Following his felony conviction, former president Donald Trump was ordered by the court to have an interview with a probation officer. Several media outlets reported on the event which was a 30-minute Zoom. Much of the coverage attempted to paint the situation as another disastrous legal situation for Trump.
MIG Reports studied social media reactions to the interview itself and media coverage. Trump supporters don’t seem to be wavering—and neither do Trump haters. However, discussions of Trump mentioning the keyword “president” increased with a net gain in approval and no data indicating lowered support.
Many Americans, particularly those on the right, view Trump's legal treatment as egregious and unfair, further fueling their support for him. They use the theatrical nature of his probation interview to criticize what they perceive as increasingly steep political persecution against conservatives.
Voters are also divided regarding current President Joe Biden. They criticize him for his administration’s failures and see Trump as a more favorable option, often also calling for Biden's impeachment.
Some defend President Biden, arguing any impeachment attempts are baseless and targeting political opponents. However, their view of Trump is the opposite among those on the left who tend to view claims of Trump's mistreatment as either false or that he deserves what he’s getting. They also continue expressing deep dissatisfaction with Trump's comments about certain issues, like recent remarks about Taylor Swift.
Other Reactionary Conservative Discussions
The topic of Hunter Biden's conviction is brought up repeatedly in discussions of Trump's probation interview. Some argue about alleged double standards in the justice system, indicating suspicion about how both cases were handled by authorities.
Posts referencing Marjorie Taylor Greene's intent to impeach Joe Biden presents a divided reaction, with many dismissing it as futile and a waste of time, while a significant portion support her efforts reflecting a heightened political polarization.
On June 12, news outlets reported on a Russian submarine arriving in Cuba. American reactions to Russia’s subsequent military exercises conducted off the east coast of the U.S. are significantly polarized. They reflect the high-tension surrounding Russia-U.S. relations and their wider global implications.
Two themes are prominent in voter discussions: geopolitical anxieties and domestic political divisions.
Geopolitical Anxieties
Americans are concerned about escalating geopolitical tensions, especially due to Russia's military exercises near American soil.
Russia's military actions are seen as a significant geopolitical statement linked to its invasion of Ukraine.
There are discussions about potential U.S. responses, including using frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine, which could cause inflation.
There is widespread worry about China aligning with Russia and escalating tensions further.
Many voters have divergent views on whether Russia and China are aligning against the U.S. or reflecting global ambivalence towards U.S. foreign policy.
Domestic Political Divisions
President Biden's foreign policy on Russia and Ukraine is highly contentious, with critics alleging it provokes Russia and potentially involves corruption.
Supporters emphasize the complexity of international relations and past U.S. interventions.
There is widespread critique of U.S. interventionist policies by both Democratic and Republican administrations, with claims of lost moral high ground.
Discussions on Russia's military exercises reveal deeper anxieties and divisions in American society, linking international affairs with domestic politics.
Other Discussions
Some voters raise concerns about the economic impact of potential conflicts, highlighting risks posed to the global economy and speculating about possible retaliatory sanctions.
There were also discussions about the role of NATO, with some questioning its effectiveness. Others defend the alliance's necessary role in maintaining balance.
Given the historical context of U.S.-Russian-Cuban relations, the fact that Russia’s naval vessels arrived in Cuba sparked significant apprehension among some Americans.
Sentiment Analysis
Skepticism and concern seem to dominate American feelings about potential escalations with Russia. There is a generally anxious mood regarding the recent military drills and the potential threat from adversaries. However, due to the complex and nuanced nature of the topic, sentiments scatter widely across the spectrum. Positive sentiments are largely expressed with dismissive attitudes, while negative sentiments are more common among those critical of the Biden administration's foreign policy.
Headlines about the May CPI report laud no movement as a sign the economy is improving. Reports also urge consumers to spend into the economy, despite Americans insisting they don’t have extra cash to spend.
Headlines are exclaiming a better-than-expected CPI report, but many people are focused on specific economic and financial issues directly impacting their quality of life this year. This includes things like taxes, investments, and government spending.
The mention of CPI in hashtags shows people view it as a key indicator of inflation trends. However, the overall sentiment implies voters have reservations about whether these measurements truly reflect their financial experiences and economic realities.
