On Oct 30, former Mayor of University Park, MD, was arrested for owning copious amounts of child porn—including child sexual abuse material known as CSAM. MIG Reports data shows social media reactions to this event are outraged but ultimately apathetic.

Discussions have sporadically emerged across social media due to this high-profile case and a general climate of social unease regarding children’s safety. However, discussion remains relatively low compared to other topics.

While some voices rally for significant reform, most conversations reveal a public wary of sustained engagement on such dark issues. Within the existing dialogue, there is deeply negative sentiment and an undercurrent of apathy. This suggests, while Americans are concerned, they are reluctant to face these tragic and sensitive issues head-on.

This despicable “man” and former mayor of University Park, Maryland, was arrested with more than 45,000 files related to child pornography and charged with 28 felonies.

Joel Biermann (D) is a huge Kamala supporter and detractor of Trump. We need to protect our kids. pic.twitter.com/85kiWWRzKD

— Jessica O’Donnell 🏈 (@heckyessica) October 30, 2024

Discussions are Low

Although child exploitation and safety represent pressing concerns, general discussion levels on these topics are notably low.

MIG Reports data shows conversations directly addressing issues like CSAM, child trafficking, and systemic child protection flaws only constitute 2-15% of overall discourse.

The sparse nature of these discussions, especially considering the severity of the topic, suggests people are uncomfortable discussing it. When instances of exploitation surface, there are brief moments of public outcry, but discussions quickly lose momentum. Sadly, most are overshadowed by other trending topics or national political events.

Overwhelmingly Negative Sentiment

When child protection issues do garner attention, the reactions are profoundly negative. Public reactions often reflect feelings of frustration, anger, and betrayal, with people expressing disillusionment in both government and societal responses.

Sentiment analysis indicates a score as low as -0.6 on a scale from -1 to 1, revealing the depth of negativity. Americans are unhappy with how institutions address, or fail to address, child exploitation issues.

The negative tone is consistent, highlighting a strong belief that current systems and officials are falling short in their duty to protect the vulnerable. Comments frequently call out inaction, corruption, and a lack of accountability. They urgently want reform, which many feel is either ignored or deflected by those in power.

Apathy and Superficial Concern

Perhaps the most telling aspect of the discourse is a pervasive sense of apathy, paired with what many describe as a superficial or surface-level concern for children’s safety. While some voices advocate passionately for change, the majority of responses suggest a resigned, almost cynical view of societal priorities.

Many people appear skeptical that the heightened emotions surrounding cases of child exploitation will lead to lasting change. This sentiment points to a belief that public outcry has become performative—high in rhetoric but lacking depth and action.

This "surface-level" engagement reflects a societal malaise, where the public is increasingly resigned to viewing these issues as intractable, with little hope for meaningful improvement.

Campaign fervor is cresting just days prior to the election and MIG Reports data shows non-Trump partisans—liberals and Democrats—are leaning into performative outrage. Using dramatic language, hyperbolic expressions, and a repeated emphasis on extreme descriptors, this group is expressing high emotion.

Some do articulate reasonable concerns over some of Trump’s policies and potential influence. A substantial portion of liberals also seem to genuinely believe the outrage, calling Trump a fascist. However, much of the discourse skews toward performative expressions, crafted to amplify emotional resonance and foster a unified group identity.

Ana Kasparian clashes with Cenk Uygur on Trump, arguing that he isn't a “fascist” and the Democrat Party misrepresents him.

Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/RPvzniKyge

— AF Post (@AFpost) November 1, 2024

Performative Elements in Language

The language deployed across these conversations frequently borders on theatrical.

• Terms such as “fascist,” “Hitler,” and “authoritarian” are common, imbuing Trump with a villainous aura that aligns with familiar tropes.
• Critics frame him as an antagonist in a moral and political struggle.
• Despite the existence of other authoritarian leaders like Pol Pot, Josef Stalin, Augusto Pinochet, Hitler is only parallel most use to depict Trump.
• The lexicon signals a collective identity that rallies around shared anxieties and moral judgments.
• Embellished phrases like “end of democracy” or “chaos in America,” tap into a performative mode designed less to analyze and more to evoke.
• The prevalence of these dramatized expressions suggests the intent is to stir reactions—likes, comments, and shares.

The tone of many online posts shows stylized indignation. Common keywords like “garbage,” “disgrace,” and “complete disaster” create an atmosphere that leans heavily on hyperbole to drive points home.

Much of the discourse can be categorized as “outrage posting,” where media and influencers exaggerate language to amplify emotional responses.

