In the cacophony of online discussions, Americans less frequently center their arguments on theological understanding. Instead, worldly logic—particularly economic and political considerations—dominates their discourse.

While theology occasionally serves as a moral framework, it often does not shape core conversations about modern life. MIG Reports analysis shows theological discussion is dwarfed by topical and current events takes. While some say Americans are less concerned with religious topics, others suggest these conversations may be playing out offline.

Americans are certainly becoming less religious in the traditional sense, but that doesn't mean they're becoming more rational or empirical.

— Clay Routledge (@clayroutledge) February 17, 2017

Worldly Logic as the Priority

Economic concerns overshadow theological narratives across most conversations. Topics such as inflation, government spending, and job security consume the majority of discussions. This focus forms a results-driven culture that values tangible, practical outcomes over abstract spiritual ideals.

For example, users discuss rising grocery prices and gas costs with an urgency rooted in immediate personal impact. There is also a universal nature to these discussions as every American faces similar economic concerns, while religious conversations are often bespoke.

Moral Framing Without Depth

Though theological language does surface, it often serves as a justification for moral arguments placed within a religious belief system. Discussions about immigration and healthcare highlight moral obligations derived from faith but largely don't delve into theological specifics.

Invoking religion on issues like immigration often emphasizes compassion, yet the primary appeal is to practical solutions. People call for things like securing the border more often than they explore spiritual philosophies or presenting their perspective through religious understanding.

This pattern demonstrates that while theology influences moral reasoning, it does so indirectly, reinforcing rather than driving the dialogue.

Division and Theology

In polarized exchanges, theology becomes a rhetorical tool for reinforcing political identities rather than a foundation for consensus-building. Conservatives often invoke religious narratives to justify nationalist or economic positions, while liberals occasionally reference theological ideals to critique perceived moral failings of policies or leaders.

Online theological discussions rarely seek to deepen understanding, instead amplifying entrenched ideological divides. For instance, comments supporting Israel often intertwine religious loyalty with political arguments, reflecting faith and nationalism related to practical outcomes.

Americans have become less religious and patriotic while placing a higher value on money, according to a new Gallup poll. Americans saying they believe religion is very important dropped from 48% in 2019 to 39% in 2023.

MORE: https://t.co/anH1w6RU5L pic.twitter.com/rxG4p1303W

— NewsNation (@NewsNation) November 21, 2023

Cultural and Structural Factors

The marginal role of theology suggests:

• Discourse often centers on worldly priorities, leaving little room for collective theological reasoning.
• Online platforms amplify emotional, results-oriented arguments, favoring the immediacy of economic and political topics over reflective theological debates.
• Cynicism toward institutions shifts reliance from theological ideals to pragmatic reasoning as a means of problem-solving.

A growing interest in transhumanism is growing, complicating discussions of modern society, technology, and health. Transhumanism is a philosophical and intellectual movement advocating using technology to enhance human capabilities, improve health, and transcend biological limitations. It aims to extend life, augment cognition, and explore post-human possibilities through advancements like genetic engineering, artificial intelligence, and cybernetics.

As society grapples with the implications of enhancing human capabilities through advanced technologies, people express hope, fear, and philosophical inquiry. Sentiments are mixed, with proponents envisioning a future of limitless potential while critics warn of existential threats to human essence. Influential figures like Elon Musk, Yuval Noah Harari, and Klaus Schwab magnify these tensions. Each figure embodies contrasting narratives of innovation, caution, and control.

The promise of transhumanism is the exact same promise the serpent gave to Eve in the Garden.

Godlike intelligence & eternal life.

This was the first deception used to lure mankind away from God, & it’ll likely be the final deception used to lead millions to hell for eternity. pic.twitter.com/ezo6BaTFEt

— SOVEREIGN BRAH 🇺🇸🏛️⚡️ (@sovereignbrah) March 19, 2023

Reactions and Online Discourse

Public sentiment on transhumanism oscillates between hope and fear.

• Optimists use speculative language, imagining a futuristic world to highlight the transformative potential of technology on human life.
• Skeptics use phrases like “if this happens, we risk...” emphasizing fears of losing humanity, ethical dilemmas, and societal divides.
• Ethical debates broach questions of enhancement technologies eroding individuality and exacerbating inequalities.

