culture Articles
-
The FBI made waves on social media by announcing racist text messages targeting black students. This ignited strong reactions from voters across the political spectrum. The incident elicits different reactions from Republicans and Democrats, each viewing it through a lens of political belief and social priorities.
FBI Statement on Offensive and Racist Text Messageshttps://t.co/vpQYAO6LT7 pic.twitter.com/iDtN36WhX4
— FBI (@FBI) November 7, 2024- Republicans emphasize personal responsibility, downplaying claims of widespread racism as a distraction from pressing issues like the economy.
- Democrats see the messages as evidence of systemic racism and call for reforms to address broader social inequities.
- Independents show mixed reactions, with some expressing frustration at the divisive narratives and calling unity.
Republicans React
On the right, voters largely interpret the reports of racist texts as “woke” overreactions. They are skeptical of racial incidents being given unwarranted attention for political gain. This group says news and federal agencies should focus on more pressing issues.
Many Republicans who already have very low trust in institutions like the FBI question the motivation for investigations. And some, including Rep. Thomas Massie, even jokingly suggest the FBI itself is creating a hoax.
It’s probably y’all sending them. Pack your bags. https://t.co/1EazekPpwI
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) November 8, 2024- Skepticism: 54% of Republicans see the emphasis on these incidents as politically driven. They question the motivations behind amplifying the issue, often viewing it as Democratic leaders “pouncing” to sway public opinion.
- Individual Responsibility: Many Republicans argue incidents like these reflect individual behavior, not an indictment of Republicans writ large. They emphasize personal accountability over sweeping indictments.
- Economic Concerns: 63% of Republicans tie these racial issues to a perceived neglect of bigger issues like the economy. Some see the focus on racial grievances as misdirected energy, diverting attention from unifying issues.
Conservative voters say the Democratic approach to racial issues polarizes rather than unites. They criticize focusing on identity politics at the expense of addressing more substantive issues.
Democrats React
The left sees the text messages as part of a much larger problem of systemic and cultural racism. Their responses emphasize the importance of recognizing and addressing issues in educational institutions and communities, often condemning MAGA supporters as racist.
Let me just say I’m thankful for the texts & the calls, but nothing that I do has ever been about me. The pain that I feel is for “US” collectively, as a World.
— Jasmine Crockett (@JasmineForUS) November 7, 2024
I NEVER like being wrong but I’m praying that I am… the immediate aftermath 👇🏾doesn’t give me much hope, but… pic.twitter.com/GIKTmeM9ct- Outrage: 83% of Democratic responses voice anger toward the incident, demanding immediate action and accountability for those responsible.
- Systemic Hatred: Democrats consistently view incidents like these as symptomatic of systemic racial issues. Many also say it’s representative of Trump voters and those on the right.
- Mobilization: They call for requirements around racial sensitivity and inclusivity, particularly on college campuses. They argue inclusion training is essential to prevent incidents like these and foster equity.
For many Democrats, these reports confirm assumptions that Republicans and conservatives are largely racist. They point to jokes and memes among Republicans as contributing to the problem—including black and gay Republicans making jokes about themselves being “sent to camps” or other tropes.
Independents React
Independents generally express a desire for unity and moderation, but they are torn between the polarized narratives. Some Independents resonate with the Republican emphasis on personal responsibility, while others decry racism.
- Mixed Reactions: Some Independents are frustrated by the grave responses to what they perceive as a troll. Others call for accountability, wary of greater division through racism.
- Local Over National: Many prioritize community-level solutions, such as fostering dialogue and understanding rather than calling for systemic or partisan action.
- Practical Solutions: Some Independents express frustration with both parties, advocating for addressing local needs rather than feeding into national ideological divides.
Themes of Division and Polarization
Both Republican and Democratic voters feel a sense of betrayal but for different reasons. Those on the right accuse the left of amplifying and even fanning the flames of racism, while Democrats cry out against unacceptable and harmful language.
- Narrative Framing: Republican voters view these incidents as overblown to push a divisive agenda, while Democrats interpret them as vital warnings of entrenched national racism.
- Distrust: Voters on both sides express distrust toward opposing party motives. Republicans see this as an attempt to demonize conservatives, while Democrats see Republican resistance as complicit or enabling.
- Irreparable Division: A sense of antagonism adds to the intensity of responses, as each group sees racial issues as symbolic of broader cultural problems.
09
Nov
-
Gen Z’s response to the 2024 presidential election paints a vivid picture of a generation grappling with disillusionment, skepticism, and a desire for cultural change. Social media discussions reveal how young voters process and articulate their choices, show patterns and perspectives that define this cohort’s political identity.
