American voters have an unhappy view about the job market and general state of the economy. Conversations online boil down to two indicators:
Distrust in the economic reporting
How the government spends money
Americans remain skeptical about the job reports, with claims that half of the jobs are "fake" and the other half being government jobs. They also express concern about the lack of new jobs for native-born Americans since 2018. This sentiment could be indicative of wider concerns about unemployment, underemployment, and the overall health of the job market.
Online conversations support this a pattern of the top discussions:
Concerns about job security and employment prospects, especially for native-born Americans
Doubts about the accuracy and reliability of government-provided statistics
Belief in the recovery and stabilization of the labor market
General interest in economic matters, with specific focus on employment rates and the health of the job market
The broader context of political discourse, with jobs and the economy being key issues in political campaigns and policy-making
Bipartisan Disapproval
Democrats' comments seem to focus more on dissatisfaction with the current tax system, advocating for reform and suggesting that wealthy individuals and large corporations are not paying their fair share. They also express concerns about how tax money is being spent, particularly with regard to funding wars.
Republicans' comments reveal a similar dissatisfaction with the tax system, but from a different angle. They mention the burden of taxes on the middle class and business owners, and they express frustration with how tax money is spent. They also seem to be against high taxes and are more likely to suggest tax cuts or reforms that reduce taxes.
Independents' comments are a mix of the above. They express frustration with the complexity of the tax system, the perceived unfairness of the distribution of tax burdens, and the misuse of tax money. They also discuss the impact of taxes on various groups, including the homeless and the self-employed. Some Independents seem open to both tax hikes for the wealthy and tax cuts for middle-income earners and businesses.
Media Narrative Support
Online conversations appear to be sustained by assistance from traditional approaches; online discussions peaked on Jan 10, Jan 18, Jan 25, Feb.
Jan 10: several articles about Biden adding 14 million jobs
Jan 18: Biden tweets about adding 14 million jobs
Jan 25: several articles and Nancy Pelosi tweet about adding 14 million jobs
Recent MIG data shows online discussions about border security is significantly increasing, implying rise in awareness and concern among Americans. The general sentiment among Republicans, Democrats, and Independents appears to be that of concern and frustration, albeit for differing reasons.
In the last 90 days, conversation online about the border has dramatically increased from an average of 2,951 mentions per day in November to 11,088 mentions per day in January.
In the past week, online discussion about the border has averaged 15,462 mentions per day with February 4 reaching a high of 25,228.
American sentiment about the border has decreased in the last 90 days. Public sentiment dropped from a consistent 50% in November to 43% today.
Sentiment on border security has remained below 50% for 84 straight days.
Reactions to the Proposed Border Bill
Discussions about the Lankford border bill appear to be highly polarized and emotionally charged. In general, the discussions also reveal a perceived link between immigration and crime. This suggests that a significant portion of the online discussion on immigration is driven by concerns over safety and rule of law.
Republicans
Sentiment among Republicans seems to be predominantly negative with strong criticism towards the border bill.
Republicans perceive it as an open borders bill that would allow unchecked immigration and jeopardize national security.
There are numerous calls for strict immigration control, including the deportation of illegal immigrants and the closure of the border.
Many accuse the Biden administration of facilitating illegal immigration, which they believe has led to an increase in crime, particularly referencing recent events in New York.
Republicans also express support for actions against certain Democratic representatives, particularly Ilhan Omar.
Many advocate for the completion of the southern border wall initiated under Trump's administration.
Some have even suggested extreme measures like crocodiles in rivers, electrified fences, and drones with bombs.
Democrats
Democrat voices are less prominent in these border discussions. But there is some criticism of Republicans for spreading what they see as racist and hateful rhetoric.
Those on the left challenge the narrative of open borders and argue that encounters at the border do not equate to an increase in the U.S. population
Sentiment suggests they believe Republicans are spreading misinformation about the bill and using the immigration issue to stoke fear and gain political advantage.
There are accusations of Republicans fear-mongering, particularly toward Trump and Governor Abbott.
There is also criticism towards the spending on the wall, with some Democrats arguing that the funds could be better used for other domestic issues.
Democrats continue to be largely critical of the border wall, but are less engaged in discussion about the current crescendo of concern around safety and rule of law.
Independents
Sentiment among independents is harder to pin down due to the diversity of views within this group.
