During the RNC convention, numerous families who lost loved ones in the attack at Abbey Gate, during Biden’s Afghanistan withdrawal, shared their personal testimonies and experiences. They talked of losing a loved one under President Biden and subsequently being ignored by the administration.

American reactions to Biden’s failure to acknowledge the Afghanistan Gold Star families reveal significant emotional intensity, anger, grief, and political implications.

Negligent Commander-in-Chief

Discussions center around Joe Biden’s repeated neglect of Afghanistan Gold Star families after his disastrous withdrawal. This offensive unwillingness to acknowledge those who gave their lives for America fuels anger and disappointment. This is especially pronounced among Americans closely tied to military communities.

Sentiment toward Joe Biden on this subject is overwhelmingly negative, marked by feelings of abandonment and disillusionment. Many argue Biden’s refusal to acknowledge these families reflects poorly on his role as Commander-in-Chief. They say it worsens the impact of his administration’s atrocious handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal.

Another closely related topic is the broader critique of how Biden handles military affairs and veterans' issues. Critics use the administration’s neglect of Gold Star families as a springboard to discuss wider failings, including the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan and its aftermath. Sentiment remains negative, often laced with strong emotional appeals highlighting the sacrifices of military service members and their families.

Sweeping Critiques of Biden’s Legacy

The discourse often transitions into a broader critique of Biden’s presidency. This includes examinations of his competence, leadership, and policy decisions. Detractors emphasize perceived failings across various domains, extending the criticism beyond military issues to encompass economic, social, and foreign policies. The sentiment across these discussions is again largely negative, albeit framed in a broader political context.

Discussion volume about Gold Star families during the RNC made up a significant portion of political discourse. The discussion was especially large within conservative and military-supportive communities. The volume of these discussions spikes during key events or statements related to military affairs or memorial observances, indicating a high level of engagement on these issues.

Impact on Voters

For undecided and Independent voters, these military issues have the potential to sway opinions. Particularly for those connected to the military or who prioritize national security and veteran affairs.

The emotional resonance of Gold Star family narratives can significantly impact voter sentiment. Independent voters, typically swayed by policy effectiveness and leadership qualities, may find the administration's perceived failings in military matters a critical factor in their decision-making process.

It has been long-established that the point of no return for Biden’s net-negative approval was marked by the Kabul evacuation. This is shown in various polls. Continued discussion, and perhaps focus on the administration writ-large, may continue to erode overall sentiment and approval for Joe Biden and even Kamala Harris.

MIG Reports data shows liberals, progressives, leftists, and Democratic voters are reacting to the Republican National Committee Convention. Generally, there is a blend of skepticism, critique, and rallying support for their own candidates and values. Among these groups, the dialogue primarily centers on defending Democratic leadership, calling out perceived hypocrisy in the GOP, and highlighting the erroneous or misleading statements made by Republican leaders.

What Democrats are Saying

Many people are outlining what they see as contradictions in the Republican stance on crime and morality. Democrats and left leaning voters often point out the irony in Republicans accusing Democrats of acting immorally while simultaneously supporting figures President Trump, who has face multiple indictments. Liberals use this apparent contradiction to reveal GOP inconsistencies and underscore a narrative of moral and ethical superiority within the Democratic camp.

There's an emphasis on contrasting the integrity and character of Democratic leaders with that of their Republican counterparts. Many express admiration for President Biden’s commitment to his official duties and perceive his unwillingness to interfere in his son’s legal matters as a sign of strong character and dedication to the rule of law.

Democrats also defend Kamala Harris, criticizing what they see as baseless and superficial attacks on her. They say comments about her demeanor and laughter are petty and inconsequential.

There is a sense of distrust and dismissal toward Republican rhetoric and actions. Critics of the GOP describe its leaders as erratic and often incoherent during public and private engagements. Descriptions of Trump seeming unable to maintain coherent thoughts during meetings form part of a broader narrative questioning his competence.