Outrage as a Mobilization Tool

The performative outrage often functions as a mobilization tool.

• Posts pushing extreme discontent or alarmist tones are among the most engaging, with metrics indicating hyperbolic statements significantly boost reactions.
• The performative nature serves as a rallying call, mobilizing users by constructing Trump as a political opponent and existential threat.
• Posts often use an urgent tone, calling for action or moral imperatives that encourage followers to align with the collective response.
• Recurring terms include, “protect democracy” or “save America,” tapping into a mythology of resistance and survival.

Heightened rhetoric on both sides shapes voter responses, promoting a sense of duty among followers. The performative outrage is often a coordinated effort to convert emotional reactions into tangible support for the broader progressive agenda.

🚨 Warning - heavy TDS: Before my flight, this woman put her middle finger up at me. I ignored it.

After the flight, she walked by me before I could record and screamed that I was a “facist”. Here is the rest of the interaction: #TDS #5days pic.twitter.com/ra5zAa2OCv

— Melissa Robey (@Robey2020) October 31, 2024

Genuine Concern vs. Amplified Rhetoric

Certain topics, such as healthcare, education, and climate change, are discussed with less sensationalism and more emphasis on practical consequences. The language shifts subtly to discuss policies or potential impacts, emphasizing marginalized groups and vulnerable communities.

Moments of sincerity suggest that while performative outrage dominates, there is a genuine core that fuels these discussions, reflecting real fears and apprehensions among progressives.

However, the performative aspect tends to overshadow genuine concerns due to rage bait engagement. This dynamic suggests the structure of social media itself, with its emphasis on engagement metrics, incentivizes users to use a hyperbolic style.

Outrage as the New Norm

Progressive conversations about Donald Trump are contentious and emotional. The use of exaggerated language, dramatized fears, and repeated calls to action suggest the discourse operates primarily to elicit reactions, reinforce group identity, and galvanize support. Genuine concerns do exist, particularly on specific policy issues, yet they are often subsumed within the larger spectacle of outrage.

Language analysis suggests discourse is disproportionately hyperbolic compared to real, normal life. However, it’s also possible to conclude that many anti-Trump voters who exhibit what some call “TDS” (Trump Derangement Syndrome), are genuinely disturbed. There are also growing discussions about mental health, anxiety, depression, and anger tied to political fears.

American feelings about their wallets are dismal, with constant discussions about the economy, inflation, and housing prices. There is unrelenting frustration and discontent with voters online as people tie the direction of the country to dissatisfaction with Biden and Harris. They want change, strained by daily financial pressures and perceptions of governmental inadequacy.

🚨 CNN ANALYST: Just 28% of Americans think the U.S. is on the right track. The incumbent party usually loses when that number nears 25%, and wins when it is near 42%. This is a bad sign for Kamala Harris. pic.twitter.com/tCbXkPLihD

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) October 4, 2024

Can’t Afford a Home

Americans are dismayed over unaffordable living costs, tying these issues to political decisions and low housing supply—due in part to the massive influx of illegal immigrants.

Voters particularly critique policies in urban areas where prices are highest. The government's focus on broader political rivalries over actionable housing solutions angers Americans struggling to live comfortably.

Many say illegal immigration is exacerbating housing scarcity, calling for leaders to prioritize Americans. Voters want American citizens to benefit from housing initiatives instead of "overly accommodating" migrant populations.

🚨🚨🚨Tim Walz Approved an Immigrant Down-payment Assistance Program in Minnesota.🚨🚨🚨 SAME NGO that used Oregon tax dollars to give 30k to undocumented migrants.

The Minnesota CDC, similar to Hacienda CDC of Oregon, will cap down-payment assistance at 32k for first-generation… pic.twitter.com/RwICfEq3RO

— Breeauna Sagdal (@Breeauna9) October 31, 2024

Biden-Harris Didn’t Pan Out

Inflation is another focal point, with significant distress over soaring costs for essentials like food, housing, and energy. While some view the Inflation Reduction Act as a win for affordable healthcare, most perceive it as insufficient in the face of steep price increases.

Biden-Harris economic policies are largely under scrutiny, with critics linking the current inflationary environment directly to their policies. Voters suggest socialistic-leaning policies are hurting market forces.

Trump supporters juxtapose their financial situations today with the more successful Trump-era economic strategies. They want stability and lower inflation, even if they don’t like Trump for other reasons.

Left Behind

Economic issues as a whole encapsulate voter dissatisfaction. People discuss the allocation of federal funds and government spending priorities as hurting Americans.