There is a noticeable contingent who suggest unorthodox solutions to the border issue, like building a wall on the northern border with Canada.
Independents are not as vocal as Republicans, but it can be inferred that they are generally concerned about border security and immigration policies.
They seem to have more nuanced views, but tend to see the need for both border security and humane treatment of immigrants.
Reactions to James Lankford
The online sentiment regarding Senator James Lankford's actions on border security is overwhelmingly negative. Many express dissatisfaction with his border security bill, viewing it as detrimental to the United States.
Approval for Lankford has fluctuated in the last 14 days with a high of 54% and a low of 38%.
Disapproval
Many argue Lankford’s bill will lead to an influx of 2-3 million illegals per year or 20-30 million in a decade, effectively ending USA borders altogether.
There’s also dissatisfaction with the bill’s distribution of funding. Many express indignation over possible allocation of more funding to Ukraine and Israel over border security.
A few voices accuse Lankford of being swayed by bribes or outside interests rather than prioritizing the needs of American citizens.
Some voters in Oklahoma, Lankford's home state, voice their disappointment, stating that they are closely watching his actions.
There is a sentiment of betrayal among some Oklahomans who accuse Lankford of siding with Democrats and "selling out" Oklahoma.
There are numerous calls for him to step down from his position, with some referring to him as a "RINO."
There's a sentiment of betrayal and a threat of political repercussions with some users threatening to primary him in upcoming elections.
Across party lines, there seems to be a perceived lack of focus on domestic issues.
Overall, sentiments reflect a demand for markedly tighter border security measures, as well as a broad disapproval of the bill's provisions.
Approval
Despite the overall negative sentiment, there are a few voices that view aid to Ukraine as beneficial to the US economy and thus support Lankford's bill.
Arguments that the Russian invasion of Ukraine has led to unprecedented demand for US arms sales, providing a significant boost to the American economy.
There are a few voices of support for Lankford, arguing that he is focused on results rather than political posturing.
However, these voices appear to be in the minority.
Reactions to Alejandro Mayorkas
Online sentiments toward Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas appear to be largely negative, with a strong focus on his alleged failure to handle the issues at the border effectively.
Many commenters accuse Mayorkas of lying about his efforts to address what they perceive as an "invasion" at the border.
People believe he has not taken action to curb the surge of illegal border crossings. Some even suggest that he's aiding and abetting the situation.
This sentiment is mostly held by those who believe that Mayorkas and President Biden's border policies have exacerbated the crisis at the southern border.
Approval for Mayorkas has fluctuated in the last 14 days with a high of 48% and a low of 44%.
Division on a Mayorkas Impeachment
While talk about the border situation is generally negative, there seems to be more division about a possible Mayorkas impeachment.
Approval
There is a strong call from many for his impeachment, with some arguing that his handling of the US-Mexico border crisis is a breach of public trust.
Many accuse him of lying to the American people and Congress and failing to enforce border security laws.
There is a belief that Mayorkas has not protected the homeland effectively and should be held accountable for his actions.
Many say Mayorkas and Biden are ignoring laws they should be enforcing and do have power to act on this issue.
Supporters insist that it is the duty of Congress members to vote in favor of his impeachment. They also accuse him of being a "Constitution hater."
Disapproval
On the other hand, there are many who view the potential impeachment as a partisan ploy by House Republicans.
Arguments that the impeachment is not about Mayorkas's job performance but an attempt to make the border issue a political talking point against the Biden administration.
Dissenters argue that the impeachment is a political stunt, a "hit job," and an abuse of the process.
There are some voices who say the impeachment will not pass the House vote and question the timing of the impeachment.
Some argue that Mayorkas does not have the authority to set the US immigration agenda and that this responsibility lies with Congress.
The public discourse surrounding the possible legal consequences for Donald Trump and the potential politicization of the justice system reveals a generally partisan landscape of opinions.
Overall, the data reveals a sense of disillusionment and frustration with the current state of the country. These sentiments tend to be shared by members of all political affiliations and could be a driving force behind the different perspectives on Trump’s legal challenges. There is a shared sentiment of dissatisfaction and frustration with the state of the nation.
Trump’s Approval Across Political Affiliations
Trump’s overall approval has averaged 48% in the last 15 days.
Sentiment towards Trump, specifically related to his legal cases, is slightly lower, averaging 46% in the last 15 days.
