Following A15 pro-Palestine protests which shut down bridges, airport traffic, and caused chaos in the streets, Americans are discussing disparate law enforcement responses. In places like California and New York, many people feel the police did little to uphold the rule of law. These optics are a sharp contrast to how police dealt with protesters in Florida where arrests were made, and protests quickly dispersed.

Much of the conversation is divided along partisan lines with more liberal and Democratic voters advocating for the protesters’ rights. Those on the right or moderates who value rule of law tend to voice support for the decisive response from law enforcement in red states like Florida.

• Sentiment toward protests on April 15 dropped in Florida to 31% from 43% the day before.
• In California, protest sentiment increased from 38% prior to April 15, to 40%, suggesting more support for the A15 protests.
• Palestine sentiment also decreased in Florida on April 15 and increased in California.

Backlash for Senator Cotton’s Tweet

A tweet from Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton has also sparked discussion about the prudence of civilian action to deal with protesters. Some people called his tweet a tongue-in-cheek call to vigilante action against protesters. Many others, however, took umbrage with the tweet.

I encourage people who get stuck behind the pro-Hamas mobs blocking traffic: take matters into your own hands to get them out of the way.

It's time to put an end to this nonsense.

— Tom Cotton (@TomCottonAR) April 16, 2024

Much of the negative response and disapproval toward Cotton's message came from liberals and progressives who claimed he was calling for violence. Some even went as far as calling for his resignation or even imprisonment.

This group accused him of inciting violence and promoting vigilantism against peaceful protesters. Some use strong language to describe their disgust, calling him a "disgrace" and stating he belongs in prison.

There also seems to be a portion of right leaning voters who agree that blocking roads is inappropriate and potentially illegal, but they disagree with the notion of citizens taking drastic actions. This group cites examples like Kyle Rittenhouse and Daniel Penny who both “took matters into their own hands,” and faced severe legal consequences.

Many asked whether Cotton would be prepared to legally defend citizens who intervened, if progressive activists or politicized prosecutors came after them legally.

Other conservative and right leaning voters voiced agreement with Cotton. They said the right to protest does not grant the right to inconvenience others or block public thoroughfares. They argue protesters who do so should face severe consequences, including jail sentences.

Law Enforcement Response in Florida

There's a mix of reactions to pro-Palestinian protests in Florida disrupting traffic. Many express frustrations at the inconvenience, while others focus more on the rationale behind anti-Israel and anti-America demonstrations.

Many Floridians commend police actions and the law-and-order stance under Ron DeSantis's leadership, particularly in dealing with Pro-Hamas protesters. This group often contrasts the response of Florida law enforcement with that of police in New York, California, and other large cities in blue states.

Progressives tend to decry any arrest of pro-Palestine protesters. Some even compare DeSantis to Adolf Hitler, saying his leadership in Florida is authoritarian and racist. However, many of the voices criticizing Florida’s governance also seem to declare their unwillingness to live in or even travel to Florida.

Perceived Inaction by Police in New York and California

Many people online criticize law enforcement in San Francisco and New York City for being passive. They believe police stood by during disruptive protests and did nothing when demonstrators blocked roads and bridges. There is a sense of frustration over disruptions to travel and commerce, accusing the police of failing to maintain order.

There is also frequent criticism for protesters for causing inconvenience and potentially endangering public safety by roads. Many are particularly critical of pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel protests, accusing them of causing unnecessary disruption, insulting America, and burning American flags.

Some protest supporters and activists who were reacting to the Middle East conflict which now involves Iran, drew attention to police brutality, arguing police officers even in blue cities are too rough with peaceful protesters. This group criticizes those who they believe are more concerned with the disruption caused by protests than with the issue of police brutality itself.

MIG Reports analysis of what Americans are saying online about their tax returns reveals mixed sentiment, however, general dissatisfaction. Many taxpayers express frustration and confusion over the complex tax filing process. Some suggest the system is designed to benefit the wealthy and corporations over average citizens. While there is appreciation for the various resources and services available to assist with tax preparation, smaller tax returns this year, amid overarching economic concerns, diminish the overall mood during tax season.