Liberals also criticize Mike Lawler and J.D. Vance, saying they embody the problematic aspects of the Republican agenda. Comments link them to extreme right-wing elements and propagandists like Alex Jones. This narrative underscores an assumption that the GOP is increasingly aligned with radical and conspiratorial thinking.

“Grown-ups” in the Room

Those defending Biden and Democratic leadership emphasize qualities like integrity and restraint. They contrast these characteristics with how they perceive GOP figures. Supporters say Democratic leaders handle personal and political challenges with mature and principled reactions. For instance, the narrative around President Biden’s decision not to interfere with investigations of Hunter Biden is highlighted as a demonstration of high ethical standards.

Many also express alarm at the increasing consolidation of conservative influence in various sectors like tech. Democrats criticize Elon Musk’s Trump endorsement following his assassination attempt, viewing it as a threat to democratic norms and values.

Those on the left are expressing frustration, ridicule, and resolve. The frustration comes from confronting repeated instances of perceived wrongdoing and hypocrisy within the GOP. Ridicule and mocking tones are employed as coping mechanisms and rhetorical strategies to undermine the opposition. Despite the heavy criticisms, there is a persistent trend of rallying behind Democratic leaders and espousing a message of unity and higher moral ground.

In recent days, discussions among Democratic leaders regarding President Joe Biden stepping down from the 2024 election have stirred significant controversy. Chuck Schumer, Adam Schiff, Kamala Harris, and Hakeem Jeffries appear to be at the center of these conversations. There are also allegations that former president Barrack Obama and Senator Bernie Sanders have called for Biden to step aside.

Speculation about leadership's motives, along with intrigue around the Democratic strategy, is surging, even with much high-profile news happening within the GOP.

Ongoing reporting claims sources indicate Democratic leaders are conducting private talks with Biden, urging him to reconsider his candidacy. They cite his waning ability to win the presidential race and his very publicly declining health. Reports from multiple news outlets suggest these leaders are positioning themselves for a possible leadership transition by delaying the Democratic Party's formal nomination of Biden.

The Current Political Environment

Earth-shattering events in recent weeks like Joe Biden’s debate debacle and an attempt on Donald Trump’s life seem to have sent Democratic political strategies into a tailspin. If the Democrats face an uphill battle in the polls, any pivot on Biden's health will likely significantly hurt his chances of a victory in November. This could push swing voters and even some disenchanted Democrats toward Republicans.

Amid increasing beliefs that Democrats cannot win, their sudden revelations about President Biden’s health only reinforces perceptions of desperation. This is likely to depress voter turnout among their base even further, pushing undecided voters away.

Media portrayal of Biden's health also plays a crucial role in shaping voter perception. Many right leaning outlets have been pointing out the hypocrisy of mainstream media in demonizing anyone who questioned Biden’s health prior to the debate. This is especially egregious as voters observe their instant pivot after the debate.

Voters are increasingly critical of Democrats’ handling of Biden's health. For a long time, the party and the media have downplayed or outright denied any concerns regarding Biden's age and mental acuity. Many voters view this as blatant gaslighting, exacerbating the sense of distrust.

When prominent figures suddenly acknowledge Biden's health issues, many view it as a political maneuver rather than a genuine concern for transparency, further eroding Democratic credibility.

Chuck Schumer Jumps Ship

Senator Chuck Schumer’s involvement in calling for Biden to withdraw adds to the Democratic confusion, given his influential position within the Party. Reactions are mixed, oscillating between support, skepticism, and outright shock. There are voices questioning the timing and motivation behind his alleged meeting asking Biden to step down. Many say Democrats are in pure panic mode.

Social media reactions are particularly telling. Various platforms are flooded with discussions attempting to deconstruct Schumer's motivations and the broader implications for the Democratic Party. Supporters of the decision commend Schumer's bravery, suggesting it signals a period of self-reflection and recalibration within the party. Critics, however, view it as cynical. Others criticize internal conflicts during a crucial election cycle.

