.
On the other hand, some dismiss the accusations as baseless and criticize those who spread such rumors. They emphasize a lack of concrete evidence for the claim, pushing back against unfounded speculations. They emphasize other issues they believe should take precedence over personal ridicule, like impeachment inquiries and political wrongdoings.
Alternative Analysis
Some media outlets reported the incident as simply a momentary lapse in judgement. They say the president thought there was a chair behind him. Additional reporting from liberal blogs and op-eds crafted stories to shift away from the viral mockery, such as “Joe Biden Didn’t Poop Himself But These Celebs Did.” Other outlets had body language experts weigh in.
Overall distrust in liberal and mainstream media suggests Americans who believe Biden’s senior moment was more embarrassing than searching for a missing chair would not be swayed by media spin.
Vice President Kamala Harris recently appeared on Jimmy Kimmel Live and made waves with her comments about former president Trump’s conviction. Among other things, the VP said, “The reality is, cheaters don’t like getting caught,” referring to Trump and implying he cheated in the 2016 election.
Many Americans took her comments as an admission that continued prosecutions against Trump are politically motivated and retributive. Much of the response displays contempt and dissatisfaction towards her and Joe Biden's administration with accusations of lying, weakening the country, and serving their own self-interests — a common sentiment when the Vice President speaks publicly.
While conservatives reacted negatively to Harris’s comments about Trump and liberals cheered, pro-Palestine protesters overshadowed the conversation. Video emerged on social media showing protesters interrupting the Jimmy Kimmel Live taping to shout at Harris saying, “Stop the genocide” and “15,000 children dead because of you.”
Most of the reactions to the video are from progressive Democrats who agree with the protesters or conservatives who enjoy the hilarity of Democrat infighting.
What People Are Saying About Harris on Kimmel
Conversations about the VP’s late night TV appearance predominantly disapprove. Conservatives and Trump supporters are critical of Harris's statements and liberals dislike her actions regarding Israel.
People argue over Trump’s conviction, Biden's potential corruption, the Biden-Harris Administration's current policies, and questions about their allegiance towards America. Anti-Trump conversation skews more positively towards Harris's remarks. This group says Trump was found guilty by a jury of his peers and the trial was a necessary measure ensuring justice is served.
Usually liberals, those agreeing with Harris frame the conviction as the consequence for breaking the law and claim nobody is above the law. They criticize suggestions of political persecution as attempts to destroy democracy and undermine the justice system.
More conservative and Republican-leaning voters view Harris's statement with outrage, denial, or frustration. Many have frequently accused her and other Democrats of being driven by bias against Trump. They believe accusations that Trump cheated in the election are false and believe his prosecutions are politically motivated witch hunts.
Kamala Harris’s typically low approval saw a slight boost after her Kimmel appearance, suggesting anti-Trump viewers approved of her comments.
However, Donald Trump’s national approval has held steady and even increased since his conviction, suggesting many believe in Democrats having political motivations.
Belief in a Weaponized Court
Many voters express continued strong support for Trump, endorsing his candidacy for the 2024 presidency. They also criticize the Biden Administration and the current state of the nation. These voters accuse Democrats and the deep state of corruption, interfering in elections, ignoring laws, and politicizing the court system.
There is a palpable belief that Trump was unfairly targeted and condemned to hamper his campaign rather than any actual misconduct. People say the conviction is an abuse of power by the Democrats to target their political opponents and a disastrous violation of norms. They compare ongoing lawfare to actions seen in authoritarian regimes.
MIG Reports analysis suggest most Americans believe the justice system has been weaponized for partisan reasons. Those on the left believe the courts are biased in Trump’s favor. Those on the right believe Democrats are using a corrupt judiciary to attack their political opponents.
On the day of Trump’s conviction in New York, national sentiment towards “weaponization of government,” dropped dramatically.
Sentiment went from the around 44% the week before to 37% on the day Trump was convicted, suggesting many people viewed the trial as an abuse of the court system.
The Biden administration's mixed messages about cryptocurrencies have stirred confusion, dismay, and frustration among American crypto users. Many views depend on what people think about regulation in general, but some are worried about the inconsistency and potential negative impact the Biden administration’s uncertainty may have on the cryptocurrency market.
Earlier in May, a joint resolution to overturn SAB 121 gained enthusiastic bipartisan support in Congress, including from Democrats like Chuck Schumer and Cory Booker.This sea change among Democrats in Congress sparked speculations about a pivot on crypto from the Biden Administration. However, Biden followed through in his promise to veto the resolution to repeal SAB 121.
Crypto Voters Are Angry
Crypto-influenced voters are now annoyed by POTUS's reconfirmed hostility and waffling on crypto. Many assert that vetoing the resolution is a nonsensical move, as SAB 121 is neither approved nor GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles). They see it as an unnecessary kick at the "cyber hornet's nest."
Voters demand action instead of mere posturing. And many who were skeptical of a true Biden pivot are now doubling down on their disapproval. Even Democratic voters who support the rest of Joe Biden’s platform are critical of his cryptocurrency policy. They say his lack of clarity is a hindrance to the development and adoption of crypto technologies.
People are also frustrated with the unclear messaging, saying that if Biden was hoping to court crypto voters, he’s doing an exceptionally poor job. Many in the crypto community are also discussing whether crypto voters as a demographic are a much larger group than the Biden White House anticipates. They say he could be severely hurting his already struggling presidential campaign by upsetting crypto holders.
The bipartisan engagement among members of the House and Senate creates a sharp contrast with Joe Biden’s anti-crypto stance. Figures like Democratic Rep. Mike Flood and Republican Senator Ted Cruz taking joining on pro-crypto issues gains them approval. Cruz's initiative for operating Bitcoin miners in Texas has gained him popularity in the crypto community.
Biden’s approval on crypto is consistently lower than sentiment toward pro-crypto politicians – especially Donald Trump.
While there is some fluctuation, Trump’s crypto approval trends similarly with overall crypto approval while Biden dipped from 52% to 45% the day before his veto.
Donald Trump is Successfully Courting the Crypto Crowd
While criticism continues toward Biden, another trending topic among American crypto voters
is a rumored discussion on crypto policy between Elon Musk and Donald Trump. The news sparked controversy as some who dislike both men ridicule them, while others are hopeful a collaboration may lead to more pro-crypto policies.
Musk denied the rumors, saying he didn't discuss crypto policy with Trump. However, he expressed support for any initiative that moves power from government to the people, which he says includes crypto.
Regardless of whether the rumors are true, many are positive about Trump’s recent crypto support, hoping more discussions lead to more crypto-friendly. They’re especially hopeful if Trump returns to the White House.
Rumors about Trump’s potential crypto policies in general have sparked a flurry of conversations leading to speculation about the role crypto will play in Trump's election campaign. Those who are highly motivated by crypto say it is part of their livelihood and important enough to vote on in the presidential election.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)