MIG Report shows several topics and themes emerge from the first presidential debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. The impact on undecided and independent voters was nuanced. However, sentiment analysis suggests Trump’s strong performance may have swayed some undecided voters in his favor. This is particularly true for those who value decisive and bold articulation of policies. Conversely, Biden’s perceived empathy and his policy responses resonated with voters who are more sympathetic to his challenges with speech.

Among core Democratic supporters, there was a call to rally behind Biden despite his poor debate performance. His backers emphasized his long career and previous policy successes, encouraging a focus on the larger narrative of his presidency rather than isolated debate moments.

Discontent among some Democrats also prompted debates about whether Biden should continue his campaign, reflecting concerns over both his age and debate performance. Republicans mostly expressed a solidifying resolve to support Trump, emphasizing his combative approach as evidence of his capability to lead.

Economic Issues

• Reactions to economic questions are sharply divided, focusing on inflation, tax policies, job creation, economic performance, border control, healthcare costs, and social security.
• Inflation is a major point of contention, with some disputing the government's CPI figures and blaming high inflation on current Biden policies. Biden supporters largely blame the impact of Trump administration policies.
• Supporters of the current administration praise legislative achievements like the Inflation Reduction Act, while critics prefer Trump's economic policies.
• Undecided voters are notably influenced by economic arguments and personal financial impacts. They express frustration with both candidates but show a slight preference for Trump, due to current economic uncertainties.

Ideological Issues

• Independent and undecided voters appear to be swayed more toward Trump in this specific debate context. This is primarily due to concerns over Biden’s ability to govern effectively.
• Biden’s crucial voter demographic expresses increasing apprehension and a desire for alternative Democratic leadership.
• Trump’s consistent messaging and the portrayal of economic and social stability under his leadership attracts some who were previously on the fence.

Border Security

• Among independent and undecided voters, the general trend shows a significant lean towards Trump, largely influenced by the discussions on immigration and border security.
• These voters are particularly swayed by the arguments highlighting crime and economic pressures related to illegal immigration.
• Comments underscore a desire for a return to stricter immigration policies and stronger enforcement measures, which they associate with Trump's time in office.
• The reactions are predominantly negative towards Biden, indicating a shift favoring Trump's stance on these issues.

Security Issues

• Undecided and independent voters lean into Trump’s narrative of strength and control. They particularly like his emphasis on no wars during his term and promises to end ongoing conflicts swiftly.
• Many reactions highlight dissatisfaction with current global instability. Voters want a return to international stability over policy specifics.
• Simultaneously, Biden appears to maintain a hold on voters who prioritize diplomatic approaches and coalition-building, although his handling of the Israel-Hamas situation and Ukraine get mixed reactions, especially from those concerned about prolonged military engagements and the humanitarian costs involved.

During the first presidential debate, Joe Biden claimed the Border Patrol Union endorsed him for president. However, after a tweet from the union’s verified X account denying the claim, reaction show overwhelming negativity towards the President.

The primary sentiment across discussions is that Biden was caught blatantly lying about the endorsement. American voters repeatedly emphasize the union’s denial, aggressively criticizing Biden for making the statement.

BPU’s now pinned tweet went viral, gaining nearly 27 million views on X.

To be clear, we never have and never will endorse Biden.

— Border Patrol Union - NBPC (@BPUnion) June 28, 2024

What Voters are Saying

There is a strong focus on the credibility and honesty of both Biden and Trump. Many voters who lean towards Trump are highlighting this incident as evidence of Biden and his administration's dishonesty. Comparisons to other statements Biden has made are also prevalent, with detractors cataloging his other reported falsehoods.

Top topics include Biden’s lack of integrity, fact-checking practices, and the response from the Border Patrol Union on X. Comparisons of policy impacts, including border security and inflation rates, are commonly raised in the broader conversation.

Sentiment Trends and Voter Movement

The sentiment trend is highly critical towards Biden, with many using strong language to underscore their disdain, calling him a liar and other pejorative terms. Conversely, there is some scattered defense and support for Biden, usually taking the stance that Trump also lies frequently or pointing out Biden's legislative successes.

As to whether this sways undecided or independent voters, the tone and intensity of the reactions indicate this specific issue as a highlight of the debate along with Biden's clearly declining state. It is possible it will resonate more with those already leaning towards Trump rather than significantly impacting truly undecided voters.

