party-politics Articles
-
Anticipation for the first presidential debate moderated by CNN reporters Jake Tapper and Dana Bash is generating controversy. Many, especially conservatives, express skepticism about whether the debate moderation will be rigged in favor of Democrat narratives. People point to the historical biases they see in both moderators and on CNN’s network.
The most pervasive concern is CNN's recurring bias against Donald Trump. Many voters say they do not trust Jake Tapper and Dana Bash to allow a fair debate. People are especially citing Tappers past comments about Trump his role in promoting Russiagate and other controversies.
Nobody Trusts Jake Tapper
Criticism against Jake Tapper is especially pronounced. There's a common theme that he is profoundly anti-Trump, with an inability to remain fair. Many discuss his ad nauseum coverage of the narrative that Trump is essentially Adolf Hitler.
Oh look, debate moderator Jake Tapper repeatedly comparing Trump to HitIer.
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) June 24, 2024
I'm sure this debate will be 100% fair.
pic.twitter.com/isshrBs72GMany also point out Tapper's role in covering and legitimizing the leftist media’s Russiagate narrative, which has now been thoroughly disproven. They also cite his inability to hold a neutral stance when reporting on Trump’s comments or actions.
Here is Jake Tapper angrily demanding CNN cut off live coverage of Trump being greeted by Cubans in a Miami restaurant pic.twitter.com/zYFkGHQ2Ct
— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) June 24, 2024Viral Clip of CNN Cutting Karoline Leavitt’s Mic
There is also significant outrage over a viral CNN clip in which Trump spokesperson Karoline Leavitt’s mic was cut when she criticized Jake Tapper. Many vies this incident as evidence of CNN's unwillingness to allow dissenting opinions, fueling calls for Trump to boycott the network's debate altogether.
The abrupt end to Leavitt's interview has compounded fears that any criticism of the moderators or the network will not be tolerated during the debate.
Like and retweet if you think Jake Tapper will be a partisan hack during the debate.
— Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) June 24, 2024
pic.twitter.com/ZYersdOb1YTrump supporters express outrage at CNN’s clear bias against Trump and his allies. They argue Leavitt was well within fair bounds to point out historical biases from Jake Tapper. Voters view the incident as an attempt to suppress legitimate criticism of CNN’s impartiality.
Fears About Mainstream Media Bias
Another major point of contention is CNN's decision to restrict independent media from streaming or providing real-time commentary on the debate. Voters view this as a deliberate attempt to protect the so-called “elite media” and prevent alternative perspectives from reaching the public.
Right leaning voters call out CNN as a "propaganda network" rather than a legitimate news organization. This sentiment is not new but has intensified with the approach of the debate. These CNN critiques often include ire toward the broader media landscape.
Americans express suspicion around media covering up election rigging, censoring opposition, and manipulating voters with politicized narratives. These arguments express a broader disenchantment with mainstream media’s role in elections and American politics generally.
With a strong belief in mainstream media bias against conservatives, Trump supporters fear possibilities like:
- Moderators pushing unfair and slanted questions.
- Accusations about Trump’s felony convictions—to which he cannot respond by gag order.
- CNN producers muting Trump’s mic when he’s speaking.
- Conditions set up to hide Joe Biden’s declining cognitive state.
There is also a repeated belief the debate will be more of a three-against-one scenario, with Joe Biden, Jake Tapper, and Dana Bash combining forces against Donald Trump. Critics say Tapper and Bash will prop up Biden by framing the narrative in his favor, effectively silencing Republican voters.
Predictions About Candidate Performance
How voters perceive the potential performances of each candidate varies with political views. Trump supporters hope he will dominate the debate, leveraging his strong debate skills, clear communication, and ability to generate viral television moments. They often contrast him favorably against Biden’s lackluster public performances and his administration’s poor legacy. Conservatives are generally confident that Trump, even with inevitable media bias, will gain the upper hand.
Democratic voters believe Trump’s performance will contrast poorly with Biden's. They expect Trump to resort to combative and inflammatory rhetoric rather than substantive discussion. They express hope the debate will highlight what they see as Trump’s erratic and dishonest tendencies. This group also urges the moderators to challenge Trump rigorously on issues like the economy and social justice.
Related Debate Conversations
There is also some talk about Robert F. Kennedy Jr. being excluded from the debate stage. Many believe this undermines democratic processes and fuels accusations of bias from conservatives, Independents, and even some moderate Democrats.
This is a particularly sore spot since Kennedy qualified according to CNN's own criteria but is still being left out. Some also voice objections over the fact that neither Trump nor Biden have been officially nominated for their Parties. People view this as a greater injustice, saying a one-on-one debate is highly irregular before the Party conventions.
Adding to the controversy is a demand for Joe Biden to take a drug test before the debate. This unusual request stems from public opinion and media denial that Joe Biden is not cognitively or physically fit to be president. Many believe Biden's handlers provide him a cocktail of drugs before public appearances in hopes that his deterioration can be hidden.