• Discussions mentioning Chuck Schumer increased in the last two days as his approval dropped slightly from 48% to 47%.

Adam Schiff Flip Flops

Adam Schiff's previous criticism Robert Hur’s assessment of Joe Biden’s health have sparked a considerable backlash. Now, just a few months later, Schiff is calling for Biden to step down due to infirmity.

Voters have not minced words in their responses, voicing strong support for Biden and criticizing Schiff for what they see as unnecessary and harmful dissent. They perceive Schiff's actions as undermining the unity needed in the Democratic Party to win the upcoming election. Some even call for Schiff to withdraw from the Senate race.

Sentiment among these voters is one of frustration and anger. They accuse Schiff of attempting to invalidate the voices of the 14 million people who voted for Biden. They say his actions are damaging to the Party's 2024 strategy.

Voters are particularly incensed with what they perceive as Schiff's hypocrisy. They say Schiff supported Biden in the past and criticized anyone who questioned his health, only to now use his cognitive abilities as a reason to oust the President.

Many find this sudden change not only disingenuous but also deeply cynical. The sentiment is clear: any attack on Biden at this critical juncture is seen as sabotage, possibly paving the way for a Trump victory.

• Adam Schiff has seen disastrously low approval in the last week, dipping as low as 30%.
• As more people mention him online, sentiment may be restabilizing, but it’s unclear whether most Democratic voters support replacing Joe Biden.

Nancy Pelosi Tears Biden a New One

Nancy Pelosi also seemed to suddenly turn on Joe Biden following his catastrophic debate performance. Pelosi, who is known for her high-level political strategy and maneuvering, spoke out more subtly against Biden at first. But now reports are leaking that Pelosi is openly opposing Joe Biden after years of steadfast defense.

Some Democratic voters express staunch disapproval, arguing Pelosi's actions undermine voter confidence and betray the will of the people. They view this move as a signal of discord within the Democratic Party, potentially handing an advantage to the Republicans.

On the other hand, a smaller number support Pelosi’s stance, advocating for a change in leadership as a strategic move to invigorate the base and improve Democratic chances against a resurgent GOP. They argue Biden’s age and current political standing necessitate a new candidate who can better unify the party and appeal to a broader base.

• At the end of last week, as rumors about Biden stepping down were swirling at their height, Pelosi’s approval dipped to 37%.
• As more Democratic leaders join in calling for Biden to step down, negativity seems to move to other prominent figures.

Voter reactions

Democratic voters are likely to have varied reactions to this abrupt development within the Party. Many of President Biden’s supporters see this strife as a betrayal by key figures within the party. There's a palpable sense of distrust and concern that such an internal coup reflects poorly on the Party's unity and strategic planning.

The immediate and intense debate on social media highlights the factional divides. Some fear sidelining Biden at this juncture could lead to a guaranteed loss.

Meanwhile, those who are frustrated with Biden's age and perceived political liabilities might welcome the calls for new leadership. This faction views a potential change as a strategic necessity to invigorate the party with fresh perspectives and renewed energy.

Overall, Democratic voters are caught in a whirlwind of emotions ranging from anger and betrayal to despair and depression. The discussions over Biden’s candidacy expose deep concerns within the party about its ability to present a unified front in the upcoming elections.

The extent of Democratic disillusionment has led some to consider re-registering as Independents or leaving the Party altogether. They see leadership hypocrisy and maneuvering as a betrayal of democratic principles. Some also interpret these developments as driven by wealthy donors rather than the electorate's genuine interests. This shift could signal a broader discontent that may bode poorly for November.

On the opening day of the RNC, Teamsters President Sean O’Brien delivered the keynote speech as the first union leader to ever speak at the RNC. In reaction, discussions about labor unions and the political support of union members toward either Joe Biden or Donald Trump flooded social media.

MIG Reports data shows union members are vocal about several major topics, revealing insights into their political leanings, the controversies that shape their views, and the prevailing trends in discourse and sentiment.

