Kamala’s Very First Interview Media Spins, Voters Cringe
August 31, 2024.png)
Key Takeaways
- Kamala Harris’s much-anticipated first interview since the start of her presidential campaign receives skepticism over her shifting positions.
- Criticism is strong concerning Harris's handling of economic issues, military support, and the border.
- Many Americans demand greater accountability and transparency from Harris, highlighting a significant distrust in her ability as a leader.
Our Methodology
Demographics
All Voters
Sample Size
44,500
Geographical Breakdown
National
Time Period
1 Day
MIG Reports leverages EyesOver technology, employing Advanced AI for precise analysis. This ensures unparalleled precision, setting a new standard. Find out more about the unique data pull for this article.
MIG Reports analysis of reactions to Kamala Harris's first media interview shows skepticism, criticism, and some support. There is division among voters between those with concerns about Harris's statements and policy shifts and her supporters. Many also note the conspicuous perception of CNN and Dana Bash preparing the interview to protect Harris from scrutiny.
People criticize the fact that the pre-taped interview was composed of soft-ball questions and was truncated to less than 20 minutes. They also question whether Harris could have fielded interview questions without her running mate, Tim Walz.
Trump’s last four interviews:
— Bad Hombre (@joma_gc) August 29, 2024
-57 minutes (Dr. Phil)
-57 minutes (Theo Von)
-2 hours and 3 minutes (Elon Musk)
-1 hour and 11 minutes (Shawn Ryan)
Kamala’s first interview in 40 days as the Democrat nominee:
18 minutes, edited, no transcript, and with a chaperone.
MIG Reports data shows:
- 65% of those discussing the interview express doubts about Harris’s reliability and consistency on policy.
- 58% voice frustration about her economic policies and lack of support for military families.
- 27% convey cautious optimism about her vision for the middle class.
- 70% call for accountability and transparency regarding her positions on key issues.
Flip-Flopper in Chief
_1.png)
Many Americans complain about Harris’s inconsistency or noncommittal posture on critical policy positions. This is a particular frustration regarding border security and immigration.
Voters express disbelief over her recent flip-flop on a border wall, calling it hypocritical given her historical stance. Americans feel betrayed, suggesting Harris's frequent shifts reveal her political opportunism, where her policies follow public sentiment rather than stand on principle.
Some also criticize her as a “copycat” saying she is adopting Trump’s populist policies like “no tax on tips” and a border wall because her own views are unpopular. People use words like "flip-flopper," "untrustworthy," and "gaslighting" to describe Harris. And 65% express doubts about her reliability on policy.
It’s the Border and Immigration, Stupid
MIG Reports analysis of election and swing state discussions confirm immigration and border issues are a strong source of public dissatisfaction toward Harris.
- In swing states, 75% of discussions on border security and 70% on immigration is negative as people voice frustration with Harris’s role as "Border Czar."
- In election discussions, 60% criticize her border security stance, and 82% disapprove of her immigration policies, focusing on leadership and ideological concerns.
- Overall, negative sentiment averages between 71-73%, highlighting significant challenges for Harris on these issues.
.png)
Other Issues
Military
Voters also disapprove of Harris's response to economic issues and the military. They criticize her, mentioning military support amidst economic hardship. Americans feel she neglects U.S. troops while simultaneously advocating for financial support for overseas actions.
There is frustration over promises of economic assistance. People say Harris’s platitudes come off as inadequate or superficial. Sentiments trend negative, with 58% expressing anger and disappointment towards Harris on economic matters and support for military families.
Middle Class
There is some cautious optimism regarding Harris’s vision for the middle class and supporting American aspirations. Some express appreciation for her hopeful messages in response to questions about her first actions as president.
This is a smaller group, however, with only 27% mentioning the interview positively. Supporters resonate with themes of hope and a desire for a new direction, even amid concerns regarding her current track record and decision-making
Accountability
An overall theme of skepticism about accountability and transparency overshadows much of the discussion. Voters raise pointed questions about her policy decisions and the implications of her previous statements.
Many view her as inauthentic and disengaged from real Americans. This consistent call for transparency highlights an overarching mistrust, as 70% demand clearer communication regarding her positions on critical issues.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)