Many citizens express disbelief over the amount of aid directed toward international conflicts, like Ukraine, while domestic needs are ignored. They voice frustration over high living costs and federal funds disproportionately benefiting illegal aliens. This stokes resentment around issues like entitlement sustainability and local infrastructure.

Voters critique the Biden-Harris administration's lack of transparency and responsiveness, with calls for policies that genuinely support the middle class. Social media discussions often echo Trump’s calls to shift from income tax to tariffs as a way to alleviate the working class's financial burden.

This level of economic unease indicates that Americans are dissatisfied and highly motivated as they consider alternative policy directions for the nation’s financial future.

In the final week before Election Day, there is a growing wave of discontent and frustration directed at Kamala Harris and Joe Biden. Many Americans are angry, betrayed, and skeptical of the political establishments. Momentum changes emphasize the growing disconnect between voters and the ruling class.

Themes of economic struggle, political distrust, and desire for strong, decisive leadership dominate the discourse. Recent polling shows Trump leading significantly in battleground states among voters who have not previously voted. This suggests enthusiasm among Republicans is high, and perhaps not so much among Democrats.

#NEW BATTLEGROUND STATES poll

Voters who have voted in...
🔵 '22/'24 primaries: Harris+3
🟡 '22, not primaries: Tie
🔴 '20 general election only: Trump+12
🔴 No voting record: Trump+19

NYT/Siena | PA/MI/WI/AZ/GA/NC

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) October 31, 2024

The Language of Anger

The language voters use is impassioned and confrontational, often with strong and colorful language, signaling more than passive dissatisfaction—but a call to action.

• People use phrases like “it’s time to wake up America” and “we’re being lied to,” going beyond mere disappointment.
• The tone suggests readiness, even a demand for mobilization, among those who believe a leadership change can restore the values and stability of America.

“Y’all need to go back to Ukraine & get my f***king money back”

Americans are getting angrier by the day as they continue to wake up. In fact it’s not just the US, but the entire Western World. pic.twitter.com/ZeGSrV7LA2

— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) October 11, 2024

Betrayal, Hypocrisy, and Urgency

Social media posts reveal a sense of betrayal and abandonment, as Americans feel deceived by political promises that remain unfulfilled.

• The language is direct, frequently harsh, and often laced with urgency—“it’s time to turn the page” or “we need change now.”
• Voters criticize Democrats for the failures of the last four years on the economy, border security, and social grievances.
• Words like “liars,” “garbage,” and “incompetent” permeate discussions, suggesting leaders are disconnected from everyday \working Americans.

Economic Disillusionment

Economic concerns are consistently a top priority.

• Discussions of inflation, wage stagnation, and rising living costs frustrate voters who feel neglected by policies they see as ineffective.
• Americans describe their struggles with affording bills, job stability, and housing—often blaming problems on failed leadership and out-of-touch policies.
• Sentiments such as “nothing has been fixed” and “the economy is in shambles” reveal a working-class who feel abandoned.

"Inflation has cooled, but people are still seething over prices," per WSJ.

"People find it unsettling that price tags don't look like they did before inflation took off during the pandemic, surging to the highest level in four decades."

— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) October 31, 2024

Anti-Establishment Fervor

A clear preference for Donald Trump is largely driven by anti-establishment ire. Voters view him as a counter to the inadequacies and corruption in the political class.

• Trump is often depicted as the antidote to systemic incompetence and political stagnation.
• Supporters view him as capable of restoring stability, strength, and decisiveness.
• Americans want a leader who can break the cycle of unfulfilled promises and ineffective governance, hoping to reform entrenched and powerful institutions.
• For many, Trump represents a sense of hope that resonates deeply with those feeling left behind.

Fear about Election Integrity

Following from the 2020 election, there is now persistent skepticism about the integrity of electoral processes.

• Voters on social media voice concerns about disenfranchisement, fraud, and dishonesty.
• Many have doubts about whether elections are truly representative or if they are, in fact, manipulated to favor the establishment.
• This distrust bolsters the desire for new leadership, with voters clamoring for transparency and reform to secure a system they can trust.

Oops!!! ABC somehow has the final results of the election in Pennsylvania, but there isn’t any cheating, and the media isn’t biased or anything. pic.twitter.com/C56NACylUB

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) October 31, 2024

After multiple days of mainstream media coverage of Tony Hinchcliffe’s Puerto Rico joke at Trump’s MSG rally, Joe Biden stole the news cycle by calling Trump supporters “garbage.” This led to Trump’s meme-like arrival in Green Bay on a garbage truck. All this dramatic and joke-driven controversy overshadowed Kamala Harris’s major rally speech at the Ellipse in D.C.

