border-security Articles
-
Ukraine Approval Remains low as overwhelming majority of Americans Focus Instead on Border Security and Immigration Crisis
Recent analysis from the Media Intelligence Group (MIG) offers a comprehensive look into how both American engagement and support for Ukraine remains low, in serious contrast from high levels seen at the start of the Ukraine conflict. These insights reveal that despite ongoing debates in Congress about further aid for Ukraine, American opinion remains unchanged and instead focused on America First principals.
Shifting Focus: MIG's data indicates that online engagement surrounding Global Affairs is viewed increasingly with an America First lens.
- Engagement towards Ukraine is dwarfed by discussions about Border Security or more longstanding priorities like the US-Israeli alliance.
- MIG found that over the last 30 days, Ukraine averages 1,106 online daily mentions, with a total of 33,185 mentions of Ukraine.
- In contrast, discussions about Border Security and the Migrant Crisis averaged 8,836 daily online mentions, totaling 265,095 online mentions in the last 30 days.
- Similarly, online conversations about Israel and Palestine are even more prominent, with a daily average of 9,072 online mentions and a total of 278,200 online mentions in the last 30 days.
- MIG found that over the last 30 days, Ukraine averages 1,106 online daily mentions, with a total of 33,185 mentions of Ukraine.
Ukraine Hawks fail to sway Americans:
- Further analysis from the MIG reveals American approval of Ukraine remains consistently below 45%, contrasting sharply with the high levels of backing seen at the start of the conflict.
- In late 2023, Gallup found that American support for Ukraine had dropped sharply since the onset of Russia’s invasion.
- When Russia forces had first breached Ukrainian defenses, American support for Ukraine stood at 66%. This dropped sharply in Gallup’s subsequent poll in October 2023, when 41% of respondents stated they believed the United States was doing too much for Ukraine.
- MIG’s latest numbers from the last 30 days find support for Ukraine hasn’t budged. Despite many Ukraine Hawks in Congress making the case for further aid to Kiev, MIG finds Ukraine’s average approval stuck at 41%.
- Worse, Ukraine’s approval reached 44% just three times in the last 30 days, while it fell below 40% for 7 days total.
America First, Here to Stay:
- MIG's data underscores a growing shift in America’s focus in prioritizing an America First global perspective, as online discussions about Ukraine sink into further irrelevancy and are eclipsed by Border Security and Immigration debates.
- Notably, these findings are supported by a recent Harvard Harris poll, which found Immigration as the top policy concern amongst Americans, well ahead of foreign policy but even surpassing inflation and the economy.
- Despite unending frustrations with a Congress many believe is disconnected from the rest of America, recent comments from Majority Leader Mitch McConnell may reveal Americans are forcing D.C. to listen. This week, McConnell told Senate colleagues “When we started this, the border united us and Ukraine divided us” but that “The politics on this have changed.”
26
Jan
- Engagement towards Ukraine is dwarfed by discussions about Border Security or more longstanding priorities like the US-Israeli alliance.
-
Discussions online about the recent SCOTUS ruling that Texas must not use razor wire at the border are highly charged and divided. The majority of sentiments expressed are in favor of border control measures. Many express frustration towards the Republican party's actions regarding immigration policy and border control.
- Between 6,000 and 14,000 people have been talking about border and immigration issues daily in the last week.
- Public sentiment towards border issues in the last 7 days averaged 45%.
What Texans are Saying About the Border
- Texans show strong support for the enforcement of border control measures.
- Many Texans are outspoken about their belief in the need for a physical barrier, such as a wall, to deter illegal border crossings.
- There is great support for the actions of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and criticism of the Biden administration's immigration policies.
- A majority of Texans are critical of SCOTUS' ruling to remove the razor wire.
- Abbott supporters argue that the state's actions are necessary to ensure security and protect against threats such as drug cartels and human trafficking.
- Some also contend that federal interference in the state's efforts to control the border is unwarranted.
- A recurring sentiment is that voters support legal immigration, but not illegal immigration.
- Many commenters express support for Texas' stance on immigration.
- Texans applaud Abbott's actions, such as deporting over 100,000 undocumented immigrants, and seem to favor strict border control measures.
- Voters are critical of supposed conservative leaders whom they perceive as not adhering strictly to conservative principles, including Justice Barrett.
- There is a sense of dissatisfaction with the current Republican party in Texas, with calls for more conservative leadership and criticism of perceived liberal agendas.
- Many express readiness to assist in defending the border, criticizing the federal government.
- A minority contingent of people condemn the use of razor wire as inhumane and dangerous.
Overall, the majority of the discussions reveal a split within the Republican party in Texas between those who align more with MAGA and more moderate or 'establishment' Republicans.
Approval for Texas Leaders
- In the days following the SCOTUS ruling allowing razor wire to be removed from the Texas border, Greg Abbott’s approval increased from 45% a week ago to 51% today.
- Ken Paxton’s approval increased from 47% a week ago to 50% today.
Reactions to Biden Administration Policy
- Public sentiment towards the Biden administration's immigration policies is overwhelmingly negative.
- There is a stark contrast between the collective sentiment towards the federal government's immigration policies and the state of Texas' stance on the issue.
- There is a general sentiment that Biden is prioritizing illegal immigrants over US citizens.
- Many people believe the Biden administration's policies are ineffective and have led to an increase in illegal border crossings.
- The sentiment is that Biden is not taking the necessary steps to secure the southern border and is contributing to an "invasion" at the southern border.
- Most commenters express strong opposition to what they perceive as an "open border" policy, and are advocating for stricter border control measures.
- Some progressive voices are present in the discussions, expressing support for a more diverse and progressive platform. However, these voices are in the minority.
Solutions the People Want
- Some propose the creation of a human wall or using the homeless population as a deterrent.
- Others suggest the construction of an electric fence.
- Many express support for more stringent measures, such as the use of razor wire at the border.
- There is also a call for state governors to bolster their State Guards in response to perceived federal government inaction.
- Some have expressed a desire for mass deportations, while others argue that such an approach would be unrealistic or result in conflict.
- Voters call for politicians who support open borders to step forward, suggesting a desire for transparency and accountability.
- There are repeated calls for the governor to declare the situation an "invasion," which could trigger legal authority for Texas to protect its own border.
In conclusion, the SCOTUS ruling and the broader issue of border control is a contentious topic amongst Texans and Americans in general. Overall sentiment leans towards a more conservative approach to immigration, with criticism directed at both state and federal officials for perceived inaction or leniency.
There is a clear divide within the Republican party in Texas, and a desire for more conservative leadership. Despite this, there is also a minority progressive voice advocating for more inclusion and border leniency.
24
Jan