Data suggests people feel more negatively about Trump’s legal challenges compared to his platform as a whole.
Republicans Feel the Courts Are Biased
In general, Republicans seem concerned across the board about the potential for political bias within the justice system and weaponization of the courts against conservatives.
Skepticism Toward Current Indictments
Allegations of corruption and personal misconduct against individuals involved in the lawsuits, such as Fani Willis, cause Republicans discredit the cases.
Republicans question the impartiality of Special Counsel Jack Smith and Judge Chutkan, suggesting they have overstepped their authority or misused their power.
There are some Republicans who express reservations about Trump's character and conduct, indicating a split within the party.
Frequently, there are assertions that the justice system is being used as a political tool by Democrats and "radical liberal" judges to hinder Trump’s reelection bid.
The postponement and removal of Trump's trial from the federal court's public docket is seen as a possible indication of a lack of concrete evidence against him.
Concerns of Bias and Selective Prosecution
Republicans express fears that the system is being unfairly used against Trump and other conservative figures.
They tend to view the legal cases against Trump as politically motivated attempts to tarnish his reputation and undermine his achievements.
They believe these lawsuits are part of a larger pattern of witch-hunting and political persecution led by Democrats.
In general, there’s a sense of inconsistency in how the law is applied, such as activists tearing down historical statues being treated differently than the destruction of a “Satanic” statue.
Conversation suggests that Republicans believe there is a double standard at play, with actions against conservative figures or symbols being treated more harshly.
Democrats Approve of Consequences for Trump
Democrats are more likely to view the potential legal consequences for Trump as legitimate and necessary.
Belief that Trump is Guilty
A large portion of Democrats believe that Trump has committed a variety of violations ranging from sexual misconduct to financial fraud.
This group generally denies claims of the justice system being used as a political weapon, arguing that the legal cases simply reflect the rule of law.
Many argue that the justice system is doing its job by holding Trump accountable for his alleged actions and is not being used as a political tool against him.
It seems a large swath of Democrats perceive the lawsuits and investigations as necessary checks on his actions and power.
However, there is a noticeable portion of Democrats who express concern about the potential misuse of the justice system for political gains.
There are also some Democrats who worry that allegations about Fani Willis could potentially taint the proceedings against Trump.
Pushback Against Trump’s Reelection Campaign
There is an argument from Democrats that Trump should not be listed on future Republican primary ballots.
Accusations of corruption, tax evasion, and dictatorial tendencies recur throughout the discourse, fanning the flames that he is unfit to be reelected.
There are assertions that Trump is a threat to democracy and needs to be held accountable for his alleged crimes.
There is concern over Trump's comments about becoming a "day-one dictator" if re-elected, implying many Democrats believed it was more than a jest.
Independents Are Divided on Trump Indictments
Independents seem to have a more divided consensus than the two partisan sides. Some echo Democrat concerns about Trump's alleged crimes and the need for accountability. Others express suspicions about the politicization of justice.
General Dissatisfaction With Both Political Parties
One of the main themes among Independents is a frustration with the perceived corruption and bias in both political parties.
Some Independents accuse Biden of reinstating Trump's policies and taking credit for them.
There is some agreement with Nikki Haley's comments implying that Trump should be focused on the American people rather than on his legal issues.
Some argue there is clear evidence of corruption in Trump's actions. They point to his alleged attempts to interfere with the legal process and protect his political allies.
Independents seem to dislike the substantial amount of money (around $50 million) spent by PACs supporting Trump to cover his legal bills.
Concern Over Potential Threats to Democracy
Many are concerned about the potential politicization of the justice system, regardless of whether they believe Trump is guilty or innocent of the charges against him.
There’s a distinct group who say they will not vote for Trump, but seem to believe his legal issues could potentially undermine the legal system and democratic processes.
A common argument against the legal proceedings is the potential conflict of interest over Fani Willis’s personal relationship with Nathan Wade.
Trump's remarks about being a “dictator” are viewed with concern, as they can be interpreted as a willingness to overstep legal and constitutional boundaries.
The Democratic Party’s divide between its establishment base and progressive branches is growing. Overall, there seems to be a split among Democrats and progressives, with some continuing to support Israel's right to defend itself and others advocating for a more balanced approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with an emphasis on human rights and international law. There is a strong sentiment of frustration towards the amount of military aid going to Israel, with some suggesting it should be reduced or cut off completely.