Frat boys celebrating the landslide win pic.twitter.com/6OuQJSF88b
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) November 7, 2024Disenfranchised vs. Empowered
There is pervasive disenchantment from both major political parties among Gen Z voters. Roughly 30% of comments express disappointment with the current political landscape, feeling alienated by traditional party structures. T
here is a noticeable frustration with the Democratic Party abandoning working-class advocacy. But some Gen Z voters are drawn to the Republican Party’s shift under Trump, viewing it as a new populist and working-class coalition.
Political dissatisfaction underscores a lack of enthusiasm for major political figures, amplifying calls for structural change in the political arena.
Leadership
Trump supporters in this demographic frequently voice desire for strong, decisive leadership. They frame him as a protector of American values, national security, and economic stability. They link his policies with the American Dream and the aspiration of a safer, more secure nation.
Language in this group often exhibits patriotic fervor, expressing loyalty and admiration toward America. Trump is seen as a figure capable of realigning the nation’s priorities to focus on traditional American ideals, creating a sense of vindication and pride.
Despite being the demographic breaking for Harris at the highest rate, Gen Z voters online are voicing pushback against many of the progressive ideals Millennials fought for at their age.
Looks like Gen X delivered the White House to Trump. pic.twitter.com/ANv5Ahssu1
— Philip Klein (@philipaklein) November 6, 2024Fake News
A shared distrust of mainstream media surfaces as a potent unifying theme across both pro-Trump and pro-Harris Gen Z voters. This skepticism stems from collective frustration with media biases and manipulations. Many view mainstream narratives as distortions of reality.
Trump supporters often feel demonized by the media, viewing coverage as subservient to a political agenda. Harris voters feel her media portrayal doesn’t align with the real issues facing their generation.
Distrust has become a rallying point that transcends party lines, as young voters increasingly question the reliability of traditional information sources and media-driven political narratives.
Raging Against the Machine
Anxiety over election integrity drives distrust, appearing frequently in conversations from both sides of the political divide. For Trump supporters, electoral cheating is a common concern, with discussions focusing on alleged malfeasance and voter interference.
Harris supporters express disillusionment with polling and media narratives that, they feel, fail to represent genuine public sentiment. This overlap in skepticism toward institutional reliability suggests a generational shift. Many Gen Z voters voice doubts about the transparency and fairness of the political process.
🗳️ Gen Z Voters: 👍 or 👎 after the election results were announced?
— SIAdvance (@siadvance) November 6, 2024
Here’s what they had to say about it... 🗣️
Let us know your thoughts in the comments, Gen Z’ers. 📲#genz #vote #voters #statenisland #siny pic.twitter.com/xY5DISgo7LIdentity Politics? Okay!
Divides over identity politics and policy emphasis also emerge clearly in these discussions.
Harris voters point to her reliance on identity policies over actionable policies. This sentiment is particularly strong among those who lean progressive but want concrete solutions to pressing issues.
Trump supporters emphasize nationalism and traditional values, viewing Harris’s platform as detached from American identity. The ideological split reveals generational how Gen Z voters prioritize identity and inclusivity versus policy impact and nationalism.
Progressive Tension
A segment of Gen Z shows a complex response to Harris’s background, especially in discussions that merge respect for her identity with criticism of her policies. While some are proud of her accomplishments, they question her leadership, creating tension between valuing diversity and prioritizing competence.
This conflicted view suggests an evolving perspective in progressive circles, where identity is honored yet separated from expectations for impactful governance. These sentiments reflect the delicate balance Gen Z voters face between representation and meaningful action.
08
Nov
-
Donald Trump’s popular vote win shocked many people, and online discussions are ablaze with opinions on what his victory represents. People wonder whether it signals a clear mandate for his leadership.
Sentiments are as complex as they are intense, revealing viewpoints of Trump as a figure of change, defiance against the establishment, and the embodiment of traditional American ideals.
Steve Bannon has a message; pic.twitter.com/pIni6FH0ZZ
— Anonymous Patriot (@0331online) November 6, 2024Hope, Anxiety, and Defiance
Hope for a Renewed America
- Sentiment: 70% of Trump supporters are positive, expressing excitement and optimism. They say a popular vote win grants Trump a mandate to lead America back to prosperity, strength, and unity.
- Key Themes: This group talks about Trump’s potential to fulfill promises of national well-being. They want to “Make America Great Again,” emphasizing economic growth, strong borders, and traditional values.
Distrust of the Ruling Class
- Sentiment: 25% of discussions voice rejection of the existing political elite. For them, Trump’s victory is a rebuke of the ruling class, which they perceive as corrupt, self-serving, and disconnected from everyday Americans.
- Key Themes: Commenters use terms like “elites” and “out-of-touch politicians,” contrasting them with Trump’s outsider image. People say the establishment neglects and betrays its constituents, and Trump’s team is the antidote.