Sentiment seems to vary by political affiliation. Republicans tend to have a more positive view of the tax return process, citing the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 as beneficial for lowering tax rates and simplifying the process. This Trump-era Act was the only noticed bright spot throughout the online discussions. Democrats, on the other hand, feel the tax cuts disproportionately favor the wealthy and corporations, leading to a more negative sentiment.

As Tax Day approached, online conversations increased to their highest point in the tax season, while sentiment dropped to its lowest point.

Demographics

Economic classes play a role in shaping sentiment. Lower and middle-class taxpayers often express frustration over the perceived unfairness of the tax system, feeling that they shoulder a disproportionate burden. Wealthier taxpayers, while also expressing some dissatisfaction with the complexity of the tax process, generally show a more positive sentiment due to the financial benefits they receive from tax cuts. Although, in general all Americans seem concerned about the economy and maintaining their standard of living.

Age also affects sentiment towards tax returns. Older taxpayers, who are often more acquainted with the tax filing process, show less frustration compared to younger taxpayers who may be navigating the process for the first time. The sentiment among different racial groups seems to be mixed, with no clear patterns emerging.

Geographically, there is less sway in discourse and sentiment; however, taxpayers in states with higher state and local taxes, such as California and New York, express more dissatisfaction due to caps on state and local tax deductions.

Overall, while there are resources available to help Americans with their tax returns, sentiment leans negative, with calls for a simpler, more equitable tax system. There is also an undercurrent of concern that tax dollars are not being used efficiently.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas recently admitted the border situation is a “crisis” and said sanctuary cities should remove criminal illegal immigrants. While discussion about the border and immigration is still extremely negative, MIG Reports data shows voter attention has turned to the economy in recent weeks.

As the House prepares to send articles of impeachment against Mayorkas, discussions about border security are negative, though lower in volume compared to last month.

• National sentiment regarding the border has steadied around 50% in the last week as discussion volume has fallen.

Those who are still vocal about border security regularly mention elected officials like Mayorkas and Biden, accusing them of enabling illegal immigration. Voters express a desire for stronger leadership, prioritizing national security and law enforcement over political considerations.

There are also repeated mentions of drug cartels, indicating a concern about the connection between illegal immigration and organized crime. Most people talking about this issue believe the government is not doing enough to combat drug trafficking at the border.

Sentiment Towards Secretary Mayorkas

Many voters believe Mayorkas has failed in his role as Secretary of Homeland Security and that his impeachment could be a step in the right direction. They say he has allowed an unprecedented number of illegal immigrants to enter the country, leading to the "worst border crisis in history."

Critics of Mayorkas say he should be held accountable for the administration's mishandling of the border crisis. Many voters are also calling out Senator Schumer for not setting a trial for Secretary Mayorkas, arguing he is violating 200 years of Senate precedent and constitutional duty. Some suggest that Senate Democrats, particularly Senator Schumer, fear a trial could negatively affect the 2024 elections.

There is some discussion of the consequences of Mayorkas' policies, describing the U.S. as turning into a "third world hell-hole." People say increasing crimes and costs from illegal immigrants is unacceptable. They cite specific examples, such as a Salvadoran MS-13 gang member charged with assaulting police and family members, who was reportedly released into the community despite a detainer request from ICE.

Supporters, however, argue holding an impeachment trial for Mayorkas is simply a political move by the GOP. They argue Republicans have consistently voted against border initiatives since Biden took office and are now trying to shift the blame onto Mayorkas and the Biden administration.

• Discussion about Mayorkas has increased in the last four days, but his approval has remained relatively steady.
• Those who speak out in support of Mayorkas tend to view his impeachment as a political tactic by Republicans.

Views About Biden’s Border Policy

Many people continue to criticize the Biden administration for failing to enforce strict border control measures. This sentiment is often accompanied by a call for the reinstatement of Trump's border policies, which are seen as more effective in curbing illegal immigration.

Some Biden supporters voice opposition to the idea of building a wall and criticize such measures as xenophobic and harmful. Mostly Democrats, this group often labels the rhetoric around border security as a political tactic used to appeal to a specific demographic. They argue those in favor of strict immigration policies stigmatize immigrants and undermine the country's values of inclusivity and freedom.

