MIG Reports shows voters are comparing crime rates during the Trump and Biden-Harris administrations. As people engage with the topic of crime, themes of political bias, media manipulation, and immigration policies surface as focal points. These discussions highlight overarching concerns about how crime is managed, reported, and perceived in the current political climate.
Views of Crime Under Democrats
Data shows public sentiment leaning heavily toward skepticism about Biden-Harris policies for handling of crime.
62% of the MIG Reports data sample express distrust in crime statistics reported by the Biden-Harris administration.
45% believe crime has increased in discussions mentioning “crime under Trump.”
The disparity between the views of each administration focuses on immigration, political agendas, and media bias.
What Voters are Saying
When comparing crime under Trump versus Biden-Harris, many view Trump’s administration as maintaining stronger law enforcement policies. They mention border security and stricter immigration controls.
In contrast, Americans perceive Biden-Harris policies as too lenient, particularly regarding immigration and sanctuary cities. Around 62% of commenters blame Democrats for increasing crime. People link rising crime to border policies, citing specific instances of migrant crime. They say current policies embolden criminals and endanger public safety.
Discussions also emphasize widespread distrust of media and official crime statistics—like rampant distrust in job numbers. Many Americans feel the media is downplaying or manipulating crime data to protect the Biden-Harris administration, including David Muir in the recent debate.
These perceptions about incorrect data further generate discontent. 45% suggest that media bias plays a significant role in shaping public opinion about the administration’s effectiveness.
Conversations don’t contain any noticeable defense that media is not shaping public opinion. Many also question the accuracy of reported crime stats, citing the number of large metropolitan areas which don’t report crime statistics to the FBI.
There are examples, like one from 2022. Among 19 of the largest law enforcement agencies—all of which are responsible for more than 1 million people—seven were missing from the FBI's crime data.
Voters are also concerned about politicization of law enforcement. Many believe the justice system under Biden-Harris is biased, with certain groups receiving preferential treatment. This idea of unequal justice adds to the frustration and deepens the divide between supporters of the two administrations.
In Nantucket, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested four illegal immigrants charged with raping or sexually assaulting children or residents. Voter discussions about illegal aliens and sex crimes reflect an intense and emotional reactions. There is particular vitriol toward the Biden-Harris administration for its part in the border and crime crisis.
Americans are outraged, afraid, and frustrated as these crimes repeatedly shine a light on border security, migrant crime, and the incompetence of the Biden-Harris regime.
NEW: In a multi day operation on Nantucket Island, ICE’s Boston office announces they arrested four illegal aliens who are charged with raping or sexually assaulting Nantucket children or residents - all of whom were released from local custody despite the serious charges.
Sentiment is overwhelmingly negative toward Democratic immigration policies and border security failures.
80% of discussions focus on the administration’s perceived failure to address sex crimes, particularly child rape and trafficking, committed by illegal immigrants.
70% mention concerns about rising crime rates due to illegal immigrant crime and border policies.
60% express anger and frustration towards the Biden-Harris administration.
55% voice fears related to national security and public safety.
Americans criticize what they see as Democrats prioritizing political gain over the safety and welfare of American citizens.
Many call for stricter immigration laws and better enforcement of border security measures.
Throughout voter conversations, people demand greater transparency and accountability from the government. Many believe the Biden-Harris administration is mishandling the border situation, which they view as enabling criminal activity, particularly child exploitation. This pervasive distrust reflects a deeper fear about the erosion of safety and values in American society. Voters want immediate, tough action on border control and immigration enforcement to protect children.
🚨Holy sht
Former Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Tom Homan reveals that there are OVER 500k unaccompanied minors that have crossed over our southern border.
They are then released to “sponsors” and often sold into indentured servitude or the s*x… pic.twitter.com/f1Q44vVfCg
The recent surge in criminal activities by the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua in Aurora, Colorado has ignited a wave of public outrage. People express concern over unchecked illegal immigration, crime, and governance.
A "gang takeover" of apartment complexes in Aurora is at the center of discussion, causing local and national concern. There are reports of armed gang members controlling properties, engaging in criminal activities, and causing a surge in violence. Law enforcement has been forced to form special task forces to address the issue.