Union-First: It’s a Mixed Bag

Discussions among union members about their political support for Joe Biden or Donald Trump reveal nuances. There are some key themes such as taxation, the economy, trade policies, healthcare, and labor rights.

Taxation

Many union members are dissatisfied with policies favoring the wealthy and increasing the tax burden on the middle class. Biden supporters appreciate his efforts to reduce unemployment and increase wages. Trump's critics highlight his tax reforms as benefiting the affluent.

Economy

Biden supporters credit his policies for reducing inflation, lowering gas prices, creating jobs, and emphasizing benefits for the working class. Trump supporters argue his deregulation and corporate tax cuts stimulate economic growth, though critics say these measures favor businesses over workers.

Trade Policies

Trump's tariffs and trade wars are seen as protective, but criticized by opponents for increasing costs and financial strain on Americans. Opinions are mixed on the effectiveness of bringing manufacturing jobs back to the U.S.

Healthcare and Social Security

Biden supporters value his commitment to expanding social safety nets, while Trump's stance on reducing government spending and repealing the Affordable Care Act raises concerns about benefits and affordable healthcare among union members.

Labor Rights

Many union members support Biden for his pro-union stance and support for collective bargaining, contrasting with Trump's actions which are perceived as weakening union power.

Corporate Influence and Elitism

Trump gets criticism for being corporate-friendly and pandering to elite interests. His supporters praise his anti-establishment rhetoric and efforts to dismantle entrenched political systems. 

Union Workers

Conversations about union workers expose sharp political divides, particularly their support for either Joe Biden or Donald Trump. Key areas of contention include union leadership endorsements, policy impacts, and the broader implications of political alliances on labor rights and worker conditions.

Union Leadership and Support

Biden often garners support from union leaders and members who emphasize his pro-labor stances. Leaders like Liz Shuler of the AFL-CIO call Biden the "most pro-union president in history." They highlight his efforts to promote labor rights, increase investments in new industries, and foster training and apprenticeship programs. Union leaders and members who favor Biden highlight the positive impacts on labor and the economy, aligning with historically labor-friendly Democratic positions.

Trump’s relationship with labor unions is contentious. Union members who support Trump often praise his economic policies and efforts to bring jobs back to the United States. However, many union leaders oppose Trump, labeling him anti-union due to his administration’s labor policies, which they argue weakened labor protections, undermined collective bargaining, and promoted right-to-work laws that diminish union power.

Policy Impacts and Economic Approaches

Union members favoring Biden argue his administration supports labor union goals and protects worker rights. Conversely, Trump supporters within unions argue his economic policies led to job growth and prosperity, though these claims are often disputed by union leadership pointing to the negative impact of his labor policies.

Sentiment Trends

Pro-Biden sentiment among union members includes trust in his commitment to labor rights and his administration's tangible successes. Pro-Trump union members exhibit enthusiasm for his economic policies and frustration with union leadership, which they perceive as out of touch or excessively partisan.

Controversial Topics

Immigration is a contentious issue, with some union members criticizing Biden's policies for potentially undercutting wages by flooding the labor market. Trump’s stance is seen as protecting domestic jobs.

Political Realignment

There is anxiety over union leadership's engagement with conservative politicians. Events like Sean O’Brien’s appearance at the Republican National Convention evoke strong reactions. Critics within unions protest any engagement with Republicans, citing historical antagonism toward labor unions in conservative policies. Some union members warn that Republican overtures toward labor unions may be strategic moves to weaken them later.

Broader Implications

Union-related conversations about Biden and Trump are deeply divided, reflecting broader political polarizations. Union leadership generally supports Biden while criticizing Trump’s labor policies.

However, a significant faction within rank-and-file union members perceives benefits in Trump’s economic approach. This dynamic continues to provoke vibrant debate and starkly contrasting sentiments among union members, encapsulating the broader national discourse on labor and political allegiance.

The recent assassination attempt on former president Donald Trump has generated a tsunami of conversation online. In the immediate aftermath, social media platforms lit up with comments from various factions across the political spectrum, showcasing a mixture of disbelief, conspiracy theories, and outright hostility.