27
Jun
-
The first presidential debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden is scheduled for tomorrow. Americans have been taking to social media expressing interest in key topics and how they believe the general election will impact their lives. People also speculate about the performance of both candidates, wondering if Joe Biden will be able to make it through despite his clear decline. Others wonder if Donald Trump will be unfairly treated by moderators or have his mic cut off, despite his vast popular support.
Republicans focus on illegal immigration, its economic impact, and Democrats prioritizing illegal immigrants over Americans. They also critique policies like student loan forgiveness and other economic issues.
Right leaning voters express frustration and distrust toward the Biden administration, advocating for tougher border policies and fiscal conservatism. Many firmly oppose current approaches to immigration, the economy, and international relations.
Democrats defend Biden’s measures as steps toward social justice and economic equity. They support immigration reform and policies aiding debt relief and pathways to citizenship. They are generally optimistic about the debate, hoping it will highlight Biden's achievements and reinforcing progressive values.
Independents and moderates have varied opinions. Many are concerned about economic management, immigration, and policy effectiveness. They seek clarity on policy impacts from the debate, with some undecided and awaiting more substantive discussions before finalizing their stance.
Economic Issues
Discussion Trends
Economic Policies and Tax Management
- Republicans argue current policies are creating economic instability and unfairly burdening taxpayers.
- Democrats support policies like student loan forgiveness and the Inflation Reduction Act, believing they reduce the economic burden on average Americans.
- Independents are looking for clear economic policies from candidates that address inflation, taxation fairness, and job market improvements.
Inflation
- Republicans blame the current administration for high inflation and believe previous policies kept inflation and gas prices lower.
- Democrats emphasize long-term investments and measures to revitalize the economy, suggesting current policies will benefit the economy in the future.
- Independents are concerned about high inflation and government inaction, seeking detailed plans from candidates.
Trump vs. Biden
- Republicans highlight greater economic stability and lower inflation under the Trump administration.
- Democrats argue Biden is correcting past missteps and making long-term investments.
- Independents are undecided and looking forward to upcoming debates for clearer comparisons.
Sentiment Trends
Republicans
- Predominantly dissatisfied with the current administration.
- Believe Trump provided more economic stability.
- Concerned about inflation, increased crime rates, and immigration policies.
- View policies like student loan forgiveness as economically destabilizing.
Democrats
- Support Biden’s efforts to reduce economic burdens.
- Emphasize alleged job market gains and infrastructure development.
- View policies like student loan forgiveness as necessary for economic inclusivity.
- Believe the Biden administration is addressing climate change and revitalizing the economy.
Independents
- Skeptical about both political parties.
- Concerned about high inflation and government inefficacy.
- Undecided and awaiting the debate to form opinions.
- Seeking clear and detailed economic and social policies from candidates.
- View debates as critical for understanding policy impacts and candidate capabilities.
Border Security
Discussion Trends
Immigration Policy and Citizenship Pathways
- Republicans have a strong negative reaction to Biden’s plan for citizenship for 500,000 illegal immigrants.
- They express concern about vote manipulation, crime, and economic strain.
- They call for stricter immigration controls, border security, and broad deportation measures.
- Democrats support policies prioritizing humanitarian values and family unity.
- They emphasize a moral obligation to provide protection and opportunities.
- Democrats show an internal disagreement on implications for domestic policy and public welfare systems.
- Independents have mixed responses oscillating between socio-economic concerns and humane treatment of immigrants.
- They call for a pragmatic approach, balancing border security and addressing the status of long-term illegal immigrants.
- There is frustration over the lack of bipartisan solutions and politicization of immigration.
Border Security and Legal Process
- Republicans and some Independents emphasize stronger border security and deportation illegal immigrants, especially those with criminal records.
- Democrats and more progressive Independents advocate for comprehensive immigration reform, ensuring border security and a fair path to citizenship.
Crime
- Many people express increased crime among illegal immigrants as an emotionally charged topic, especially among Republicans and Independents.
- Recent violent crimes committed by illegal immigrants intensify calls for tougher immigration policies.
Economic Impact
- There are concerns about the strain on social security, healthcare, and public services.
- Republicans and Independents stress safeguarding resources for American citizens.
- Democrats highlight their belief in the positive economic contributions of illegal immigrants and call for their integration into the formal economy.
Sentiment Trends
Republicans
- Overwhelmingly negative sentiment towards Biden's immigration policy.
- Fear of increased crime and economic strain, with accusations of vote manipulation using illegal immigrants.
- Strong advocacy for stricter immigration controls and border security.
Democrats
- Support for the Biden administration’s policies based on humanitarian values and family unity.
- Internal caution regarding domestic policy implications and public welfare systems.
- Emphasis on balancing security with compassion in immigration reform.
Independents
- Mixed perspectives with a pragmatic approach to border security and humane treatment for immigrants.
- Frustration with bipartisan failures to address underlying immigration issues constructively.
- Calls for detailed policy clarification and practical solutions.