Some Democrats are supportive of the US's military aid to Israel, viewing it as necessary to combat threats from Hamas and other destabilizing forces in the Middle East. They believe that Iran, backed by Russia and China, is a significant threat to global peace, and that the US and its allies must remain vigilant. They also argue that Hamas has been a significant contributor to the ongoing conflict and suffering in Gaza, using aid money for military purposes instead of improving the lives of Palestinians.
On the other hand, there are Democrats and progressives who are critical of the US's military aid to Israel. They condemn the treatment of Palestinians in Gaza and argue for a reassessment of the US's loyalty to Israel. They are concerned about the humanitarian situation in Gaza, accusing Israel of blocking aid and contributing to the suffering of the Palestinian people. Some go as far as calling for an end to US funding for Israel, equating Israel's actions in Gaza to genocide.
Talking About (Democrats)
Some of the more progressive Democrats express a sense of betrayal, calling it a "huge concession" that the bipartisan border-Israel-Ukraine package blocks all funding for UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East) from the US. They object to the idea of providing more money for Israel while reducing aid to Palestinian children.
The discussions also reveal a concern among Democrats about the potential implications of not passing the bill. Some users note that failure to pass the bill could lead to direct military confrontations in the Middle East and against Russia, suggesting a fear of escalation.
Newsom is frequently cast in public discussion as being out of touch and ineffective in his handling of California’s crime issue. Discussion online spiked as a result of a video clip where Newsom says he was blamed for a shoplifting incident to his face. People find his story either ironic or fitting. Californians say Newsom’s story shows a failure to address crime and shoplifting effectively.
On the topic of “crime,” Gavin Newsom’s approval score dropped to a 7-day low of 27%.
His approval bounced back to 44% on the day of his comments as discussion volume surged.
Following his shoplifting comments, discussion volume related to crime and Newsom doubled.
Newsom’s support overall, including the topic of “crime,” reached a 7-day low of 40%, including the day his shoplifting comments became public.
What People Are Saying
Online discussions show that people are expressing strong negative sentiment towards Gavin Newsom, the Governor of California, regarding the state's crime situation, especially in relation to shoplifting.
People argue that Newsom's approach to handling crime in California is inefficient and ineffective.
Californians express frustration and disappointment, citing an increase in taxes, high homelessness, rampant drug use, and uncontrolled crime rates as key issues.
Many people feel these problems are direct results of Newsom's leadership and policies.
There is a deep dissatisfaction with increasing instances of shoplifting and the overall crime rate in California.
There's a sentiment that excessive amounts of tax money are not being used effectively, with some alleging corruption and misuse of funds.
Many are blaming Newsom for creating an environment that is seen as favoring criminals.
Larger Contributing Issues
Many Californians see the crime increase as one problem among many other larger issues. Overall, the online sentiment towards Gavin Newsom in relation to crime in California is highly critical.
There are suggestions that Newsom's policies are driving people out of California
People accuse Newsom of being detached from reality and failing to acknowledge the impact of his policies on small businesses.
They also argue that insurance companies are pulling out of California due to the rise in crime.
Californians express a desire for stronger law enforcement, stricter policies towards criminals, and more effective solutions for homelessness and drug addiction.
There is a belief that economic decline and problems like a failing school system and increased cost of living are causing people to leave California.
A frequently expressed belief is that California has become excessively liberal under Newsom's leadership, with some labeling it as “communist.”
Positive sentiments are few and far between, suggesting Newsom is facing significant public backlash over his policies.
Crime and the Border
A primary concern Californians discuss about the border is Newsom's perceived support for “open borders,” which they believe has led to an influx of illegal immigrants in the state. Many people attribute the high crime rates in California to Newsom's alleged failure to effectively control the state borders.
People express anger and frustration towards Newsom, with some labeling him as a “dangerous person” and a “traitor” to California.
They accuse him of condoning illegal immigration and even facilitating criminal activities, such as human trafficking and drug trafficking.
There is also widespread belief that Newsom's border policies have resulted in a surge of crime in the state.
Critics believe that illegal immigrants contribute to the high crime rates in the state, with some even suggesting that Newsom's administration has turned California into a “criminal haven.”
Many say Newsom’s neglect of important issues in favor of supporting illegal immigrants is a testament to his inability to effectively govern the state.