Headlines reporting a positive CPI report seem to bolster slightly increased national sentiment toward the economy and inflation. But online conversations are severely negative about the cost of living—especially housing prices. This is something Americans are considering heavily in their voting decisions. These voters appear to be predominantly middle-class homeowners or prospective homeowners who are hard-hit by rising property prices and high interest rates.
The U.S. Housing Market
Talk about the housing market focuses on high interest rates, which contributes to inflation and reduces people's capacity to afford homes. Americans voice a desire for home prices to be reduced to levels that are affordable even amidst high interest rates. This sentiment is often accompanied by skepticism about the likelihood of significant rate cuts happening before any kind of price correction.
Online discussion suggests there is a lack of faith in government or Federal Reserve interventions aimed at curbing inflation. There’s also negativity about the fact that housing is one of the most significant expenses in the average household. It seems many Americans believe low home prices due to high-interest rates might eventually happen, but not in the immediate future.
Many feel the current economy presents an adverse economic climate which strangles the affordability of homes. High interest rates are a particular pain point, preventing many from purchasing homes and increasing demand for renters leading to elevated shelter costs across the board.
Property Taxes
There is also significant discussion about property taxes, calling them a “scam.” This particularly applies to homeowners who have paid off their property. This group argues property tax undermines the concept of ownership. Some say property taxes enhance the value of properties and are essential to maintaining public facilities—but most homeowners tend to feel negatively about property taxes.
Crypto Investments
Cryptocurrency investments have also become a topic of conversation with news of the May CPI report. Conversations suggest a changing economic climate where individuals may be investing more in cryptocurrency and related ventures. Reports of a Bitcoin price jump and increased Bitcoin buys with the CPI numbers have crypto investors suggesting lowered inflation is causing crypto excitement.
Income Tax
Complaints about taxes are not limited to property taxes. Voters complain about the taxes on tips for service workers, debating its fairness. They also wonder whether tips should be considered income or gratitude gifts. Some show disgust towards people who do not pay taxes despite benefiting from government services, hinting at increased frustration over border security and taxpayer funding for illegal immigrants.
Taxpayer Dollars Misused
People also complain about the misuse of tax money in terms of allegations of fraud and misappropriation. There is concern over government-funded programs like the Frontline Worker payment program in Minnesota. This reflects a general discontent and demands for better accountability in public spending.
Recent reporting identified President Joe Biden as suffering his lowest approval numbers from voters at around 37.4%. Americans say they’re dissatisfied with the current administration because of multiple issues, which ae causing the dwindling approval rating. Some of the top issues include the economy, immigration, impeachment efforts, and allegations against his son, Hunter Biden.
The Economy
Many Americans are frustrated with the current economic situation. They believe their wages are not increasing in line with the rising cost of living. Some feel they are working mainly to pay bills, further exasperating their discontent with Biden's policy. Accusations around Biden favoring special interests and corporations over everyday people are also adding to the negative sentiment.
Immigration
Concerns around immigration policy and border security, particularly related to the U.S.-Mexico border, are contributing to Biden's low approval rating. Biden has been criticized for the problems persisting at the border despite his rule change and executive orders.
Impeachment Efforts
Some discussions focus on efforts by Republicans, led by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and others, to impeach Biden. This has sparked debate around the validity and evidence behind these efforts. Many express frustration at the perceived pettiness and partisanship of these moves even as they have been largely unsuccessful.
Family Ties
Hunter Biden’s business dealings have also drawn scrutiny and criticism. Some Americans believe not enough is being done to investigate Hunter Biden and that Joe Biden should be held accountable too. Conversely, others point out that Biden has not interfered in ongoing investigations or litigation involving his son, showing integrity and respect for the justice system.
Israel-Palestine
Many online discussions highlight divisions in the Democratic Party regarding the conflict between Israel and Palestine. Democratic voters will likely continue to be split by this conflict, especially with no ability to offset emotional stressors which have helped drive the abysmal approval numbers.
Establishment Sentiment
There is a significant amount of misinformation and extreme views circulating, some accusing Biden of totalitarian rule and election fraud, even leading to aggressive and threatening comments.
Furthermore, the prevalent perception that Biden is not doing enough for the American people seems to be negatively impacting his approval rating. Whether accurate or not, this perception can influence how people view his performance, which is reflected in polls.
Democratic Perspectives
While his supporters are vocally in favor of President Biden amid dropping approval ratings, their reasons are less nuanced and not universal.