As other MIG Reports have shown, however, there’s an increasing number of Democrat voters who agree the situation at the border a crisis. Some are now saying border control should not be a federal issue but a state issue. They argue the states should have the autonomy to decide their own immigration policies, in line with the Constitution.

• In March border security was the top issues in conversations online about Joe Biden.
• A month later in April, border security dropped significantly, falling below the economy and the Israel-Hamas war.

Growing Democratic Voter Disapproval

Many Democratic Party voters, particularly those with more progressive leanings, have expressed disappointment and frustration regarding Biden's border policies. They argue Biden has not veered far enough from the hardline policies implemented by Trump. This group tends to criticize policies like Title 42, which enables the expulsion of asylum seekers due to public health concerns. They criticize Biden for not being inclusive enough.

Centrist Democrats are more likely to support Biden's approach to the border. They appreciate his efforts to undo some of the more controversial policies of the Trump era, such as the "Remain in Mexico" policy.

However, even among these voters, there is a level of concern about the surge in border crossings and the potential political fallout. They worry if the situation is not quickly addressed, it could harm the Democratic Party's prospects in the upcoming elections and beyond.

After a recent video of Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee showed her speaking at a high school during Monday’s solar eclipse. Jackson Lee is seen calling the moon a planet and saying it is “made up of gases.” She continued to say, "The sun is a mighty powerful heat, but it’s almost impossible to go near the sun. The moon is more manageable."

Comments from Americans online about Rep. Jackson Lee's statements are overwhelmingly negative. While Jackson Lee herself claims Republicans are criticizing her for something that is unimportant, voters seem to associate Jackson Lee’s misinformed comments as typical of politicians who regularly make false statements.

People online are mocking her for making such a glaring error. Some even called her a “moron” and others questioned the quality of her education. Many express disbelief that she has been re-elected multiple times despite her perceived lack of knowledge. The conversation strongly indicates a significant amount of voter dissatisfaction with Jackson Lee.

Voters also repeatedly bring up the fact that she used to sit on the House Science Committee and the House Space Committee, expressing incredulity that someone in her position could make such erroneous statements. They criticize her as being uneducated, incompetent, and even question her intelligence and that of anyone who voted for her.

Several comments also sarcastically suggest she should be the first person to try to live on the moon, given her belief in its gas composition. Some also express embarrassment and concern over her representation of Texas's 18th district.

Another emerging theme in the conversation connects Jackson Lee to Joe Biden, also mocking him for his own frequent fumbles, inaccuracies, and obvious cognitive decline.

The newsworthy event gave people a reason to criticize her for her policies as well. Some called her out for giving a poorly prepared eclipse speech rather than addressing more pressing issues like crime, border control, and high taxes.

People also seem frustrated about her being a part of the Congress that levies taxes. Overall, the sentiment appears to be negative, with voters voicing disapproval and mockery.

• Rep. Jackson Lee’s approval dropped as mentions spiked after the video was released.
• Her approval dropped from 47% on Sunday to 40% on Tuesday, along with an increase of online mentions from 14 to 278,

Voter Opinions of People in Congress

This incident with Sheila Jackson Lee echoes a broader theme in conversations about elected officials. There is a prevalent belief among American voters that most Congress members are self-serving, unaccountable, and lack the necessary qualifications to effectively carry out their duties.

Overall sentiment seems to be one of distrust and dissatisfaction. Many voters display a cynical view of the "ruling class" and their qualifications for office. People often feel their representatives are more interested in ideological posturing than in serving the people.

Several people express frustration with the perceived hypocrisy of politicians, suggesting they are out of touch with everyday Americans. Others take issue with politicians' intelligence, implying they are not informed or articulate enough to effectively govern.

There's a notable level of anger directed at both Democrats and Republicans, accusing both sides of being pompous and corrupt, as part of the political elite.

Another common sentiment is a perceived lack of accountability among members of Congress. Several voters say these officials have managed to evade consequences for their actions, further fueling the belief that they are above the law. This lack of trust in the integrity of Congress could contribute to voter apathy and disillusionment.