Political Ideologies
Discussion Trends
Political Polarization
- Republicans express strong support for Trump and opposition to Biden, focusing on critiques of Biden's policies on immigration, the economy, and healthcare.
- Democrats defend Biden's record and attack Trump’s character and previous presidency, emphasizing reproductive rights, healthcare, and preserving democratic norms.
- Independents show frustration with the partisan nature of politics and are undecided, waiting for debates to form opinions.
Social Security and Medicare
- Both Republicans and Democrats accuse each other of threatening these programs.
Economic Concerns
- Issues like inflation and tax policies are central among Democrats and Republicans, reflecting anxiety about future financial stability.
Debate Expectations
- Voters have high expectations for the debates, viewing them as crucial for undecided voters, especially Independents, to make final decisions.
Sentiment Trends
Republicans
- Distrust mainstream media, suspecting conspiracies.
- Feel a sense of urgency and anger, viewing Biden as a threat to America’s future.
Democrats
- Emphasize reproductive rights, healthcare, and democratic norms.
- Concerned about GOP misinformation and threats to social security.
- Fear a second Trump term, viewing it as a potential catastrophe for democracy and social progress.
Independents
- Skeptical and disillusioned with both major parties.
- Frustrated with intense partisanship.
- Express high expectations for clarity and policy specifics in debates.
Security Issues
Discussion Trends
Foreign Policies and Geopolitical Tensions
- Republicans have strong critiques of Biden's foreign policies, particularly concerning Ukraine and Israel.
- They compare Trump's approach, viewing Biden's policies as weakening U.S. foreign policy.
- There are concerns about emboldened adversaries like Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, and a potential for World War III.
- Democrats defend Biden's strategic continuity and responses to long-standing international threats.
- There are internal divisions on the Israel-Palestine conflict, with progressives questioning traditional support for Israel.
- Democrats generally support Biden's actions against Russian aggression in Ukraine and maintaining alliances.
- Independents express concerns about escalation in global conflicts and dissatisfaction with bipartisan approaches.
- They call for a more nuanced and less interventionist foreign policy.
Ukraine-Russia Conflict
- Both sides debate whether U.S. strategy is too aggressive or appropriately defensive.
U.S. Relationship with Israel
- There are growing concerns over recent foreign policy decisions, including withholding ammunition and Middle East policy.
Alliances Against the U.S.
- Most Americans fear geopolitical consequences involving Russia, China, and North Korea.
Domestic Implications
- Voters worry over military spending and economic stability resulting from foreign policy decisions.
Sentiment Trends
Republicans
- Overwhelmingly negative sentiment towards Biden's foreign policy.
- Dissatisfaction with current Ukraine and Israel strategies.
- Fear Biden's policies are bringing the world closer to major conflict.
- Hope for a return to Trump's diplomacy to stabilize geopolitical tensions.
Democrats
- Largely support Biden's foreign policy actions, though with some internal divisions.
- Emphasis on strategic continuity and necessary responses to threats.
- Tension within the party over support for Israel, with progressives advocating for Palestinian rights.
- Support for efforts to counter Russian aggression and maintain alliances.
Independents
- Mixed perspectives with general skepticism towards both parties.
- Concerns about global conflict escalation and dissatisfaction with current foreign policy management.
- Calls for a less interventionist approach and more effective international relations.
<
26
Jun
-
Voter conversations about California Governor Gavin Newsom in recent days have been intensely critical. There are multiple issues negatively influencing opinions, but one of the most severe is the alarming increase in antisemitic incidents. Jewish communities have faced violent assaults from protesters, especially in Los Angeles. The outrage has been palpable, with citizens questioning Newsom's stance and demanding immediate action to curtail hate crimes on the streets of LA.
- In the last 10 days, Newsom’s overall support has averaged 40%, dipping down from 44% to 38% with a spike in online mentions.
- Sentiment toward Newsom regarding Israel-Palestine issues dropped dramatically from 50% to a low of 27%.
- Voters are also extremely negative about the economy and crime, with Newsom’s sentiment respectively reaching lows of 33% and 30%.
Antisemitic Protests
Public discourse about Gavin Newsom is intensely focused on incidents of violence and tension between pro-Palestine protesters and the Jewish community in Los Angeles. Many disapprove of the violent clashes where pro-Palestine protesters reportedly assaulted Jewish individuals near synagogues, particularly in the Pico-Robertson neighborhood.
There are vivid descriptions of chaos, including instances where Jewish women have been pinned to the ground and injured. These events sparked alarm and outrage from Californians. Many are questioning where Gavin Newsom and other leaders are during these times of crisis.
People are also discussing the broader issue of antisemitism. There is palpable anger toward Newsom for not publicly denouncing antisemitic actions. Protesters blocking the entrance to synagogues and verbally or physically harassing Jewish attendees exacerbate fears and frustrations.
Many argue these disturbing protests cross a line beyond political protest and enter religious and ethnic discrimination.
Top Issues Impacting Newsom Support
The issue of rising antisemitism in California has been at the forefront of conversation in recent days. However, there are several ongoing issues which land blame at Newsom’s door, making voters angry.