However, the strong negative framing around Biden's honesty could chip away at his support among some independents who value transparency and facts. The interplay of Biden's perceived dishonesty and Trump's alleged habitual falsehoods may allow some voters to stay within their pre-existing biases rather than switching allegiance based on this incident alone. However, this combined with voter views of Joe Biden's cognitive decline may work against him.

Numerous stories are surfacing criticizing Trump’s candidate endorsements during the primaries, some of whom did not perform as intended. While the stories themselves are not generating overwhelming online discussion, there have been vigorous debates among Americans around the narratives involved. MIG Reports data shows discussion trends around Trump’s prolific endorsements and support compared to Biden.

Data First

• Trump endorsed 255 primary candidates, which is 127.5 times more than Biden’s two endorsements. His success rate was 67%, which is 34% better than Biden’s 50%.
• Some believe that Trump is strategically endorsing candidates who will bolster his vision for America.
• Democratic voters don’t have a strong defense for Biden and are often vocal in their mix of alarm and schadenfreude.

Discussion Trends

The reactions to Trump’s endorsements can be broadly classified into two schools of thought—those who continue to support Trump despite or perhaps because of these endorsements and those who express frustration and disillusionment.

Opinions look to be multifaceted and heavily dependent on political alignment. A voter’s perspective on Trump's influence in the Republican Party is also a factor, as well as the underpinning issues voters care about.

For Trump supporters, there is often a defensive sentiment. Some believe Trump is strategically endorsing candidates who will bolster his vision for America. There is great loyalty among his followers, who commend him for sticking to his principles. They also criticize other Republicans who stray from the "America First" doctrine.

Trump’s detractors within the GOP argue his choices are harming the party’s unity and coherence. There is a palpable tension from certain Freedom Caucus loyalists who feel betrayed by Trump backing candidates they label as “RINOs” (Republicans in Name Only).

Prolific endorsements by Trump also spark debates about the future direction of the Republican Party. There are accusations of betrayal from both pro-Trump and anti-Trump wings of the GOP. Such conversations often touch on issues like loyalty to the conservative cause, the influence of “swamp” politics in endorsement decisions, and concerns over electability in general elections. Some Republicans view this internal strife as weakening the party's standing against Democratic opponents.

For Democrats, Trump's endorsements are alarming but provide schadenfreude. Democrats see Trump’s endorsements as evidence of his continued grip on a faction of the GOP. They hope this will ultimately alienate more moderate voters.

Many Democrats also view these endorsements as opportunities to galvanize their base by emphasizing the purported extremism and erratic nature of Trump-aligned candidates.

Sentiment Trends

Voter feelings are diverse, with intense distrust and animosity toward Trump among Democrats and some traditional conservatives as well. Many of this group are worried about potential negative impacts of Trump-endorsed candidates winning primaries. They fear MAGA-aligned candidates will further polarization in American politics.

Many Republicans also feel the lack of Biden-endorsed candidates exemplifies the fact that he’s not the true leader of the party, nor his administration.

Some recurring topics of debate include:

• The loyalty and betrayal dynamics within the GOP, particularly surrounding the Freedom Caucus.
• Ideological battles within the party, as Trump-endorsed candidates clash with what some perceive as “more traditional” conservatives.
• Discussions about the impact of these endorsements on the Republican Party’s ability to present a united front against Democrats in upcoming elections.
• The perceived influence (or lack thereof) of Trump in shaping the future legislative and ideological landscape of the GOP.
• Concerns over the electability of Trump-endorsed candidates in general elections versus their appeal in primaries.
• Celebrations or dismay over specific endorsement outcomes, seen as both victories and defeats for “true conservatism” or “MAGA” values.

MIG Reports data shows ongoing discussions about differences between younger and older conservatives which center around generational perspective differences. The intricacies of these discussions reveal ideological shifts between young and aging voters within the conservative spectrum. There are varying degrees of animosity, respect, and calls for unity.

Generational Differences on the Right

Older conservatives who are skeptical of the MAGA and America-first platforms, worry that Trump's influence has "hijacked" the party. They say dramatic moves to the right and fanaticism is eroding civil discourse and principled conservatism. Often called “neocons” by younger conservatives, this group advocates for a return to core Republican values to preserve the party's long-term viability.

Younger MAGA supporters remain loyal to Trump, viewing a departure from him or his platform as detrimental. They see Trump's leadership as essential for future victories and criticize traditional Republicans as out of touch. They emphasize strong border security, criticize globalism, and oppose liberal government overreach.