Sometimes the Democrat elite tell us what they really think of us. Hillary Clinton thinks we are “deplorables”. Joe Biden thinks we are “garbage.” Kamala Harris thinks we are so stupid as to believe her lies.

We deserve better. Vote Trump pic.twitter.com/cwEBnGSbLj

— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) October 30, 2024

Voter reactions show how each candidate’s strategic choices and surrogate impact are shaping the final days of the campaign.

• Prior to Joe Biden’s comment, Harris was leading Trump in national sentiment as news coverage slammed the MSG rally.
• After Biden’s “garbage” comment and Trump’s subsequent garbage truck stunt, public sentiment in swing states and nationally swung in Trump’s favor.
• In the national race, Trump maintains a support lead with 53% support to Harris’s 44%.

Harris at the Ellipse vs. Biden’s “Garbage”

Closing Arguments

Kamala Harris’s Ellipse rally drew an impressive crowd, reportedly reaching 75,000 attendees—a notable turnout for any candidate. Her message centered on anti-Trump rhetoric, January 6, calls for unity, and even, again cribbing from Trump, claims that a Harris administration would implement deportations for illegal immigrants.

Vice Pres. Harris addresses voters from the Ellipse, where then-Pres. Donald Trump gave Jan. 6 speech.

“He is the person who stood at this very spot nearly four years ago and sent an armed mob to the United States Capitol." https://t.co/ruQEQkjaUQ pic.twitter.com/MwPeAE9Ubb

— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) October 29, 2024

The speech resonated with her base, eliciting positive responses. However, the message alone fell flat with most Americans, including the pro-Palestine segment of Democratic voters.

Unfortunately, the content alone was not the downfall of Harris’s closing argument for presidential office. In the midst of her rally, Joe Biden was on camera making comments that swiftly took over the news cycle.

Biden’s “Garbage” Comment

Biden’s comment calling Trump supporters “garbage” flooded online conversation and news coverage. The episode drew outrage among conservatives who viewed it as another example of disdain from Democratic elites, causing team Biden to issue a clarification. The Washington Post helped with damage control.

Earlier today I referred to the hateful rhetoric about Puerto Rico spewed by Trump's supporter at his Madison Square Garden rally as garbage—which is the only word I can think of to describe it. His demonization of Latinos is unconscionable. That's all I meant to say. The…

— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) October 30, 2024

However, the controversy escalated when mainstream media and even the White House transcript began to spin the remark, claiming he wasn't referring to all Trump supporters. Discussion volumes around Biden vastly overshadowed Harris’s rally, adding fuel to the fire for those decrying Democrats over hypocrisy.

BREAKING: Rep @EliseStefanik sent a scorching letter to the White House Counsel demanding they correctly quote Biden's "garbage" comment after the official WH transcript EDITED it to cover for Biden.

They may have BROKEN THE LAW.

The WH is trying to rewrite history. This is… pic.twitter.com/EZEMTTkv0K

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) October 30, 2024

Losing the Spotlight

MIG Reports data shows 70% of conversations following the incident focused on Biden’s remark compared to only 30% discussing Harris’s speech and rally.

Conservatives

• Trump supporters are quick to point out the hypocrisy of Democrats and the media.
• They say those who claimed to be scandalized by a Puerto Rico joke were too quick to dismiss Biden’s comment.
• Many MAGA voters also embrace the label, calling for Trump to make use of the comment by working a garbage route.

Independent Discontent

• Moderates and Independents largely voice disappointment in Biden’s tone.
• They say it’s yet another instance of divisive rhetoric in politics, which contradicts Harris’s attempt at a unity message.
• Independents are disillusioned with the rhetoric on both sides of the aisle, but many recognize the incongruence of media coverage.

Trump’s Garbageman Meme

Adding insult to injury for Harris, who lost the news cycle, Trump arrived at his Green Bay rally wearing a reflective orange vest and riding a garbage truck. Social media erupted with commentary, making viral photos and clips of Trump into memes and jokes at the expense of Biden and Harris.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: "How do you like my garbage truck? This truck is in honor of Kamala and Joe Biden." pic.twitter.com/7UwMZ8syvx

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 30, 2024

Trump’s tongue-in-cheek and unapologetic style energizes his base. Embracing the garbage meme, Trump appeals to everyday, working-class Americans as refreshingly down-to-earth. He also took the time to sincerely assure Americans that they are not garbage.

