Recent viral reporting is alerting Americans about illegal aliens in 49 states being given voter registration forms without requiring proof of citizenship. MIG Reports studied online reactions to the news and Americans are reacting strongly and mostly negatively.

Illegal Immigrants Register to Vote

The discourse on this subject is highly polarized, like most political conversations in America. Conservatives express concern over election integrity and illegals being allowed to register to vote. Liberals dismiss these concerns as politically motivated fearmongering.

Conservative Concerns

Voters on the right believe illegal immigrants voting would dilute legitimate votes. They argue normalizing illegal immigrant votes is a strategy of the left to get unearned votes. If illegal aliens are allowed to vote, most Republicans would view it as blatant election cheating by Democrats and a violation of America’s sovereignty as a country.

Conservatives place emphasis on voting irregularities and election integrity suspicions, particularly in Democratic areas like Fulton County, Georgia. Many conservatives fear rampant election fraud and call for stricter voter ID laws. They see legislative responses like the SAVE Act as necessary to protect democracy.

Liberal Rebuttals

Democrats and liberals claim widespread illegal voting is a myth perpetuated by Republicans. They view these claims as a strategy to justify restrictive voting laws, which they say would affect minority communities.

Social Media and Distrust

There is deep polarization and intense political rivalries on social media. Discussions involve political figures, historical grievances, and legal battles over election interference. Many people make accusations of corruption and election cheating cover-ups, leading to a climate of suspicion.

Broader Patterns

• There is rampant distrust towards mainstream media and government officials.
• Electoral legitimacy is a hotly contested issue and is especially tied to partisan debates.
• The discourse reflects a mix of alarm, distrust, and political maneuvering.

Election Integrity

Many Americans want to focus on securing elections. There are references to alleged fraud and manipulation, especially in the 2020 presidential election. Some mention fraudulent ballots and voter irregularities in states like Michigan and Georgia.

Political Polarization

There is frequent accusatory language between political parties. Republicans blame Democrats for allegedly enabling election fraud. And Democrats say Republicans spread false claims and incite distrust among the electorate.

The two sides debate whether political figures like Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton should face consequences for election-related crimes. There are accusations of bias in law enforcement and legal systems.

Mistrust of Governmental Institutions

There are intense debates over the potential illegitimacy of 2024 election results. Some express concerns about voting machine manipulation, absentee ballots, and mail-in voting. There are calls for a return to manual, paper-based voting methods.

Sentiment Trends

Predominantly Negative and Distrustful

There is widespread skepticism regarding the fairness and transparency of elections. Many voters accuse the opposing Party of voter fraud and corruption. People online use charged and aggressive language reflecting frustrations and fears.

Many Americans also direct at individuals, political parties, and government officials involved in election oversight.

Defensiveness and Dismissal

Democrats tend to make arguments that election fraud claims are unfounded and destabilize democratic processes. They believe in the fundamental soundness of the electoral system and criticize claims of corruption.

Overall, it seems many voters lack confidence in the prospect of a "free and fair" election in 2024. Many people call for significant electoral reforms to restore trust.

Governor Kathy Hochul's handling of the NYC subway system, including a possible face mask ban, is upsetting voters in New York. Online reactions reveal strong opposition, frustration, and concern about her decisions. Conversations seem to suggest a vote of no confidence from many New Yorkers. Many people call for more consistent, health-conscious, and forward-thinking leadership to guide the city's future.

Recent headlines suggest Gov. Hochul may soon impose a face mask ban on the subway, which is receiving blowback from both liberals and conservatives. Left leaning voters view a ban as a disgraceful move, especially in the context of New York’s substantial suffering during COVID-19. These critics argue masks are essential for public safety, not just from COVD, but many diseases and pollution.

Right leaning voters are more likely to criticize Hochul for hypocrisy. They say mask mandates during COVID, which normalized masks in public, have now led to surges in crime four years later. They say masks are not and were never needed and Hochul and other leaders are now facing the consequences of reckless mandates over COVID fears.