The online discussions about the US border are rife with emotion and conflicting opinions. An underlying theme in these discussions is the perceived failure of both the federal government and the GOP to protect Americans.
Greg Abbott
A key figure in these discussions is Texas Governor Greg Abbott, who is both lauded and criticized for his stance on border control.
Abbott‘s statement against the Supreme Court's ruling allowing razor wire to be removed from the southern border has sparked fervent responses.
Supporters applaud his assertion of Texas's rights against what they perceive as a federal government overreach.
They view the situation at the southern border as an "invasion," expressing fears about illegal immigration and Texas.
Critics accuse him of fearmongering and of being absent during what he himself has labeled a crisis.
Donald Trump
Another key figure in the national conversation is Donald Trump.
Many support Trump‘s wall as a means to control immigration, while others see it as an ineffective and divisive measure.
Critics point out that the wall not only failed to solve the immigration issue but also inadvertently created easy access points for smugglers.
They further argue that the situation at the border could have been prevented had Trump been competent in his initial attempts to build the wall.
Farmers
American farmers are also highlighted in the discussion, with some Americans praising them for supporting Texas in its efforts to stem the perceived "invasion" at the southern border.
Ilhan Omar
Multiple people express strong negative sentiments towards Representative Ilhan Omar, often linking her to what they perceive as an open-border policy.
Commentors believe Omar‘s stance threatens national security.
There are frequent calls for her to be removed from Congress and deported.
Many are pointing to a perceived lack of allegiance to the US.
A significant group of Americans seem to identify Omar as a key figure negatively affecting the border situation.
Democrats Overall
There's also a significant, recurring narrative that accuses Democrats of wanting open borders to score political points.
Some suggest that this is a strategy to attract future voters from among illegal immigrants.
Others accuse Republicans of creating fear and anger around the issue for their political gain.
The current administration is frequently criticized for its perceived attempts to allow open borders and endanger the country.
Support for Key Figures Involved in Border Issues
James Lankford
There is no conversation specifically mentioning Sen. Lankford.
In the last 7 days, Lankford’s average approval was 50%. Today it sits at 49%.
Joe Biden
Many people blame Biden for the influx of illegal immigrants.
There is criticism of the so-called "Biden-McConnell open borders amnesty bill," which some users feel would only increase illegal immigration.
Biden’s 7-day average national approval rating was 47%. Today it’s 44%.
His average approval in swing states over the last 7 days was 42%. Today it’s 42%.
Alejandro Mayorkas
Some users believe Mayorkas is corrupt and accuse him of breaking the law.
Calls for his impeachment, claiming he and Biden have committed treason by not fulfilling their oaths of office and endangering American citizens.
In the last 7 days, Mayorkas’s average approval rating was 45%, and 43% today.
Greg Abbott
There is praise for his efforts to protect the Texas border and his attempts to rally support from other states to address the situation.
Governor Abbott is seen as a strong leader by many.
There is some criticism with some attributing the state's immigration issues to his governance.
Discussion about Abbott's controversial decision to send busloads of immigrants to other states. Some say it’s an attempt to avoid addressing the root of the problem.
In the last 7 days, Abbott’s average approval rating was 47%. Today it sits at 47%.
Ukraine Approval Remains low as overwhelming majority of Americans Focus Instead on Border Security and Immigration Crisis
Recent analysis from the Media Intelligence Group (MIG) offers a comprehensive look into how both American engagement and support for Ukraine remains low, in serious contrast from high levels seen at the start of the Ukraine conflict. These insights reveal that despite ongoing debates in Congress about further aid for Ukraine, American opinion remains unchanged and instead focused on America First principals.
Shifting Focus: MIG's data indicates that online engagement surrounding Global Affairs is viewed increasingly with an America First lens.
Engagement towards Ukraine is dwarfed by discussions about Border Security or more longstanding priorities like the US-Israeli alliance.
MIG found that over the last 30 days, Ukraine averages 1,106 online daily mentions, with a total of 33,185 mentions of Ukraine.
In contrast, discussions about Border Security and the Migrant Crisis averaged 8,836 daily online mentions, totaling 265,095 online mentions in the last 30 days.
Similarly, online conversations about Israel and Palestine are even more prominent, with a daily average of 9,072 online mentions and a total of 278,200 online mentions in the last 30 days.