Fear and Dismay
- Sentiment: 60% of anti-Trump comments express alarm and anxiety, fearing a reversal of progress on social and economic issues. They say Trump’s victory is not just a political setback but a moral and societal regression.
- Key Themes: This group discusses the potential outcomes of a Trump administration, fearing for their rights and democracy itself. They express concern that a majority of Americans have embraced Trump’s image and promises.
Online Language
Religious and Battle Imagery
- Interpretation: Many on the right invoke religious and battle verbiage. Comments like “God has a plan” or “this is a battle for America’s soul” frame the election as having both political and moral consequences.
- Significance: This language suggests religious people see themselves as voters and participants in a higher mission. The election becomes a spiritual, existential choice, where support signifies alignment with a “righteous” path.
Inclusive and Exclusive Language
- Interpretation: Trump voters mostly use inclusive pronouns (“we,” “us”), crafting a narrative of unity among Americans who want change. They refer to the opposition as “the elites” or “the out-of-touch,” dividing citizens and the ruling class.
- Significance: There is a tribalistic tone in politics, where supporting Trump opt voters into a kind of national identity. This language can intensify polarization, where opponents view the unity cause as antithetical to their values.
Nostalgia and Moral Imperatives
- Interpretation: Americans want to return to a simpler, more authentic American identity. They talk about “freedom,” “prosperity,” and “American Dream,” evoking nostalgic imagery, framing a new administration as a new dawn.
- Significance: Many say this election isn’t only about policies but about reviving a lost culture and identity. This language carries a moral weight, making visions for the future part of a duty to uphold traditional American values.
Rejecting the Ruling Class
Americans see Trump’s popular vote win as a rejection of the political establishment. They criticize elites for their being detached from ordinary American. This sentiment is not limited to Trump’s ardent supporters, it resonates with Independents and swing voters who feel politicians on both sides have failed to represent the people’s interests.
Desire to Instill MAGA
Along with rejecting elites, there is a strong desire to instill MAGA ideals. Trump’s base ties his second administration to reviving core values like patriotism, economic opportunity, and personal freedom.
Many vies MAGA as a condensed moniker for their desire to re-embrace American values and rebuild a brighter future. This desire is coupled with a sense of urgency, as many suggest Trump has only a short time to restore the practical and thematic trajectory of the country.
Anti-Elite, Pro-America
The two forces—rejection of the ruling class and the MAGA ethos—are often intertwined. Approximately 15% of comments blend both sentiments. This suggests for many, Trump’s appeal stems from being an outsider and the embodiment of pro-America ideals.
Supporters view Trump as an opponent of the “corrupt establishment” and a catalyst for a cultural and political renaissance centered around MAGA values
07
Nov
-
Prior to Sean “P Diddy” Combs’s arrest, "Nice try, Diddy" began as a humorous meme used to mock him for his relentless self-promotion and involvement in multiple projects. People spammed the phrase in the comments of unrelated posts and ads as a way to sarcastically suggest he was behind everything.
However, after Diddy is facing serious allegations, including sex trafficking, the phrase took on a darker, more critical tone. It now reflects public skepticism and disdain, particularly toward his attempts to maintain a positive public image. Now, people use the phrase to imply a sarcastic disbelief in his sincerity.
MIG Reports analysis shows the phrase “Nice try Diddy” has evolved as a focal point in cultural and political commentary. It symbolizes the public’s sharpened skepticism toward high-profile figures for nefarious, behind-the-curtain acts.
This seemingly lighthearted meme conveys a barbed critique of Diddy’s alleged crimes, contradictions, or hypocrisy. The phrase signals shifting cultural patterns around authenticity, the complex role of celebrity activism, and polarized views among average Americans.
Omg. The woman who was standing by and watching Diddy blackmail and sexually assault men, women and children is now weeping begging you to vote for Kamala Harris. pic.twitter.com/FZYhpjOEJr
— Green Lives Matter (@Ultrafrog17) November 1, 2024Cynicism and Skepticism
Posts using “Nice try Diddy” convey a powerful skepticism toward establishment and elite figures. It questions their intentions, especially when actions do not match their professed beliefs.
For instance, when celebrities who advocate for social change simultaneously flaunt luxurious lifestyles or engage in contentious politics, audiences often respond with this phrase as a callout of perceived hypocrisy.
This pattern speaks to a cultural climate in which authenticity is increasingly prized. After Diddy’s recent arrest, skepticism toward his actions and potential crimes transform the phrase into a more serious critique, conveying deep distrust and disgust.
Contradictions in Celebrity Activism
"Nice try, Diddy” also reveals the contradictions in celebrity activism, where persona and identity is synonymous with wealth and luxury. When public personalities delve into political or social commentary, especially on issues like inequality or social justice, “Nice try Diddy” becomes a pointed response to hypocrisy.
