NY Mayor Indicted: Americans Worry About Politicized Justice
September 28, 2024.png)
Key Takeaways
- The DoJ indicted NYC Mayor Eric Adams on corruption charges, causing speculation among voters about political targeting.
- Many conversations avoid Adam’s guilt or innocence, instead focusing on the broader issues of politicians who speak out against Biden-Harris border policies.
- Those suspicious of politicized DoJ indictments cite Adams’ comments about the cost of illegal immigration in NYC, while critics focus on allegations of foreign money in U.S. politics.
Our Methodology
Demographics
All Voters
Sample Size
10,000
Geographical Breakdown
National
Time Period
1 Day
MIG Reports leverages EyesOver technology, employing Advanced AI for precise analysis. This ensures unparalleled precision, setting a new standard. Find out more about the unique data pull for this article.
The sudden indictment of New York City Mayor Eric Adams on corruption charges sparks national debate over the integrity of the justice system. Many on the right say Adams’ indictment exacerbates a crisis of public trust in the justice system and the political establishment. This situation exposes fractures in how Americans perceive the Department of Justice (DoJ) and its potential politicization.
Adams himself made a statement claiming he is being targeted by a politicized investigation.
BREAKING: New York City mayor Eric Adams issues a statement, says he is being targeted for standing his ground to protect the citizens of New York.
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 26, 2024
🔥🔥
“My fellow New Yorkers. It is now my belief that the federal government intends to charge me with crimes.”
“If so, these… pic.twitter.com/XyfPMW1nIe
The Charges Against Adams
The indictment, which was unsealed on Thursday, accuses Adams of financial misconduct, alleging he accepted illegal campaign donations. This includes money tied to foreign entities. The allegations place Adams in direct violation of federal campaign finance laws, which strictly prohibit such actions.
Yet, for many on the right, the significance of these charges goes beyond Adams himself. Many say the charges are also an indictment of a weaponized DoJ, the Biden-Harris border, and the failings of leadership in major American cities.
Adams’ Verboten Comments on Immigration
Recently, Adams has become outspoken about federal immigration policies and the burden illegal immigrants place on New York City. In the last year, he has called out the federal government for failing to manage huge waves of illegal immigrants, saying the city was being "overrun."
His comments, saying illegal immigration could destroy NYC, resonate with anyone concerned about the border. However, they also anger those advocating for Biden-Harris policies. Some Americans are suspicious Adams is being targeted by the Democratic establishment for defying the regime narrative on immigration.
Exactly one year ago, Mayor Eric Adams admitted (off-script) that migrants are "destroying NYC"
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 26, 2024
He was just indicted by Biden-Harris pic.twitter.com/oDhKVuPAzA
- In general, conservatives see Adams as rightfully speaking out against illegal immigration, but some say he supports policies that undermine real enforcement.
- Progressives criticize Adams for taking a critical stance on sanctuary cities, contradicting their views about the value of mass migration.
Voter Reactions Sympathizing and Condemning
American voters are responding with a mix of support, skepticism, and hostility toward Adams and the DoJ. MIG Reports analysis of voter conversations shows:
- 35% of voters support Adams, arguing the indictment is politically motivated and the justice system is being used to undermine dissenters.
- 40% of voters express skepticism about the justice system, questioning whether the charges are opportunistic or part of a larger political agenda.
- 20% criticize Adams directly, saying the indictment reflects his failures as a leader and validates concerns about his corruption.
- 10% express outrage about what they see as a broader pattern of weaponizing justice against political opponents.
.png)
Sympathizers Perceive a Border Cover Up
While many express uncertainty about whether Adams is guilty or not, most of the conversation frames the issue as broadly damning of the Biden-Harris border. Voters focus on the government's lack of control over the border situation and suspicions that the administration wants to silence anyone bringing attention to the issue.
Many frame the indictment within their ongoing frustrations with political leaders, emphasizing immigration failures and their consequences. In these discussions, voters agree with Adams’ comments that the influx of migrants causes higher crime rates and economic strain.
Critics Focus on Foreign Influence
For those critical of Adams, there is strong concern about foreign influence in American politics and references to Adams allegedly taking money from foreign powers in Turkey.
This group frames the indictment as an indication of elected officials prioritizing personal gain over public service. This perspective coincides with discussions about the need for stricter regulations to eliminate foreign money from politics entirely.
Critics say the indictment should not be dismissed or taken lightly. They emphasize accountability and the necessity for elected officials to uphold ethical standards. There is recurring skepticism or outright condemnation of Adams with calls for accountability. These voters question his fitness to lead, suggesting the charges are a culmination of a pattern of mismanagement.
.png)
The Broader Crisis: Distrust in Institutions
Adams’ indictment feeds into larger fears of institutional decay which simmer in political discourse in the U.S. Increasingly, voters are growing disillusioned and distrusting of federal agencies like the DoJ, the FBI, and the election system itself. The perceived weaponization of these institutions causes many to question whether legal processes can remain impartial or trustworthy.
Many Americans believe the system is broken and, regardless of the belief in Adams’ guilt or innocence, use the indictment as justification for their doubts. The DoJ’s handling of politically sensitive cases—particularly those involving Trump and other conservatives—generates widespread skepticism especially on the right.
Overarching Voter Concerns
The charges against Adams highlight skepticism Americans increasingly harbor against government actions. This includes:
- DoJ Distrust: Many view the Department of Justice as biased, targeting dissenting voices but turning a blind eye to equal wrongdoings among establishment figures.
- Election Integrity: Questions about the 2020 election snowballed a sharp decline in voter trust as many still question the integrity of the process for 2024.
- Federal Agencies: From the FBI to the Secret Services and the IRS, federal agencies are increasingly viewed as instruments of politicized power, undermining Americans rather than serving them.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)