Some anti-Trump individuals went so far as expressing regret that the shooter missed Trump, causing significant backlash. Objections show a mixture of anger, condemnation, and a call for accountability. Many express outrage at such statements, labeling them morally bankrupt and indicative of deeper issues within American political discourse.

Liberal Reactions to Trump Being Shot

The left responded to the attempted assassination with a mixture of denial and downplaying of the severity of the incident. Some maintain it was an isolated event not indicative of a broader trend of political violence among their ranks.

However, there are also clear divisions within the left. Some moderate voices condemn the assassination attempt unequivocally while radicals either dismiss the event as fabricated or suggest it was deserved. Many, like Tenacious D band member Kyle Gass, made comments like, “Don’t miss next time,” or expressed similar disappointment.

Conspiracy theories quickly spread on the left, with some suggesting the assassination was a staged stunt designed to garner sympathy for Trump. These theories range from accusing Trump’s own team of orchestrating the attempt, to claims of a false flag operation to paint the opposition in a negative light.

Conservatives Object

Republican circles and Trump loyalists have taken the assassination attempt as further proof of what they describe as an unhinged and violent leftist agenda. They point fingers at the mainstream media, liberal politicians, and social media rhetoric for increasing the chances of violence. Many also speculate about how badly the Secret Service mishandled the situation, with critiques focusing on security lapses, lack of preparedness, and potentially cynical negligence.

Liberal reactions and the disappointment over Trump’s survival have caused many on the right to claim hypocrisy among those calling for “unity” and “lowering the temperature.” After Biden’s statements and the media’s relentless insistence on Republicans toning down rhetoric, many conservatives are enraged. Some are calling for anyone making heinous comments about the assassination online to face consequences.

Many perceive leftist sentiments as not only inflammatory but contributing to a dangerous climate of political violence. People condemn both individuals and the media for perpetuating or tolerating aggressive anti-Trump rhetoric.

Jack Black and Tenacious D

The incident involving Jack Black and Tenacious D showed a video of Kyle Glass making outrageous statements against Trump on stage at a show. This generated severe anger from conservatives—many of whom called for accountability for the celebrities.

BREAKING: Jack Black and Tenacious D are halting all future shows after bandmate Kyle Gass said on stage he wishes Trump was shot and k*lled.

In a new statement, Black says he was blindsided by the statement and was postponing shows.

“I was blindsided by what was said at the… pic.twitter.com/T1B5iDA3WT

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 16, 2024

Soon after the controversy, Jack Black released an apology and announced the band’s tour would be canceled. Some attributed this turn of events to an Australian senator calling for Tenacious D to be deported from Australia.

Australian Senator Ralph Babet calls for the immediate deportation of Tenacious D after Kyle Gass called on other would-be assassins not to miss their shots on Trump. pic.twitter.com/uNkD6ZJ5tB

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) July 16, 2024

Some Black fans criticized perceived censorship, arguing for artistic freedom and the right to controversial expression. Most on the right celebrated the acknowledgement and apology from Black. They also expressed satisfaction when reports emerged that Kyle Gass was dropped from his talent agency.

Cancel Culture Discussions on the Right

Jack Black and Tenacious D are a high-profile example of leftists facing consequences for their divisive rhetoric. But many on the right are also calling for average Americans to suffer punishments for their comments about the assassination attempt.

The prominent X account LibsOfTikTok has been calling out and documenting firings of many who shared Kyle Gass’s sentiments online. These “cancelations” have sparked controversy on the right about where the line should be for accountability versus cancel culture.

A particular case of a Home Depot worker losing her job has generated sharp disagreement. The woman was let go for making comments about the shooter online, allegedly saying he, “should have been a better shot.”