Heated exchanges between these factions focus on policy priorities and GOP legislative actions. Younger conservatives blame older GOP leaders for failing to pass reforms, accusing them of complicity with Democrats and external influences. Older conservatives are frustrated with the younger faction's obstruction of bipartisan efforts and reluctance to compromise.

Both sides express frustration with political inertia, calling for radical measures to counter perceived threats from leftist policies. Younger conservatives often criticize the GOP establishment for failing to take decisive actions on issues like immigration, gun control, and spending. There is a heavy emphasis among this cohort on border security and immigration.

Conversely, traditional Republicans call for a return to decorum and principled leadership. They often point to historical accomplishments of the GOP like the Civil Rights Act of 1866 to argue the party has a legacy of positive contributions that should guide its future. They raise alarms about the potential long-term damages of embracing extreme populist tactics, proposing instead a focus on sustainable, pragmatic governance.

Feelings Within the GOP

Sentiment analysis shows younger, Trump-aligned conservatives feel embattled. They are rallying around a strongman figure as a bulwark against what they perceive as an existential cultural and political threat. Older conservatives, meanwhile, are characterized by a mixture of nostalgia for a bygone era of Republican politics and concern for the future direction of the party. There is mutual disdain but also a recognition that these internal battles could dictate the future trajectory of American conservatism.

Younger conservatives often express frustration with what they perceive as a lack of action and resolve among the older GOP establishment. There is a recurring demand for more tangible actions against political opponents and systemic issues, such as calls for investigations and legal actions against figures like Fauci and pharmaceutical companies. This group seems to favor a more aggressive and confrontational approach, suggesting that inaction has led to a loss of faith within the base.

The interaction between these groups can be quite contentious. Younger conservatives frequently deride older party members as being too passive or out of touch, while older conservatives criticize the younger faction for embracing what they see as extremism and populist rhetoric. Terms like "RINO" and expressions of betrayal are commonly used by both groups to describe one another, indicating a deep ideological rift.

Anticipation for the first presidential debate moderated by CNN reporters Jake Tapper and Dana Bash is generating controversy. Many, especially conservatives, express skepticism about whether the debate moderation will be rigged in favor of Democrat narratives. People point to the historical biases they see in both moderators and on CNN’s network.

The most pervasive concern is CNN's recurring bias against Donald Trump. Many voters say they do not trust Jake Tapper and Dana Bash to allow a fair debate. People are especially citing Tappers past comments about Trump his role in promoting Russiagate and other controversies.

Nobody Trusts Jake Tapper

Criticism against Jake Tapper is especially pronounced. There's a common theme that he is profoundly anti-Trump, with an inability to remain fair. Many discuss his ad nauseum coverage of the narrative that Trump is essentially Adolf Hitler.

Oh look, debate moderator Jake Tapper repeatedly comparing Trump to HitIer.

I'm sure this debate will be 100% fair.

pic.twitter.com/isshrBs72G

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) June 24, 2024

Many also point out Tapper's role in covering and legitimizing the leftist media’s Russiagate narrative, which has now been thoroughly disproven. They also cite his inability to hold a neutral stance when reporting on Trump’s comments or actions.

Here is Jake Tapper angrily demanding CNN cut off live coverage of Trump being greeted by Cubans in a Miami restaurant pic.twitter.com/zYFkGHQ2Ct

— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) June 24, 2024

Viral Clip of CNN Cutting Karoline Leavitt’s Mic

There is also significant outrage over a viral CNN clip in which Trump spokesperson Karoline Leavitt’s mic was cut when she criticized Jake Tapper. Many vies this incident as evidence of CNN's unwillingness to allow dissenting opinions, fueling calls for Trump to boycott the network's debate altogether.

The abrupt end to Leavitt's interview has compounded fears that any criticism of the moderators or the network will not be tolerated during the debate.

Like and retweet if you think Jake Tapper will be a partisan hack during the debate.
pic.twitter.com/ZYersdOb1Y

— Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) June 24, 2024

Trump supporters express outrage at CNN’s clear bias against Trump and his allies. They argue Leavitt was well within fair bounds to point out historical biases from Jake Tapper. Voters view the incident as an attempt to suppress legitimate criticism of CNN’s impartiality.

Fears About Mainstream Media Bias

Another major point of contention is CNN's decision to restrict independent media from streaming or providing real-time commentary on the debate. Voters view this as a deliberate attempt to protect the so-called “elite media” and prevent alternative perspectives from reaching the public.

Right leaning voters call out CNN as a "propaganda network" rather than a legitimate news organization. This sentiment is not new but has intensified with the approach of the debate. These CNN critiques often include ire toward the broader media landscape.