Diddy's arrest, combined with the ongoing historical lack of transparency on Jeffrey Epstein's client list, the dissonance resonates more deeply. Many Americans question the chances of justice for elites involved in heinous crimes as none seem to face proportional consequences.
Distrust of Political Elites
Discourse around “Nice try Diddy” extends beyond celebrity culture into political polarization, especially regarding figures like Kamala Harris. Supporters and detractors alike use similar expressions to bolster their narratives, framing opposing viewpoints as out-of-touch or disingenuous.
This polarization reinforces political identities, creating a landscape where opposing ideas often seem trivialized, further widening divides. The added layer of Diddy’s recent controversies amplifies the meme’s resonance in polarized circles. The phrase indicates skepticism is growing toward political and cultural elites.
Indicative Cultural and Political Forces
“Nice try Diddy” echoes cultural critiques around the role of celebrities in politics, amplifying widespread frustration with disingenuous narratives from establishment elites.
This discontent fuels a demand for authentic leadership, causing people to rally around candidates and influencers they see as more relatable or “real.” People call for congruence between rhetoric and action, amplified by high-profile figures facing legal and moral scrutiny.
This reinforces the anti-establishment sentiments sweeping through contemporary discourse, which is often manifested in memes and ironic online endeavors.
“Nice try, Diddy” echoes older memes like “Epstein didn’t kill himself,” resonating with public skepticism toward elites protecting themselves. While Diddy is certainly a cultural force, his association with the political class also erodes any significant grasp as a cultural influence.
Overall, “Nice try Diddy” reflects a growing political groundswell where authenticity is non-negotiable, and public accountability extends beyond elected officials to include influential cultural figures.
With his recent allegations casting a long shadow, this phrase underscores a societal shift toward decentralizing authority and demanding accountability and transparency from establishment elites.
04
Nov
-
Many people are discussing the “gender gap” in this election with women largely leaning Harris and men leaning Trump. While many people understand that trends among men and women differ, it remains to be seen how these trends may sway the election results.
MIG Reports data confirms many trends driving male and female voters, their alignment with candidates, and generational trends influencing attitudes.
Male Support for Trump
Most men’s discussions of politics online are supportive of Trump. They say they’re drawn by his economic and national security policies. MIG Reports analysis reveals:
- 61.53% of male voters align with Trump, citing law and order and the economy. They view Trump as reinforcing traditional American values and ensuring stability.
- 38.47% of male voters support Harris, often citing dissatisfaction with Trump’s rhetoric rather than alignment with Harris’s policies.
Female Support for Harris
Female voters, especially those concerned with social equity and healthcare, favor Harris.
- 70.49% of female voters back Harris, praising abortion and gender equity. They see her as defending women’s autonomy and achieving social progress.
- 29.51% of female voters express support for Trump, often driven by economic concerns, which they feel outweigh social policies.
Men Dominate Online Discussions
Online data may not be completely representative as male voices dominate discussions.
- MIG Reports data shows 62.34% of online discussion is among men.
- This higher representation often skews discussions toward economic and national security themes, creating a narrative aligned with Trump’s platform.
- Only 37.66% of the discussions comes from women online.
- The gender disparity reflects broader trends where men dominate discourse on traditional political issues, while engaged women tend to be highly energetic.
Statistics show there are more women in American than men—168 million women versus 165.28 million men. This suggests the full spectrum of female viewpoints is likely not captured exclusively through online voter discussions.
Male Voter Priorities
In online discussions, men say they prioritize economic stability and national security.
Economic Stability
- Inflation, job creation, and taxes are top concerns.
- Many men align with Trump’s promise of fiscal conservatism and deregulation.
- They say Trump’s economic approach offers tangible stability, with sentiments focused on his track record of job creation and pro-business tax policies.
National Security and Immigration
- Male conversations voice anxiety about immigration policy and national security.
- Trump’s approach to border control resonates deeply, with men framing stricter immigration as essential to preserving American sovereignty.
Female Voter Priorities
Women mostly prioritize social equity, abortion, and healthcare.
Abortion and Healthcare
- Women discuss Harris’s pro-abortion platform with passion.
- Following the overturning of Roe v. Wade, many women say their support for Harris reflects a desire to safeguard personal freedoms.
- However, MIG Reports data also shows a growing number of women are willing to prioritize public health and MAHA over abortion.
Social Equity and Climate Change
- Many women are drawn to Harris’s positions on climate change and environmental policy, seeing these as critical to family and future welfare.
- Women focus less on economic strength compared to men, saying they prefer policies that will address systemic inequities.
Younger Voters (Under 30)
- Younger voters, especially women, lean towards progressive issues.
- This age group prioritizes social justice, climate change, and abortion, with strong support for Harris.