BREAKING: Home Depot confirmed this person is no longer an employee. https://t.co/LMfoMU5ava pic.twitter.com/DoH9JR2lsL

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) July 16, 2024

Some on the right say fervent backlash against average Americans like the Home Depot worker are taking cancel culture too far. This group often says they approve of consequences for those with large platforms and influence like Tenacious D, but getting minimum wage workers fired is “punching down.”

Others on the right argue that, to stop leftist censorship tactics, they must receive a taste of their own medicine. This group argues conservatives being canceled for their religion, COVID vaccine or lockdown objections, and denial of gender ideology now have an obligation to turn the tables.

Among those advocating for taking a harder stance, cancel culture is sometimes reframed as a form of "accountability culture." They differentiate between canceling someone for their beliefs and addressing statements that endorse or incite violence. Under this framework, calling for the firing or shaming of individuals who make particularly egregious or dangerous comments is seen not as cancel culture, but as holding them accountable for harmful behavior.

On a more strategic level, some conservatives argue utilizing cancel culture could be an effective short-term tactic in a broader cultural war. By demonstrating they are willing to fight fire with fire, conservatives aim to force progressives to reconsider their use of cancel culture. This, they believe, might lead to a mutual disarmament, where both sides agree to cease leveraging social and professional exclusion as political weapons.

Reactions to the first day of the Republican National Convention garnered a range of responses including support and criticism. One of the biggest news stories from opening day was Trump’s announcement of his pick for vice president.

VP Nomination

Trump selecting J.D. Vance as his vice-presidential running mate generated most of the news on Monday. Reactions to this choice are largely positive among conservative circles, with many the choices as a strategic move that could bolster support for Trump’s potential second term.

However, there are undercurrents of skepticism as well. Some conservatives express doubts about Vance’s past comments on Trump, fearing he might later downplay his allegiance to the administration.

Too Much of the Same and Too Much Change

Another significant topic is the overall organization and leadership of the convention. Opinions are divided here, with some attendees praising the convention’s coordination and the lineup of speakers.

However, there are also criticisms, particularly aimed at perceived favoritism and the alignment of the convention's themes with specific Republican figures. Some conservatives feel the convention did not cater adequately to all segments of the party.

The presence of non-traditional American conservatism and non-Christian elements within the convention’s content and speaker roster garners mixed reactions. While inclusivity is celebrated by some as a reflection of a modern and evolving party, others within right-leaning circles criticize this shift. These critics argue it dilutes traditional conservative values and alienates core constituents who uphold more conventional views.

Trending Sentiment

Concerns around issues of security at the convention come into sharp focus, especially following a shooting incident in Albuquerque and attempted assassination of Donald Trump. Right-leaning audiences display significant concern over security measures, with discussions highlighting perceived inadequacies in the Secret Service’s preparedness to protect prominent figures like Trump. This issue stirs anxiety and dissatisfaction among many Republicans who emphasize the need for robust security protocols.

There is also considerable attention on potential 2024 Democratic strategies to counter the Trump-Vance ticket. Conservative voters and pundits speculate on the lines of attack Democrats might pursue. Some dismiss any strategic options Democrats might pursue as ineffective or a lost cause, given the current political climate. The rhetoric is charged, with many expressing confidence in the resilience of the Trump camp despite anticipated opposition.

There is also enthusiastic support for speakers who embody traditional conservative charisma, such as Tim Scott. His dynamic presence at the convention energizes the crowd and garners favorable reactions, even if he ultimately did not secure the vice-presidential nomination.

Criticism from within the Republican base does exist, particularly concerning allegations of superficial commitments to action over rhetoric. This sentiment is encapsulated in critiques of politicians who are perceived as skilled orators but ineffective in implementing significant changes. This internal critique reflects a thirst for tangible results among the conservative base.

Reports of 20,000 Haitians in Springfield, OH, have sparked intense reactions across social media. Americans focus on national security, government accountability, and cultural impact, with many conversations steering towards extreme stances on deportation policies.