It seems most voters are deeply dissatisfied with the current state of American politics. This suggests a potential appetite for new voices and ideas in the political sphere.

President Biden is once again trying to implement a student loan forgiveness program that would cancel debts for 25 million Americans. After a previous attempt was blocked by the Supreme Court, the Biden administration is seeking to gain charity with some voters by announcing a new, although scaled back, plan. This announcement has caused a variety of reactions – many of which are negative.

Overall, people seem skeptical and disapproving of Biden’s most recent student loan forgiveness attempt. Those who have loans to be included in the debt forgiveness are most likely to be supportive. However, those who do express support still seem to hold some reservations.

Suspicion That Biden’s Motives Are Cynical

In general, many voters express a deeply negative view of the Biden administration. They tend to view this move to forgive student loans as a cloying attempt to find positive campaign initiatives in the face of border and economic backlash.

A vast majority of online comments are extremely critical of President Biden and Vice President Harris, as some call for their impeachment. The language used is often strong, with some labeling Biden and Harris as "traitors," "imbeciles," and "the worst president and vice president."

Some voters accuse Biden of having achieved nothing significant during this administration. They argue Biden has done more harm than good and is therefore grasping for something – in this case debt forgiveness – to attract voters.

Many accuse Biden of misrepresenting the administration’s actions and intentions. They argue the administration is misleading the public about its ability to address certain issues like loan forgiveness at the federal level. Voters frequently criticize Biden, accusing him of lying, being ineffective, and being un-American.

• Sentiment towards universities is similar among both Democrats and Republicans, hovering around 50% approval.
• Biden approval on the topic of universities is slightly lower, averaging 46% in the last week.

Reactions to the Debt Forgiveness Program

Commentary on Biden’s most recent student loan forgiveness plan encompasses multiple concerns. Some include:

Affordability Concerns

Voters highlight the increasing costs of higher education, and the challenges students face in repaying their loans. This is mostly the group who have or had student loan debt and are more likely to express support.

Opposition Based on Personal Responsibility

Many others argue that anyone who took out loans should be responsible for paying them back. This tends to be among demographics that value personal responsibility and fiscal conservatism.

Accusations of Pandering to Privilege

Many voters point out Biden is offering an olive branch to higher economic classes and those who went to college, ignoring lower income Americans. They argue the plan panders to the privileged class, which Democrats and Biden himself often decry.

Criticism of Higher Education System

Some voters express discontent with the current state of higher education, including high salaries for college presidents and the shifting of cost burdens onto students. These voters are more likely to criticize the cost of education overall.

Skepticism About Implementation

Many question whether the President has the authority to forgive student loans or express doubt about the execution of such a plan. There is skepticism about the feasibility and practicality of loan forgiveness, and many argue Biden is simply trying to buy votes, knowing the plan is not feasible in reality.

Limited Support Among Those with Student Loans

Supporters appreciate Biden's attempt to rectify what they view as a problematic system of funding for higher education. Some who have paid off their loans say they still appreciate Biden's initiative to address this issue. However, they also express some skepticism, withholding full support until they see how certain legal challenges pan out.

While there is some approval among Biden’s voter base and those who would benefit, the negativity is much stronger. MIG Reports analysis reveals mostly negative conversation regarding Biden and student loans, his 2024 campaign, and his administration overall. The discussion about student loan debts often branches into adjacent issues as voters voice their disapproval.

In a recent revelation that has sent shockwaves through political circles, a former FBI agent, Gavin O’Blennis, was caught on camera discussing the agency's alleged tactics, including targeting American citizens and potential entrapment strategies. O’Blennis's claims, made to an undercover journalist, have ignited a fiery debate about the fairness of prosecutions and the existence of a double standard within the American justice system, particularly concerning former President Donald Trump and his supporters.