- Younger men are more likely to voice anti-establishment sentiment, with economic anxieties often eclipsing party loyalty.
- However, many younger men resonate with Trump’s focus on economic growth as an antidote to inflation.
Middle-Aged Voters (30-50)
- Middle-aged men say economic stability and national security are motivating them, leading many in this group to support Trump.
- These men associate Trump with financial and familial security.
- Middle-aged women see Harris’s healthcare and family welfare policies as preferable.
- They value stability but view it through a lens of economic impact through social policies and feeling reassured rather than economic theory.
Older Voters (50+)
- Older men mostly lean toward Trump, seeing his policies as preserving national strength and security.
- Older women, while concerned with national stability, place a higher emphasis on healthcare access and social welfare policies.
- Many voice preference for Harris’s opposition to Trump and advocacy for progressive social values.
Gender-Based Issues and Voter Engagement
Based on MIG Reports analysis of voter discussions, women likely to show higher turnout at the polls. This is fueled by anger over Roe v. Wade and abortion discussions among Democrats.
Many women see the election as a direct defense of their personal freedoms. Female urgency is evident in passionate discussions around Kamala Harris, whom they see as a champion for these rights.
Men are also engaged strongly in political discussions but indicate a mix of motivations to vote. Issues like gun rights and immigration also tend to feature prominently in male discussions, overshadowing the more interpersonal issues highlighted by women.
Energy levels suggest women are slightly more energized compared to men. Female commenters express a profound commitment to change, speaking out against Trump and calling to resist authoritarianism.
Men often express support in more practical and less emotional terms. The disparate energy level in discourse could suggest turnout differences. However, this remains to be seen if men choose to vote, while remaining at a lower baseline for emotional intensity.
04
Nov
-
Campaign fervor is cresting just days prior to the election and MIG Reports data shows non-Trump partisans—liberals and Democrats—are leaning into performative outrage. Using dramatic language, hyperbolic expressions, and a repeated emphasis on extreme descriptors, this group is expressing high emotion.
Some do articulate reasonable concerns over some of Trump’s policies and potential influence. A substantial portion of liberals also seem to genuinely believe the outrage, calling Trump a fascist. However, much of the discourse skews toward performative expressions, crafted to amplify emotional resonance and foster a unified group identity.
Ana Kasparian clashes with Cenk Uygur on Trump, arguing that he isn't a “fascist” and the Democrat Party misrepresents him.
— AF Post (@AFpost) November 1, 2024
Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/RPvzniKygePerformative Elements in Language
The language deployed across these conversations frequently borders on theatrical.
- Terms such as “fascist,” “Hitler,” and “authoritarian” are common, imbuing Trump with a villainous aura that aligns with familiar tropes.
- Critics frame him as an antagonist in a moral and political struggle.
- Despite the existence of other authoritarian leaders like Pol Pot, Josef Stalin, Augusto Pinochet, Hitler is only parallel most use to depict Trump.
- The lexicon signals a collective identity that rallies around shared anxieties and moral judgments.
- Embellished phrases like “end of democracy” or “chaos in America,” tap into a performative mode designed less to analyze and more to evoke.
- The prevalence of these dramatized expressions suggests the intent is to stir reactions—likes, comments, and shares.
The tone of many online posts shows stylized indignation. Common keywords like “garbage,” “disgrace,” and “complete disaster” create an atmosphere that leans heavily on hyperbole to drive points home.
Much of the discourse can be categorized as “outrage posting,” where media and influencers exaggerate language to amplify emotional responses.
Outrage as a Mobilization Tool
The performative outrage often functions as a mobilization tool.
- Posts pushing extreme discontent or alarmist tones are among the most engaging, with metrics indicating hyperbolic statements significantly boost reactions.
- The performative nature serves as a rallying call, mobilizing users by constructing Trump as a political opponent and existential threat.
- Posts often use an urgent tone, calling for action or moral imperatives that encourage followers to align with the collective response.
- Recurring terms include, “protect democracy” or “save America,” tapping into a mythology of resistance and survival.
Heightened rhetoric on both sides shapes voter responses, promoting a sense of duty among followers. The performative outrage is often a coordinated effort to convert emotional reactions into tangible support for the broader progressive agenda.
🚨 Warning - heavy TDS: Before my flight, this woman put her middle finger up at me. I ignored it.
— Melissa Robey (@Robey2020) October 31, 2024
After the flight, she walked by me before I could record and screamed that I was a “facist”. Here is the rest of the interaction: #TDS #5days pic.twitter.com/ra5zAa2OCvGenuine Concern vs. Amplified Rhetoric
Certain topics, such as healthcare, education, and climate change, are discussed with less sensationalism and more emphasis on practical consequences. The language shifts subtly to discuss policies or potential impacts, emphasizing marginalized groups and vulnerable communities.