The recent influx of 20,000 Haitians has amplified debates on immigration, with supporters and opponents expressing strong emotions. Trending topics center on increased threats to community safety and socioeconomic impacts. There is a notable surge in demand for stricter immigration measures. Many express distrust toward Biden’s administration, accusing them of weakening national security by allowing uncontrolled immigration.

Sentiment towards mass deportations in response to this influx is highly polarized. Among those favoring tighter border control, there is intense advocacy for aggressive actions such as mass deportations to resolve what they deem a crisis.

Advocates for deportation argue the current situation represents a severe breach in border security and a burden on local resources and infrastructure. Hashtags like #BuildTheWall and #MassDeportations surface repeatedly, emphasizing a narrative of reclaiming control and prioritizing national interests.

Conversely, opposition voices urge compassion and structured assimilation policies. Critics of mass deportations highlight the inhumanity and potential legal breaches entailed in such measures. Discussions in these circles stress the need for reform in asylum procedures and call for a balanced approach that includes supporting asylum seekers through systematic means. Sentiments in these conversations often feature calls for increased humanitarian support and criticize the aggressive rhetoric of deportation proponents.

Public discourse extends to the perceived political motivations behind immigration policies. Accusations against political figures for either mishandling the border situation or exploiting it for political gain surface frequently. The narrative often shifts towards broader societal and cultural impacts, with voters arguing about the balance between preserving national identity and embracing multiculturalism.

Social media engagement rates reveal this topic remains highly relevant, with a significant increase in discussions linked to related keywords like "border security," "illegal immigration," and "deportation.” The dynamic nature of these conversations underscores the profound and ongoing public concern over immigration policy and its implications for future governance and society.

In analyzing sentiment trends, it becomes clear that, while support for mass deportations garners substantial backing from certain groups, Americans are deeply divided. There is also a significant push for humane and structured immigration reform. The issue of the 20,000 Haitians in Springfield acts as a mirror, reflecting wider national anxieties over immigration, governance, and national identity.

Kicking off the 2024 Republican National Convention, Ohio Senator J.D. Vance was selected as Trump's Vice-Presidential pick. The announcement, made via Trump’s Truth Social platform, has polarized opinions, highlighting various factions within the GOP.

Reactions from the MAGA Base

Among Trump's staunch supporters, the response is largely positive. Many celebrate Vance as a fresh face who embodies the working-class struggles that Trump frequently highlights. Admiration stems from Vance’s transformation from a Never Trump critic to a MAGA advocate.

This segment perceives Vance as a potential successor for Trump’s populist agenda. They also say choosing Vance is a strategic move to secure the Rust Belt states, vital for the 2024 election. His background, including military service and authoring "Hillbilly Elegy," is seen as appealing to blue-collar voters and enhancing Trump's image as a champion of forgotten Americans.

Opposition and Skepticism Within and Beyond the GOP

Skepticism abounds within segments of the GOP and among Independents and Democrats. Critics from within the Republican Party highlight Vance’s previous harsh critiques of Trump, with some labeling him a flip-flopper driven by opportunism rather than genuine conviction.

Those who are wary of Vance often align with "Never Trump" Republicans who view the choice as pandering to Trump’s loyalist base rather than a unifying strategy for the broader party. The concern is that Vance will do little to attract moderate and Independent voters who are critical to winning the general election.

Concerns Over Voter Impact

Analysts and pundits express varying perspectives on how Vance’s candidacy might affect voter turnout. Some argue his selection will invigorate Trump’s base, solidifying support among core MAGA followers. Others contend that Vance lacks the broader appeal necessary to sway undecided voters or pull votes from the Democratic ticket.

Discussions also focus on whether Vance’s past as a Never Trumper might erode trust among unwavering MAGA supporters or if his new alignment with MAGA policies can mend those sentiments.

Sentiment Patterns and Discussion Trends

The overall sentiment trends suggest a polarized reaction. Loyal Trump supporters largely express approval, emphasizing Vance’s alignment with Trump’s policies and his perceived ability to carry on the MAGA legacy. Discussions often revolve around themes of loyalty, transformation, and Vance's potential to attract working-class voters.