Dismissive: Many argue President Biden is a “clean politician,” capable of shaking off any negative allegations.
Mainstream Media’s Fault: Some blame Biden's unpopularity on factors such as media exaggerations and hypocrisy.
Reality Check: Some admit Biden faces a tough battle in countering these negative perceptions.
Issues that will likely continue impacting Biden’s approval include:
Continued border crossing numbers in the face of Biden’s meager response to control the border.
CPI and other inflation reporting continually adjusted.
Democratic National Convention nominating Joe Biden as the presidential candidate via Zoom.
Elizabeth Warren's call for the Federal Reserve to cut rates has sparked responses from Americans on the left and the right. Most perceive her actions and recent press release as overly progressive or socialist leaning. Those who support her measures want to find greater means of reaching economic equality.
Overall, sentiment towards Elizabeth Warren's economic policies, tax platform, and desire for rate cuts are largely negative. Most voters react with skepticism and opposition, which can be seen in many of her tweets that get significantly ratioed.
If we tax the rich, we can fund opportunity for all.
U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren, Jacky Rosen, and John Hickenlooper wrote to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, urging him to lower the federal funds interest rates from their current high of 5.5%. They argue high rates are worsening the housing and auto insurance costs, which are key drivers of inflation. They believe rates are widening the economic gap between the U.S. and Europe, where central banks are cutting rates.
Warren asserts the Fed's policy is not reducing inflation as intended but is instead harming the economy and risking a recession.
Many Americans seem to believe current high interest rates benefit the wealthy and are detrimental to average citizens. However, most online discourse doesn’t specifically mention Warren’s call for rate cuts. This could indicate either a lack of understanding of the direct impact of federal interest rates on citizens’ daily lives or lack of interest in the topic.
Warren’s overall approval dipped to 38% in the last few days with an increase in her online mentions.
Approval for Warren on the topics of banking, the economy, and taxes are also dismal, falling as low as 32% for banking and 31% for taxes in the last two weeks.
Opinions of Warren’s Policies are Mostly Partisan
Many Americans discuss the potential impacts of a Fed rate cut, discussing whether it would remedy the economic strain citizens are feeling. Liberals generally support rate cuts, arguing for economic stimulus. Republicans and the fiscally conservative tend to be wary that artificially low interest rates will worsen runaway inflation.
Arguments Supporting Rate Cuts
Liberals say lowering interest rates could stimulate economic activity by making borrowing cheaper for businesses and consumers, potentially leading to increased investment and spending.
Reduced mortgage rates would likely encourage more home sales and purchases.
High interest rates do not address the underlying causes of rising auto insurance costs, but lower rates could ease financial conditions for consumers facing these expenses.
With other major central banks cutting rates, lowering U.S. rates could help prevent the dollar from strengthening too much, which can tighten financial conditions domestically.
High interest rates risk pushing the economy into a recession, leading to job losses and business closures. Lowering rates could mitigate this risk and support job growth.
Arguments Against Rate Cuts
Conservatives tend to say high interest are more effective at controlling inflation. Lowering rates risks worsening inflationary pressures, undermining efforts to stabilize prices.
Maintaining higher rates could contribute to long-term economic stability by preventing overheating and speculative bubbles in asset markets, including housing.
Higher interest rates benefit savers by providing better returns on deposits and fixed-income investments, which is important for retirees and others relying on interest income.
Sudden changes in monetary policy can create uncertainty and volatility in financial markets, potentially destabilizing investment environments
While other central banks are cutting rates, maintaining relatively higher rates in the U.S. can attract foreign investment, supporting the dollar and providing a buffer against global economic shocks.
The Political Divide on Economic Issues
More conservative and libertarian voters vehemently oppose Warren's proposals. They fear her approaches lean socialist or communist. They argue government involvement should be minimal and the Fed has little power to improve the economy.
They fundamentally disagree with the Federal Reserve controlling capital or being involved in “handing out” opportunities. They see Warren's actions as promoting over-dependence on government, which in their view contradicts their understanding of personal responsibility and paves the way toward an unsustainable economic system.
Liberal voter opinions on Fed policy are more difficult to discern. It appears there is segment of voters who support Warren's call for lowering rates, although they do not or cannot discuss the intricacies of the policy or why it would be beneficial. Among them, some voters in Michigan seem appreciative of her progressive stance. This group advocates government intervention to balance power dynamics and believes that equity of outcome should be a primary economic objective.