• Gov. Hochul’s approval hovers in the low to mid 40% range with some spikes in discussion volume, which tend to correlate with a drop in sentiment.

Discussions Around a Mask Ban

Many New Yorkers are vehemently opposed to the proposed mask ban, perceiving it as a threat to public health. They say they are especially worried for the aging and immunocompromised who depend on the subway system. This sentiment is particularly acute among those who still view COVID as an ongoing pandemic. They suggest attempting to lower crime rates with a mask ban is an egregious disregard for their safety.

Others, however, feel banning masks is necessary to curb criminal activities where perpetrators use masks to conceal their identities. This group supports a potential ban and believes it could deter crime on the subway system and create a more secure environment for all passengers.

Pausing NYC Congestion Pricing

Many New Yorkers express dissatisfaction with her governance decisions, arguing they reveal a poor understanding of public needs. The ire directed at Gov. Hochul often touches on congestion pricing, which was intended to reduce traffic congestion in lower Manhattan and finance public transit improvements. Many criticize her decision to pause or scrap the congestion pricing plan, viewing it as a capitulation to special interests and suburban voters at the expense of city residents.

Some contrast Hochul's choice to paus congestion pricing with examples from other cities, like London, where congestion pricing has been highly successful in improving traffic conditions and public transit. The halt has led to feelings of betrayal among those who believe congestion pricing is crucial for reducing pollution, easing traffic, and funding essential transit improvements.

Critics believe with the governor backing away from congestion pricing, the financial stability of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) is at risk. They say this could potentially lead to a downgrade in its credit rating and deferred improvements to the subway system. The general sentiment is one of exasperation with the short-sightedness and lack of commitment to long-term urban planning.

Other Issues Impacting Sentiment

Among Hochul's vocal critics, there is fierce and often derogatory language, reflecting broader dissatisfaction with her policies and liberal governance style. People accuse her of authoritarianism and failed leadership, calling her a "lying destructive tyrant" and drawing parallels to repressive regimes.

Not Protecting the Working Class

New Yorkers call her out for a perceived inconsistency in policy making. They argue her claims of protecting working-class New Yorkers, increased payroll taxes in place of congestion pricing will be equally, if not more, harmful.

People complain about taxes on large businesses, which would bear the brunt of higher taxes and trickle down to employees and consumers. This, people argue, would hurt the same demographics the governor says she wants to shield.

Increasing Crime in New York

Further complicating Hochul’s public image is her stance on crime and gun violence statistics. Her administration faces backlash for leniency on crime and law enforcement policies. Critics argue her policies on bail reform and parole contribute to higher crime rates.

Voters blame increased lawlessness on her administration. Calls for stricter law enforcement and reforms to reverse these policies have been loud and consistent, with demands for her to intervene more decisively in criminal justice issues.

Deprioritizing Suburban New Yorkers

Some upstate New Yorkers feel disproportionally burdened by policies seen as biased towards urban interests. They voice resentment towards the continuous flow of resources from upstate to downstate projects, including MTA improvements, without proportional benefits.

Identity Politics

Racial and identity politics also animate much of the discussion. Accusations of condescension and racism have surfaced, particularly in relation to her comments and policies that some view as patronizing towards minority groups. These sentiments create a complicated portrait of her as a leader struggling to balance progressive values with practical governance.

Hunter Biden's conviction for federal gun charges has sparked many conversations about justice and politicized prosecutions. Most voter opinions seem to align with their political affiliations, but there are pockets within Democrat and Republican partisans who emphasize different aspects of the issue.

Politicized Views of the Hunter Trial

Some Democrats feel frustration with perceived double standards in how the Biden family is treated compared to other political figures. Other Democrats affirm the court as completely unbiased, citing Hunter’s conviction as evidence. They also predict the conviction could generate sympathy for President Biden, citing the possibility of President Biden pardoning Hunter Biden post-election.