Elon Musk says in order to achieve human-AI symbiosis we will ultimately need to replace our skulls so we can implant enough electrodes to interface our brains with computers pic.twitter.com/4Ri9LNsNCm

— Tsarathustra (@tsarnick) October 29, 2024

Supporters frame transhumanism as inevitable progress, while opponents warn of existential risks. Influential figures like Elon Musk, Yuval Noah Harari, and Klaus Schwab further shape opinions.

• Musk’s advocacy garners optimism for innovation but skepticism about societal risks.
• Harari evokes mixed reactions, with his philosophical insights inspiring some but alarming others.
• Schwab polarizes most, with fears of technocratic control overshadowing support for his vision.

The race to develop AI is driven by mistrust between humans. But what reason do we have to trust AI?
My full conversation with @Trevornoah and Christiana Mbakwe Medina is available on https://t.co/gVJopn4l2f.#NexusBook pic.twitter.com/c7rLNEQvZT

— Yuval Noah Harari (@harari_yuval) October 5, 2024

Cultural and Political Context

Cultural values and ideological leanings deeply influence these discussions.

• Supporters align with champions of innovation, while critics highlight threats to autonomy and equity.
• Speculative language amplifies these divides, allowing people to project aspirations and anxieties onto an uncertain technological future.

This Thanksgiving, as families across the country gather around the table, there are signs of profound cultural and social shifts. The nuclear family, once central to American life, has become the subject of intense public debate, sparking both concern and hope.

Tectonic shifts in the cultural milieu resonate particularly during the holiday season, a time traditionally associated with family unity, reflection, and shared values. Yet, in many households, the reality of strained family dynamics and political division casts a shadow over the celebrations.

MSNBC host Joy Reid: Stay away from pro Trump family members since they ENDED democracy, may turn you in pic.twitter.com/3v1UGKeSdT

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) November 22, 2024

A Holiday at Odds with Itself

Thanksgiving has long symbolized the ideals of togetherness and gratitude. However, as political polarization deepens, traditional ideals are increasingly tested.

• Many Americans report tension at family gatherings, where differing political beliefs create tense conversations
• Rifts at times overshadow familial bonds, causing strife and alienation.
• Online, Americans discuss the holiday season as becoming a battleground of ideological clashes and a fragmenting of traditional family structures.

Family conflicts are exacerbated by the ongoing breakdown of traditional family structures. The rise in single-parent households, declining marriage rates, declining fertility rates, and an emphasis on friends over familial interdependence contribute to a sense of social fragmentation.

The Decline of the Nuclear Family

The nuclear family—long a symbol of stability and continuity—faces significant changes in modern society. Many say contributing factors include:

• Marriage rates dropping
• Fertility rates at historic lows
• Nontraditional families becoming increasingly common
• Millennials and younger people prioritizing careers and independence over family

Many Americans attribute these changes to progressive ideologies that challenge traditional gender roles and redefine family.

• Some on the left view these shifts as positive and inclusive.
• Others express concern they undermine social cohesion and stability provided by the nuclear family.
• Online conversations highlight the consequences of these trends on societal well-being, mental health, and social atomization.

Economic and Social Pressures

Economic realities further complicate the picture.

• People cite rising costs of housing, childcare, and education as a hinderance to family formation for younger generations.
• For many, the financial burden of raising children or supporting extended family members adds to the stress of an already fragmented environment.
• Mental health challenges also exacerbate feelings of isolation and societal pressures, creating barriers to family building.

During Thanksgiving, these issues often become more pronounced, highlighting the struggles people face in modern life.

Polarization at the Table

Political division has also become a defining feature of the modern holiday experience.

• Families with differing ideological perspectives often struggle to find common ground, leading to heated debates or estrangement.
• Discussions around immigration, social justice, or economic policy frequently spill into personal relationships.

This polarization challenges the traditional role of holidays as a unifying force. Many Americans express nostalgia for a time when political differences could be set aside during family gatherings.

My parents are MSNBC liberals who think Trump is a paid Kremlin asset.

I’m ultra MAGA.

Know what Thanksgiving will be like this year?

.

.

It will be great, because we’re normal people who love our family more than we care about politics.

It’s not that hard, folks.

— Robert Sterling (@RobertMSterling) November 11, 2024

A Cultural Renewal in Progress

Amid these challenges, there are signs of a cultural reevaluation.