Ukraine Hawks fail to sway Americans:
Further analysis from the MIG reveals American approval of Ukraine remains consistently below 45%, contrasting sharply with the high levels of backing seen at the start of the conflict.
In late 2023, Gallup found that American support for Ukraine had dropped sharply since the onset of Russia’s invasion.
When Russia forces had first breached Ukrainian defenses, American support for Ukraine stood at 66%. This dropped sharply in Gallup’s subsequent poll in October 2023, when 41% of respondents stated they believed the United States was doing too much for Ukraine.
MIG’s latest numbers from the last 30 days find support for Ukraine hasn’t budged. Despite many Ukraine Hawks in Congress making the case for further aid to Kiev, MIG finds Ukraine’s average approval stuck at 41%.
Worse, Ukraine’s approval reached 44% just three times in the last 30 days, while it fell below 40% for 7 days total.
America First, Here to Stay:
MIG's data underscores a growing shift in America’s focus in prioritizing an America First global perspective, as online discussions about Ukraine sink into further irrelevancy and are eclipsed by Border Security and Immigration debates.
Notably, these findings are supported by a recent Harvard Harris poll, which found Immigration as the top policy concern amongst Americans, well ahead of foreign policy but even surpassing inflation and the economy.
Despite unending frustrations with a Congress many believe is disconnected from the rest of America, recent comments from Majority Leader Mitch McConnell may reveal Americans are forcing D.C. to listen. This week, McConnell told Senate colleagues “When we started this, the border united us and Ukraine divided us” but that “The politics on this have changed.”
There are some clear trends in how people use and perceive the concepts of “MAGA” versus “Progressive.” In general, MAGA is associated with pro-Trump Republicans. The term progressive is generally associated with liberal or left-leaning politics. However, there are some varying definitions and perceptions for each word, depending on a group or person’s viewpoint.
How MAGA is Used
MAGA is often linked with a conservative political stance.
Discussions frequently referring to traditional values, resistance to “wokeness” or progressive ideologies, and an emphasis on patriotism.
Supporters view MAGA as a symbol of defiance against political correctness.
MAGA is often used to express support for stricter border control and election integrity.
The term is often used pejoratively by those who disagree with these views, associating MAGA with regression, intolerance, divisiveness, and a lack of progress.
However, supporters of MAGA tend to view it positively, associating it with a return to perceived traditional American values and norms.
How Progressive is Used
The term “progressive” is often associated with left-wing politics, social justice issues, inclusivity, and change.
Progressive is frequently used to criticize the Biden administration's handling of border control and economic issues.
Critics of progressives often use the term “woke,” implying that progressives are overly sensitive and focused on political correctness
Supporters of progressivism view it as a necessary drive towards social and economic justice and equality.
MIG data shows the term “progressive” is often used online negatively toward those with left-leaning politics. Liberals themselves seem to use it less often in these discussions.
A possible conclusion could be that “progressive” is losing effectiveness as a branding term.
MAGA Conservatives
According to MIG data, the perception of MAGA among conservatives includes:
A strong stance on the US border including support for stricter security and physical barriers.
Prioritizing America’s issues and struggles at home as opposed to over-funding foreign aid.
There are internal debates within MAGA about how the party should be lead and whether Republicans can find unity.
Donald Trump remains the figurehead of the MAGA movement and feelings of negativity or positivity toward MAGA correlate with feelings about Trump.
There are internal disagreements within MAGA between populist and conservative views of abortion.
MAGA supporters often express strong support for Israel, viewing it as an ally in the Middle East and criticizing Hamas for the escalation of violence.
The discussions show that conservatives view MAGA positively, associating it with personal freedom, protection of individual rights, and a bulwark against perceived threats like big tech censorship, 'woke' culture, and perceived liberal agenda.
Progressive Democrats
According to MIG data, the perception of progressives among left-leaning people includes:
Leftists generally view progressives favorably, seeing them as advocates for social justice, diversity, and equity.
Progressives are seen as champions of change, fighting for issues like race and gender equality, and climate change.
There’s support for plight of the Palestinians and criticism of Israel for what leftists perceive as disproportionate use of force and violation of human rights.
Discussions about the economy and taxes are relatively low, suggesting either lack of concern among leftists or quiet disagreement with progressive economic polices.
Progressives are not directly mentioned in discussions on the border but are implicitly positioned as the ideological opponents of MAGA conservatives.