Others suggest the timing of the trial may be a strategic tactic by Republicans to divert attention from Donald Trump's conviction. These comments tend to frame the trial as a false distraction meant to create an illusion of nonpartisanship within the DOJ.

Republicans are more likely to feel Hunter's trial as a diversion, intended to draw attention away from more serious allegations about Hunter's alleged influence pedaling in Ukraine and China. Critics claim the DOJ intentionally minimalized charges to shield the “Biden crime family.”

Those on the right also believe Hunter Biden's laptop casually being authenticated during the trial highlights corruption from Democrats and the media who repeatedly denied its authenticity during the 2020 election.

A large part of the conversation on both sides draws comparisons to Donald Trump’s legal troubles. Democrats tend to argue Hunter was convicted to “get back at” Democrats after Trump’s conviction. Conversely, Republicans cite Hunter’s conviction as a performative way for Democrats to claim the courts are unbiased.

Who is the Justice System Weaponized Against?

Critics of the Biden administration view Hunter Biden's conviction as an instance of political favoritism. They argue the DOJ only prosecuted him on gun charges, while ignoring more severe crimes.

Conservatives believe the Biden family is engaging in a two-tier justice system where Democrats often don't face consequences for their actions. They believe the charges brought against Hunter Biden were carefully selected to protect Joe Biden from association with his son’s legal trouble, thus shielding him from political and legal backlash amid a struggling 2024 campaign.

On the other hand, Biden supporters view Hunter Biden’s conviction as evidence the justice system is not biased against conservatives. This groups draws a comparison to Donald Trump Jr., suggesting there should be greater scrutiny of his actions. According to liberals and Democrats, the courts are just for convicting Hunter Biden, but many potential crimes may be going unpunished by Donald Trump Jr., Trump himself, and others.

Hunter’s Laptop

Many Biden critics magnify the significance of Hunter Biden’s laptop. They interpret its authentication during the trial as a confirmation of a media and Democrat coverup. There are also widespread claims Hunter Biden’s laptop confirms many other, more serious crimes.

People call for the accountability of 51 intelligence officials who persistently dismissed the laptop contents as Russian disinformation. Many are vocally critical of Democrat hypocrisy in prosecuting Trump by saying he interfered in the 2020 election. Critics say Democrats were the ones interfering by squashing the laptop story.

Convicting Hunter on insignificant gun charges, some say, is a politicized effort to silence Trump supporters who take issue with the validity of Trump’s multiple prosecutions. This group views the left's narrative of “nobody is above the law” as a blatant double standard.

They also raise concerns about free speech, citing social media suppression of posts about Hunter's laptop in 2020. They are convinced that social media companies and news outlets conspired with the government to suppress dissent.

Biden Speaks at a Gun Control Rally

Soon after Hunter’s conviction, Joe Biden spoke at an event promoting stronger gun control in the U.S. This drew accusations of double standards in enforcing gun laws. Some people find it ironic that Joe Biden would give a speech about gun control while everyone expects he would unhesitatingly pardon his son’s sentence.

Many are incredulous at the timing of this appearance, pointing to the irony of a President advocating for stricter gun laws while his own son is convicted on three federal gun charges. These reactions also include accusations of hypocrisy against Democrats who sympathize with Hunter while holding anti-gun political position.

Meanwhile, those Democrats and gun control activists underscore the importance of thorough background checks to limit access to guns. They argue anyone celebrating Hunter's conviction should embrace stronger gun control laws.

Proponents of gun control see President Biden's speech and actions as an important part of the fight against gun violence. Despite Hunter's conviction, this group largely supports the administrative actions taken to reduce gun violence and establish gun safety measures. They do not view Joe Biden’s stance as hypocritical, but rather view him as a loving father who is unwilling to demonize his son.

Anti-Israel and climate change protestors took the field yesterday at the annual Congressional Baseball Game. Reactions to the protests seem to be mostly influenced by political affiliations.