• A growing number of Americans are advocating for a return to family-centered values, viewing the nuclear family as a stabilizing force in society.
• Grassroots movements, faith-based initiatives, and a conservative resurgence are championing family and rebuilding community ties.

With cultural tides turning, many express hope for a return to traditional norms. They say America has rejected progressive, woke ideology. Many also claim these social movements are to blame for social isolation and mental health crises. Returning to core American values and building families, many say, could be on the horizon with a right leaning cultural renaissance.

Younger right-leaning Americans are making a cultural re-evaluation what they view as Baby Boomer conservative values. This often uses humor and cultural references as a medium for critiquing the old guard.

While humor may seem inconsequential, it functions as an entry point to deeper conversations about generational identity and shifting priorities. Many younger Americans say the set of problems facing conservative is different than it was 25 or 50 years ago. This influences how they look at culture, political tactics, and lifestyle decisions.

Boomers selling their homes for $2 million after buying them in 1969 for 7 raspberries pic.twitter.com/0SiTVOVYhG

— Historic Vids (@historyinmemes) March 13, 2024

Humor as a Point of Contention

For many younger, right leaning Americans, "boomer humor" embodies a worldview they perceive as disconnected from current realities. Comments often describe this humor as overly nostalgic, leaning on references and experiences that fail to resonate with a younger demographic navigating different social and economic landscapes.

• Younger voices view boomer humor as representing a time when social structures were more stable and prosperity seemed attainable. They critique this saying it doesn’t encapsulate their current struggles, which include stagnant wages and housing affordability.
• The critiques of generational humor reveal a discontent from what young people perceive as oversimplification of complex issues, such as national decline, cultural erosion, and economic doomerism.

"Homeownership is unaffordable for the middle class," per Bankrate.

— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) November 25, 2024

Cultural Symbols

Beyond humor, young people engage with new cultural symbols, positioning them as markers of generational identity and disagreement. Music, media, and traditions associated with boomers are often juxtaposed against emerging cultural elements more relevant to younger audiences.

• Younger generations prefer modern, inclusive cultural items that align more closely with contemporary challenges. For instance, references to memes or digital media, often absent in boomer culture, are a common way to communicate the urgency of current issues.
• Many younger conservatives express that boomer cultural artifacts reflect moral frameworks that no longer hold for modern societal shifts. This critique is not inherently oppositional but seeks to redefine what conservative morals mean in a rapidly changing world.

Thinking about wifejak and realizing she is the best example of rejecting boomerism, the joke is no longer “I hate my wife” it’s now become “I love my wife”. Massive cultural victory. pic.twitter.com/ElHsqAvOPC

— The Ghost of Francisco Franco (@FrancosGhost) November 23, 2024

Generational Friction

There are three major patterns emerging in younger right-wing discussions about humor and cultural divides.

Redefining Conservatism

Younger conservatives seek to reinterpret traditional conservative values in a way that incorporates modern realities. They cite things like poor economic conditions and value shifts. Their critiques of boomer humor often function as critiques of a static understanding of conservatism.

The Role of Humor in Identity

Humor is used both to critique and differentiate. While some younger conservatives see boomer humor as alienating, others engage with it as a way to reclaim the narrative and assert their own generational identity on what people consider the emerging right.

Disillusionment with Legacy Ideals

The generational divide underscores a broader tension regarding legacy ideals, with younger conservatives frequently discussing the need to adapt to modern contexts without losing foundational principles.

Average boomer retirement plan. https://t.co/aAqm9jaCid

— Devon Stack (@Black_Pilled) November 22, 2024

Objective Observations

The discourse around humor and generational values reveals a nuanced engagement rather than outright rejection. Younger Americans are not dismissing conservatism but are critically assessing the frameworks and symbols used to define it. Humor and other cultural items act as focal points, offering a lens through which they explore generational differences of perspective.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau drew criticism over the weekend with video of him dancing at a Taylor Swift concert while Canada faced violent and destructive pro-Palestine protests. The juxtaposition of leadership dancing while citizens face turmoil also sparks reactions among American observers who view it as a familiar image.

Terrorism on our streets and Trudeau doesn't care.

