Protect Children: Public Backlash Against Migrant Crimes
September 01, 2024.png)
Key Takeaways
- Americans are outraged at stories of migrant crimes against children, expressing fear and outrage.
- There is a strong belief that current immigration policies are too lenient and even complicit, directly contributing to increased crime and cartel activity.
- People call for stricter border controls and greater political accountability, saying the government and NGOs are enabling the crisis.
Our Methodology
Demographics
All Voters
Sample Size
41,500
Geographical Breakdown
National
Time Period
7 Days
MIG Reports leverages EyesOver technology, employing Advanced AI for precise analysis. This ensures unparalleled precision, setting a new standard. Find out more about the unique data pull for this article.
When Americans are aware of migrant crimes against children, particularly those involving trafficking and abuse, they are furious. Voter conversations show widespread concern and anger over child safety.
People’s reactions are shaped by their awareness of these crimes and their perceptions of the underlying problems. This analysis explores prevailing sentiments, focusing on how awareness impacts public emotions and beliefs about the impact of unchecked immigration on American children.
.png)
.png)
Awareness and Emotional Impact
People are increasingly aware of the crimes committed by migrants, especially those involving children. This awareness triggers intense emotional responses, predominantly fear and outrage. Approximately 75-85% express negative sentiments, with voters expressing alarm over child trafficking and abuse linked to illegal immigration.
Americans view these crimes as an imminent threat to the safety their children, heightening a sense of urgency and desperation. Fears are compounded by frequent mentions of specific incidents involving children, which serve to personalize and amplify emotional impact.
The public’s awareness of these issues does not merely evoke concern but generates discussion of societal vulnerability and government failure. When the media reports crimes against children, Americans express outrage, often blaming Biden-Harris policies as facilitating increased dangers.
BREAKING: Illegal aliens tried to hijack 2 buses full of kids in San Diego
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) August 29, 2024
Border Czar Harris owns this mess pic.twitter.com/KovIECZgLc
Perceived Problems and Their Origins
Voters discussing these issues regularly insist the root of the problem is the Biden-Harris border. People view these policies as too lenient, allowing criminals to exploit vulnerable populations, particularly children.
MIG Reports analysis shows 70-80% of discussions emphasize the belief that open borders and ineffective enforcement contribute directly to the rise in migrant crime. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris receive the blame as voters assert their immigration policy is a major failure.
National sentiment is that leaders have both failed to protect citizens and created a situation where migrants can commit these crimes with impunity. There are widespread calls for stricter immigration controls and harsher penalties crimes—especially against children.
There is also a growing distrust of government institutions, with around 60% suggesting government agencies and nonprofits are either complicit in or negligent toward the border crisis.
.png)
Role of NGOs at the Border
Many Americans accuse Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) of facilitating illegal immigration. They regularly implicate these organizations in the crimes committed by migrants, particularly those involving children.
The means sentiment is predominantly negative as people express outrage and betrayal, believing NGOs enable human trafficking and other criminal activities. This distrust is further exacerbated by the perception that NGOs prioritize the welfare of migrants over the safety of citizens. Many people call for stricter regulation and oversight of these organizations.
Some of the reasons Americans give for blaming NGOs include:
- Operational Practices: Some say NGOs providing aid like shelter and legal advice to migrants facilitate illegal immigration by making the journey more viable.
- Collaboration with Smugglers: There's suspicion that some NGOs inadvertently or directly aid smugglers with logistical support or information.
- Political and Ideological Motives: Some view NGOs, especially those with international affiliations, as pushing for U.S. open borders or demographic change.
- Financial Incentives: Critics say NGOs, often funded by governments or international bodies, encourage migration because their financial benefits are tied to the scale of the crisis they manage.
- Misuse of Resources: People say NGOs divert resources meant for legal residents to illegal migrants.
- Lack of Accountability: Lack of oversight at the U.S. border causes accusations of activities beyond humanitarian aid, potentially including trafficking.
Anger at Cartels
Voters also cite cartels as a root cause of violence and trafficking across the U.S. border. Public sentiment strongly links the activities of Mexican cartels to the broader issue of border security and safety for American communities.
Discussion reflects a widespread belief that lax border policies allow cartels to thrive, facilitating and even encouraging drug trafficking and child trafficking. This fuels public demand for more aggressive measures to combat cartel influence.
.png)
Additional Themes
Beyond the complicity of government and NGOs with cartels, Americans also discuss broader societal issues like the erosion of American cultural and moral values through immigration.
Citizens express concern that the influx of migrants, coupled with the government's inaction, is leading to a decline in societal standards. Many argue that migrants who increasingly do not assimilate, deepen national cultural fractures and erode Americans values.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)