Americans express suspicion around media covering up election rigging, censoring opposition, and manipulating voters with politicized narratives. These arguments express a broader disenchantment with mainstream media’s role in elections and American politics generally.

With a strong belief in mainstream media bias against conservatives, Trump supporters fear possibilities like:

• Moderators pushing unfair and slanted questions.
• Accusations about Trump’s felony convictions—to which he cannot respond by gag order.
• CNN producers muting Trump’s mic when he’s speaking.
• Conditions set up to hide Joe Biden’s declining cognitive state.

There is also a repeated belief the debate will be more of a three-against-one scenario, with Joe Biden, Jake Tapper, and Dana Bash combining forces against Donald Trump. Critics say Tapper and Bash will prop up Biden by framing the narrative in his favor, effectively silencing Republican voters.

Predictions About Candidate Performance

How voters perceive the potential performances of each candidate varies with political views. Trump supporters hope he will dominate the debate, leveraging his strong debate skills, clear communication, and ability to generate viral television moments. They often contrast him favorably against Biden’s lackluster public performances and his administration’s poor legacy. Conservatives are generally confident that Trump, even with inevitable media bias, will gain the upper hand.

Democratic voters believe Trump’s performance will contrast poorly with Biden's. They expect Trump to resort to combative and inflammatory rhetoric rather than substantive discussion. They express hope the debate will highlight what they see as Trump’s erratic and dishonest tendencies. This group also urges the moderators to challenge Trump rigorously on issues like the economy and social justice.

Related Debate Conversations

There is also some talk about Robert F. Kennedy Jr. being excluded from the debate stage. Many believe this undermines democratic processes and fuels accusations of bias from conservatives, Independents, and even some moderate Democrats.

This is a particularly sore spot since Kennedy qualified according to CNN's own criteria but is still being left out. Some also voice objections over the fact that neither Trump nor Biden have been officially nominated for their Parties. People view this as a greater injustice, saying a one-on-one debate is highly irregular before the Party conventions.

Adding to the controversy is a demand for Joe Biden to take a drug test before the debate. This unusual request stems from public opinion and media denial that Joe Biden is not cognitively or physically fit to be president. Many believe Biden's handlers provide him a cocktail of drugs before public appearances in hopes that his deterioration can be hidden.

The first presidential debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden is scheduled for tomorrow. Americans have been taking to social media expressing interest in key topics and how they believe the general election will impact their lives. People also speculate about the performance of both candidates, wondering if Joe Biden will be able to make it through despite his clear decline. Others wonder if Donald Trump will be unfairly treated by moderators or have his mic cut off, despite his vast popular support.

Republicans focus on illegal immigration, its economic impact, and Democrats prioritizing illegal immigrants over Americans. They also critique policies like student loan forgiveness and other economic issues.

Right leaning voters express frustration and distrust toward the Biden administration, advocating for tougher border policies and fiscal conservatism. Many firmly oppose current approaches to immigration, the economy, and international relations.

Democrats defend Biden’s measures as steps toward social justice and economic equity. They support immigration reform and policies aiding debt relief and pathways to citizenship. They are generally optimistic about the debate, hoping it will highlight Biden's achievements and reinforcing progressive values.

Independents and moderates have varied opinions. Many are concerned about economic management, immigration, and policy effectiveness. They seek clarity on policy impacts from the debate, with some undecided and awaiting more substantive discussions before finalizing their stance.

Economic Issues

Discussion Trends

Economic Policies and Tax Management

• Republicans argue current policies are creating economic instability and unfairly burdening taxpayers.
• Democrats support policies like student loan forgiveness and the Inflation Reduction Act, believing they reduce the economic burden on average Americans.
• Independents are looking for clear economic policies from candidates that address inflation, taxation fairness, and job market improvements.

Inflation

• Republicans blame the current administration for high inflation and believe previous policies kept inflation and gas prices lower.
• Democrats emphasize long-term investments and measures to revitalize the economy, suggesting current policies will benefit the economy in the future.
• Independents are concerned about high inflation and government inaction, seeking detailed plans from candidates.

Trump vs. Biden

• Republicans highlight greater economic stability and lower inflation under the Trump administration.
• Democrats argue Biden is correcting past missteps and making long-term investments.
• Independents are undecided and looking forward to upcoming debates for clearer comparisons.