Economic Struggles
There is considerable anger toward California leadership for how they are handling economic matters. High unemployment rates, exacerbating income disparities, and a surging cost of living fuel discontent. Many Californians say Newsom's policies are accelerating the decline of a state once renowned for its economic vitality and prosperity. Voters direct particular ire at legislative decisions, such as those surrounding the controversial SB7, which some argue undermines voters' rights concerning taxes, housing, and utilities.
California Senate Bill 7 (SB7) removes county and city government abilities to object to state-determined housing needs and reduces review times. Supporters claim it will address the housing crisis more effectively. However, opponents argue it undermines local autonomy, imposes a one-size-fits-all approach, and overburdens smaller governments. They also worry about potential community resistance and legal challenges regarding the erosion of local control.
Crime and Public Safety
Another pain point for Californians is the issue of public safety and infrastructure. Crime is alarmingly high, there is widespread homelessness, and ineffective policing leaves many citizens feeling unsafe and neglected. A gun violence incident in Oakland, where a family was attacked with an AK-47, has generated pronounced negativity. Many call for Newsom to address the growing menace of violent crime, which Californians feel he has utterly failed at.
Environmental Grievances
Environmental and energy issues also generate harsh criticisms for Newsom. People accuse him of prioritizing the interests of large energy firms over public rights, causing distrust. Recent rulings by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) regarding rooftop solar have only intensified these frustrations. The sentiment that California is being mismanaged extends to perceptions that Newsom failed to capitalize on the state's natural resources sustainably.
Distaste for Newsom Himself
Many Californians also place intense scrutiny on Newsom’s personal conduct and political aspirations. People castigate him for his failures in governance and his gauche ambition for higher political office, including the presidency. There are many allegations of corruption within the Democratic leadership in California, amplified by recent high-profile raids, further tarnishing Newsom's reputation. Many say the state's political landscape has become increasingly chaotic and dysfunctional under his leadership.
There is also sharp criticism of Newsom’s communication methods and ways of addressing state issues. His decision to deliver his State of the State address via a pre-recorded video rather than a traditional speech has been met with disdain. People interpret the choice as indicative of Newsom’s off-putting lack of transparency and accountability. Voters see Newsom as a member of the political elite who absolve themselves of blame and wrongdoing while citizens bear the consequence of their poor governance.
A thread that combines these various strands of discontent is how voters view Newsom’s hypocrisy and lack of accountability. Whether it's the accusations of failing to support healthcare workers, the disenchantment over neglected public services, or his cancelled State of the State address, it seems trust in Newsom is at an all-time low. The overarching narrative is that California, under Newsom's leadership, is grappling with deep-seated social, economic, and political crises, causing many people and businesses to leave the state.
26
Jun
-
Two controversial reversals in Snopes fact-checks are causing online discussion and controversy. Debates over Donald Trump's infamous "very fine people" comment and Ashley Biden's diary are fervent.
Snopes, a left-leaning fact checking website, reversed its previous fact-check that Donald Trump called neo-Nazis “very fine people” after the Charlottesville protests of 2017. In April, Snopes also reversed a fact check about whether the contents of Ashley Biden’s diary were confirmed, changing its rating from "Unproven" to "True."
These reversals are stirring public sentiment and cast a spotlight on broader issues of media trust and political bias – both of which look to have influence on voting trends in the 2024 election.
Very Fine People Hoax
The media’s continual characterization of Trump’s "very fine people" comment has long been contentious. President Joe Biden, in 2019, launched his campaign citing this now-debunked claim that Trump called neo-Nazis fine people.
Many Americans feel Snopes’s revisions validate their previously held beliefs either about mainstream media's unfair portrayal of Trump or its broader role in pushing political narratives.
Among Trump's supporters, there is a palpable sense of vindication. They argue Snopes admitting Trump’s comments were mischaracterized demonstrates how media and fact-checker spin has fueled a biased narrative against the former president and other conservatives.
This skepticism toward media is fueling a deeper mistrust of news and fact checking outlets. It also seems to encourage voters’ growing resolve to support Trump more fervently in the upcoming election. Trump's base, which includes a substantial portion of rural and working-class voters, is therefore likely to remain steadfast or grow.
Critics of Trump view the Snopes revision as problematic. They contend that, while the retraction might be technically accurate, it could be weaponized to downplay the serious implications of Trump's rhetoric.
Anti-Trump voters fear such reversals may perpetuate a dangerous narrative and embolden extremist views. This skepticism towards media corrections could boost voter turnout among those who oppose Trump, particularly in urban and suburban areas where such views are more prevalent.
Ashley Biden’s Diary
Regarding Ashley Biden's diary, the Snopes reversal regarding it authenticity and content have further deepened partisan divides. Right-leaning Americans suggest the original fact-check of the diary was another among many attempts to shield the Biden family from scrutiny.