Overall, Warren's call to cut rates has prompted polarized reactions. Critiques correlate her call to socialist or communist principles, advocating for smaller government and personal responsibility. However, there are supporters who want economic equality and justice by any means.
Justice Samuel Alito was secretly recorded talking about the discontented nature of American politics and partisan divides. During the interaction, Justice Alito said, “One side or the other is going to win. There can be a way of working, a way of living together peacefully, but it’s difficult, you know, because there are differences on fundamental things that really can’t be compromised."
What Americans are Saying
MIG Reports analyzed voter sentiment on the themes Justice Alito spoke about across varying online conversations to determine if voters agree with his position. While reactions to Alito’s comments themselves are scattered and indirect, the themes he spoke about are prominent.
The state of political divides in the country and increasingly irreconcilable value clashes are at the forefront of American discourse. Most people agree that ideological, political, and cultural differences have dwindling prospects for national unity or resolution.
Analysis indicates a clear sense of worry Americans have about the future of the country’s institutions, event beyond government institutions. There are concerns about the erosion of educational institutions, corporations and small business brands, and cultural institutions like the news media and entertainment.
However, there are stark disagreements on the causes and solutions to these concerns. Alito's comments speak to the broader political polarization present in America and real-time voter discussions seem to substantiate his position.
Discussion topics in three top categories for online conversation demonstrate the accuracy of Justice Alito’s statements about the fracturing of American political and cultural unity.
Ideologies in America
Discussion Trends
Wokeness: Many people express negative views on wokeness, criticizing it for promoting political correctness, cancel culture, and societal sensitivity. Critics argue it leads to societal decay and stifles free speech.
Role of Government: There is significant disagreement over government initiatives, with some criticizing perceived overreach and authoritarianism. Opinions are split between support for libertarian or conservative policies versus socialist or liberal measures.
Identity Politics: Discussions on race, gender, and sexual orientation show defensiveness and hostility towards changing societal norms with little room for compromise.
Political Partisanship: The division between conservatives and liberals is clear, with each side blaming the other for societal issues and accusing each other of spreading propaganda. There is a yearning for a return to “normalcy,” despite skepticism that normalcy is possible.
Media Bias: Many believe mainstream media is biased, promoting a leftist agenda or lacking impartiality.
Sentiment Trends
Society feels upheaval from changing values or oppressive norms.
Both sides are frustrated and fearful, longing for unity but failing to see a path to it.
Disagreements hinder understanding, leading to confrontational discourse.
President
Discussion Trends
Political Focus: Many Americans are discussing political affairs, particularly focusing on President Biden's administration, impeachment efforts, political lies, and border-related issues.
Polarization: There is a clear divide in discussions between those who support President Biden and those who are against his presidency.
Accusations and Defense: While both sides engage in accusations and defense, there is also distrust towards the actions and decisions taken by Biden's administration. Some accuse leaders of lying, and others question their motives.
Lack of Constructive Dialogue: Discussions lack constructive dialogue, with participants engaging in personal attacks and derogatory statements. This contributes to further discord and division rather than seeking solutions.
Sentiment Trends
There is a prevailing sentiment of disagreement and frustration with the current political landscape.
Voters express resentment and dissatisfaction towards politicians, accusing them of inaction, political bias, and crimes.
Sentiments are polarized between those who support President Biden and those who oppose his presidency.
Overall, there is a sentiment of division and discord, and Americans fear a lack of compromise and peaceful coexistence.
Weaponized Government
Discussion Trends
Government Criticism: There is much talk about government overreach. Voters express concern about losing control of the government and the growing power disparity.
Political Party Division: Discussions are marked by a clear divide in political party preferences. Both Democrats and Republicans receive blame for the nation's issues, reflecting deep partisan divides.
Calls for Citizen Action: Many people emphasize the need for citizens to reclaim government control. There is a strong emphasis on protecting democratic principles and citizen rights.
Government Involvement in Specific Issues: People discuss federal government involvement in issues like birth control. Discussions highlight the need for a clear delineation of roles between state and federal governments.
Sentiment Trends
There is a prevailing sentiment of dissatisfaction with the current political landscape and government actions.
Sentiments are polarized along party lines, with both sides blaming each other for societal problems.