Sentiment Trends

Republicans

• Predominantly dissatisfied with the current administration.
• Believe Trump provided more economic stability.
• Concerned about inflation, increased crime rates, and immigration policies.
• View policies like student loan forgiveness as economically destabilizing.

Democrats

• Support Biden’s efforts to reduce economic burdens.
• Emphasize alleged job market gains and infrastructure development.
• View policies like student loan forgiveness as necessary for economic inclusivity.
• Believe the Biden administration is addressing climate change and revitalizing the economy.

Independents

• Skeptical about both political parties.
• Concerned about high inflation and government inefficacy.
• Undecided and awaiting the debate to form opinions.
• Seeking clear and detailed economic and social policies from candidates.
• View debates as critical for understanding policy impacts and candidate capabilities.

Border Security

Discussion Trends

Immigration Policy and Citizenship Pathways

• Republicans have a strong negative reaction to Biden’s plan for citizenship for 500,000 illegal immigrants.
• They express concern about vote manipulation, crime, and economic strain.
• They call for stricter immigration controls, border security, and broad deportation measures.
• Democrats support policies prioritizing humanitarian values and family unity.
• They emphasize a moral obligation to provide protection and opportunities.
• Democrats show an internal disagreement on implications for domestic policy and public welfare systems.
• Independents have mixed responses oscillating between socio-economic concerns and humane treatment of immigrants.
• They call for a pragmatic approach, balancing border security and addressing the status of long-term illegal immigrants.
• There is frustration over the lack of bipartisan solutions and politicization of immigration.

Border Security and Legal Process

• Republicans and some Independents emphasize stronger border security and deportation illegal immigrants, especially those with criminal records.
• Democrats and more progressive Independents advocate for comprehensive immigration reform, ensuring border security and a fair path to citizenship.

Crime

• Many people express increased crime among illegal immigrants as an emotionally charged topic, especially among Republicans and Independents.
• Recent violent crimes committed by illegal immigrants intensify calls for tougher immigration policies.

Economic Impact

• There are concerns about the strain on social security, healthcare, and public services.
• Republicans and Independents stress safeguarding resources for American citizens.
• Democrats highlight their belief in the positive economic contributions of illegal immigrants and call for their integration into the formal economy.

Sentiment Trends

Republicans

• Overwhelmingly negative sentiment towards Biden's immigration policy.
• Fear of increased crime and economic strain, with accusations of vote manipulation using illegal immigrants.
• Strong advocacy for stricter immigration controls and border security.

Democrats

• Support for the Biden administration’s policies based on humanitarian values and family unity.
• Internal caution regarding domestic policy implications and public welfare systems.
• Emphasis on balancing security with compassion in immigration reform.

Independents

• Mixed perspectives with a pragmatic approach to border security and humane treatment for immigrants.
• Frustration with bipartisan failures to address underlying immigration issues constructively.
• Calls for detailed policy clarification and practical solutions.

Political Ideologies

Discussion Trends

Political Polarization

• Republicans express strong support for Trump and opposition to Biden, focusing on critiques of Biden's policies on immigration, the economy, and healthcare.
• Democrats defend Biden's record and attack Trump’s character and previous presidency, emphasizing reproductive rights, healthcare, and preserving democratic norms.
• Independents show frustration with the partisan nature of politics and are undecided, waiting for debates to form opinions.

Social Security and Medicare

• Both Republicans and Democrats accuse each other of threatening these programs.

Economic Concerns

• Issues like inflation and tax policies are central among Democrats and Republicans, reflecting anxiety about future financial stability.

Debate Expectations

• Voters have high expectations for the debates, viewing them as crucial for undecided voters, especially Independents, to make final decisions.

Sentiment Trends

Republicans

• Distrust mainstream media, suspecting conspiracies.
• Feel a sense of urgency and anger, viewing Biden as a threat to America’s future.

Democrats

• Emphasize reproductive rights, healthcare, and democratic norms.
• Concerned about GOP misinformation and threats to social security.
• Fear a second Trump term, viewing it as a potential catastrophe for democracy and social progress.

Independents

• Skeptical and disillusioned with both major parties.
• Frustrated with intense partisanship.
• Express high expectations for clarity and policy specifics in debates.