Biden critics argue this reversal exposes a concerted effort within the media to protect Biden. The reversal also reinforces their belief in a biased media that unfairly attacks conservative figures while ignoring liberal misdeeds. This perception bolsters support for Trump and could attract more undecided or moderate voters who are increasingly skeptical of media integrity.
Conversely, left-leaning voters and Biden supporters are disheartened by Snopes's reversals. They interpret these actions as caving to pressure and contributing to the spread of misinformation. Many believe such admissions could have a demoralizing effect, potentially dissuading some voters from participating in the election due to a feeling of disillusionment with the political process and media landscape.
However, there's also a counter-effect among those who perceive these reversals as hair-splitting. These exhausted voters may be energized to fight against what they see as manipulation and misinformation.
25
Jun
-
After a viral tweet sparked harsh backlash, a Democrat staffer set his X account to private as sweeping criticisms drowned him in a wave of negativity. The post, which thanked the Biden administration for canceling Ben Kamens’s student loans, was viewed by more than 20 million people and was squarely ratioed at a rate of 40,000 replies to 23,000 likes before it was restricted.
Ben Kamens is taking a beating on his post…check it out to keep up with:
— DANGER: DISINFORMATION (@RetiredCrimeDog) June 20, 2024
- the ratio
- thanking @JoeBiden for buying his vote
- having a $500k house and poor taxpayers helping him pay it off
- enjoys a Capitol Hill Comms job but didn’t see the backlash coming
- doxing himself… pic.twitter.com/aPiJpkPIWIKamens faced biting critiques from people criticizing his apparently well-off position as a Capitol Hill staffer, earning a higher salary than average working-class Americans. Many people commented that his tweet, which emphasized the importance of voting for Biden in 2024, reveals how modern Democrats sideline average Americans to pander to their own in the elite class.
Different voter groups express a range of discontent, suggesting a broader disillusionment with Biden’s administration—especially on economic issues. Many Republicans are particularly vocal, arguing Biden's policies favor illegal immigrants, international interests like Ukraine, and American elites over the needs of struggling Americans. They say prioritizing college graduates with student loans diminishes the working class, who are more impacted by immediate economic concerns than by student debt.
Many Americans say "forgiving" loans embodies a fundamental inequity, especially for those who have lived frugally or delayed significant life milestones to honor their debts. They see this policy as another instance of political maneuvering – a vote-buying scheme – rather than genuine economic reform.
For much of the working class, there is resentment and skepticism. They perceive student loan forgiveness as pandering to those who have already had the opportunity to pursue higher education, thus benefiting the privileged.
General Unfairness
A significant amount of frustration also comes from voters who managed to pay off their student loans through hard work, sometimes working multiple jobs. These people often express resentment towards those who are now receiving loan forgiveness. Despite being among the educated class, they view debt forgiveness as a lack of personal responsibility and an unfair redistribution of financial burdens. This group argues it overlooks the sacrifices they made to fulfill their financial obligations without government intervention.
There are also prevalent concerns about the costs associated with the loan forgiveness program. Critics say it will be passed on to taxpayers, many of whom did not attend college or who work in trades that do not require a college degree. The rhetoric here revolves around the perception that plumbers, construction workers, and other blue-collar employees are now being asked to subsidize the education of others, which they find unjust.
Related Complaints on Fiscal Policy
There is also a perception that Biden's policy shifts taxpayer burdens from one group to another without addressing root causes. Critics say reforms such as reducing college tuition fees, adjusting interest rates on loans, or holding educational institutions accountable for inflated costs as more equitable solutions.
Furthermore, Biden’s detractors often cite broader accusations of inefficacy and corruption with critiques of his student loan policies. People say illegal immigration harms economic stability for lower-income Americans or argue current fiscal policies contribute to higher living costs. These complaints amplify the skepticism towards Biden’s debt forgiveness plan.
Trouble for the Democratic Platform
Divisiveness within the Democratic Party is also increasing, with some factions arguing current policies disproportionately favor elite interests and liberal social agendas, often at the expense of the working class. The frustration largely stems from a perception that Biden’s policies do not effectively address day-to-day struggles Americans face, including job security, wage growth, and affordable housing.
In addition, rhetoric from progressives within the party has shifted considerably, with an increasing emphasis on social justice, climate change, and comprehensive healthcare reform. While these issues are critical for the Democratic platform, there is a feeling among certain voter segments that too much focus on these areas overshadows immediate economic concerns which have historically been the core of working-class Democratic support.
Further complicating Democratic unity, voters express anxiety over crime rates, border security, and healthcare costs. Many blue-collar Democrats feel the Party’s focus has drifted away from ensuring safety and economic stability. They view it as favoring a progressive agenda that doesn't resonate with their day-to-day struggles.
The perception that rising crime, unsustainable tax policies, and high health insurance premiums are being inadequately addressed feeds into the narrative that Democrats no longer prioritize the interests of a segment of their base.
