Blue Cities Reap the Consequences of Their Housing Policies
March 06, 2024_.png)
Key Takeaways
- A viral story about squatters in New York highlights concerns over housing policies in blue cities.
- Many people see tenant protection laws as prohibitive to owning property in Democrat run jurisdictions.
- People say they have left or are considering leaving blue cities because of economic worries, regulations, and crime.
Our Methodology
Demographics
All Voters
Sample Size
350,000
Geographical Breakdown
Democrat Cities
Time Period
30 Days
MIG Reports leverages EyesOver technology, employing Advanced AI for precise analysis. This ensures unparalleled precision, setting a new standard. Find out more about the unique data pull for this article.
A recent viral story about a retiring couple who are buried in a legal dispute with a squatter who took possession of their recently purchased dream retirement home in New York has sparked discussion about housing policies in blue cities. Many people are shocked and horrified at the extent of squatter's rights in New York and other Democrat-run cities.
On social media, New Yorkers express their concerns about squatters in their city, arguing they exploit loopholes in housing laws and exacerbate housing shortages. Many find it unfair and unsustainable that hardworking, taxpaying citizens must shoulder the burden of supporting individuals who, they argue, are not contributing to society in a meaningful way.
Many people have moved away or are threatening to move away from blue cities, citing frustration with policies that cater to squatters and illegal immigrants at the expense of law-abiding citizens.
Most Americans agree that there is a shortage of affordable housing across the country. But they tend to disagree on the causes and solutions.
In large, urban cities, where Democrats are often in power, there is a strong emphasis on tenants’ rights and protecting vulnerable populations. These places often have robust tenants' rights laws and policies aimed at preventing homelessness. However, these policies often face criticism from property owners who argue they unfairly infringe upon their rights and prohibit business, investments, and even the ability to occupy one’s own home.
Homeowners Frustrated with Squatter’s Rights
Many people – especially homeowners and landlords – see squatters as taking advantage of the system and property owners. They argue that property rights should be respected and that it's unfair for property owners to bear the burden of housing people without compensation. They often call for stricter laws and enforcement to protect the rights of property owners.
Those who can afford to own real estate express concerns about rent control policies, eviction moratoriums, and other tenant protections they see as too strict or lenient, leading to preferential treatment in favor of tenants.
Many property owners in places like New York argue that tenant-focused policies infringe the rights of landlords and homeowners. They believe they should have the right to control their own properties, including setting their own rental prices and choosing their own tenants.
Economic conservatives and property owners express frustration with overbearing regulations that make owning or renting property in blue cities nearly impossible.
_.png)
Property Owners Vote with Their Feet
In many blue states and cities, there is a sentiment that tenant rights need to be protected. Mostly Democrats, voters and policymakers say landlords and homeowners should bear certain responsibilities. This includes maintaining safe and habitable living conditions, not discriminating against tenants, and not exploiting tenants with excessively high rents.
However, despite voting for politicians who enact tenant-focused policies, homeowners and landlords have been leaving blue cities in droves. Since COVID, many people have commented on the number of people moving from states like California and New York to places like Texas and Florida.
Many of the top reasons people say they left blue cities are economic. They mention high cost of living, food, real estate, and healthcare as reasons for leaving. A lot of inter-state migrants say they moved to avoid high taxes, progressive policies, or high crime rates.
Squatter and Tenant Defenders
There are advocates who argue tenant protections are necessary to prevent exploitation and displacement, particularly in cities with high living costs. They often point to instances of landlords using loopholes and aggressive tactics to evict long-term tenants and raise rents.
Some express concerns that affordable housing and systemic issues are one of the main issues facing middle- and lower-class Americans. They argue that squatters are often people who have fallen through the cracks of the system and are forced to resort to occupying vacant properties just to survive. They see the issue as a symptom of larger social and economic problems that need to be addressed.
Fewer Americans Can Afford to Own Real Estate
While the debate over housing policies in blue cities is often driven by partisan divides, Americans do seem to agree that housing is becoming too expensive across the country. Most people feel it’s prohibitively expensive for Americans to afford to own real estate. More are beginning to feel that, even if they could afford to own property, it may not be worth it.
For some, particularly younger generations, the importance of homeownership is decreasing. The flexibility of renting, coupled with an increasing emphasis on experiences over possessions, is challenging traditional notions of homeownership as a benchmark of success. However, this shift is not universal, and many Americans still aspire to own their own homes.
- Voters consistently say the economy, including the difficulties of housing, is one of their top issues of concern.
- Discussion about the economy is consistently high online, implying it remains on people’s minds.
_.png)
_.png)
_.png){kind=spacer}
_.png){kind=spacer}
_.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)