Security Issues

Discussion Trends

Foreign Policies and Geopolitical Tensions

• Republicans have strong critiques of Biden's foreign policies, particularly concerning Ukraine and Israel.
• They compare Trump's approach, viewing Biden's policies as weakening U.S. foreign policy.
• There are concerns about emboldened adversaries like Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, and a potential for World War III.
• Democrats defend Biden's strategic continuity and responses to long-standing international threats.
• There are internal divisions on the Israel-Palestine conflict, with progressives questioning traditional support for Israel.
• Democrats generally support Biden's actions against Russian aggression in Ukraine and maintaining alliances.
• Independents express concerns about escalation in global conflicts and dissatisfaction with bipartisan approaches.
• They call for a more nuanced and less interventionist foreign policy.

Ukraine-Russia Conflict

• Both sides debate whether U.S. strategy is too aggressive or appropriately defensive.

U.S. Relationship with Israel

• There are growing concerns over recent foreign policy decisions, including withholding ammunition and Middle East policy.

Alliances Against the U.S.

• Most Americans fear geopolitical consequences involving Russia, China, and North Korea.

Domestic Implications

• Voters worry over military spending and economic stability resulting from foreign policy decisions.

Sentiment Trends

Republicans

• Overwhelmingly negative sentiment towards Biden's foreign policy.
• Dissatisfaction with current Ukraine and Israel strategies.
• Fear Biden's policies are bringing the world closer to major conflict.
• Hope for a return to Trump's diplomacy to stabilize geopolitical tensions.

Democrats

• Largely support Biden's foreign policy actions, though with some internal divisions.
• Emphasis on strategic continuity and necessary responses to threats.
• Tension within the party over support for Israel, with progressives advocating for Palestinian rights.
• Support for efforts to counter Russian aggression and maintain alliances.

Independents

• Mixed perspectives with general skepticism towards both parties.
• Concerns about global conflict escalation and dissatisfaction with current foreign policy management.
• Calls for a less interventionist approach and more effective international relations.

<

Voter conversations about California Governor Gavin Newsom in recent days have been intensely critical. There are multiple issues negatively influencing opinions, but one of the most severe is the alarming increase in antisemitic incidents. Jewish communities have faced violent assaults from protesters, especially in Los Angeles. The outrage has been palpable, with citizens questioning Newsom's stance and demanding immediate action to curtail hate crimes on the streets of LA.

• In the last 10 days, Newsom’s overall support has averaged 40%, dipping down from 44% to 38% with a spike in online mentions.
• Sentiment toward Newsom regarding Israel-Palestine issues dropped dramatically from 50% to a low of 27%.
• Voters are also extremely negative about the economy and crime, with Newsom’s sentiment respectively reaching lows of 33% and 30%.

Antisemitic Protests

Public discourse about Gavin Newsom is intensely focused on incidents of violence and tension between pro-Palestine protesters and the Jewish community in Los Angeles. Many disapprove of the violent clashes where pro-Palestine protesters reportedly assaulted Jewish individuals near synagogues, particularly in the Pico-Robertson neighborhood.

There are vivid descriptions of chaos, including instances where Jewish women have been pinned to the ground and injured. These events sparked alarm and outrage from Californians. Many are questioning where Gavin Newsom and other leaders are during these times of crisis.

People are also discussing the broader issue of antisemitism. There is palpable anger toward Newsom for not publicly denouncing antisemitic actions. Protesters blocking the entrance to synagogues and verbally or physically harassing Jewish attendees exacerbate fears and frustrations.

Many argue these disturbing protests cross a line beyond political protest and enter religious and ethnic discrimination.

Top Issues Impacting Newsom Support

The issue of rising antisemitism in California has been at the forefront of conversation in recent days. However, there are several ongoing issues which land blame at Newsom’s door, making voters angry.

Economic Struggles

There is considerable anger toward California leadership for how they are handling economic matters. High unemployment rates, exacerbating income disparities, and a surging cost of living fuel discontent. Many Californians say Newsom's policies are accelerating the decline of a state once renowned for its economic vitality and prosperity. Voters direct particular ire at legislative decisions, such as those surrounding the controversial SB7, which some argue undermines voters' rights concerning taxes, housing, and utilities.

California Senate Bill 7 (SB7) removes county and city government abilities to object to state-determined housing needs and reduces review times. Supporters claim it will address the housing crisis more effectively. However, opponents argue it undermines local autonomy, imposes a one-size-fits-all approach, and overburdens smaller governments. They also worry about potential community resistance and legal challenges regarding the erosion of local control.

Crime and Public Safety

Another pain point for Californians is the issue of public safety and infrastructure. Crime is alarmingly high, there is widespread homelessness, and ineffective policing leaves many citizens feeling unsafe and neglected. A gun violence incident in Oakland, where a family was attacked with an AK-47, has generated pronounced negativity. Many call for Newsom to address the growing menace of violent crime, which Californians feel he has utterly failed at.