President Trump is about to get off Trump Force One…and head over to the MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN Garbage Truck here in Wisconsin… pic.twitter.com/XpqvRFqgJv

— Dan Scavino Jr.🇺🇸🦅 (@DanScavino) October 30, 2024

Internal Biden-Harris Conflict?

The Biden-Harris relationship has also become a focal point of discussion across voter groups, with each side interpreting this dynamic differently. Many speculate that, behind closed doors, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have a rocky relationship where, intentionally or inadvertently, Biden ends up damaging her with his public comments.

Even among those who do not believe there is animosity between the two, most agree that Biden is not helping Harris on the campaign trail. This was once again demonstrated by confusion and disgust at images of Biden biting babies at the White House Halloween Party.

President Trump is mingling with garbage men at his rally in Wisconsin.

Meanwhile, Joe Biden is literally BITING BABIES at the White House Halloween Party.

WTF IS THIS TIMELINE? pic.twitter.com/wYIzsDjxDt

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) October 31, 2024

Republican Criticism

• GOP voters see Harris as complicit in Biden’s failures, viewing her as an ineffective extension of his administration.
• Many Republicans speculate about bad blood between the two, suggesting Biden may be intentionally undermining her.

Unenthusiastic Democrats

• While Democrats acknowledge Harris’s historic role, there is significant tension within the party.
• The base voices frustration over Harris's ineffectiveness both as VP and on the campaign trail.
• There are also questions about the division she causes among different groups like Muslims and black men.

Independent Ambivalence

• For Independents, Harris’s visibility compared to Biden raises questions about leadership within the administration.
• Many express sentiments suggesting Americans have “forgotten that Biden is president.”
• This group wants an action-oriented administration, and the perceived lack of coordination among Democrats is causing some to reconsider their support.

Reactions to Kamala Harris’s closing pitch in Washington, D.C. were tepid. There are significant obstacles for her, with criticism and skepticism largely overshadowing positive responses.

I am in Kamala Harris’s Ellipse rally crowd in D.C., and her whole crowd is angry pro-Hamas voters chanting “Intifada Revolution.” A Kamala victory means all these “lovely” people standing behind me will be coming to “protest” in your town. President Trump is the only one with… pic.twitter.com/xNg3Jl6ilb

— Charles R Downs (@TheCharlesDowns) October 29, 2024

Voter Sentiment

• Sentiment toward Harris’s closing pitch skews heavily negative, with approximately 70% of comments expressing critical perspectives on her message and policies.
• While some supportive voices resonate with her emphasis on democratic values, the dominant tone is critical.
• Primary criticisms focus on issues like immigration, corruption, and perceived leadership failings, and her lack of support for Palestine.

Independents

• Around 82-85% of Independents express skepticism or opposition to Harris’s messaging.
• Many Independents are frustrated with her approach to the border, seeing her policies as disconnected from their concerns.
• Americans perceive her as out of touch with citizen needs, viewing her focus on unity and democracy as insufficient to address immediate crises.
• Only 15-18% expressed support, typically referencing her work for marginalized communities, though this support was notably less intense than the criticisms.

Language Patterns

The language on social media is charged and polarized. Key negative phrases—such as “inept,” “failure,” and “delusional”—paint a picture of Harris as lacking the capacity to address critical issues.

Negative terms related to immigration and law enforcement, like “open borders” and “corrupt judges,” further intensify the critical narrative, as commenters often challenge her ability to lead on pressing national issues.

Supportive language, though less frequent, often contains “democracy,” “freedom,” and “hope,” portraying Harris as an advocate for marginalized groups. However, this positive language is overshadowed by the stronger negative critiques.

Independents

Language among Independents reflects heightened skepticism, often using vivid and direct critiques of Harris’s policies. Terms like “open borders” and “draining Social Security” capture the most common concerns.

The rhetoric suggests Independents view her priorities as misaligned, prioritizing illegal migrants over American citizens. Other terms like “defund the police” and “intifada” reveal an intense reaction to what they see as her radical policies. Many protesters, even in her own base, are furious about Harris’s support for Israel.

Just a few seconds in and Kamala's already getting drowned out by sirens. pic.twitter.com/Fype2ThqP2

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 29, 2024

Convincing Undecided Voters

Harris’s narrative, focused on unity and social justice, struggles to resonate with undecided voters. They voice distrust and anger in response to her closing message.

The dominant critique from undecided voters is the disconnect between her rhetoric and American priorities. They say her messaging lacks the substance needed to sway them. Keywords like “inefficiency” and “self-seeking” further emphasize a view of Harris as unable to address critical issues convincingly.