Pro-Hamas riots are taking place in Montreal, meanwhile Trudeau is at a Taylor Swift concert displaying his cringe dance moves. pic.twitter.com/0wpXUgRNFa

— Canada Proud (@WeAreCanProud) November 23, 2024

Americans React

45% Criticize Leadership

• Many view Trudeau’s actions as inconsiderate and poor leadership, with comments like “while you were dancing, Montreal was burning.”
• Some compare Trudeau to American leaders making similar blunders. A few mention figures like Ted Cruz who flew to Cancun during a historic ice storm in Texas or Tim Walz who let BLM riot in Minnesota after George Floyd’s death.
• Voters in the U.S. and some in Canada want leaders who engage and lead with strength during moments of national distress.

30% Defend Trudeau

• Supporters say leaders deserve personal moments, framing the backlash as a “right-wing tears” moment, which they find entertaining.
• Some suggest Trudeau’s love for Taylor Swift humanizes him and boosts morale among his constituents.

15% Criticize the Protest

• Some frame the protesters as extremists driven by radical anti-Isreal agendas.
• While they focus less on Trudeau and more on pro-Palestine rioters, they mention the lack of a decisive government response.
• Critics say Trudeau's actions are hypocritical and enable disruptive protests.

10% are Neutral

• A minority prefers to focus on broader political grievances, dismissing talk of Trudeau’s behavior and redirecting to the unrest itself.

Performative Politics Leaves a Void

Critics say Trudeau neglecting the riots illustrates a larger trend of performative leadership, where public figures prioritize image over engagement or solutions. This frustration mirrors American critiques of leaders like Gavin Newsom who emphasize public relations optics while neglecting urgent governance.

Trudeau’s progressive governance using identity politics and “woke” policies further inflame criticism. For many Americans, these policies foster division and exacerbate societal unrest. Many claim that silence on issues like anti-Israel protests tacitly condones such sentiments—though Trudeau tweeted a condemnation the next day.

What we saw on the streets of Montreal last night was appalling. Acts of antisemitism, intimidation, and violence must be condemned wherever we see them.

The RCMP are in communication with local police. There must be consequences, and rioters held accountable.

— Justin Trudeau (@JustinTrudeau) November 23, 2024

Many see Trudeau’s actions as a validation of the cultural upheaval America is experiencing following Trump’s reelection. They say the results of weak political leadership, cultural coercion, and tyrannical government in Canada are the very outcomes Americans voted to reject by reelecting Trump.

There are also criticisms of Canadian law enforcement for arresting Rebel News CEO Ezra Lavant, a Jewish man who attempted to question pro-Palestine protesters. Some Americans say antisemitism is ingrained in progressive ideology and manifest in Canadian government.

CANADA HAS FALLEN

Watch and share how my boss Ezra Levant was arrested in Toronto today for being Jewish while practising journalism

Help him fight back at https://t.co/y0N5bzmSdJ

pic.twitter.com/bFeHQwPLVm

— Avi Yemini (@OzraeliAvi) November 24, 2024

Shared Frustrations Across Borders

Trudeau’s PR debacle draws the attention of U.S. voters grappling with their own discontent toward leaders. The frustrations Canadians face mirror similar ones in the U.S.

• Economic Concerns: Inflation and economic instability continue to dominate both Canadian and American political discourse. Voters see leadership as disengaged from the realities of middle-class struggles.
• Social Unrest: Rising protests, antisemitism, and cultural divisions reflect a shared narrative of dissatisfaction with progressive leadership.

U.S. Conservative Perspectives

For conservative or pro-Israel Americans, Trudeau’s actions are another example of “woke” leadership and elitist mindsets. They point out the chasm between political elites and everyday citizens, as leaders indulge in lavish lifestyles while their citizens face political upheaval and economic strain.

This sentiment strengthens a broader cultural critique of progressive and establishment governance. The populist resurgence in America has a very distinct anti-establishment and anti-elite flavor. This causes an extreme reaction of disgust and condemnation for leaders like Trudeau who seem to indulge in fading norms where elites are protected by their political power and legacy media coverups.

outh Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace has become a central figure in the national debate over transgender bathroom access and discussions about gender politics. Her advocacy for sex-segregated bathrooms, particularly in spaces like the Capitol, reflects her alignment with traditionalist values. Mace, like many anti-woke advocates, frames the issue as one of safety and privacy, emphasizing the need to protect women’s spaces.