UPDATE: The city and Aurora Police Department, as previously stated, established a special task force in collaboration with other local, state and federal partners to specifically address concerns about Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua (TdA) and other criminal activity affecting… pic.twitter.com/ytAhIcBxy0
Migrant gang criminal activities include intimidation, drug dealing, and potentially sex trafficking. The increase of this organized crime is sparking debate about immigration policies, local law enforcement's response, and the pressing issue of community safety.
As migrant gangs establish footholds in suburban American communities, residents feel fear, frustration, and political disillusionment. MIG Reports analysis shows rampant fear about safety, the border crisis, and government complicity.
Immigration
Concerns over illegal immigration and border security weigh Americans down. Many blame Biden-Harris policies for the rise of gangs like Tren de Aragua. The conversation frequently links the gang's presence in Aurora to what residents perceive as an open border, leading to a deterioration in community safety.
Sentiment is negative, with approximately 75% of the discussion expressing fear and frustration. The public narrative suggests the influx of illegal immigrants, facilitated by "open border" policies, is a direct threat to local safety and stability.
Crime
Gang activities in Aurora contribute strongly to widespread fear and concern over migrant crime overall. Americans highlight the gang's involvement in violent criminal activities, including human and drug trafficking, which has led to a surge in local crime rates.
Residents are angry and frustrated at what they see as a failure of law enforcement and local governance. Sentiment in conversations is overwhelmingly negative, with most of the discourse focused on stronger law enforcement and more effective community protections against gang violence.
NGOs
The current national political climate also shapes perceptions of local communities toward Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). The negative sentiment toward NGOs often stems from broader ideological conflicts, particularly the belief that their practices align with liberal or progressive agendas. Critics argue NGO actions exacerbate illegal immigration, allowing violent offenders into their communities.
NGOs are perceived as extensions of the Biden-Harris administration, driving current immigration policies. Voters view them as tools used to implement and sustain open border policies.
Criticism of NGOs is not isolated to local conversations but widespread nationally, fomenting dissatisfaction with political leadership. Disapproval is heightened among those who feel NGOs prioritize ideological goals over community safety and social order.
This is a Major Problem
The overarching narrative on migrant crime and gang activity is one of fear and frustration. Residents in communities like Aurora express deep concerns about the threats posed by gangs like Tren de Aragua.
Border issues, which many believe are limited to border states, are becoming a national problem. Americans perceive government failure is causing the crisis to spread across all communities.
Voters distrust political leadership and believe Harris’s current and proposed immigration and law enforcement policies will be inadequate. People want more robust border security, stricter immigration enforcement, and decisive action from local and national leaders to ensure community safety.
Discussion of the border has reignited in the aftermath of Laken Riley’s murderer being convicted on all counts. Riley’s death is widely viewed as emblematic of the Biden administration’s failure to protect the border and the American people.
For many, Riley’s story exemplifies the threat of an “open border” approach. Americans are frustrated with the administration’s unwillingness to stop the border crisis and, in the case of Riley’s murderer, even providing free resources to illegals. Her tragic death has become a rallying cry for stricter immigration enforcement, with voters demanding:
Harsher penalties for illegal migrants who commit crimes.
Policies that prioritize public safety over migrant sympathy.
Migrant Caravans Try to Cross
Recent reports of migrant caravans approaching the U.S. border hoping to cross before Trump takes office elicit various reactions. Many say it’s confirmation of Biden’s negligent policies, saying migrants know they have a better chance to get in while he’s in office.
Public Sentiment
Many Americans are anxious about the strain on resources and law enforcement if large migrant caravans try to cross. The perception of a "border invasion" spurs calls for immediately shutting down the border.
Progressives emphasize the dire conditions prompting these migrations, advocating for compassionate responses. They feel the U.S. has a responsibility to help address root causes.
Prominent figures like Trump highlight the caravans to underscore the need for robust border security measures. He says this is a cause for mass deportations when he retakes office.
In areas directly threatened by caravans, local leaders voice concerns about the impact on their communities. For instance, Newport Beach Mayor Will O’Neill criticized California Governor Gavin Newsom’s sanctuary policies following the arrival of migrant boats.