Environmental Grievances

Environmental and energy issues also generate harsh criticisms for Newsom. People accuse him of prioritizing the interests of large energy firms over public rights, causing distrust. Recent rulings by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) regarding rooftop solar have only intensified these frustrations. The sentiment that California is being mismanaged extends to perceptions that Newsom failed to capitalize on the state's natural resources sustainably.

Distaste for Newsom Himself

Many Californians also place intense scrutiny on Newsom’s personal conduct and political aspirations. People castigate him for his failures in governance and his gauche ambition for higher political office, including the presidency. There are many allegations of corruption within the Democratic leadership in California, amplified by recent high-profile raids, further tarnishing Newsom's reputation. Many say the state's political landscape has become increasingly chaotic and dysfunctional under his leadership.

There is also sharp criticism of Newsom’s communication methods and ways of addressing state issues. His decision to deliver his State of the State address via a pre-recorded video rather than a traditional speech has been met with disdain. People interpret the choice as indicative of Newsom’s off-putting lack of transparency and accountability. Voters see Newsom as a member of the political elite who absolve themselves of blame and wrongdoing while citizens bear the consequence of their poor governance.

A thread that combines these various strands of discontent is how voters view Newsom’s hypocrisy and lack of accountability. Whether it's the accusations of failing to support healthcare workers, the disenchantment over neglected public services, or his cancelled State of the State address, it seems trust in Newsom is at an all-time low. The overarching narrative is that California, under Newsom's leadership, is grappling with deep-seated social, economic, and political crises, causing many people and businesses to leave the state.

Two controversial reversals in Snopes fact-checks are causing online discussion and controversy. Debates over Donald Trump's infamous "very fine people" comment and Ashley Biden's diary are fervent.

Snopes, a left-leaning fact checking website, reversed its previous fact-check that Donald Trump called neo-Nazis “very fine people” after the Charlottesville protests of 2017. In April, Snopes also reversed a fact check about whether the contents of Ashley Biden’s diary were confirmed, changing its rating from "Unproven" to "True."

These reversals are stirring public sentiment and cast a spotlight on broader issues of media trust and political bias – both of which look to have influence on voting trends in the 2024 election.

Very Fine People Hoax

The media’s continual characterization of Trump’s "very fine people" comment has long been contentious. President Joe Biden, in 2019, launched his campaign citing this now-debunked claim that Trump called neo-Nazis fine people.

Many Americans feel Snopes’s revisions validate their previously held beliefs either about mainstream media's unfair portrayal of Trump or its broader role in pushing political narratives.

Among Trump's supporters, there is a palpable sense of vindication. They argue Snopes admitting Trump’s comments were mischaracterized demonstrates how media and fact-checker spin has fueled a biased narrative against the former president and other conservatives.

This skepticism toward media is fueling a deeper mistrust of news and fact checking outlets. It also seems to encourage voters’ growing resolve to support Trump more fervently in the upcoming election. Trump's base, which includes a substantial portion of rural and working-class voters, is therefore likely to remain steadfast or grow.

Critics of Trump view the Snopes revision as problematic. They contend that, while the retraction might be technically accurate, it could be weaponized to downplay the serious implications of Trump's rhetoric.

Anti-Trump voters fear such reversals may perpetuate a dangerous narrative and embolden extremist views. This skepticism towards media corrections could boost voter turnout among those who oppose Trump, particularly in urban and suburban areas where such views are more prevalent.

Ashley Biden’s Diary

Regarding Ashley Biden's diary, the Snopes reversal regarding it authenticity and content have further deepened partisan divides. Right-leaning Americans suggest the original fact-check of the diary was another among many attempts to shield the Biden family from scrutiny.

Biden critics argue this reversal exposes a concerted effort within the media to protect Biden. The reversal also reinforces their belief in a biased media that unfairly attacks conservative figures while ignoring liberal misdeeds. This perception bolsters support for Trump and could attract more undecided or moderate voters who are increasingly skeptical of media integrity.

Conversely, left-leaning voters and Biden supporters are disheartened by Snopes's reversals. They interpret these actions as caving to pressure and contributing to the spread of misinformation. Many believe such admissions could have a demoralizing effect, potentially dissuading some voters from participating in the election due to a feeling of disillusionment with the political process and media landscape.

However, there's also a counter-effect among those who perceive these reversals as hair-splitting. These exhausted voters may be energized to fight against what they see as manipulation and misinformation.