Men don't belong in our private spaces. It's deeply disturbing that they want to be. https://t.co/mlqXd1Oq4n

— Rep. Nancy Mace (@RepNancyMace) November 19, 2024

Emotional Reactions

Reactions to Mace’s position are emotional and fraught, revealing the contentiousness of ongoing public debate. Those who agree with Mace express gratitude for her courage in addressing what they view as a critical issue. They say she is standing up for and protecting women and girls and providing common sense leadership.

Critics voice frustration and anger, saying her position that women’s bathrooms should be reserved for women is discriminatory and harmful to transgenders. Hostile emotions are often directed both at Mace’s policies and her as a person, causing many to double down on their respective viewpoints.

This is the exact type of man I don’t want in the women’s restroom with me.

He says he’s going to
🚨Grab my ratty looking f*****g hair
🚨Drag my face to the floor
🚨Repeatedly bash my head until blood everywhere
🚨And kill me pic.twitter.com/WnbMgGYId4

— Rep. Nancy Mace (@RepNancyMace) November 19, 2024

Both sides voice confusion and fear, particularly when discussing the purported insensitivity of their opposition. Speculative language, such as “what if” scenarios, reveals the uncertainty many feel about the implications of changing long-standing norms. Many anti-woke advocates call for stricter protections for women, while trans activists say the fear for transgender rights.

Safety vs. Inclusivity

Mace’s arguments focus heavily on protecting the safety and privacy of women and girls. This appeals to those concerned about risks of biological men in shared spaces. Opponents, however, claim the pronounced safety concerns are based on misinformation without evidence. They say biological women who identify as transgender do not pose a threat to women and girl, rather claiming the need for inclusivity and dignity for all.

Generational and Cultural Divide

There are also generational and cultural divides. Younger and more progressive audiences tend to favor gender inclusivity and recognizing non-binary identities. They see Mace’s stance as outdated and discriminatory.

Older and more conservative individuals, however, resonate with Mace's call to protect traditional values and common sense. This group views keeping sex divides within biological boundaries for women’s safety.

The Role of Leadership

Mace’s willingness to address such a divisive issue positions her as a leader willing to engage in contentious debates. For her supporters, this reinforces her image as someone unafraid to stand firm on her principles, even when faced with opposition.

Critics argue her focus on this issue detracts from broader governance priorities, framing her actions as politically motivated rather than solutions oriented.

Polarization of Public Discourse

The conversation around Mace demonstrates the polarized nature of political dialogue. Discussions often devolve into accusations and hostility, with each side perceiving the other as extreme. Despite this, Mace’s prominence in these discussions suggests her approach resonates with a significant portion of the electorate, especially as cultural tides are turning.

JUST IN: Nancy Mace Moves to Ban Trans Women From Capital Bathrooms Receives Death Threat From Trans Activist

The move comes just two weeks after the election of America's first out transgender person to congress. Rep.-elect Sarah McBride.

(READ FULL ARTICLE) pic.twitter.com/pQJCxyZ0VZ

— SlightlyOffensive (@SlightlyOffens) November 19, 2024

Online discussions about the quality of modern films compared to past decades generate disdain fueled by nostalgia, cultural decay, and evolving industry standards. From emotional recollections of classics to admiration for contemporary storytelling diversity, American audiences remain divided but largely not entertained nor inspired.

https://t.co/XBEKOEFf2A pic.twitter.com/UJflAaly3l

— The Right To Bear Memes (@grandoldmemes) November 14, 2024

Contributing Factors

The disintegration of Hollywood’s cultural influence is driven by several factors.

• Emotional attachments to formative years skew perceptions toward older films.
• The explosion of available movies creates an overflow of mediocrity.
• Modern films prioritize current societal narratives over authentic storytelling.
• Technology risks sidelining storytelling and removing human connection.

I need to be as clear & concise as humanly possible: #RedOne (🌟) is not just the single worst movie of 2024, it’s one of the worst movies I’ve seen in my life. Do not waste even half a second of your day on this movie- please. I beg you. I understand the responsibility that… pic.twitter.com/zNwG9xek8h

— Cinema Tweets (@CinemaTweets1) November 13, 2024

The Nostalgia Factor

Nostalgia is a potent driver of sentiment, as many view films from the 1980s and 1990s as pinnacles of American culture and emotional resonance. This emotional anchor often skews opinions against contemporary offerings. Many view past favorites as ensconced in a "golden era" of filmmaking. People say, back then, movies were an art form but now Hollywood is just a factory churning out low-quality content.