Outrage at Democratic Leadership
The Biden administration faces intense scrutiny over border security, particularly the issue of unaccompanied migrant children. Reports of 400,000 missing migrant children reveal the accountability crisis in federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
🚨BREAKING: HHS Secretary is NOT ABLE to account for the over 400,000 missing children! pic.twitter.com/wa4e68Zj7P
Adding to voter frustration are local officials like Denver Mayor Mike Johnston, who pledged to obstruct federal deportation efforts by deploying the Denver police. This angers voters nationally as well as Denver residents who are tired of leaders who refuse to protect their own people from invasion, crime, and economic burden.
What the ACTUAL FUCK IS WRONG with our Denver fucking "mayor"?
Denverites will NOT be stopping them. If anything we will be on the side of the feds on this one.
Fuck Mike Johnston. WE THE PEOPLE will peacefully SPEAK OUT against our "government" on this. https://t.co/sOX6TdYdWe
— Dr. Vinnie Boombatz, America 1st Patriot 🇺🇸 (@flyboy0255) November 21, 2024
Voters express:
Anger at local officials pledging to defy federal authority regarding deportations.
Belief that Democratic leaders are undermining national sovereignty.
Crime, Gangs, and Public Safety
Illegal immigration as a cause of rising crime rate is a dominant theme in border discussions. High-profile cases like Laken Riley’s murder and growing concerns about gang activity permeate conversations. The Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang, now operating in 16 U.S. states, has become a focal point of anger about:
Dangerous criminals being allowed and helped into American communities.
The inability and unwillingness of current politicians to prevent such threats.
Moderates echo these concerns but also highlight the complexities of balancing crime prevention with the economic benefits of migrant labor.
The Tren de Aragua (TdA), a violent Venezuelan gang, has expanded its operations into multiple states, infamously taking over apartment complexes in Aurora, CO.
The gang is involved in gun smuggling, robbery, assault, and sex and human trafficking, with specific crimes reported in places like Queens, New York, where gang members dominate areas such as Roosevelt Avenue.
Jose Ibarra, Laken Riley’s murderer, is a member of this gang, bringing the issue of their presence to national attention.
Economic Strains on the Border Debate
While public safety dominates the conversation, economic implications are also high on Americans’ priority list. Around 45% of U.S. farm workers are illegal migrants and the agricultural sector faces potential labor shortages if deportations escalate.
55% of Americans worry about disruptions in food production and rising costs.
Farmers fear operational collapses if there are mass deportations.
However, many conservatives criticize these concerns among liberals and high-income Americans. They say this group is happy to treat migrants like near-slave laborers to maintain low-wage food and service industry workers.
Conservatives say safety is a higher priority than low-wage labor. They say it’s equally racist, if not more, for liberals to decry removing migrant laborers who are willing to work for low wages, as those who want to protect American sovereignty.
Kind of wild that every lib argument for illegal immigration inevitably advocates for quasi-slavery so they can have cheaper vegetables. https://t.co/NOd83MX2Sf
Donald Trump’s impending return to the White House heightens voter expectations for rectifying the border and tightening immigration policies. Supporters demand this administration restore “law and order” by:
Enforcing mass deportation policies.
Securing the border with a wall and preventing continued illegal crossings.
While conservatives express optimism, progressives fear severe actions could worsen humanitarian crises. Moderates are cautious, torn between supporting stronger enforcement and avoiding economic fallout.
Viral stories of Haitian migrants in Springfield, OH, over the weekend shed light on several alarming issues including claims that illegal immigrants are killing and eating local geese in park ponds. Voter conversations online illustrate a climate of fear, frustration, and political division. Sentiment about immigration is predominantly negative, with concerns about crime, resource allocation, and national security. The Biden-Harris administration is a primary target of blame, with many linking the perceived immigration crisis to larger systemic failures.
Haitian migrant wanders around the streets of Springfield, Ohio carrying a dead goose after killing it at a local park. pic.twitter.com/9JUy7qTSsp
MIG Reports analysis of more than 4,500 posts shows 70-80% of voters voicing dissatisfaction with current immigration policies. Anger and fear dominate, particularly concerning increased crime rates and the strain on public resources attributed to the influx of undocumented immigrants.