Many are irritated by the protests, feeling they are disruptive, and indicate a lack of respect for Israel’s right to exist. Some Americans voice strong support for Israel and a desire to see pro-Palestine protestors arrested or deported.

However, many liberals also voice support for the protestors, emphasizing the importance of their right to free speech. They claim Palestinians are entitled to the same rights as Israelis and argue against the actions of Israel in the ongoing conflict. There’s significant portion of the online conversation advocating for the rights and lives of Palestinians.

Several social media posts react critically to the protest disruption by referencing other recent protests where protesters burned American and Israeli flags and damaging a WWI monument. People argue this kind of behavior is violent and would potentially lead to arrests if perpetrated against other symbols like Pride flags.

Discussion sentiment varies widely between political ideologies, and protests don’t seem to move opinions. This suggests a deeply entrenched and polarized view of the Israel-Palestine conflict. It also seems most sentiments lean toward outright support for Israel, or an emphasis on the rights and struggles of both Israelis and Palestinians.

There's significant backlash against protestors who engage in disruptive or violent behaviors. Americans generally disapprove of blocking roads or occupying buildings. Many strongly condemn these tactics and call for punitive measures against such protestors.

Fulton County DA Fani Willis and her boyfriend-turned-special-prosecutor Nathan Wade are making news again in the wake of Wade’s recent CNN interview. Following the indefinite pause in Willis’s RICO case against former president Trump, Wade appeared on CNN with Kaitlan Collins, causing a kerfuffle over the timeline of his relationship with Willis.

In a clip Collins posted on X, Nathan Wade struggles to respond to her question about when his romantic relationship with Willis began. After a short interruption by Wade’s team, he returned to the interview refusing to answer the question. This clip has garnered various reactions of incredulity, ridicule, and disgust from voters.

My exchange with Nathan Wade tonight on the timeline of his romantic relationship with District Attorney Fani Willis — including an interruption from a member of his team as he was answering when it began and when it ended. pic.twitter.com/S5AJzdsmOC

— Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) June 13, 2024

Nathan Wade's team interrupting him during the interview is raising doubts and suspicions among the public about the credibility of Wade, Willis, and even CNN for how it aired the interview. These discussions are adding to the ongoing speculations of hidden manipulations and collusion between Democrats, prosecutors, and the media.

Many suggest Wade's representation on CNN confirms inadequacies in both his and Willis’s abilities as legal professionals. There are also allegations about the two jointly strategizing on the draft and process of the case, feeding the narrative of collusion and undue influence.

Views of DA Fani Willis

Most voter opinions of Fani Willis seem to derive from their politics with people either condemning her or celebrating her for her perseverance. However, the general sentiment towards Willis is highly negative among most voters.

Voters often believe she is engaged in corruption and pursuing politicized prosecutions. They reference her alleged involvement in serious cases of graft, voter manipulation, and witness intimidation. Some also say Willis was part of a plot to intimidate witnesses in the concurrent trial against the rapper Young Thung.

The combinations of a Willis-Wade affair, alleged corruption, the indefinite pause on Trump’s RICO case, and outlandish proceedings in the Young Thug trial have served to further erode DA Willis’s reputation.

Allegations of Corruption

Most of Willis’s criticism comes from a belief that Trump’s RICO indictment was politically orchestrated. However, while some view Willis as an aggressive figure with political motivations, others see her as a crusader for justice in challenging Trump's alleged misdeeds. The news about her alleged involvement in election fraud and money laundering has added fuel to the public discourse. Her supporters stick to the notion of a political victimization plot against her, while opponents find the allegations as evidence for unethical behavior.

There are multiple accusations about her visit to the White House prior to Trump's indictment, suggesting collusion. This also raises concerns among certain voters of potential inappropriate influence by the Department of Justice (DOJ). Also, the fact that both Willis and Special Counsel Jack Smith may be disqualified from their respective cases has split the public's view further. Some see it as an affirmation of the law working properly, while others condemn it as an example of systemic corruption.