Moments of sincerity suggest that while performative outrage dominates, there is a genuine core that fuels these discussions, reflecting real fears and apprehensions among progressives.
However, the performative aspect tends to overshadow genuine concerns due to rage bait engagement. This dynamic suggests the structure of social media itself, with its emphasis on engagement metrics, incentivizes users to use a hyperbolic style.
Outrage as the New Norm
Progressive conversations about Donald Trump are contentious and emotional. The use of exaggerated language, dramatized fears, and repeated calls to action suggest the discourse operates primarily to elicit reactions, reinforce group identity, and galvanize support. Genuine concerns do exist, particularly on specific policy issues, yet they are often subsumed within the larger spectacle of outrage.
Language analysis suggests discourse is disproportionately hyperbolic compared to real, normal life. However, it’s also possible to conclude that many anti-Trump voters who exhibit what some call “TDS” (Trump Derangement Syndrome), are genuinely disturbed. There are also growing discussions about mental health, anxiety, depression, and anger tied to political fears.
03
Nov
-
In the final week before Election Day, there is a growing wave of discontent and frustration directed at Kamala Harris and Joe Biden. Many Americans are angry, betrayed, and skeptical of the political establishments. Momentum changes emphasize the growing disconnect between voters and the ruling class.
Themes of economic struggle, political distrust, and desire for strong, decisive leadership dominate the discourse. Recent polling shows Trump leading significantly in battleground states among voters who have not previously voted. This suggests enthusiasm among Republicans is high, and perhaps not so much among Democrats.
#NEW BATTLEGROUND STATES poll
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) October 31, 2024
Voters who have voted in...
🔵 '22/'24 primaries: Harris+3
🟡 '22, not primaries: Tie
🔴 '20 general election only: Trump+12
🔴 No voting record: Trump+19
NYT/Siena | PA/MI/WI/AZ/GA/NCThe Language of Anger
The language voters use is impassioned and confrontational, often with strong and colorful language, signaling more than passive dissatisfaction—but a call to action.
- People use phrases like “it’s time to wake up America” and “we’re being lied to,” going beyond mere disappointment.
- The tone suggests readiness, even a demand for mobilization, among those who believe a leadership change can restore the values and stability of America.
“Y’all need to go back to Ukraine & get my f***king money back”
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) October 11, 2024
Americans are getting angrier by the day as they continue to wake up. In fact it’s not just the US, but the entire Western World. pic.twitter.com/ZeGSrV7LA2Betrayal, Hypocrisy, and Urgency
Social media posts reveal a sense of betrayal and abandonment, as Americans feel deceived by political promises that remain unfulfilled.
- The language is direct, frequently harsh, and often laced with urgency—“it’s time to turn the page” or “we need change now.”
- Voters criticize Democrats for the failures of the last four years on the economy, border security, and social grievances.
- Words like “liars,” “garbage,” and “incompetent” permeate discussions, suggesting leaders are disconnected from everyday \working Americans.
Economic Disillusionment
Economic concerns are consistently a top priority.
- Discussions of inflation, wage stagnation, and rising living costs frustrate voters who feel neglected by policies they see as ineffective.
- Americans describe their struggles with affording bills, job stability, and housing—often blaming problems on failed leadership and out-of-touch policies.
- Sentiments such as “nothing has been fixed” and “the economy is in shambles” reveal a working-class who feel abandoned.
"Inflation has cooled, but people are still seething over prices," per WSJ.
— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) October 31, 2024
"People find it unsettling that price tags don't look like they did before inflation took off during the pandemic, surging to the highest level in four decades."Anti-Establishment Fervor
A clear preference for Donald Trump is largely driven by anti-establishment ire. Voters view him as a counter to the inadequacies and corruption in the political class.
- Trump is often depicted as the antidote to systemic incompetence and political stagnation.
- Supporters view him as capable of restoring stability, strength, and decisiveness.
- Americans want a leader who can break the cycle of unfulfilled promises and ineffective governance, hoping to reform entrenched and powerful institutions.
- For many, Trump represents a sense of hope that resonates deeply with those feeling left behind.
Fear about Election Integrity
Following from the 2020 election, there is now persistent skepticism about the integrity of electoral processes.
- Voters on social media voice concerns about disenfranchisement, fraud, and dishonesty.
- Many have doubts about whether elections are truly representative or if they are, in fact, manipulated to favor the establishment.
- This distrust bolsters the desire for new leadership, with voters clamoring for transparency and reform to secure a system they can trust.
Oops!!! ABC somehow has the final results of the election in Pennsylvania, but there isn’t any cheating, and the media isn’t biased or anything. pic.twitter.com/C56NACylUB
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) October 31, 202402
Nov
-
Conversations about whether Americans view Donald Trump as a fascist are partisan. Trends in voter discussions provide insight into the impact views of Trump have on the race and following either election outcome.