A smaller segment, between10-20%, calls for empathy and a more structured, legal approach to immigration. The divide exists, but voters overwhelmingly demand stricter controls and enforcement. Voters, including Independents in critical swing states express negativity about the consequences of illegal immigration.
Ruining Our Society
Language in election-related discussions on immigration and border issues tends to be highly politicized and accusatory. Voters frequently connect immigration to broader political concerns like election fraud, illegal voting, and the erosion of democratic integrity.
The Biden-Harris administration gets blame for enabling illegal immigration. Americans are frustrated over the failure of the government to protect citizens. These discussions emphasize the economic burden placed on taxpayers and highlight the belief that undocumented immigrants are receiving preferential treatment over American citizens, especially veterans.
Immigration-focused conversations focus on crime, safety, and resource allocation within local communities. People voice concerns about public safety, with many associating immigrants—particularly Haitians—with rising crime rates, including violent offenses. The call for mass deportations and a return to stricter immigration policies underscores a strong desire for action. The language here, while still politically charged, is more rooted in fear for personal safety and the welfare of local communities.
Ruining Our Lives
One of the most prominent themes across both election and migration-focused discussions is the perceived competition for resources. Americans frequently express resentment that public housing, healthcare, and other social services are being diverted away from American citizens in favor of illegal immigrants. Sentiment is often framed as a betrayal by the government. Voters believe leaders prioritize illegal migrant needs over those of vulnerable citizen populations, such as veterans and low-income households.
Nevertheless, They Persist
Despite the overwhelming negativity, a small group advocates for a more humane approach to immigration. These voices, though often drowned out by the dominant narrative of fear and frustration, call for legal pathways to citizenship and fair treatment for immigrants seeking better lives. They claim immigration policy should balance national security concerns with compassion and respect for human rights, reflecting a broader debate on how the country should manage its borders.
Public discourse about Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and their border policies reveals dissatisfaction, concern, and calls for action. Negative sentiment is sustained, with recurring discussion of policy failures, open borders, and fraud in immigration programs.
Border Security
Much of the public expresses disapproval toward Biden's immigration policies. There's a prevalent belief that Biden administration border policies are inadequate. People say this administration’s actions have led to unchecked illegal entries and increased crime. Most voters view the border situation as complete chaos and a crisis, voicing national security concerns.
Fraud and Security Concerns
There are many allegations of fraud in immigration programs. Phrases like "fraudulent information," "fake social security numbers," and "fraud revelations" are common. Americans view the Biden administration as either complicit or negligent in managing the immigration system. People often mention the suspension of the migrant flight program as evidence that Biden’s policies have only served to facilitate fraud and crime.
Impact on American Communities
Voters also link increased immigration to negative outcomes for American communities. They cite the cost of resources and taxpayer dollars, increased crime, and economic challenges. Many accuse Biden and Harris of prioritizing illegal immigrants over American citizens. Americans also resent housing and food benefits being provided to illegals and fear criminals entering the country.
Comparisons to Trump Administration
Trump’s policies provide a stark contrast to current Biden-Harris policies, generating a sense of nostalgia. Many believe Trump’s policies were more effective in curbing illegal immigration, praising things like Remain in Mexico and the border wall. People also express resentment at many of these policies which the Biden administration has reversed.
Political Ramifications
Biden’s border security failures have the potential to be devastating at the ballot box. There's widespread anger at Biden’s immigration policies which could impact voter decisions in November. This negativity crosses political lines as more Democrats—especially in sanctuary cities—express anger at the current situation. Some also fear election fraud and the potential for illegal immigrants to vote.
Personal Attacks
The border is a polarizing and hotly debated issue, with many conversations becoming passionate and emotional. People use words like “incompetence,” “failure,” and “corruption” to describe Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. People criticize Biden’s cognitive decline and Harris’s unintelligent public image.
Americans are Angry
Voters demand more effective policies. They express a sense of urgency and crisis, fuming at the government’s apparent lack of desire to protect U.S. interests. Voters are not just critical but also highly mobilized, suggesting immigration is a motivating issue when it comes to voting.
Following the assassination attempt on Donald Trump and Joe Biden dropping out of the presidential race, online discussion has become increasingly volatile. Particularly after July 7, discussion volume and sentiment has fluctuated significantly.