Willis as a Political Pawn

Some view Willis as a pawn in a larger political game, tied to figures like Joe Biden. Her impartiality is often questioned, with several users perceiving her actions against Trump as politically motivated rather than issues of criminality.

There is some mention of Hunter Biden's trial, comparing it to Willis and other public figures involved in prosecuting certain political figures. Some say Willis, Alvin Bragg, Jack Smith, and Leticia James are all products of elite law school DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) programs. This, they say, increases the likelihood of their prosecutions being politically motivated.

Many voters seem to believe that—while Fani Willis is likely a corrupt politician—she is a small fish in a larger political game being played at every level of the court system.

Current public discourse about the Democratic Party potentially replacing President Joe Biden as their nominee is slowly growing. Discussion is heterogeneous and fragmented, leaning heavily on individual political biases and perceptions. However, there is not significant or concentrated chatter suggesting the Democratic Party is considering replacing Biden.s

Several mainstream media reports have discussed this issue during the Democratic primary, specifically as the “Uncommitted” movement has gained steam. MIG Reports performed an initial study of online commentary to find insights into voter sentiment about replacing Joe Biden.

Google Search Trends previously showed an increase in searches for "Uncommitted Movement” and "replace Biden.” Often, these searches mirror primary election days. For the first time in 2024, "replace Biden” outpaced searches for "Uncommitted Movement.”

Online discourse shows low volume in several topics related to the nomination process. However, the notable disastrous swing in sentiment may indicate the discussion, while still a niche topic, may be heading to an inflection point.

Based on the two datasets, it is possible to extrapolate that voters are becoming curious about the feasibility of replacing Joe Biden as the Democratic nominee. This may prove to be one more chaotic element to an already unprecedented nomination process. In addition, Biden is set to be nominated via Zoom despite no COVID-lockdowns and growing voter dissatisfaction.

Voters are Increasingly Rejecting Biden

Online conversations reveal a predominantly negative sentiment towards the Democratic Party and Joe Biden. Most of the discussion focuses on allegations of platform discrepancies and lies from Biden’s administration.

Other prominent themes include accusations of corruption, communism, socialism, and a perceived bias in favor of Democrats in Hunter Biden's conviction. Several voters suggest the Democratic Party is no longer representing the views of its traditional base. There is criticism for perceived radical or extremist views within the party. Voters feel alienated and claim the party has diverged from its original moderate standpoint to adopt more radical ideologies.

Many also express a belief that the Democratic Party wants the “destruction of America.” This further indicates the extent of the negative sentiment as people view the Democratic party and Joe Biden as untrustworthy and power-hungry.

Voters accuse Democrats and the media of censorship, particularly surrounding the Hunter Biden laptop story. Politicians, news media, and government agents are being accused of participating in misinformation and election rigging.

There are only a few social media posts defending Biden and the Democratic party. These threads highlight some positive aspects of Biden's tenure. However, even within these comments, there's considerable criticism about how Biden is handling issues like the border, Israel, and the economy.

Prevalent negative sentiment implies a significant level of dissatisfaction with the current administration and the Democratic Party. Although this is not a comprehensive view of all Americans nor a scientific study, it provides some insight into current discussions and sentiment trends among Americans online. It's important to acknowledge that social media discussions often skew negative and may not accurately represent the views of the wider population.

Following his felony conviction, former president Donald Trump was ordered by the court to have an interview with a probation officer. Several media outlets reported on the event which was a 30-minute Zoom. Much of the coverage attempted to paint the situation as another disastrous legal situation for Trump.

MIG Reports studied social media reactions to the interview itself and media coverage. Trump supporters don’t seem to be wavering—and neither do Trump haters. However, discussions of Trump mentioning the keyword “president” increased with a net gain in approval and no data indicating lowered support.

Many Americans, particularly those on the right, view Trump's legal treatment as egregious and unfair, further fueling their support for him. They use the theatrical nature of his probation interview to criticize what they perceive as increasingly steep political persecution against conservatives.