BREAKING: CIA Officer/Former FBI Boasts “Can Put Anyone in Jail…Set ’Em Up!” “We Call It a Nudge”

FBI “Did What We Wanted” with Alex Jones @RealAlexJones “Took His Money Away” “Chop His Legs Off”

Estimates 20 Undercover FBI Agents at J6, Works with Some of Them Now at CIA

FBI… pic.twitter.com/QxP20emKB5

— Sound Investigations (@SoundInvestig) April 9, 2024

Key Themes of Conversation

Disapproval of FBI and CIA Tactics

• Users express strong disapproval of the FBI and CIA, accusing them of setting people up and engaging in unethical practices.
• Demands for defunding these agencies emerge as a response to the perceived abuse of power and manipulation of the justice system.

Support and Criticism of Political Figures

• Discussion about Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (MTG) surfaces, with some users praising her for purportedly revealing the truth, while others criticize her actions.
• Allegations of political bias and agenda-setting within government institutions like the FBI and CIA prompt scrutiny of their role in targeting specific individuals.

Controversies Surrounding FISA and Prosecutions

• Anger erupts over efforts to reauthorize the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), viewed by some as a tool for unwarranted spying on Americans.
• The prosecution of individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol riot, coupled with claims of entrapment and unfair treatment, fuels discussions about the integrity of the justice system and potential political motivations behind prosecutions.

Analysis

Online discourse around the FBI official's admission delves into a myriad of conspiracy theories and suspicions surrounding the actions of intelligence agencies. A prevalent belief among some conservatives suggests a concerted effort by the "deep state" to undermine Trump and his supporters. This narrative often intertwines allegations of election fraud and accusations of biased prosecutions against conservative figures.

• Sentiment around the topics of “deep state” and “political opponents” took a hit as discussion of the undercover video increased.

The term "deep state" features prominently in discussions, with users expressing concerns about partisan agendas within government agencies and the perceived targeting of individuals based on their political affiliations. Criticism of media outlets and accusations of liberal bias contribute to the overarching sentiment of distrust towards mainstream institutions.

Moreover, conversations highlight broader societal issues, such as concerns about the influence of political correctness or "woke culture," and debates about gender issues and media integrity. Allegations of censorship and selective reporting further deepen divisions within the online discourse, reflecting broader societal polarization.

Conclusion

The admission by an FBI official has served as a catalyst for intense debates about justice, political bias, and the erosion of trust in institutions. The conversations reflect a deep-seated divide in ideologies, with accusations of unfair treatment and manipulation amplifying existing tensions within society. As discussions continue to unfold, the ramifications of these revelations on public trust and accountability remain at the forefront of national discourse.

The recent inflation report and Consumer Price Index (CPI) report show a significant increase in prices. The inflation rate has soared, signaling a heightened cost of living for Americans. The CPI report, a measure that examines the weighted average of prices of a basket of consumer goods and services, such as transportation, food, and medical care, has seen a corresponding spike.

Sentiment among Americans towards these economic indicators is largely negative. This is not only rooted in the immediate impact of higher prices but also in a broader concern about the state of the economy. Confidence in the market is shaky, and this uncertainty seems to decrease public trust towards the Biden administration.

Along demographic lines, political affiliation plays a significant role in shaping sentiments. Democrats are more likely to view the situation as temporary or a result of global economic conditions. Republicans are more inclined to blame the current administration for the economic situation.

Race also plays a role in voter perceptions. Minority communities, particularly African Americans and Hispanics who are more likely to be in the lower economic strata, are feeling the brunt of the inflation more and struggling to get jobs. Their sentiment towards the current economic situation and trust in the government can be described as highly skeptical and frustrated.

The middle and lower classes are the most impacted by rising inflation. These groups are expressing a higher degree of dissatisfaction and are more likely to hold a negative perception of the market and the current administration.

Geographically, there is a negative outlook – but for varying reasons. In urban areas, where public transportation is more accessible, the impact of gas prices may be less felt than in suburban and rural areas where people rely heavily on personal vehicles. However, price increases on food and general cost of living have increased concerns about inflation for most Americans. The reasons for negative sentiment and a lack of confidence in the government vary among voter groups but are similar in terms of volume.

Increasing prices, such as the surge in the national gas prices from $3.61 for regular, $4.39 for premium, and $4.05 for diesel since February 19, has also sparked concerns and discontent. These price jumps are impacting American households and businesses, particularly those in lower economic classes and in regions where commuting is essential.