The narrative propagated by conservatives paints Democrats as increasingly disconnected from the real needs of working-class Americans. They cast Democrats as elitist and overly focused on identity politics. This portrayal has potential electoral consequences, especially in regions where economic hardship is prevalent and where voters feel their struggles are not represented.
24
Jun
-
In a White House press conference, Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre recently claimed clips of Joe Biden looking confused are "cheap fakes." These comments, particularly dismissing footage of former president Barack Obama leading Biden off stage by his wrist, are causing uproar among those who view the president as clearly in cognitive decline.
White House Gaslighting
Most average voters who witness Biden’s ongoing deterioration at public appearances perceive the White House comments as blatant gaslighting. This group says the White House is attempting to dismiss any negative portrayal of Biden as fabricated, attempting to undermine any legitimate criticism.
Many say labeling inconvenient clips as "cheap fakes" is a tactic to delegitimize opposing voices and maintain a favorable image of the administration, even at the expense of reality. These voters are concerned that Democrats are actively eroding trust in American, reinforcing a belief that government is manipulating information to maintain control.
Others see the White House’s dismissal of any negative story related to Biden as consistent with past efforts to suppress information. For them, Hunter Biden’s laptop denial by Democrats and the media symbolizes a broader pattern of lying to and insulting the public.
Some also say the White House Press Secretary made up the term “cheap fakes,” as a desperate attempt to confuse people. They say Jean-Pierre wanted to imply the videos are deep fakes but knew she could not say it outright since they’re not deep fakes.
Memes and Resurfacing Biden Clips
Online reactions to Press Secretary Jean-Pierre claiming footage of Joe Biden walking around confused and fumbling his words are “cheap fakes” often include memes, insults, and outright disbelief.
Drefanzor Memes for the win. Karine and her cheap fakes.pic.twitter.com/Ud3ScoXyxX
— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) June 19, 2024Many right leaning voters took the opportunity to post clips of Joe Biden currently and from years past, reminding everyone the White House has broadly labeled them all “cheap fakes.”
CHEAP FAKE ALERT:
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) June 19, 2024
A new video is out that seemingly shows President Biden struggling to go inside a Suburban.
An anonymous source says that what ACTUALLY happened was Biden was demonstrating how difficult life is for handicapped people of color. pic.twitter.com/3yotZYPKj1Wow look at these “deep fakes” and “cheap fakes” and “manipulated” videos of Biden’s gaffes and mumblings! Why would Republicans do this?!
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 19, 2024
It would be really bad if everyone tagged @PressSec asking her about this!! pic.twitter.com/qCJ1jqo3j3Frustrated Americans who are fed up with feeling the White House and mainstream media constantly lie to voters also ripped outlets like CNN, CBS, and MSNBC for unquestioningly regurgitating Biden administration talking points.
BREAKING: @CBSNews falsely claims that raw footage of Joe Biden at the G7 was "DIGITALLY ALTERED."
— Andrew @ Don’t Walk, RUN! (@DontWalkRUN) June 19, 2024
Here is a video comparing the "cheap fake" with the raw footage. Please note that they are EXACTLY THE SAME! pic.twitter.com/41AwLVC32ZCNN spent almost all day warning people about cheap fake videos yesterday.
— Big Fish (@BigFish3000) June 19, 2024
They needed to interview their own staff. pic.twitter.com/GyTamOniNWMainstream news figures like Brian Stelter and Nicole Wallace both received flack online for their breathless support of the White House narrative about Joe Biden. Many in the media focus on the alleged cheap fakes, while leaving questions of Biden’s health completely unasked.
‘CHEAP FAKES!’ The Biden campaign is so screwed that today, they rolled out a new strategy to tell Americans they can't believe their own eyes when seeing video evidence of Biden's mental decline.
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) June 18, 2024
They're panicking. pic.twitter.com/ShG2M8ikm5CNN must be desperate for talking heads since they brought on Potato Head to defend Biden from “cheap fakes.”
— I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 (@ImMeme0) June 20, 2024
Apparently, Biden’s campaign is worried that people will see, with their own eyes, Joe's mental and physical decline. pic.twitter.com/iSqAVA5KsSDemocrats Spout White House Talking Points
Progressive Democrats say they believe Jean-Pierre’s explanation and insist it's a necessary effort to address misinformation in the digital age. They argue with the proliferation of sophisticated editing tools, it is crucial for the administration to call out manipulated content. For these partisan voters, promoting the party line is a matter of safeguarding democracy, even if they don’t personally believe it.
Though many Democrats are unwilling to speak out publicly about Joe Biden’s mental and physical health, MIG Reports data suggests many are questioning it. Plummeting approval numbers for Biden and increased conversations about Biden’s ability to lead the country suggest even Democrats don’t believe White House rhetoric. However, many Democrats also seem willing to prioritize beating Trump over shielding the country from an incapacitated Joe Biden’s second term.
21
Jun
-
An Ecuadorian national in the U.S. illegally was arrested for raping a 13-year-old girl at a popular Queens park. NYPD made the arrest after a group of at least 10 neighbors swarmed and detained the criminal until police arrived around 1 a.m. on Tuesday.