Voters are also divided regarding current President Joe Biden. They criticize him for his administration’s failures and see Trump as a more favorable option, often also calling for Biden's impeachment.

Some defend President Biden, arguing any impeachment attempts are baseless and targeting political opponents. However, their view of Trump is the opposite among those on the left who tend to view claims of Trump's mistreatment as either false or that he deserves what he’s getting. They also continue expressing deep dissatisfaction with Trump's comments about certain issues, like recent remarks about Taylor Swift.

Other Reactionary Conservative Discussions

The topic of Hunter Biden's conviction is brought up repeatedly in discussions of Trump's probation interview. Some argue about alleged double standards in the justice system, indicating suspicion about how both cases were handled by authorities.

Posts referencing Marjorie Taylor Greene's intent to impeach Joe Biden presents a divided reaction, with many dismissing it as futile and a waste of time, while a significant portion support her efforts reflecting a heightened political polarization.

Recent reporting identified President Joe Biden as suffering his lowest approval numbers from voters at around 37.4%. Americans say they’re dissatisfied with the current administration because of multiple issues, which ae causing the dwindling approval rating. Some of the top issues include the economy, immigration, impeachment efforts, and allegations against his son, Hunter Biden.

The Economy

Many Americans are frustrated with the current economic situation. They believe their wages are not increasing in line with the rising cost of living. Some feel they are working mainly to pay bills, further exasperating their discontent with Biden's policy. Accusations around Biden favoring special interests and corporations over everyday people are also adding to the negative sentiment.

Immigration

Concerns around immigration policy and border security, particularly related to the U.S.-Mexico border, are contributing to Biden's low approval rating. Biden has been criticized for the problems persisting at the border despite his rule change and executive orders.

Impeachment Efforts

Some discussions focus on efforts by Republicans, led by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and others, to impeach Biden. This has sparked debate around the validity and evidence behind these efforts. Many express frustration at the perceived pettiness and partisanship of these moves even as they have been largely unsuccessful.

Family Ties

Hunter Biden’s business dealings have also drawn scrutiny and criticism. Some Americans believe not enough is being done to investigate Hunter Biden and that Joe Biden should be held accountable too. Conversely, others point out that Biden has not interfered in ongoing investigations or litigation involving his son, showing integrity and respect for the justice system.

Israel-Palestine

Many online discussions highlight divisions in the Democratic Party regarding the conflict between Israel and Palestine. Democratic voters will likely continue to be split by this conflict, especially with no ability to offset emotional stressors which have helped drive the abysmal approval numbers.

Establishment Sentiment

There is a significant amount of misinformation and extreme views circulating, some accusing Biden of totalitarian rule and election fraud, even leading to aggressive and threatening comments.

Furthermore, the prevalent perception that Biden is not doing enough for the American people seems to be negatively impacting his approval rating. Whether accurate or not, this perception can influence how people view his performance, which is reflected in polls.

Democratic Perspectives

While his supporters are vocally in favor of President Biden amid dropping approval ratings, their reasons are less nuanced and not universal.

• Dismissive: Many argue President Biden is a “clean politician,” capable of shaking off any negative allegations.
• Mainstream Media’s Fault: Some blame Biden's unpopularity on factors such as media exaggerations and hypocrisy.
• Reality Check: Some admit Biden faces a tough battle in countering these negative perceptions.

Issues that will likely continue impacting Biden’s approval include:

• Continued border crossing numbers in the face of Biden’s meager response to control the border.
• CPI and other inflation reporting continually adjusted.
• Democratic National Convention nominating Joe Biden as the presidential candidate via Zoom.

Justice Samuel Alito was secretly recorded talking about the discontented nature of American politics and partisan divides. During the interaction, Justice Alito said, “One side or the other is going to win. There can be a way of working, a way of living together peacefully, but it’s difficult, you know, because there are differences on fundamental things that really can’t be compromised."