Critiques often emphasize Harris's lack of authenticity, with terms like “pandering” and “lip service” describing her message. Harris’s focus on unity falls flat in the wake of divisive rhetoric from Harris and, during her closing speech, from Joe Biden.

Shriveling Enthusiasm

Any enthusiasm generated by her closing pitch is modest and likely unable to counterbalance the significant opposition. Supporters rallying behind her message are literally drowned out by protests from angry Democratic voters and disillusioned Independents. Many Americans view her policies as radical and impractical.

Independents say her closing pitch leaves them feeling disconnected rather than energized. There is a sense of disenchantment rather than engagement. Harris’s efforts to invoke pride or urgency appear largely ineffective, particularly overshadowed by Joe Biden’s comments calling Trump supporters “garbage.

The online conversations of the past day continue charged discussions as the U.S. election approaches. There is significant engagement around cultural topics, the economy, border security, and recent campaign rallies. MIG Reports data shows Trump still leading the top discussion topics in both volume and sentiment.

The election is literally just people on the Diddy list vs people who want to be able to afford groceries.

Do you agree? https://t.co/tK8CU98Ewc

— Elon Musk (Parody) (@ElonMuskAOC) October 26, 2024

Culture, Ideology, and Alienation

Ideological divides are growing stark between the two sides. The most recent symbol of this chasm is President Biden's comment calling Trump supporters "garbage." This remark incited considerable backlash, particularly among MAGA supporters who see the comment as emblematic of a broader disdain from political elites.

• For many Trump supporters, Biden’s rhetoric confirms their belief in a hypocritical leftist agenda that uses one-sided cultural blame to demonize conservatives.
• Biden and Harris Democrats frequently emphasize MAGA voters as extremist, describing them as a threat to democratic values.
• These discussions heighten polarization, with voters expressing skepticism about the potential for national unity under the current leadership.

Still the Economy, Stupid

Economic issues remain central to the discourse, with inflation and rising living costs consistently vehicles to criticize the Biden-Harris administration.

• Voters recall lower inflation rate and better wages under Trump, contrasting this with current financial strain.
• While Harris claims to have big plans for middle-income economic relief, skeptics argue her policies are idealistic and lack practical or feasible implementation.
• Border security concerns intersect here as well, with many saying lenient immigration policies worsen economic strain.
• Many believe Trump’s economic strategies are more effective, hoping for a return to successfully managing inflation and stimulating job growth.

Border and Public Safety

Discussions around border security further sentiments that the current administration has failed, leading to increased crime and economic burdens.

• Trump supporters want a hardline approach, arguing strict immigration policies are necessary to maintain safety and economic stability of American citizens.
• The tone often reflects frustration with Harris’s inability to address the social and economic challenges caused by unchecked immigration.
• People want a law-and-order leader like Trump, whose proposed policies promise strict enforcement and deportations.

Rhetoric at Trump and Harris Rallies

Trump and Harris rallies are also a focal point, with commenters closely scrutinizing both candidates’ crowds, messaging, and optics.

• Harris’s recent rally at The Ellipse drew attention for its scale, despite being upstaged by Biden’s “garbage” comments.
• Trump’s events continue to face criticism from Democrats and the media over controversial humor and “American First” messaging.
• Biden’s comments about Trump supporters add to this charged environment, further polarizing voters who see these statements differently.
• Both sides receive criticism for their rhetoric, campaign priorities, and ideologies, underscoring the emotional weight of this election.

Housing Crisis Worries Americans

Skyrocketing housing costs continue to concern voters, particularly as many struggle with rent affordability or buying a home.

• Critics say Biden-Harris policies prioritize special interests over citizen needs, with some suggesting lax immigration exacerbates the housing shortage.
• The overlap of economic and housing issues indicates a public demand for urgent solutions that address affordability.
• Biden’s recent comments about Americans only intensifies frustrations among voters who see this election as elites versus average people.

Conversations about whether Americans view Donald Trump as a fascist are partisan. Trends in voter discussions provide insight into the impact views of Trump have on the race and following either election outcome.

Only around 35% the country voices genuine belief that Donald Trump is a fascist, based on comment data. The majority of those who believe this representation of Trump are strongly convinced.

However, most of the overall discourse expresses doubt about the sincerity of these accusations. Some say those calling Trump a fascist do so disingenuously.