There’s a strong sensitivity to political partisanship and mutual distrust.
Many people feel an urgency for the American people to take action on their beliefs.
There is a call for a proper balance between state and federal government roles.
Since Governor Gavin Newsom enacted a $20-per-hour mandate for fast food employees in April, California has lost 10,000 jobs and numerous franchises closed locations. MIG Reports analysis show distinct disapproval from Californians in their discussion of Newsom.
In 2024, Gavin Newsom’s approval on the economy is trending downward, currently at 35%, which is 7 points below his six-month average of 42%.
Economic Issues
Public sentiment is highly negative about the wage mandate's impact on fast-food jobs in California, blaming Governor Newsom's policies.
Californians are discussing their desire for lower taxes as the current tax rates as detrimental to businesses and leading to job losses like the 10,000 fast-food employees.
Newsom is perceived as ineffective in managing the state's economy and addressing the needs of lower-income families, leading to feelings of disenfranchisement.
Concerns include increasing crime rates, high costs of living, and more people leaving the state. These make it difficult for many to afford essentials like fuel, food, utilities, and medication.
Fiscal Policy
Governor Newsom’s name is mentioned frequently and mostly negatively. Most Californians criticize him for how he handles the state's budget and transforming a surplus into a deficit.
Some voters interpret California's large budget deficit as contributing to the loss of 10,000 fast food employees. There isn't a specific emphasis on the wage mandate, but complaints are often tied back to overall economic mismanagement.
Many California residents complain about the cost of living, prices for gas and food, and a decrease in their savings. They directly point to the governor's policies as a reason for these changes.
Overall, Californians seem to distrust Governor Newsom, which seems largely due to his financial decisions. People are voicing their frustrations about the state's budget deficit and the perceived negative impact of Newsom's economic policies on their personal finances.
Sentiment about the overall economic health of the state is negative. Voters express concerns over job loss, increased living costs, and overall poor management of California's economy.
There is also a sense of exasperation, as people feel their concerns and hardships are not being addressed. They urge Newsom to "sit down” and get in touch with the people.
People are frustrated and dissatisfied with Newsom's leadership and many call for fresh leaders who can manage the economy better.
Reparations, which refer to compensating descendants of African slaves in America for the economic disparities black Americans suffered, are a growing topic of political and social discourse in the United States. However, opinions on this matter vary broadly among various demographics and political affiliations, causing various proposals for reparations to elicit mixed reactions.
National sentiment toward racial reparations hovers in the low 40% range, suggesting it has not become a widely popular issue.
In general, Democrats have a more negative sentiment on racial issues than Republicans, suggesting they may see more of a need for something like reparations.
Supporters and Detractors of Reparations
Many African American voters view reparations as a necessary act of justice and financial redress that should address hundreds of years of institutionalized slavery, racial discrimination and inequality. Advocates argue economic compensation would be an effective way of remedying the racial wealth gap. They also believe it would be a required step to achieving racial justice. They contend slavery helped build the wealth of the nation on the backs of the enslaved, and the benefits of that economy have lingered into the 21st century.
However, not all Americans support reparations — particularly conservatives and Republicans who consider it part of woke ideology. Those in opposition to racial reparations argue slavery was a historical event that current generations bear no responsibility for. Many express fears about the potential economic costs and social implications of racially motivated and imposed payments. They raise concerns about the practicality of determining who would qualify for reparations, and how a program might be administered.
Reparations critics also worry about the economic feasibility of such a large and coercive transfer of wealth. They fear they could lead to increased taxes or government debt, without effectively or fairly solving problems for economic classes or races.
Others argue reparations could potentially increase racial tension and divisiveness. These critics, spanning the spectrum of political ideologies, often promote targeted policies aimed at improving education, housing, and job opportunities for minority communities rather than directly compensating individuals for past injustices.
Political and Generational Divides
The dividing lines of how Americans view reparations seem to be largely political and perhaps generational. The Democratic party has generally been more supportive of reparations, with some democratic presidential candidates in 2020 urging studies on the issue. Conversely, Republicans have been broadly opposed to reparations, with several key figures arguing they would be costly, divisive, and unfair.
The progressive left are the strongest advocates for reparations and say they are necessary to confront the country’s history of racial injustice. More centrist Democrats focus on broad social programs aimed at reducing economic inequality, rather than reparations specifically for black Americans.