What Americans are Saying

MIG Reports analyzed voter sentiment on the themes Justice Alito spoke about across varying online conversations to determine if voters agree with his position. While reactions to Alito’s comments themselves are scattered and indirect, the themes he spoke about are prominent.

The state of political divides in the country and increasingly irreconcilable value clashes are at the forefront of American discourse. Most people agree that ideological, political, and cultural differences have dwindling prospects for national unity or resolution.

Analysis indicates a clear sense of worry Americans have about the future of the country’s institutions, event beyond government institutions. There are concerns about the erosion of educational institutions, corporations and small business brands, and cultural institutions like the news media and entertainment.

However, there are stark disagreements on the causes and solutions to these concerns. Alito's comments speak to the broader political polarization present in America and real-time voter discussions seem to substantiate his position.

• Discussion topics in three top categories for online conversation demonstrate the accuracy of Justice Alito’s statements about the fracturing of American political and cultural unity.

Ideologies in America

Discussion Trends

• Wokeness: Many people express negative views on wokeness, criticizing it for promoting political correctness, cancel culture, and societal sensitivity. Critics argue it leads to societal decay and stifles free speech.
• Role of Government: There is significant disagreement over government initiatives, with some criticizing perceived overreach and authoritarianism. Opinions are split between support for libertarian or conservative policies versus socialist or liberal measures.
• Identity Politics: Discussions on race, gender, and sexual orientation show defensiveness and hostility towards changing societal norms with little room for compromise.
• Political Partisanship: The division between conservatives and liberals is clear, with each side blaming the other for societal issues and accusing each other of spreading propaganda. There is a yearning for a return to “normalcy,” despite skepticism that normalcy is possible.
• Media Bias: Many believe mainstream media is biased, promoting a leftist agenda or lacking impartiality.

Sentiment Trends

• Society feels upheaval from changing values or oppressive norms.
• Both sides are frustrated and fearful, longing for unity but failing to see a path to it.
• Disagreements hinder understanding, leading to confrontational discourse.

President

Discussion Trends

• Political Focus: Many Americans are discussing political affairs, particularly focusing on President Biden's administration, impeachment efforts, political lies, and border-related issues.
• Polarization: There is a clear divide in discussions between those who support President Biden and those who are against his presidency.
• Accusations and Defense: While both sides engage in accusations and defense, there is also distrust towards the actions and decisions taken by Biden's administration. Some accuse leaders of lying, and others question their motives.
• Lack of Constructive Dialogue: Discussions lack constructive dialogue, with participants engaging in personal attacks and derogatory statements. This contributes to further discord and division rather than seeking solutions.

Sentiment Trends

• There is a prevailing sentiment of disagreement and frustration with the current political landscape.
• Voters express resentment and dissatisfaction towards politicians, accusing them of inaction, political bias, and crimes.
• Sentiments are polarized between those who support President Biden and those who oppose his presidency.
• Overall, there is a sentiment of division and discord, and Americans fear a lack of compromise and peaceful coexistence.

Weaponized Government

Discussion Trends

• Government Criticism: There is much talk about government overreach. Voters express concern about losing control of the government and the growing power disparity.
• Political Party Division: Discussions are marked by a clear divide in political party preferences. Both Democrats and Republicans receive blame for the nation's issues, reflecting deep partisan divides.
• Calls for Citizen Action: Many people emphasize the need for citizens to reclaim government control. There is a strong emphasis on protecting democratic principles and citizen rights.
• Government Involvement in Specific Issues: People discuss federal government involvement in issues like birth control. Discussions highlight the need for a clear delineation of roles between state and federal governments.

Sentiment Trends

• There is a prevailing sentiment of dissatisfaction with the current political landscape and government actions.
• Sentiments are polarized along party lines, with both sides blaming each other for societal problems.
• There’s a strong sensitivity to political partisanship and mutual distrust.
• Many people feel an urgency for the American people to take action on their beliefs.
• There is a call for a proper balance between state and federal government roles.