Tim Walz: Calling Trump voters garbage Nazis doesn’t undercut our “unity” message pic.twitter.com/b1WbxA0vJY

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) October 30, 2024

Accusations Cause Arguments

Only around 30% of those labeling Trump a fascist initiate discussion about it in an original post or comment. This suggests the overwhelming majority—70% of comments—are reactionary rhetoric.

Rather than framing Trump as a fascist based on independent assessments, critics often respond to events or others’ comments to pile on with accusations. Trump supporters often step in to defend him once the accusation is made. This creates a series of rebuttals and counter-rebuttals rather than a primarily accusatory dialogue.

Dictator, Fascist, Nazi

The style of these conversations ranges from intense and serious to emotionally charged. Voters are strongly invested in the potential consequences of Trump’s leadership. Those calling him a fascist attempt to intellectualize it, referencing historical examples and using terms like "dictator," "authoritarian," or "threat to democracy.”

The overwhelming majority use Hitler or Nazi comparisons, despite numerous other examples of fascism in history. About 55% of these discussions use a serious tone, framing the danger of Trump as high stakes. This group says preventing him from taking office is pivotal for the future of American governance.

Kamala — increasingly reeking of desperation — is closing her campaign NOT by talking about the issues that matter to Americans, but by calling President Trump "fascist."

It's disrespectful to the intelligence of voters. If she had any self-respect, she'd be ashamed of herself. pic.twitter.com/aWXFb5L6Eh

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 24, 2024

Trump defenders instead take a defensive stance, often using mockery, memes, and humor. Some do question the validity of fascism accusations, calling them exaggerated or feigned rather than a substantive critique.

Among Democrats, 70% of comments are serious and alarmed. There is pronounced fear of potential democratic erosion under Trump’s leadership. The language Democrats use reflects a sincere conviction, with critiques often reinforcing each other and solidifying a collective stance against Trump as the ultimate adversary.

"Trump is my biggest obstacle in life, I think about him all day and all night" pic.twitter.com/aNfcOyhVXo

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) October 29, 2024

However, while a genuine belief that Trump is an authoritarian exists, some conversations on both sides suggest a bandwagon effect. Among critics, about 30% rely on hyperbolic language, using “fascist” as a rhetorical shorthand that lacks specific implications.

It’s Not Going Away

Trump critics frequently react to events and statements attributed to him, using these moments as springboards for arguments against his character or leadership style. Instead of presenting or asserting an alternate point of view, many conversations are driven by opposition to Trump—including the Harris campaign.

This reactive pattern elicits a strong defensive impulse from Trump supporters. They are quick to counter accusations they perceive as unjust or politically motivated. Defensive rebuttals against the fascist label reveal a cyclical and reactionary pattern between the two sides.

NY Mayor Adams obliterates the media:

"Stop asking silly questions like about if Trump is a fascist or HitIer.. It gives you headlines and clicks, but it is not what Americans are dealing with." pic.twitter.com/DETh84rGes

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) October 29, 2024

Americans are polarized on Trump with 55% of his defenders viewing accusations as overblown and partisan. Meanwhile, 45% of critics view authoritarian traits as a real threat. The conversation remains serious, underscoring the scope of Trump’s influence on American society and political identity. It also reveals a cycle of accusation and rebuttal, suggesting arguing is unlikely to shift opinions and only reinforce existing divides.

Joe Rogan's podcast allows public figures to connect directly with a vast and ideologically diverse audience—bypassing traditional media. And this election cycle, online content creators and podcasters have eclipsed the legacy media in audience reach, and potentially also influence.

Many voters believe, with internet generations joining the voting ranks, legacy media outlets—which are now facing a credibility crisis—could be obsolete before the 2028 cycle.

Donald Trump’s recent appearance on “The Joe Rogan Experience” had more than 40 million views on YouTube alone, just five days after its release. Rogan also posted the entire interview on X, implying YouTube may be throttling the video. Now, voters are discussing the impact of the three-hour-long interview, along with the pressure Kamala Harris is facing to sit with Rogan as well.

Since there's an issue with searching for this episode on YouTube here is the full podcast with Trump pic.twitter.com/sl2GTUaWdE

— Joe Rogan (@joerogan) October 29, 2024

Comparing the Risks and Rewards

The disparities in voter reactions show contrasting risks and rewards for both candidates. For Harris, the stakes are high, as her recent media appearances have not created an image of a proficient or confidence-inspiring leader. Democrats fear an unscripted interview would not make her more relatable but expose vulnerabilities in her policies.

For Trump, the Rogan interview played as on-brand for his persona. This is a double-edged sword as many voters cannot be swayed in his direction with more exposure. Others, however, feel the conversation’s comprehensive and casual tone made Trump more appealing to moderates.