Overall, on the top trending topics that do not include social justice and equity issues, there is low discussion volume among progressives and democrats.
The discussions show that liberals view progressivism positively, associating it with gender equality, social justice, diversity, and .
Moderates and Independents on MAGA vs Progressive
There is a clear distinction between how conservatives view MAGA and how moderates and independents see it. Similarly, leftists view progressives positively and the perception by moderates and independents tends to be more negative. The perception of both MAGA and progressives seems to be largely influenced by political affiliation, leaving moderates skeptical.
MAGA
Some moderates perceive MAGA positively for its focus on economic growth and national pride.
MAGA has recently gained some support from moderates and independents on things like the Texas border crisis and child sex change operations.
There are concerns about divisive rhetoric, perceived authoritarianism, and its association with far-right ideologies.
Many moderates perceive MAGA as an extreme or radical representation of conservative politics.
There is criticism for controversial aspects like a perceived association with nationalism, xenophobia, and aggressive foreign policies.
While some moderates are critical of Biden, they express skepticism about the effectiveness of MAGA’s impeachment push as a solution.
Many moderates express dislike for Trump and an unwillingness to vote for him.
Progressives
Some moderates appreciate the progressive focus on social issues and equality, others express concern about perceived radicalism, identity politics.
Moderates and independents tend to support progressive views on abortion and criticize MAGA for its perceived stance on women’s health.
There is also criticism among independents for a perceived disregard for economic realities in leftist politics and Bidenomics.
Many moderates are critical of progressive attitudes toward the Israel-Hamas conflict.
There is dislike for progressive silence on the border and are perceived as promoting open borders and enabling illegal immigration.
Some feel that the progressive movement is too focused on symbolic gestures rather than substantive policy changes.
Online discussions about union support for Donald Trump and union leadership support for Joe Biden reveal a spectrum of opinions. Some posts accuse UAW union bosses of not representing their members and claim that Biden has worked against the interests of auto workers. These posts often argue that the union leadership has sided with the Biden administration, which they believe has harmed working-class Americans.
American workers seem divided in their support for Trump's and Biden's policies, with some expressing strong support for Trump's policies and others strongly supporting Biden's policies. However, the general sentiment towards the Biden administration's union policies seems negative, with many comments calling for his impeachment.
Raises Trump's Support:
Hiring union workers.
Strong stance on border issues.
Support from the Republican party.
Perceived financial acumen due to billionaire status.
Opposition to mass migration.
Lowers Trump's Support:
Perceived disregard for the working man.
Alleged history of not paying workers.
Perceived prioritization of billionaires over workers.
Accusations of using border issues for campaign reasons.
Negative sentiment from union leadership.
Union Approval - Trump vs Biden
Raises Biden's Support:
Policies believed to create jobs.
Enforcing strong labor standards.
Proposals for clean energy.
Perceived willingness to negotiate on issues like border control.
Support from union members.
Lowers Biden's Support:
Accusations of ignoring border crisis.
Perceived lack of strong stance on border issues.
Lack of significant discourse on his union policies.
Perceived partisan politics.
Absence of notable union endorsements.
Wages and Salaries
Under Trump's Administration
Some dissatisfaction with what they perceived as globalist control over union leadership
Criticism of UAW President's negative comments about Trump, with suggestions that this reflected a broader trend of union leadership being out of touch with their members' interests
Supporters of Trump's policies argued that his promises of Rust Belt revitalization were being undermined by union leaders aligned with the Democratic Party.
Under Biden’sAdministration
Substantial support for his policies, particularly those perceived as promoting social and racial justice.
These supporters often used the term "woke" in a positive context, arguing that being aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues, especially issues of racial and social justice, was a crucial part of supporting Biden's policies.
Also criticism of Biden's policies, arguing that a focus on "woke" politics was alienating certain sections of society and that this could harm support for unions
Some concerns that Biden's policies were putting American citizens at risk, particularly in relation to immigration.
Union Trends
Union membership rate of public-sector workers (32.5%) continued to be more than five times higher than the rate of private-sector workers (6%).
The highest unionization rates were among workers in education, training, and library occupations (32.7%) and protective service occupations (31.9%).
Percentage of Workforce Union Membership Over Time
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
_1.png)
_1.png)
_1.png)
.png)
_1.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.jpg)