Other timely economic indicators seem to mirror distrust and general dissatisfaction. Following the inflation and CPI reports being released, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 300 points. Several news outlets are covering the issue despite a history of complying with President Biden’s request to cover economic news with more positively.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and its reauthorization have been a significant topic of discussion, especially in the context of surveillance and privacy issues. It is critical to understand citizen perceptions about FISA and whether they believe it is being used as a political tool against opponents.

Political party affiliation has a significant influence on perceptions of FISA. Democrats generally have a more positive sentiment towards FISA, often viewing it as a necessary tool for national security. Republicans are more likely to question the act, particularly after the 2016 elections and allegations of its misuse against President Trump's campaign. They tend to view FISA with suspicion, believing it could potentially be used to target political opponents. Independents fall somewhere in the middle, with their views varying based on individual beliefs about privacy and national security.

When looking at other demographics, it becomes a bit more complex. Economic class, for example, may influence perceptions, with wealthier individuals tending to be more skeptical of government surveillance. Geographically, those living in urban areas, particularly on the coasts, tend to be more accepting of FISA, seeing it as a necessary tool in the fight against terrorism. In contrast, those in rural areas or the heartland are more likely to view it as a potential infringement on their rights.

It's crucial to note that these perceptions are not static but can shift based on current events, political climate, and individual experiences. For instance, perceived misuse or abuse of FISA could lead to more widespread skepticism, regardless of party affiliation or demographic group. Therefore, maintaining trust in FISA requires transparency, accountability, and ongoing dialogue to address concerns and misconceptions.

There is also a lot of distrust and skepticism expressed towards politicians and institutions, including the CIA and FBI. Many voters view these agencies as being part of the “Deep State.” Many people seem to believe there is widespread corruption and misuse of power at various levels of government. These individuals often use terms like “Uniparty” or “Deep State Cartel” to refer to what they view as a singular, corrupt entity controlling American politics.

MIG Reports analysis found the public reaction to the recent jobs report largely conveys skepticism and criticism, with some undertones of frustration and disappointment. This is a stark contrast from what Joe Biden has determined as, “A milestone in America’s comeback.”

The March jobs report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics claimed 303,000 jobs added and a lower unemployment rate of 3.8%. Federal Reserve Employment Data, however, reveals that 100,000 of those jobs belong to foreign-born workers.

Many criticisms also point out that full-time employment is at its lowest since October of 2020, while part-time is the category that is increasing. This is less optimistic since many workers need full-time work to make ends meet. The report also doesn’t fully consider those not seeking employment.

Americans are questioning the reliability of positive job reports, expressing doubts about the reality of these statistics. They voice concerns that these positive reports do not accurately reflect the struggle of many individuals who are unable to secure jobs. There is also an implication of mistrust towards government and authorities, suggesting a perceived disconnect between them and the average American.

The two general themes that emerge from the discourse are:

Discrepancy between job reports and reality

Voters express skepticism about the accuracy of positive job reports, highlighting the struggle of many who are unable to secure jobs despite applying for hundreds. The sentiment suggests the positive statistics do not match the reality on the ground, painting a picture of an economy in distress, despite official reports.

Mistrust towards authorities

There is a recurring theme of mistrust towards government, the media, and financial authorities. American suggest the ruling class is out of touch with the reality most of the population faces daily. By blaming economic woes on the general public, these authorities are seen as failing to address the root causes of job scarcity and economic distress.

Among other demographics, there is a sentiment of dissatisfaction for those who belong to the lower economic classes. They feel ignored by the positive job reports and express their struggle with finding jobs. Their perception is that the distress they experience is not reflected in the data.

American voters remain unconvinced of the Biden administration’s jobs reports. Fueling this distrust are real-world factors such as increased competitiveness from migrants receiving federal employment benefits and other economic factors such as high inflation. With many previous jobs reports being ‘adjusted’ weeks after their respective initial release, it is possible the current report may have to be adjusted as well, giving further justification to the distrust from Americans.