Younger people like Gen Z are also more open to the idea of reparations than older generations. One study indicated less than one-third of white adults of any age support reparations, compared to about three-quarters of black adults. While Democrats have been more receptive to reparations, polls show that the party is divided along racial and generational lines.
A significant proportion of African American voters support reparations, viewing it as necessary for achieving racial justice. Other minority groups have also expressed support, drawing parallels between their experiences and the historical injustices faced by African Americans. However, white voters are generally less supportive of reparations.
Ideological Drivers
There is a portion of black conservative voters who do not support reparations, as well as white liberals who do. This suggests support for or opposition to reparations is not wholly racial in nature, but largely ideological.
Talk about reparations often goes beyond the question of financial compensation and ventures into addressing systemic racism, wealth disparity, educational opportunity gaps, and other forms of inequality that persist in modern America.
Those who believe in equity and systemic racism are more likely to support the idea of reparations. Those who believe in meritocratic achievement, personal responsibility, and free market capitalism are less likely to support reparations.
America’s reaction to European elections reveals a politically and ideologically polarized discourse. This is especially true for right-leaning Americans and their response toward left-leaning opponents. There is a strong anti-leftist or anti-communist milieu, referring to the left as a threat to western governance and associating it with socialism and communism.
Americans are increasingly expressing anti-woke sentiment, attributing alleged election losses in Europe to “woke liberalism.” Wokeness is portrayed as a harmful force that is destroying countries and weakening societies. Some are also critical of the invocation of political correctness in comedy, seeing it as an infringement on artistic freedom.
The topic of free speech is a major trend in these discussions. Many emphasize the importance of free speech, yet there's a discernible disagreement about where boundaries are. Discussions of boundaries are mostly brought up by those with leftist positions since they view censorship as necessary in more circumstances than fervent free speech supporters.
Questions of free speech limitations are also brought up in reference to viral videos of German youth who support the AfD (Alternate for Germany, a right-wing populist party) recreating a nightclub song with the words, “Ausländer raus, Deutschland den Deutschen,” which mean, “Foreigners out, Germany for Germans.”
Anti-globalist sentiments also emerge in these discussions, with many accusing leftist globalists of funding propaganda and divisive rhetoric. Some people tie this to broader conspiracies involving George Soros and other alleged puppeteers of globalist disruptions.
Furthermore, there are numerous references to immigration debates, with some claiming mainstream media in the West is hiding the negative consequences of immigration. This is tied into broader concerns about Islam's influence in the West, with some viewing it as contrary to Western and liberal societal norms.
Sentiment Trends
Negativity To Biden: Conversations largely display a negative sentiment toward President Biden, reflecting dissatisfaction with his term so far. The significant points of criticism include how he is handling the border crisis, his actions or perceived inactions, and his policies.
Anti-Establishment: There is also a pronounced displeasure with the establishment in general, encompassing both parties. Americans express a desire for new leadership beyond the traditional dichotomy of the Democrats and Republicans.
Sentiment To Trump: Feelings toward Trump remain polarized, with some expressing enduring support for him and others criticizing and pointing to his alleged felonies and impeachment.
Sentiment Toward Voting: Conversations reveal a mixture of commitment to vote, a desire for change, and skepticism toward current available options.
Immigration
In light of European politics, American discussions show a pro-Trump sentiment. Many support his rhetoric on immigration policy, particularly his promise for a more stringent stance on illegal immigration. This perspective dovetails with the trend of European governments leaning further to the right in their political ideology and desiring stricter immigration controls.
There are many comments, "Great to see people all over the world voting for freedom and their own nation and a controlled border! Trump is the next 1 to win," and "Want the illegals gone - VOTE TRUMP!" This discourse reveals a positive sentiment toward Trump's policies and leadership and a desire to prevent Europe's immigration struggles from repeating in the U.S. These trends show a strong approval for stricter borders and the preference for national interests.
Much of the discussions centered around deportation policies, with many Americans supporting strong borders and deporting illegal immigrants. This sentiment is captured in comments like, "Stand with Trump we have a country to save. 🚨 JUST IN — CBS POLL: Over 60% of voters support Donald Trump's plan to deport ALL illegal aliens," and "Finish the wall and deport them to the Mexico side of it." Overall, there is a vocal desire for stronger national security and concern over the perceived economic and societal impacts of illegal immigration.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)