Quality Versus Quantity

The industry's current output underwhelms viewers who lament a decline in narrative depth replaced by formulaic productions. While modern technology allows for prolific filmmaking, audiences struggle to find authenticity in a sea of commercialized content. Many people lament franchises, sequels, and licensed content, saying there’s a lack of original material for film and television.

DEI in the Movies

Some people appreciate the progressive narratives in contemporary films, which often tackle social issues and offer diverse perspectives. They see modern cinema as more inclusive and culturally aware society. However, a broader cultural shift away from progressive wokeism pushes back against cultural agendas in art.

Technology as a Double-Edged Sword

Technological advancements in visual effects evoke mixed reactions. While some marvel at the immersive experiences CGI and AI offer, others say it overshadows the essence of storytelling and character development.

Socio-Political Influences

Modern films increasingly mirror societal challenges, dividing opinions. While some viewers applaud their relevance, others want escapist entertainment that provides relief from real-world tensions.

An Inevitable Conclusion

While most Americans view older films as superior, a vocal minority highlights the value of diversity and contemporary relevance. This debate underscores the evolving relationship between culture, technology, and art, mirroring a dynamic cultural landscape. As the American demographic continues to change, audiences will grapple with these shifts. Their discourse reveals more than cinematic tastes—it offers a window into the changing fabric of society itself.

Leftists on social media are talking about anti-Trump Americans leaving the United States prior to his second presidency. Discussions are a multifaceted web of identity, belonging, authoritarian fear, disillusionment, and economic anxiety—intertwined with individual and communal expressions of distress.

Many who are complaining mention their perceptions of American values eroding nationwide, sparking concerns over identity and belonging. Many describe feeling disconnected from a national identity they once resonated with but now find alien. They view the political landscape appears increasingly hostile to their beliefs.

Statements like “I’m seriously considering leaving” reflect a reckoning among leftists, where the desire to is a physical relocation and symbolic rejection of an America they see as departing from democratic and progressive ideals.

Man dressed up as a woman says he can’t live in the US under Trump so he’s moving back to Australia.

He put on lipstick to make this historic announcement. pic.twitter.com/nFsHW1w7hC

— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) November 7, 2024

True Belief in the Second Coming of Hitler

Fear of authoritarianism and fascism dominates these discussions, with progressives envisioning Trump as an existential threat to personal freedoms and civil rights. They often refer to Trump as akin to Hitler, calling his supporters racists, misogynists, and fascists.

They say things like, “I won’t stay under this regime” with visceral urgency. Among this group, emigration is a defense against the potential for oppressive governance. Fears are not isolated but collectively felt, amplified by social media.

Leftists find solace and validation in shared anxieties. They feel leaving is not just an escape but a protective measure against an anticipated erosion of democratic norms.

Virtue Signals in an Echo Chamber

There is also economic and social anxiety, as many express concerns about Trump exacerbating economic inequality, deteriorating social policies, and making healthcare unreliable.

Those on the left express a sense of vulnerability regarding the perceived socioeconomic regressions that a Trump administration will impose. Phrases like “I won’t suffer through another four years of this” reveal an underlying apprehension that cuts across personal and societal dimensions.

For some, leaving the country is a decision driven by ideological and material concerns, amplifying their sense that America may no longer offer stability or security.

A Lump Sum

A striking element in these discussions is the concept of “collective departure,” or leaving as a communal protest against a Trump regime. Those who share this sentiment are bound by shared fears and frustrations.

There is a sense of community and solidarity in the idea of abandoning a country that seems to threaten authoritarianism. Progressives say things like, “We’re planning our exit strategy” or “A group of us are looking into moving out together.” In this way, leaving is a unified response to a disillusioning political reality.

Social media’s role in creating these communal spaces magnifies the sentiment, fostering a sense of solidarity among those who feel estranged.

Oh shit. He won.

Anyone wanna check back on those “if Trump wins I’m going to kill myself” posts? pic.twitter.com/fBCD84M3V3

— 𓄂Pew (@PewOrPew) November 6, 2024

A big discussion prior to the 2024 election was the gender divide in support for Trump and Harris. Many concluded women would overwhelmingly turn out for Harris, based on “women’s rights” or abortion issues. However, surprising results showing Trump gaining ground with women, shocking some observers.