Only around 35% the country voices genuine belief that Donald Trump is a fascist, based on comment data. The majority of those who believe this representation of Trump are strongly convinced.
However, most of the overall discourse expresses doubt about the sincerity of these accusations. Some say those calling Trump a fascist do so disingenuously.
Tim Walz: Calling Trump voters garbage Nazis doesn’t undercut our “unity” message pic.twitter.com/b1WbxA0vJY
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) October 30, 2024Accusations Cause Arguments
Only around 30% of those labeling Trump a fascist initiate discussion about it in an original post or comment. This suggests the overwhelming majority—70% of comments—are reactionary rhetoric.
Rather than framing Trump as a fascist based on independent assessments, critics often respond to events or others’ comments to pile on with accusations. Trump supporters often step in to defend him once the accusation is made. This creates a series of rebuttals and counter-rebuttals rather than a primarily accusatory dialogue.
Dictator, Fascist, Nazi
The style of these conversations ranges from intense and serious to emotionally charged. Voters are strongly invested in the potential consequences of Trump’s leadership. Those calling him a fascist attempt to intellectualize it, referencing historical examples and using terms like "dictator," "authoritarian," or "threat to democracy.”
The overwhelming majority use Hitler or Nazi comparisons, despite numerous other examples of fascism in history. About 55% of these discussions use a serious tone, framing the danger of Trump as high stakes. This group says preventing him from taking office is pivotal for the future of American governance.
Kamala — increasingly reeking of desperation — is closing her campaign NOT by talking about the issues that matter to Americans, but by calling President Trump "fascist."
— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 24, 2024
It's disrespectful to the intelligence of voters. If she had any self-respect, she'd be ashamed of herself. pic.twitter.com/aWXFb5L6EhTrump defenders instead take a defensive stance, often using mockery, memes, and humor. Some do question the validity of fascism accusations, calling them exaggerated or feigned rather than a substantive critique.
Among Democrats, 70% of comments are serious and alarmed. There is pronounced fear of potential democratic erosion under Trump’s leadership. The language Democrats use reflects a sincere conviction, with critiques often reinforcing each other and solidifying a collective stance against Trump as the ultimate adversary.
"Trump is my biggest obstacle in life, I think about him all day and all night" pic.twitter.com/aNfcOyhVXo
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) October 29, 2024However, while a genuine belief that Trump is an authoritarian exists, some conversations on both sides suggest a bandwagon effect. Among critics, about 30% rely on hyperbolic language, using “fascist” as a rhetorical shorthand that lacks specific implications.
It’s Not Going Away
Trump critics frequently react to events and statements attributed to him, using these moments as springboards for arguments against his character or leadership style. Instead of presenting or asserting an alternate point of view, many conversations are driven by opposition to Trump—including the Harris campaign.
This reactive pattern elicits a strong defensive impulse from Trump supporters. They are quick to counter accusations they perceive as unjust or politically motivated. Defensive rebuttals against the fascist label reveal a cyclical and reactionary pattern between the two sides.
NY Mayor Adams obliterates the media:
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) October 29, 2024
"Stop asking silly questions like about if Trump is a fascist or HitIer.. It gives you headlines and clicks, but it is not what Americans are dealing with." pic.twitter.com/DETh84rGesAmericans are polarized on Trump with 55% of his defenders viewing accusations as overblown and partisan. Meanwhile, 45% of critics view authoritarian traits as a real threat. The conversation remains serious, underscoring the scope of Trump’s influence on American society and political identity. It also reveals a cycle of accusation and rebuttal, suggesting arguing is unlikely to shift opinions and only reinforce existing divides.
01
Nov
-
Joe Rogan's podcast allows public figures to connect directly with a vast and ideologically diverse audience—bypassing traditional media. And this election cycle, online content creators and podcasters have eclipsed the legacy media in audience reach, and potentially also influence.
Many voters believe, with internet generations joining the voting ranks, legacy media outlets—which are now facing a credibility crisis—could be obsolete before the 2028 cycle.
Donald Trump’s recent appearance on “The Joe Rogan Experience” had more than 40 million views on YouTube alone, just five days after its release. Rogan also posted the entire interview on X, implying YouTube may be throttling the video. Now, voters are discussing the impact of the three-hour-long interview, along with the pressure Kamala Harris is facing to sit with Rogan as well.
Since there's an issue with searching for this episode on YouTube here is the full podcast with Trump pic.twitter.com/sl2GTUaWdE
— Joe Rogan (@joerogan) October 29, 2024Comparing the Risks and Rewards
The disparities in voter reactions show contrasting risks and rewards for both candidates. For Harris, the stakes are high, as her recent media appearances have not created an image of a proficient or confidence-inspiring leader. Democrats fear an unscripted interview would not make her more relatable but expose vulnerabilities in her policies.