Immigration Issues
Prior to July 7, fluctuations in discussion volume and sentiment were minimal.
After, discussion volume increased by 635%, with volumes moving from an average of around 593 to a peak of 4,359.
Sentiment also varied more widely, swinging by about 14%. The average sentiment rose from around 37% to a peak of 45%.
Border Security
Before July 7, changes in both metrics were minimal.
After, discussion increased 750% from an average of around 842 to 7,157.
Sentiment fluctuated by 13%, indicating greater shifts in public mood, moving from 39% to a peak of 43%.
Immigration Issues
Top topics repeatedly center around the massive influx of illegal immigrants in the U.S. People assert that millions have entered the U.S. since Biden took office, with true numbers impossible to track. Voters often mention crimes involving illegal immigrants, expressing their frustration that this situation is allowed to continue.
Sentiment Trends
Public sentiment scrutinizes Democratic unwillingness to address the border. People discuss reports of rampant fraud in immigration programs and refusal by politicians to enact existing policies.
Allegations of the migrant flight program being paused due to systemic fraud, involving duplicate and fake Social Security numbers, fraudulent sponsor applications, and misuse of addresses, infuriate Americans. People say this exemplifies the administration's complicity in allowing criminals into the country.
Vice President Kamala Harris’s role as Border Czar also erodes the administration’s image. People criticize Harris and the media for attempting to change the narrative around her role at the border. Media claims that she was “never Border Czar” and not in charge of enforcement makes voters angry.
Negativity on the border and immigration catalyzes support for figures like Trump who promise to restore stringent immigration laws and reinforced border security.
President-elect Trump is already changing sentiment tides on the border, just a week after being elected. For most of 2024, polling showed upwards of 75% of voters viewed the border as either a serious threat or a crisis.
CBS POLL: 75% of Americans "see the situation at the U.S./Mexico border as either a 'crisis' or a 'very serious situation'" — a "notable increase" from previous surveys pic.twitter.com/uumUM0gCQs
Following Trump’s win, sentiment immediately improved—particularly with news of new leadership and promises of deportation. Americans on the left and the right demand secure borders and national sovereignty, though some leftist Democrats still object to Republican border plans.
Since November 5, border and immigration sentiment has increased, reaching the high 40% range.
MIG Reports data also shows sentiment toward Biden’s DHS secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on a consistent decline to 41% in the days after the election.
A slight bump in Mayorkas’s sentiment over the weekend is due to celebrations over his imminent departure from DHS.
The Immediate Trump Effect
A distinct mood change has been evident in the first few days since Trump’s victory. Voters, especially Republicans, express confidence that a Trump 2.0 administration will address longstanding border issues.
Voters regularly say things like, “More has been accomplished in 72 hours than in the previous 3 1/2 years.” Trump’s pick of former acting ICE director Tom Homan as Border Czar fuels excitement and optimism. Border Patrol and ICE agents who were constrained for years, now feel empowered to enforce policies effectively.
Rapid Mood Change
Border Patrol and ICE agents report a “total 180” shift in morale, with many expressing renewed hope in their ability to fulfill their duties.
The morale boost comes from Trump’s victory, and Homan’s leadership, which are both seen as positive for immigration enforcement.
Republicans Versus Democrats
Around 80% of Republicans voice support for Trump’s immigration plans, emphasizing mass deportations and border wall completion.
Democrats are less vocal as only 20% are commenting. Those who are engaging in the discussion express concern about the humanitarian impact of stricter policies.
Immediate public perception shifts show the early impacts of Trump’s win are already evident. Voters are eager to improve border enforcement for several key reasons.
Key Issues Voters Want Addressed
Migrant Caravans being discouraged and even disbanded are a positive for voters. Many view reports that caravans are dissolving as a concrete result of Trump’s tough image. Voters see stopping caravans as symbolic of regained control of the U.S. border.
Mass Deportation is still high on the list of things voters want. Enthusiasm for mass deportations is high, particularly among those who link illegal immigration to crime and economic strain. Voters hope deportation will be a cornerstone of Trump’s immigration agenda, especially for illegals who commit crimes once inside the U.S.