Harris Stakes

• Vulnerabilities: High potential for a challenging, possibly damaging interview experience.
• Reward Potential: Could humanize her and bridge gaps with undecided voters.
• Base Voter Risks: Many Democratic voters see Rogan’s platform as hostile territory, losing enthusiasm if she were to appear.

Trump Stakes

• Strengths: Rogan’s unformatted style aligns well with Trump’s communication approach.
• Reward Potential: Further cements his position as a no-nonsense leader who has a depth of knowledge and willingness to speak openly.
• Moderate Risk: Potential to alienate some moderate Independents, though many in this group already have an immovable negative opinion.

Her Base is Scared She’ll Bomb

Democratic voters don’t want Harris to go on Rogan, voicing skepticism and concern. They voice their strong reluctance, centering caution around Rogan’s format, which often promotes freewheeling dialogue, challenging guests directly. They view this as a risk to Harris’s image, especially given the scrutiny she is facing over all her public appearances.

Democrat Reactions

• 70% of Democratic voters discourage Harris from appearing on Rogan, citing concerns his audience and style could expose her to intensified criticism.
• 10% say an appearance could sway undecideds toward her, a low figure exclusive to those who believe she’s a capable and competent leader.
• Key Concerns: Democrats fear an interview could backfire, as any missteps would be widely circulated and potentially weaken her already wavering campaign.

Rogan himself has commented, saying a Harris sit-down is not out of the question. However, his post can also be read as critical, saying the Harris team will not go to his studio and want to limit the interview to one hour.

Also, for the record the Harris campaign has not passed on doing the podcast. They offered a date for Tuesday, but I would have had to travel to her and they only wanted to do an hour. I strongly feel the best way to do it is in the studio in Austin. My sincere wish is to just…

— Joe Rogan (@joerogan) October 29, 2024

Independents Think She’ll Faceplant

Independent voters, typically more open to alternative media and diverse perspectives, advocate for Harris appearing on Rogan. They emphasize the importance of new media, but also express skepticism about the likelihood a Harris sit-down could change their votes.

Moderates and Independents responded mostly positively to Trump’s interview. They recognize Rogan’s platform could present Harris with an opportunity to connect authentically with voters, but many also believe she is not capable of doing so.

Independent Reactions

• 60% of Independents say Harris should go on Rogan, viewing it as a chance for her to address criticism and try to humanize her image.
• 30% say it could positively shift their view of her, only half of those urging her to accept the invitation.
• Key Concerns: Independents doubt Harris’s messaging and relatability will improve with longform content, raising further questions about her authenticity.

Rogan: "I'll give you 3 hours to say anything you want to America on the most popular show in the country."

Kamala: "No."

Leftoids: "So brave. Stunning."

— hoe_math (@ItIsHoeMath) October 27, 2024

Reactions to Trump’s Rogan Interview

Donald Trump’s appearance on “The Joe Rogan Experience” resonates strongly with his base. Conservative and right-leaning Independents widely celebrate the three-hour conversation, viewing it as an unfiltered display of his commitment to America and his breadth of knowledge.

Even among some undecided voters, Trump’s unapologetic style on Rogan’s platform resonates as authentic, further distinguishing him from traditional politicians.

Right Leaning Reactions

• Trump supporters view his Rogan appearance as reinforcing anti-establishment sentiments, particularly contrasting Harris’s controlled media performances.
• Independents are divided. Some found the candid conversation appealing, humanizing Trump. But others find his rhetoric polarizing.
• For many, Trump’s unfiltered approach is refreshing. Though his divisive image still alienates some moderate and undecided voters.

The Broader Political Implications

MIG Reports data suggests a Rogan appearance for Harris could be a high-risk, high-reward gamble. Her base appears unconvinced of the benefits, while Independents offer only tepid support.

Meanwhile, Trump supporters praise both Trump’s performance and Rogan as a pioneer in the new media space. Many who distrust mainstream media, calling it biased and in Democrats’ pocket, say presidential politics crossing into digital media is a positive shift.

Voters are also discussing recent news that GOP VP candidate J.D. Vance is also scheduled to appear on Rogan before election day. Increasing anti-establishment feelings and distrust in legacy media suggests traditional outlets may be facing death throes.

⁦@JDVance⁩ will sit down with Joe Rogan tomorrow - Live Updates - POLITICO https://t.co/7zK2uee79D

— Joe Rogan Podcast (@joeroganhq) October 29, 2024