On the other hand, detractors focus on his history of criticism against Trump. These sentiments are also echoed by moderate Republicans and Independents who doubt Vance's ability to appeal to a broader electorate. Critics voice concerns that Trump missed an opportunity for a more strategically beneficial choice, such as a candidate who might appeal to suburban women or minority voters.

Patterns Within GOP Factions

Vance’s selection has illuminated rifts within the Republican Party. Trump loyalists celebrate the move as a reinforcement of their influence within the party. However, establishment Republicans and those with a more traditional conservative outlook express reservations, underscoring a preference for a candidate who might bridge the divide between Trump’s base and centrists.

Reactions to President Biden's calls for unity following the attempt on Donald Trump’s life is serving to create more division. Aggressive political rhetoric on both sides exacerbates the contentious political landscape. Many are expressing a sense of hypocrisy as Biden’s own words one day prior to calling for unity call Trump a “danger to the country” and democracy.

Biden — days after an assassination attempt on President Trump — calls him "a real danger to the country" pic.twitter.com/PCnJrZempZ

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 15, 2024

Conservative Takes

Biden's call for unity is met with skepticism or outright disbelief from both ends of the political spectrum. On one side, many conservatives and right-leaning individuals express hostility and doubt regarding Biden's intentions, interpreting his rhetoric as insincere or politically motivated.

They frequently cite examples of Biden’s own incendiary comments, along with other Democrats. They accuse Democrats and the media of fanning divisive flames against Trump and his supporters.

Many bring up a specific instance of Joe Biden saying it’s time to put Trump “in the bullseye,” which he later dismissed when questioned about it.

NBC: You called President Trump "an existential threat" and said it's time to put him "in the bullseye."

BIDEN: "I didn't say 'crosshairs.'" pic.twitter.com/RKeKVxULJ9

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 15, 2024

Sentiment among conservatives is largely negative, with repeated calls for accountability among Democrats and leftist groups. They express frustration and anger, claiming Biden and liberals are the ones provoking violence with incendiary rhetoric that goes unchecked. This group tends to feel their perspectives and concerns are regularly undermined and demonized by mainstream media and political elites.

Many on the right also point to the fact that Morning Joe was pulled from MSNBC on the Monday following Trump’s shooting. The network allegedly sidelined the show to avoid inappropriate comments on live television that could be used against MSNBC. Conservatives took this as an admission that MSNBC and, specifically Morning Joe, are part of the problem when it comes to divisive rhetoric.

Pulling Morning Joe off the air is an admission.

— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) July 15, 2024

Liberal Takes

On the other hand, discussions among liberals exhibit polarized emotions but focus primarily on the narrative of right-wing extremism and Trump's rhetoric. Here, sentiments veer towards portraying Trump and his supporters as the primary sources of division and violence. They accuse conservatives of inciting insurrection and civil unrest. Many also point out Trump’s shooter was registered as a Republican, placing the blame for political violence at the feet of Trump’s own side.

Liberals defend Biden's calls for unity as necessary and justifiable attempts to restore order and civility in American politics. They frequently highlight cases of violence attributed to right-wing extremists and decry the perceived hypocrisy of conservatives who fail to acknowledge their own side's contribution to the nation's divisive climate.

Demographic Patterns

Younger and left leaning voters often use social media to express their distrust and condemnation of Trump and his followers. They portray MAGA voters and Trump’s administration as threats to democracy. These sentiments are further amplified by older, staunch Democrats who recall past grievances and historical wrongs as justification for their current political stance.

Independent and undecided voters seem fractured in their reactions. Some feel alienated by the extreme partisanship and are disillusioned with both major parties. This group shows a mix of frustration and apathy, often expressing that the divisive rhetoric from both sides makes it hard to trust either.

However, violent incidents, such as the attempted assassination of Trump, have the potential to push independents to more firmly support one side over the other, depending largely on how the events and subsequent discussions are framed by the media they consume.