I don't know who needs to hear this, but Trump won white women outright pic.twitter.com/sxO5oc7pEw

— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) November 6, 2024

Despite conventional narratives suggesting women would vote strongly based on abortion, post-election conversations are illuminating. While past elections hinged on topics like abortion and identity politics, this election saw many women—and other voter groups—recalibrating toward economic stability, women’s safety, and traditional values.

🚨 JUST IN: Trump gains in nearly every demographic from 2020

🔴 Women: +2
🔴 Men: +3
🔴 Non-college: +6
🔴 Hispanic: +6
🔴 Black: +7
🔴 Young: +10 pic.twitter.com/qNcFOTDAVm

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) November 6, 2024

Democrats Feel Women Failed Them

Around 40% of Democratic comments voice disappointment over female support for Trump. Many lament the disappointing turnout for abortion as the cornerstone issue of the Harris campaign.

This is “political analyst” & former poly-sci professor Dr. Arlene who brainwashed hundreds of thousands of people on TT into thinking Harris would win.

On Nov 5th, she told a story about how she taunted a grocery store worker about how Harris was 100% going to win

On Nov 6th,… pic.twitter.com/NbVhQ6uftx

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) November 7, 2024

• A common theme among Democrats was disappointment over women supporting Trump, viewing it as a step back for women’s rights.
• Many Democrats express anxiety that Trump will roll back progress on abortion and gender equality.
• However voting results suggest women want policies that align with their family priorities and provide practical solutions.

Analysis

Previous MIG Reports data showed women are underrepresented in online political discourse. This may suggest that women voting for Trump are either less inclined to discuss it, or simply not captured due to lack of online presence.

Remember all those ads about "your husband won't know who you voted for?"

Turns out it wasn't their husbands that they were hiding their vote from, it was their judgy lefty girly pals.

— mrs. dobbins ☕️🪶 (@mrsdobbins_) November 6, 2024

The rise of policy-driven voting behavior among women may be attributed to the receding influence of gender ideology. This presents a strategic opportunity for Republicans to continue appealing to women with a platform that addresses concrete concerns.

Economic Stability Trumps Abortion

Drastically rising prices, particularly for essentials like groceries, healthcare, and housing, has become a major driver of political sentiment among female voters.

• Roughly 65% of women discussing the election online say economic concerns are the top priority.
• Women say things like, “Financial stability matters more than any other issue right now,” pointing to high costs and stagnant wages.
• Many women credit Trump’s policies with lower inflation and better household finances—they see his return as a path to restoring stability.

Analysis

Women directly link economic stability to their families' well-being. This trend suggests the social and identity issues emphasized in the culture over the last decade have lost potency amid economic fears.

In 2024, women are making decisions based on financial considerations, which they see as non-negotiable. For a Republican administration, continuing to address voter economic concerns pragmatically could solidify and increase this trend.

Sick of “Woke” Politics

Many women say they view Trump’s emphasis on traditional values as a welcome departure from identity politics.

• 30% of Republicans celebrate Trump's cultural alignment with anti-woke values.
• 25% of women say they feel alienation from Democratic messaging on woke issues—particularly transgender rights and women’s safety.
• Many say transgender policies, particularly in women’s sports and public spaces, are more severely encroaching on women’s rights than abortion restrictions.

Analysis

Trends suggests there may be a growing cultural shift to the right, with conservative female voters rallying to reorient around traditional values over progressive ideology. Republican messages that champion economic stability, safety, and family-focused policies resonate deeply with women. As identity politics increasingly alienates this voter base, progressives may continue to lose hold on women.

Failed “Women’s Rights” Movement

Many on the left lauded abortion as the most critical issues for women in 2024. Although it was a dominant issue in the 2022 midterms post-Dobs, current trends show the economy and personal safety supersede abortion issues for many women.

• Only 20% of women discussing the election emphasize abortion, suggesting a diminishing role in shaping female voting patterns.
• Many in this group—particularly mothers—say they prioritize “women’s rights” in the form of securing the border and female spaces.
• While many voters still express concern over potential abortion rollbacks in certain states, this does not seem to have a dramatic impact on the presidential race.

Analysis

Many women, including pro-choice advocates, are balancing abortion issues with more pressing economic and safety concerns. State races show a significant number of women still place importance on abortion, however Republican messaging about states’ rights post-Roe may impact voter decisions for national issues.