Prioritizing Public Resources is a common refrain among Republicans. They say taxpayer funds should prioritize American citizens over illegal immigrants. Many advocate reallocating resources to benefit veterans and citizens in need, instead of providing aid to people who should not be here.
Job Market Benefits are another expectation for securing the border. Many say a reduced strain on social services and less job competitions will create more opportunities for American workers. People point out that most of the job growth under Biden-Harris benefitted foreign-born workers.
Sanctuary City Policies remain a focal point for Trump supporters. They view migrant sanctuaries as a roadblock to federal enforcement. With the new administration, voters expect stricter immigration policy alignment nationwide, overriding local policies that protect illegal immigrants and enforcing federal policies.
New Leadership in Tom Homan and speculations about North Dakota Governor Kristi Noem replacing Alejandro Mayorkas as DHS secretary spark discussion. Voters want strong leaders who will take decisive action to shore up the border and combat Democratic influence.
Mood Shift and Enthusiasm
Empowered Law Enforcement for Border Patrol and ICE agents under Trump 2.0 generates excitement and energy. Many agents, previously constrained by restrictive policies, are reportedly “ecstatic to go to work,” ready to act without Biden-Harris limitations tying their hands.
Killing "Woke" Policies drives hope for shifting away from progressive open border policies. Americans want a return to past norms where national sovereignty and citizen protection take priority over globalist and progressive immigration ideals.
Law and Order emphasis under Trump brings relief to voters who see current Democratic policies as detrimental to American communities. Voters believe Trump can stop increased crime among illegal immigrants and restore the rule of law.
Crime and Trafficking connected to illegal immigration also motivates voters. An open border is often synonymous with increased violent crime, drug trafficking, and gang activity. Voters point to problems like those in Aurora, Colorado, as exemplifying the need for anti-gang and anti-cartel border enforcement.
Partisan Divides cause friction between Republicans who are celebrating renewed border security and Democrats who fear mass deportations could lead to human rights abuses. Despite an overwhelming majority of Americans supporting strict borders, Democrats continue to oppose Trump’s policies—many of which were standard under Obama.
NEW: @ScottJenningsKY takes CNN panel to school by dropping some simple facts about deportations:
“It’s overwhelmingly popular. Everybody is trying to make this controversial. This is not controversial. Presidents always deport people."
Online discussions about Vice President Kamala Harris and her role as “Border Czar” under President Joe Biden is notably critical and with widespread disapproval. The public prominently questions her efficacy and commitment to addressing the complex issues at the southern border, often emphasizing her lack of communication with top Border Patrol officials like Jason Owens and Raul Ortiz. This perceived neglect fuels a narrative of incompetence and inaction.
What People Are Saying
Top topics in these conversations include illegal immigration, crime rates associated with migrant populations, and the economic or social impacts of border policies. Words and phrases such as "illegal immigrants," "cartels," "border crisis," and "fentanyl deaths" frequently surface, underscoring the public's focus on security threats and their repercussions on American communities.
The narrative also revisits Harris's past comments from 2019, where she dismissed the idea of a border crisis. This exacerbates the current sentiment that she is detached from the reality on the ground.
The Trump campaign’s efforts to spotlight Harris's border record drive many recent conversations. Trump’s calls with influencers like Border Patrol Union Presidents Brandon Judd and Paul Perez reinforce the critique of Harris as Border Czar. Recent Trump PAC advertisements Biden-Harris border failures, highlighting comments from Harris supporting decriminalizing illegal immigration and abolishing ICE.
Media Try to Change the Narrative
Many Americans, who are already disillusioned with the mainstream media, are pointing out rushed attempts to change Harris’s border narrative. Outlets are now claiming that Biden never appointed Harris as “Border Czar,” despite the very same outlets reporting on in at the time.
Axios in particular is facing severe backlash for retroactively correcting its own reporting calling Harris Border Czar. People rip Axios and other mainstream outlets attempting to walk back their own reporting in efforts to improve Harris’s image. Voters, especially on the right, accuse mainstream media of shaping politicized narrative and lying to Americans.
Journalists were calling Kamala the border czar until like five minutes ago. Don't let the media gaslight you. pic.twitter.com/oveoFcBn4G
Voters mostly feel Harris’s tenure as a failure. They attribute severe consequences like increased crime, profit gains for cartels, and widespread fentanyl deaths to her Border Czar policies. The criticism intensifies with claims of Harris's policies harming Special Education services due to resource strains caused by illegal immigration.