After a viral tweet sparked harsh backlash, a Democrat staffer set his X account to private as sweeping criticisms drowned him in a wave of negativity. The post, which thanked the Biden administration for canceling Ben Kamens’s student loans, was viewed by more than 20 million people and was squarely ratioed at a rate of 40,000 replies to 23,000 likes before it was restricted.

Ben Kamens is taking a beating on his post…check it out to keep up with:

- the ratio
- thanking @JoeBiden for buying his vote
- having a $500k house and poor taxpayers helping him pay it off
- enjoys a Capitol Hill Comms job but didn’t see the backlash coming
- doxing himself… pic.twitter.com/aPiJpkPIWI

— DANGER: DISINFORMATION (@RetiredCrimeDog) June 20, 2024

Kamens faced biting critiques from people criticizing his apparently well-off position as a Capitol Hill staffer, earning a higher salary than average working-class Americans. Many people commented that his tweet, which emphasized the importance of voting for Biden in 2024, reveals how modern Democrats sideline average Americans to pander to their own in the elite class.

Different voter groups express a range of discontent, suggesting a broader disillusionment with Biden’s administration—especially on economic issues. Many Republicans are particularly vocal, arguing Biden's policies favor illegal immigrants, international interests like Ukraine, and American elites over the needs of struggling Americans. They say prioritizing college graduates with student loans diminishes the working class, who are more impacted by immediate economic concerns than by student debt.

Many Americans say "forgiving" loans embodies a fundamental inequity, especially for those who have lived frugally or delayed significant life milestones to honor their debts. They see this policy as another instance of political maneuvering – a vote-buying scheme – rather than genuine economic reform.

For much of the working class, there is resentment and skepticism. They perceive student loan forgiveness as pandering to those who have already had the opportunity to pursue higher education, thus benefiting the privileged.

General Unfairness

A significant amount of frustration also comes from voters who managed to pay off their student loans through hard work, sometimes working multiple jobs. These people often express resentment towards those who are now receiving loan forgiveness. Despite being among the educated class, they view debt forgiveness as a lack of personal responsibility and an unfair redistribution of financial burdens. This group argues it overlooks the sacrifices they made to fulfill their financial obligations without government intervention.

There are also prevalent concerns about the costs associated with the loan forgiveness program. Critics say it will be passed on to taxpayers, many of whom did not attend college or who work in trades that do not require a college degree. The rhetoric here revolves around the perception that plumbers, construction workers, and other blue-collar employees are now being asked to subsidize the education of others, which they find unjust.

Related Complaints on Fiscal Policy

There is also a perception that Biden's policy shifts taxpayer burdens from one group to another without addressing root causes. Critics say reforms such as reducing college tuition fees, adjusting interest rates on loans, or holding educational institutions accountable for inflated costs as more equitable solutions.

Furthermore, Biden’s detractors often cite broader accusations of inefficacy and corruption with critiques of his student loan policies. People say illegal immigration harms economic stability for lower-income Americans or argue current fiscal policies contribute to higher living costs. These complaints amplify the skepticism towards Biden’s debt forgiveness plan.

Trouble for the Democratic Platform

Divisiveness within the Democratic Party is also increasing, with some factions arguing current policies disproportionately favor elite interests and liberal social agendas, often at the expense of the working class. The frustration largely stems from a perception that Biden’s policies do not effectively address day-to-day struggles Americans face, including job security, wage growth, and affordable housing.

In addition, rhetoric from progressives within the party has shifted considerably, with an increasing emphasis on social justice, climate change, and comprehensive healthcare reform. While these issues are critical for the Democratic platform, there is a feeling among certain voter segments that too much focus on these areas overshadows immediate economic concerns which have historically been the core of working-class Democratic support.

Further complicating Democratic unity, voters express anxiety over crime rates, border security, and healthcare costs. Many blue-collar Democrats feel the Party’s focus has drifted away from ensuring safety and economic stability. They view it as favoring a progressive agenda that doesn't resonate with their day-to-day struggles.

The perception that rising crime, unsustainable tax policies, and high health insurance premiums are being inadequately addressed feeds into the narrative that Democrats no longer prioritize the interests of a segment of their base.

The narrative propagated by conservatives paints Democrats as increasingly disconnected from the real needs of working-class Americans. They cast Democrats as elitist and overly focused on identity politics. This portrayal has potential electoral consequences, especially in regions where economic hardship is prevalent and where voters feel their struggles are not represented.