Americans Are Increasingly Negative About Border Bill
February 06, 2024
Key Takeaways
- Recently, online discussion about the border has averaged 15,462 mentions per day with February 4 reaching a high of 25,228.
- Sentiment regarding Senator James Lankford's border bill is overwhelmingly negative, hitting a low of 38%.
- Americans are also negative towards Secretary Mayorkas, with a focus on his alleged failure to handle the issues at the border effectively.
Our Methodology
Demographics
All Voters
Sample Size
25,000
Geographical Breakdown
National
Time Period
90 Days
MIG Reports leverages EyesOver technology, employing Advanced AI for precise analysis. This ensures unparalleled precision, setting a new standard. Find out more about the unique data pull for this article.
Public Awareness on the Border
Recent MIG data shows online discussions about border security is significantly increasing, implying rise in awareness and concern among Americans. The general sentiment among Republicans, Democrats, and Independents appears to be that of concern and frustration, albeit for differing reasons.
- In the last 90 days, conversation online about the border has dramatically increased from an average of 2,951 mentions per day in November to 11,088 mentions per day in January.
- In the past week, online discussion about the border has averaged 15,462 mentions per day with February 4 reaching a high of 25,228.
.png)
- American sentiment about the border has decreased in the last 90 days. Public sentiment dropped from a consistent 50% in November to 43% today.
- Sentiment on border security has remained below 50% for 84 straight days.
.png)
Reactions to the Proposed Border Bill
Discussions about the Lankford border bill appear to be highly polarized and emotionally charged. In general, the discussions also reveal a perceived link between immigration and crime. This suggests that a significant portion of the online discussion on immigration is driven by concerns over safety and rule of law.
Republicans
Sentiment among Republicans seems to be predominantly negative with strong criticism towards the border bill.
- Republicans perceive it as an open borders bill that would allow unchecked immigration and jeopardize national security.
- There are numerous calls for strict immigration control, including the deportation of illegal immigrants and the closure of the border.
- Many accuse the Biden administration of facilitating illegal immigration, which they believe has led to an increase in crime, particularly referencing recent events in New York.
- Republicans also express support for actions against certain Democratic representatives, particularly Ilhan Omar.
- Many advocate for the completion of the southern border wall initiated under Trump's administration.
- Some have even suggested extreme measures like crocodiles in rivers, electrified fences, and drones with bombs.
Democrats
- Democrat voices are less prominent in these border discussions. But there is some criticism of Republicans for spreading what they see as racist and hateful rhetoric.
- Those on the left challenge the narrative of open borders and argue that encounters at the border do not equate to an increase in the U.S. population
- Sentiment suggests they believe Republicans are spreading misinformation about the bill and using the immigration issue to stoke fear and gain political advantage.
- There are accusations of Republicans fear-mongering, particularly toward Trump and Governor Abbott.
- There is also criticism towards the spending on the wall, with some Democrats arguing that the funds could be better used for other domestic issues.
- Democrats continue to be largely critical of the border wall, but are less engaged in discussion about the current crescendo of concern around safety and rule of law.
Independents
- Sentiment among independents is harder to pin down due to the diversity of views within this group.
- There is a noticeable contingent who suggest unorthodox solutions to the border issue, like building a wall on the northern border with Canada.
- Independents are not as vocal as Republicans, but it can be inferred that they are generally concerned about border security and immigration policies.
- They seem to have more nuanced views, but tend to see the need for both border security and humane treatment of immigrants.
Reactions to James Lankford
The online sentiment regarding Senator James Lankford's actions on border security is overwhelmingly negative. Many express dissatisfaction with his border security bill, viewing it as detrimental to the United States.
Approval for Lankford has fluctuated in the last 14 days with a high of 54% and a low of 38%.
.png)
Disapproval
- Many argue Lankford’s bill will lead to an influx of 2-3 million illegals per year or 20-30 million in a decade, effectively ending USA borders altogether.
- There’s also dissatisfaction with the bill’s distribution of funding. Many express indignation over possible allocation of more funding to Ukraine and Israel over border security.
- A few voices accuse Lankford of being swayed by bribes or outside interests rather than prioritizing the needs of American citizens.
- Some voters in Oklahoma, Lankford's home state, voice their disappointment, stating that they are closely watching his actions.
- There is a sentiment of betrayal among some Oklahomans who accuse Lankford of siding with Democrats and "selling out" Oklahoma.
- There are numerous calls for him to step down from his position, with some referring to him as a "RINO."
- There's a sentiment of betrayal and a threat of political repercussions with some users threatening to primary him in upcoming elections.
- Across party lines, there seems to be a perceived lack of focus on domestic issues.
- Overall, sentiments reflect a demand for markedly tighter border security measures, as well as a broad disapproval of the bill's provisions.
Approval
- Despite the overall negative sentiment, there are a few voices that view aid to Ukraine as beneficial to the US economy and thus support Lankford's bill.
- Arguments that the Russian invasion of Ukraine has led to unprecedented demand for US arms sales, providing a significant boost to the American economy.
- There are a few voices of support for Lankford, arguing that he is focused on results rather than political posturing.
- However, these voices appear to be in the minority.
Reactions to Alejandro Mayorkas
Online sentiments toward Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas appear to be largely negative, with a strong focus on his alleged failure to handle the issues at the border effectively.
- Many commenters accuse Mayorkas of lying about his efforts to address what they perceive as an "invasion" at the border.
- People believe he has not taken action to curb the surge of illegal border crossings. Some even suggest that he's aiding and abetting the situation.
- This sentiment is mostly held by those who believe that Mayorkas and President Biden's border policies have exacerbated the crisis at the southern border.
Approval for Mayorkas has fluctuated in the last 14 days with a high of 48% and a low of 44%.
.png)
Division on a Mayorkas Impeachment
While talk about the border situation is generally negative, there seems to be more division about a possible Mayorkas impeachment.
Approval
- There is a strong call from many for his impeachment, with some arguing that his handling of the US-Mexico border crisis is a breach of public trust.
- Many accuse him of lying to the American people and Congress and failing to enforce border security laws.
- There is a belief that Mayorkas has not protected the homeland effectively and should be held accountable for his actions.
- Many say Mayorkas and Biden are ignoring laws they should be enforcing and do have power to act on this issue.
- Supporters insist that it is the duty of Congress members to vote in favor of his impeachment. They also accuse him of being a "Constitution hater."
Disapproval
- On the other hand, there are many who view the potential impeachment as a partisan ploy by House Republicans.
- Arguments that the impeachment is not about Mayorkas's job performance but an attempt to make the border issue a political talking point against the Biden administration.
- Dissenters argue that the impeachment is a political stunt, a "hit job," and an abuse of the process.
- There are some voices who say the impeachment will not pass the House vote and question the timing of the impeachment.
- Some argue that Mayorkas does not have the authority to set the US immigration agenda and that this responsibility lies with Congress.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)