If the critical sentiment towards Harris solidifies among undecided voters, it is likely to hurt her presidential campaign given border security is a high-priority issue.
When Americans are aware of migrant crimes against children, particularly those involving trafficking and abuse, they are furious. Voter conversations show widespread concern and anger over child safety.
People’s reactions are shaped by their awareness of these crimes and their perceptions of the underlying problems. This analysis explores prevailing sentiments, focusing on how awareness impacts public emotions and beliefs about the impact of unchecked immigration on American children.
Awareness and Emotional Impact
People are increasingly aware of the crimes committed by migrants, especially those involving children. This awareness triggers intense emotional responses, predominantly fear and outrage. Approximately 75-85% express negative sentiments, with voters expressing alarm over child trafficking and abuse linked to illegal immigration.
Americans view these crimes as an imminent threat to the safety their children, heightening a sense of urgency and desperation. Fears are compounded by frequent mentions of specific incidents involving children, which serve to personalize and amplify emotional impact.
The public’s awareness of these issues does not merely evoke concern but generates discussion of societal vulnerability and government failure. When the media reports crimes against children, Americans express outrage, often blaming Biden-Harris policies as facilitating increased dangers.
BREAKING: Illegal aliens tried to hijack 2 buses full of kids in San Diego
Voters discussing these issues regularly insist the root of the problem is the Biden-Harris border. People view these policies as too lenient, allowing criminals to exploit vulnerable populations, particularly children.
MIG Reports analysis shows 70-80% of discussions emphasize the belief that open borders and ineffective enforcement contribute directly to the rise in migrant crime. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris receive the blame as voters assert their immigration policy is a major failure.
National sentiment is that leaders have both failed to protect citizens and created a situation where migrants can commit these crimes with impunity. There are widespread calls for stricter immigration controls and harsher penalties crimes—especially against children.
There is also a growing distrust of government institutions, with around 60% suggesting government agencies and nonprofits are either complicit in or negligent toward the border crisis.
Role of NGOs at the Border
Many Americans accuse Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) of facilitating illegal immigration. They regularly implicate these organizations in the crimes committed by migrants, particularly those involving children.
The means sentiment is predominantly negative as people express outrage and betrayal, believing NGOs enable human trafficking and other criminal activities. This distrust is further exacerbated by the perception that NGOs prioritize the welfare of migrants over the safety of citizens. Many people call for stricter regulation and oversight of these organizations.
Some of the reasons Americans give for blaming NGOs include:
Operational Practices: Some say NGOs providing aid like shelter and legal advice to migrants facilitate illegal immigration by making the journey more viable.
Collaboration with Smugglers: There's suspicion that some NGOs inadvertently or directly aid smugglers with logistical support or information.
Political and Ideological Motives: Some view NGOs, especially those with international affiliations, as pushing for U.S. open borders or demographic change.
Financial Incentives: Critics say NGOs, often funded by governments or international bodies, encourage migration because their financial benefits are tied to the scale of the crisis they manage.
Misuse of Resources: People say NGOs divert resources meant for legal residents to illegal migrants.
Lack of Accountability: Lack of oversight at the U.S. border causes accusations of activities beyond humanitarian aid, potentially including trafficking.
Anger at Cartels
Voters also cite cartels as a root cause of violence and trafficking across the U.S. border. Public sentiment strongly links the activities of Mexican cartels to the broader issue of border security and safety for American communities.
Discussion reflects a widespread belief that lax border policies allow cartels to thrive, facilitating and even encouraging drug trafficking and child trafficking. This fuels public demand for more aggressive measures to combat cartel influence.
Additional Themes
Beyond the complicity of government and NGOs with cartels, Americans also discuss broader societal issues like the erosion of American cultural and moral values through immigration.
Citizens express concern that the influx of migrants, coupled with the government's inaction, is leading to a decline in societal standards. Many argue that migrants who increasingly do not assimilate, deepen national cultural fractures and erode Americans values.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
_.png)
_.png)
_.png)
_.png)
_.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)