For Trump, the Rogan interview played as on-brand for his persona. This is a double-edged sword as many voters cannot be swayed in his direction with more exposure. Others, however, feel the conversation’s comprehensive and casual tone made Trump more appealing to moderates.
Harris Stakes
- Vulnerabilities: High potential for a challenging, possibly damaging interview experience.
- Reward Potential: Could humanize her and bridge gaps with undecided voters.
- Base Voter Risks: Many Democratic voters see Rogan’s platform as hostile territory, losing enthusiasm if she were to appear.
Trump Stakes
- Strengths: Rogan’s unformatted style aligns well with Trump’s communication approach.
- Reward Potential: Further cements his position as a no-nonsense leader who has a depth of knowledge and willingness to speak openly.
- Moderate Risk: Potential to alienate some moderate Independents, though many in this group already have an immovable negative opinion.
Her Base is Scared She’ll Bomb
Democratic voters don’t want Harris to go on Rogan, voicing skepticism and concern. They voice their strong reluctance, centering caution around Rogan’s format, which often promotes freewheeling dialogue, challenging guests directly. They view this as a risk to Harris’s image, especially given the scrutiny she is facing over all her public appearances.
Democrat Reactions
- 70% of Democratic voters discourage Harris from appearing on Rogan, citing concerns his audience and style could expose her to intensified criticism.
- 10% say an appearance could sway undecideds toward her, a low figure exclusive to those who believe she’s a capable and competent leader.
- Key Concerns: Democrats fear an interview could backfire, as any missteps would be widely circulated and potentially weaken her already wavering campaign.
Rogan himself has commented, saying a Harris sit-down is not out of the question. However, his post can also be read as critical, saying the Harris team will not go to his studio and want to limit the interview to one hour.
Also, for the record the Harris campaign has not passed on doing the podcast. They offered a date for Tuesday, but I would have had to travel to her and they only wanted to do an hour. I strongly feel the best way to do it is in the studio in Austin. My sincere wish is to just…
— Joe Rogan (@joerogan) October 29, 2024Independents Think She’ll Faceplant
Independent voters, typically more open to alternative media and diverse perspectives, advocate for Harris appearing on Rogan. They emphasize the importance of new media, but also express skepticism about the likelihood a Harris sit-down could change their votes.
Moderates and Independents responded mostly positively to Trump’s interview. They recognize Rogan’s platform could present Harris with an opportunity to connect authentically with voters, but many also believe she is not capable of doing so.
Independent Reactions
- 60% of Independents say Harris should go on Rogan, viewing it as a chance for her to address criticism and try to humanize her image.
- 30% say it could positively shift their view of her, only half of those urging her to accept the invitation.
- Key Concerns: Independents doubt Harris’s messaging and relatability will improve with longform content, raising further questions about her authenticity.
Rogan: "I'll give you 3 hours to say anything you want to America on the most popular show in the country."
— hoe_math (@ItIsHoeMath) October 27, 2024
Kamala: "No."
Leftoids: "So brave. Stunning."Reactions to Trump’s Rogan Interview
Donald Trump’s appearance on “The Joe Rogan Experience” resonates strongly with his base. Conservative and right-leaning Independents widely celebrate the three-hour conversation, viewing it as an unfiltered display of his commitment to America and his breadth of knowledge.
Even among some undecided voters, Trump’s unapologetic style on Rogan’s platform resonates as authentic, further distinguishing him from traditional politicians.
Right Leaning Reactions
- Trump supporters view his Rogan appearance as reinforcing anti-establishment sentiments, particularly contrasting Harris’s controlled media performances.
- Independents are divided. Some found the candid conversation appealing, humanizing Trump. But others find his rhetoric polarizing.
- For many, Trump’s unfiltered approach is refreshing. Though his divisive image still alienates some moderate and undecided voters.
The Broader Political Implications
MIG Reports data suggests a Rogan appearance for Harris could be a high-risk, high-reward gamble. Her base appears unconvinced of the benefits, while Independents offer only tepid support.
Meanwhile, Trump supporters praise both Trump’s performance and Rogan as a pioneer in the new media space. Many who distrust mainstream media, calling it biased and in Democrats’ pocket, say presidential politics crossing into digital media is a positive shift.
Voters are also discussing recent news that GOP VP candidate J.D. Vance is also scheduled to appear on Rogan before election day. Increasing anti-establishment feelings and distrust in legacy media suggests traditional outlets may be facing death throes.
@JDVance will sit down with Joe Rogan tomorrow - Live Updates - POLITICO https://t.co/7zK2uee79D
— Joe Rogan Podcast (@joeroganhq) October 29, 202431
Oct