BREAKING: We spoke to the #Queens man who recognized and physically restrained the alleged rapist, Christian Geovanny Inga, overnight. Jeffrey Flores says he saw the NYPD flyer and quickly identified the suspect, who he says frequents a bodega in Corona, Queens. @NBCNewYork pic.twitter.com/NPDKvOrEtM
— Melissa Colorado (@melissacolorado) June 18, 2024Following the event, emotions are running high and political tensions continue among American voters. One prominent cause of pain and disagreement is immigration policy and public safety. These conversations surged as news came out that the illegal alien perpetrator crossed the border with a 3-year-old in 2021.
Americans Demand Border Security
A dominant sentiment on social media highlights anger and frustration towards the Biden administration and Democrats. Voters are expressing outrage, attributing the crime to the administration's lenient border policies.
This anger is often framed within a broader critique of government failures to protect American citizens, tying individual criminal acts to systemic policy decisions. Users argue policies allowing more illegal immigrants into the country, and those who make such policies, are directly responsible for increased crime rates, including violent acts like rape and murder.
There is also notable skepticism over media coverage, with accusations that mainstream outlets are downplaying or ignoring crimes committed by illegal immigrants. This distrust in media reporting is coupled with a strong desire for what users call "real justice" and a sense of having to take matters into their own hands due to government negligence.
The discussion is also frequently tied to legislative and policy debates, with people contrasting current border security measures against those implemented during the Trump administration. They draw comparisons to emphasize that border deaths were lower under Trump.
There is a call for a return to Trump’s policies, which many see as more effective in safeguarding American citizens. The narrative often suggests Biden and Democrats do not prioritize American lives but are instead focused on political agendas and international matters. People resent focus on things like Ukraine funding at the expense of national security.
The tragedy of events like the one in NYC has a clear impact on voting patterns. There are repeated calls for the 2024 election to be a judgment on the Biden administration’s immigration policies.
There is a strong indication that voters who identify as Republican or are dissatisfied with Democratic leadership, this issue will galvanize support for Trump or Trump-aligned candidates. The rhetoric suggests a rallying cry for change, using personal safety and national security as key motivators.
A Rebuke to Biden’s Immigration Policies
The prevalent voter sentiment is heavy with anger and frustration directed at the Biden administration's immigration policies. Many blame President Biden for an uncontrolled surge in illegal immigration, attributing violent crimes committed by undocumented individuals to his "open borders" stance.
A significant number of Americans argue Biden’s policy changes, which they claim dismantled the measures put in place by former President Donald Trump, have led to an increase in crimes committed by illegal immigrants. This has fueled accusations that Biden and the Democrats are more focused on securing votes through immigration policies than protecting American citizens.
There is also considerable debate about the effectiveness and intent behind Biden’s recent policies for “border relief” and amnesty. Critics insist these efforts are too little, too late. They also believe any policy adjustments are politically motivated attempts to repair the damage caused.
Even some Democratic or left-leaning voters express their frustration with Biden. This dissatisfaction could potentially motivate a swing toward Trump in the upcoming election, as many believe he had stronger immigration policies. However, there are voices calling out what they see as fear-mongering and misleading statistics aimed at stoking public fear and resentment against all immigrants, not just illegal ones.
Most Americans call for stricter immigration controls, including mass deportations, citing concerns about crime, economic impact, and public safety.
21
Jun
-
Hillary Clinton's unexpected appearance at the Tony Awards has gotten fawning praise from liberals and disgust from conservatives. In her short speech, she mentioned her failed presidential campaign, celebrated women’s suffrage, and appealed to all Americans to get out and vote.
Many viewers were exhausted to see such a divisive figure like Clinton at an event traditionally dedicated to celebrating theatrical achievements. They view this disconnect as another indicator that mainstream media and entertainment are biased to the left.
Hillary Clinton gets standing ovation in surprise appearance at #TonyAwards pic.twitter.com/wtiKBLDjxK
— Deadline Hollywood (@DEADLINE) June 17, 2024A tweet from Deadline Hollywood showing a clip of Hillary Clinton's appearance garnered significant criticism both for Hollywood and Hillary herself in the replies.
Liberal Elites Can’t Get Enough of Themselves
Supporters argue Clinton's presence is a positive endorsement of the arts and a recognition of their cultural significance. To them, her participation symbolizes how politics and entertainment can collaboratively advocate for important social issues.
Partisan celebrities and political figures say they appreciate a seamless integration of political figures into entertainment venues. They view it as an opportunity for politicians to engage with different audiences and to humanize political discourse.
Media and progressive narratives frame Clinton's appearance as an endorsement of the arts, rather than an opportunistic and desperate attempt to pump up Joe Biden’s campaign. Many in this group deny that entertainment is increasingly being politicized by Democrats, instead claiming both art and politics stand to gain from greater visibility and mutual reinforcement.
Normal Americans are Exhausted by Elite Smugness
Conversations surrounding her appearance also bring attention to the disconnect between political elites and average voters. Many people see her presence at such events as indicative of a cloying political strategy that fails to resonate with everyday concerns.
They argue political figures hobnobbing with celebrities at glamorous events, like Joe Biden’s recent fundraising event, reveals they are out of touch. People feel the struggles of ordinary Americans who face real-life issues are diminished by theatrical political pandering.
Many who used to be fans of art and culture also believe awards shows, which have become extremely politicized, should be apolitical entertainment. They believe the arts should be an escape from the relentless news cycles and partisan battles.
Normal voters say the appearance of political figures at entertainment events feels invasive, turning what should be moments of levity and creativity into platforms for political grandstanding. This sentiment is particularly strong among those who feel the entertainment industry already leans too heavily into political advocacy, often at the expense of diverse viewpoints.
Criticism Toward Hillary and the Media
Critics also argue that Clinton is one of the worst offenders when it comes to alienating voters and appearing insular and self-congratulatory. For this group, Clinton’s appearance is not only out of place but downright insulting. Most view Clinton as a washed-up politician who cannot let go of her loss to Trump in 2016.
This perception is particularly acute among voters who are weary of the symbiotic relationship between mainstream media, Hollywood, and the political elite. They view these entities as working together to marginalize dissenting voices and dismiss substantial issues facing Americans.
Further exacerbating these tensions is a broader sense of frustration at the entertainment sector becoming increasingly politicized—and almost exclusively in service to liberal ideologies. Leftist bias, conservatives say, diminishes trust in both the media and political figures. It also alienates conservatives, promoting a sense of disenfranchisement in those being sidelined by elite and media narratives.
Overall, Hillary Clinton's appearance at the Tony Awards once again spotlights the contentious relationship between politics and entertainment in America. While liberal elites praise the gesture, most Americans view it as a cringey attempt by elites to maintain their power over politics and the culture.
20
Jun
-
Video of former President Barack Obama escorting President Joe Biden off stage at a high-profile fundraiser is igniting conversations on social media about Biden's regular gaffes and confusion. The main themes revolve around concerns about Biden’s health, political strategies, and broader societal and institutional implications.
Biden freezes before Obama grabs his arm and leads him off stage. Yikes! 😳 pic.twitter.com/nCgAGitoQ6
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 16, 2024Is Biden Unfit to Serve?
Many users are expressing alarm at President Joe Biden’s recurring moments of confusion or freezing on stage. More Americans are viewing these increasingly frequent episodes as a clear sign of his deteriorating health. The sentiment that Biden cannot be responsible for running the country is growing.
Discussions frequently reference Biden’s age and present it as a critical issue that impacts his capacity to govern. Sentiment is often inflammatory, highlighting a sense of urgency and alarm. There is also frequent mockery, memes, and brutal criticism, as Americans watch Biden's cognitive abilities erode in disbelief.
Biden’s supporters and those who dismiss the event downplay Obama leading the president off stage. These voices argue the incident was overblown by political opponents and media seeking to distort the narrative for sensationalism. They deflect, highlighting Biden’s accomplishments and capabilities, suggesting the short video clip does not reflect his overall performance and leadership.
Blue Collar Versus Tinsel Town
Another trend in the discussion is the increasing association of the Democratic Party and its key figures, including Obama and Biden, with Hollywood elites. This fundraiser, which featured high-profile celebrities like George Clooney and Julia Roberts, has resulted in criticism about the Democratic Party being out of touch with ordinary Americans. Social media posts imply a growing discontent with what some perceive as liberal elites' ignorance of the challenges everyday citizens face.
There is also a resurgence of the long-standing political rhetoric portraying leftist ideologies as communistic or socialistic. Some take the opportunity to paint Democratic leadership and their policies as fundamentally un-American or destructive.
These conversations often assert Democrats are utilizing manipulative strategies, like including amnesty for illegal immigrants and mass propaganda through mainstream media, to secure electoral victories. Many even believe Biden has escaped serious problems like potential prosecution because of special treatment.
Trump Supporters Pounce
Furthermore, there is significant backlash when people compare Biden to former President Donald Trump. Trump's supporters are leveraging this incident to emphasize their belief in Trump’s competency and leadership strengths. They say, despite his own controversies, Trump represents a more robust and capable alternative to Biden.
There are also comparisons between the fundraising efficacy of both political figures. Many point out that, despite glitzy Biden fundraisers and Trump's legal woes, Trump’s campaign is generating substantial grassroots financial support from many small donation donors. This draws a stark contrast with the Hollywood-centered donations for Biden.
Lastly, a segment of voters are focusing on the broader societal consequences of current political actions. They argue Biden’s administration, perceived as aligned with extreme liberal policies, is making the United States vulnerable to internal and external threats.
Concerns about border security, perceived leniency towards illegal immigrants, and an alleged erosion of American values are frequently mentioned. This fuels a broader narrative of an existential crisis facing the nation, with Biden depicted as a figurehead in a larger ideological battle.
19
Jun